<br /> ~
<br />e 25iJ
<br /> 7/28/58
<br /> - --- ---.---- -.--- --- ---~---- - -- - - -.- - ----- ~--- --.- -- - --- ---- --- ---- -- -- -- ------- - -------- - --~---- -._-- ------...-- ------ -----
<br /> . - - - ~ - - -- --
<br /> -- . -- - . ,
<br />I I 2. PLANS, FOR A NEW CITY HALL - MR. EDMUNDS, CHAIRMAN OF THE COUNCIL COMMITTEE, IN-
<br /> I !
<br /> I VESTIGATING REQUIREMENTS FOR A NEW CITY HALL, REPORTED ON THE TRIP WHICH HE, I
<br /> COUNCILMAN SHISLER AND CITY MANAGER FINLAYSON MADE, TO TACOMA, WASHINGTON WHERE \,
<br /> I
<br /> THEY CONFERRED WITH OFFICIALS OF THAT CITY WHERE A NEW CITY HALL IS NOW UNDER I
<br /> I I
<br /> I CONSTRUCTION. THEY OBTAINED FIGURES SHOWING COSTS PER SQUARE FOOT AND OTHER ,
<br /> ,
<br /> I INFORMAT~ON PERTINENT TO CONSTRUCTION COSTS. MR. EDMUNDS STATED THAT HE AND i
<br /> 1 1
<br /> HIS COMMITTEE HAD SPECT CONSIDERABLE TIME GATHERING INFORMATION AND WERE NOW :;
<br /> ,
<br /> READY TO RECOMMEND TO THE COUNCIL THAT A NEW CITY HALL CONTAINING 50,000 I
<br /> ~
<br /> I SQUARE FEET IN FLOOR SPACE, INCLUDING SPACE FOR A HEADQUARTERS FIRE STATION, ,
<br /> ,
<br /> BE CONSTRUCTED AT AN ESTIMATED COST OF $18 PER SQUARE FOOT, OR A TOTAL OF 'I
<br /> I I
<br /> $900,000. THE CITY HALL COMMITTEE FURTHER RECOMMENDED THAT IF THE PRESENT SITE ,!
<br /> , 11
<br /> . IS SELECTED, AN ADDITIONAL $~OO,OOO BE PROVIDED FOR BASEMENT PARKING, AND IF A
<br /> i "
<br /> I SITE OTHER THAN THE PRESENT SITE IS SELECTED, $100,000 TO BE PROVIDED FOR :1
<br /> I ACQUISITION OF ADDITIONAL AREA TO BE USED FOR PARKING SPACE. IT WAS ALSO RE- ':
<br /> j COMMENDED THAT $50,000 BE ALLOCATED FOR NEW EQUIPMENT AND THAT A BOND ISSUE OF I
<br /> 1,
<br /> $1,050,000 BE PLACED ON THE NOVEMBER BALLOT FOR THE VOTERS CONSIDERATION. "
<br />e' I I
<br /> \ I.
<br /> I
<br /> I ALL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT, AND SEVERAL MEMBERS OF THE I'
<br /> COUNCIL EXPRESSED CONCERN REGARDING THE TIME ELEMENT AND STATED THAT THEY I
<br /> I FELT THAT NOVEMBER IS TOO SOON TO PLACE THE ISSUE ON THE BALLOT, THAT MORE ~
<br /> ,
<br /> I STUDY IS NEEDED, THAT THERE HAS NOT BEEN SUFFICIENT PLANNING FOR A PROJECT r
<br /> .
<br /> OF THIS StOPE, THAT THE URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED, T~T THE t
<br />I I PEOPLE SHOULD HAVE MORE INFORMATION ON SITES AND COSTS IN ORDER TO VOTE IN-
<br /> I TELLIGENTLY, AND THAT 'IT IS THE DUTY OF THE COUNCIL TO MAKE A DEFINITE PRO- I,
<br /> I
<br /> I POSAL ON A SITE. THERE IS A PLAN FOR COMPETITION AMONG MEMBERS OF THE AMERI- ,I
<br /> , I
<br /> I CAN ~NSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS FOR DESIGN~NG PUBLIC BUILDING, AND IT WAS FELT THAT
<br /> j THE CITY COULD RECEIVE SOME NEW IDEAS FROM THE PLANS WHICH MIGHT BE SUBMITTED I
<br /> J
<br /> SHOULD SUCH COMPETITION BE HELD IN EUGENE. I
<br /> I I
<br /> I 1
<br /> SEVERAL COUNCIL MEMBERS THEN EXPRESSED THEMSELVES AS BEING IN FAVOR OF I
<br /> j MR. EDMUNDS' PROPOSAL AND SUGGESTED THAT A SEPARATE MEASURE BE PLACED ON THE f
<br /> I BALLOT WHICH WOULD ENABLE THE VOTERS TO CHOOSE ONE Of THREE SEPARATE LOCA- ;;
<br /> I TIONS FOR A!NEW CITY HALL, THAT THE MATTER OF ACQUIRING A SITE IS NOT A (;
<br /> I "
<br /> FINANCIAL PROBLEM SINCE THE CITY HALL WOULD BE BUILT,EITHER ON THE PRESENT !
