|
<br />321 ~
<br />e
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />--==__.~-'-- _-~=-.---C-~-~--==.-'_--_._- _=~___ _~ ...___._ _______. _.. _u__ .. _' _ _u. _ .____ _'u ..___ . ___ IO~I_~/5_~_ _
<br />
<br />---- - -- ....- - --
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />I ' WOUL 0 UNDOUBTEDL Y BE R~QUE ST~D TO, BE i NS~ ~L LED )',ND ' TH I SM I'~NT REQU I RE A STA.TEMENT
<br />. fROM A REGISTERED ENGINEER BEfORE SUCH EQUIPMENT IS APPROVED FOR ~NSTALLATION. IN I
<br />1 THE DISCUSSION-IT WAS POINTED OUT THAT IN THE ORDINANCE AS IT EXISTS THERE ARE
<br />II. CERTA I N SAFEGUARDS AND APP~OVAL PROCEDURES WH I CH .WOULD REQU I RE A REG I STEREO I
<br />1 . " , . - " "j
<br />11 E~GINEER'S STATE~ENT~ IN CONNECTION WITH THE ABOVE IT W~S PO~~T~D OUT THAT INDUS- ~
<br />',I TRIAL INSTALLATION STANDARDS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED. ',',1"
<br />I II
<br />l,l " ,
<br />P THERE WAS SOME .CONCERN EXPRESSED AS TO WHETHER THE LICENSE FEES AND PERMIT FEES ~
<br />I ,.......
<br />i AS SET FORTH IN THE ORDINANCE ARE DISCRIMINATORY AS THEY RESPECT THE GAS INDUSTRY J
<br />: AND WHETHER THERE ARE COMPARABLE FEES fOR OTHER TYPES OF ~EATING A~PLIAN~ES.'WITH !
<br />I RESPECT TO THIS IT WAS. POINTED OUT THAT THE CITY HAS NO HEATING CODE AND T~AT THE ~
<br />II GAS ,ORDI NANCE MIGHT WELL BE THE FIRST STEP TOWARD SUCH A HEAT I NG CODE ALTHOUGH II
<br />I -, -' . ,,' ,
<br />i THERE ARE NO UNIFORM FEES AT THE PRESENT ~IME FOR ALL TYP~S OF HEATING ~NSTALLA- ~
<br />1 TIONS. A COMMENT WAS MAD~, THAT THE LIQUID PETROLEUM GAS INDUSTRY ~AS BE~N UNDER i
<br />~ THE STATE CODE FOR SOME TIME AND THAT THIS INDUSTRY WOULD PREFER TO STAY UNDER J
<br />I " . I
<br />ai THE STATE CODE WITHOUT CITY REGULATION. f
<br />., I' I
<br />J A QUESTION ~AS PROPOUNDED AS TO WH~THER AN I,NDIVIDUAL WITH ADEQUATE~OWLEDGE AN~ ~
<br />I: ,TRAINING COULD BE FOUND TO MEET T~~'PREREQYISITESOF'THE ORDINANCE ,WHO COULD . :
<br />\1 SERVE AS A GAS INSPECTOR. REPR~SENTATIV~S ,OF, !HE .MAYOR'S COMMITTEE 'INDICATE~ THIS II
<br />I! HAD BEEN GONE,OVER QUITE,THOROUGI;ILY AND,THEY BELIEVED. THEY HAD"WRITTEN INTO THE 'I
<br />~ORDINANCE THE HIGHE~T ~UALlf~CATIONS.FOR.SU~H A ~ERSON THAT COULD REAS9NABLY BE ~
<br />I 1\ PUT INTO AN ORDINAN~E, CONSIDERING, THE SALARY STRUCTURES 0":, THE CITY,.'." .. III
<br />
<br />Ii Tt:'ERE WAS LIKEWISE A <?~ESTION As,TorH~. F~f: 'foR' THE LIQUID ,PETROLEUM GAS fiTTER 11
<br />11 IN RELATION TO THAT OF A PLUMBE~. IN THIS DISCUSSI~N THERE WAS SOME QUESTION AS l"l
<br />I TO ~HETHER A PLUM~ER SHOULD BE ABLE TO RECEIV~, ,A ~ICENSE FOR GAS INSTALLATION ii
<br />o WORK AT A LESS~R FEE T':'AN A L~QUID':'ETRO~EUM GAS F~TTER. THERE WAS SOME DISCUS- tI
<br />o S I ON REGARD I NG THE QUAL I F I C~T IONS FOR EACH BUT NO FORMAL DEe: ~ S I ON WAS MADE. ,0 ;11
<br />I I
<br />'I . , .' . ..11 ,. , _, I _ ..1
<br />t FOLLOWING THE CONSIDERATION Of THESE ITEMS IT WAS INDICATED THAT THE CITY ADMINI- Ii
<br />. STRATION WOULD TAKE THESE RECOMMENDATIONS UNDER ADVISEMENT AND WOULD AGAIN PRE- ~,
<br />I SENT THE PROPOS~D C~DE TO THE COUNCIL AT A' FUTURE DA~E. 'N6.ACTI~~ WITH R~~PECT il
<br />\ TO THE ORD I NANCE WAS TAKEN. ' . j
<br />11,f
<br />
<br />r 7. DISCUSSION OF BIDS ON LIBRARY EQUIPMENT - MR. TOM CHAPMA~-Of TH~ FIRM OF K6KE~ ~
<br />I,; CHAPMAN APPEARED B~~ORE THE COMMITTEE. CONCERNING THE BIDS RECEIVED fOR LIBRARY !
<br />: FURNISHINGS AND EQUIPMENT. HE 1NDICATED THAT THE SPEClf1CATIONS FOR SUCH. !
<br />~ MATERIAL WERE CLEAR'BUT_THAT THE I~STRUCTIONS ~OR BiDblNG PRESENTED SO~ ~RO- I
<br />'I BLEMS. MR. CHAPMAN INDICATED THAT Of THE FIVE BIOS RECEIVED FOR LIBRARY OfFlCEll
<br />II; FURNITURE, THREE WERE ELIMINATED AS BEING INCOMPLETE; THAT IS, NOT ALL ITEMS r
<br />, I
<br />~ IN THE GROUP WERE BID !N THEIR,ENTIRETV.
<br />
<br />t HE EXPLAINED THAT KOKE~CHAPMAN DI~ NOT BID FOUR ITEMS Of THE GROUP, AND IT WAS
<br />I; UNDERSTOOD THAT THEY DID NOT,BEL1EVE FROM.THE INSTRUCTIONS-THAT THEY, WERE ~E~
<br />.: QUIRED.TO B.ID ALL 'IT'EMS 'IN THE GR-OUP. MR'.' CHAPMAN 'INDICATED~HE BELIEVED ,THAT.
<br />I I; THE B I OS SHOULD BE LET ON A LINE I TEM BAS I S AND NOT ON THE BASI S OF A GROUP
<br />'.' BID. HE SUGGESTED THAT IN FAIRNESS TO ALL BIDDERS THE 'TEMSSHOULD BE REBID
<br />!: OR THAT THE B I DOERS WHO QUAL' F I ED AS PER SPECI F I CAT IONS ON AN I TEM BAS IS:
<br />f SHOULD BE AWARDED T~~ ~IDS~ THEINSTRUCTIONS'fOR BIDDING W~RE REA6 TO TH~ ~
<br />! COMMITTEE