<br /> SITE, OR THE MONEY COULD BE USED FROM THE SALE Of THE PRESENT SITE TO PURCHASE I,
<br /> I LAND FOR ANOTHER LOCATION. IT WAS BROUGHT OUT THAT IN THE SELECTION OF A l
<br /> I LIBRARy,'SITE, THE VOTERS HAD REVERSED THE PROPOSAL OF THE CITY COUNCLON A I
<br /> l
<br /> ! CHOICE OF LOCATIONS AND THAT I~,A' PREVIOUS SITE IS CHOSEN BY, THE COUNCIL, THE I
<br /> PEOPLE WOULD DEFEAT A BOND ISSUE FOR A NEW CITY HALL BECAUSE THEY HAD NOT BEEN I
<br /> I
<br /> GIVEN A CHANCE TO VOTE ON WHER& IT SHOULD 8E LOCATED. jtt WAS FELT THAT ~URBAN ~,
<br /> RENEWAL I S, TOO fAR I N THE FUTURE TO BE CONS JDERED AT TH IS TI ME, AND 'THAT TH,E 1
<br /> I BEST PLAN WOULD BE TO SECURE THE APPROVAL OF THE VOTERS FOR THE AMOUNT NEEDED "I
<br /> II AND A SITE AND THEN LET THE ARCHITECT DESIGN A BUILDING FOR THAT PARTICULAR SITE. :1
<br /> ,
<br /> I,
<br /> - , I,
<br /> fOLLOWING ,FURTHER DISCUSSION " THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED BY A 4-3 .VOTE THAT A i,1
<br /> I
<br /> MEASURE BE PLACED ON THE NOVEMBER 4, ,1958 BALLOT CALL I NG FOR A BOND I SSUE OF ~
<br /> ,
<br />I $1,050,000 FOR A NEW CITY HALL AND CENTRA~ FIRE STATION. ,IT WAS FURTHER RECOM- !
<br /> MENDED BY THE COMMITTEE BY A 4-3 VOTE -THAT A CHOICE Of THREE SITES; NAMELY, II
<br /> 8TH AVENUE AND PEARL STREET, SOUTH HALF OF THE OLD FRANCES WILLARD SCHOOL LOCA-
<br /> I
<br /> TION, AND THE PRtSENT LOCATION OF THE CITY HALL, BE PLACED ON THE BALLOT IN i
<br /> I
<br /> NOVEMBER WITH tHE FURTHER PROVISION THAT UNLESS ONE SITE RECEIVES A MAJORITY i
<br /> VOTE-, A FUTURE ELECTION WOULD BE HELD WITH THE CHOICE BETWEEN THE TWO LOCA- ,
<br /> "
<br /> TIONS RECtlVING THE MOST VOTES. AN AMENDMENT WHICH WOULD EXCLUDE THE fRANCES i
<br /> I
<br /> WILLARD AND PRESENT SITE WAS DEFEATED 5-2. II
<br />Ie I :1
<br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHISLER SECONDED BY MR. LINDEEN THAT PLANS AS OUTLINED IN ItEM 2 II
<br /> I "
<br /> OF THE REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE O~ THE WHOLE BE ADOPTED. I
<br /> I.
<br /> I IT WAS MOVED BY MR. McGAFFEY SECONDE.D BY MRS. LAURIS THAT THE MATTER BE TABLED. ,
<br /> ~
<br /> MOTION DEFEATED 4-2. :1
<br /> I II
<br /> I COUNCILMAN MOLHOLM ENTERED THE MEETING AT THIS POINT. 1,1
<br /> I "
<br /> ,
<br /> I j THE PLANNING COMMI,SSION RECOMMENDATIONS ON PUBLIC, BUILDING,PROGRAM DATED JULY 28,1958 i
<br /> WAS READ AS FOLLOWS: I!
<br /> I l'
<br /> , - , I
<br /> II
<br /> "To ,PROV,I,DEFOR THE EFFICIENT AND ATTRACTIVE GROUPING -OF PUBLIC BUILD- I,
<br /> I ~I',
<br /> .1 INGS; TO ASSURE A CONSOLIDATED :SITE FOR BOTH IMMEDIATE AND LONG-RANGE ,DE-
<br /> l VELOPMENT; TO CAPITALIZE ON THE CURRENT .CITY, SCHOOL DIST,RICT, COUNTY AND I
<br /> I
<br /> STATE NEEDS WHICH CREATE AONCE-IN-A-LIFETIME OPPORTUNITY FOR STARTING:A !
<br /> I I
<br />I I PUBLIC DEVELOPMENT'CENTER; TO STIMULATE, SIMULTANEOUSLY, PARKI,NG ALLEVIA- i
<br /> TION, TRAfFIC ,SIMPLIFICATION, AND PARK DEVELOPMENT; AND TO RECONSTRUCT THE ,
<br /> ,
<br /> HEART OF'EUGENE AS BEFITS ITS STRATEGIC POSITION ON THE MAIN PACIFIC COAST
<br /> HIGHWAY AND AT THE CENTER OF THE UPPER WI LLAMETTE VALLEYMETROP.OL I TAN AREA, i
<br /> WE RECOMMEND: !
<br /> . ':
<br /> I I
<br /> I. THAT ALL PUBLIC AGENCIES TAKE ALL NECESSARY STEPS TO MAKE THE ENTIRE \
<br /> !
<br /> I STRIP FROM THE COUNTY COURT HOUSE PROPERTY EAST TO THE PACIFIC HIGH- I.
<br />e I
<br /> "
<br /> i
<br /> Ii I,
<br /> ,
<br /> ~ I
<br /> ~
<br /> "
<br /> I
<br />
|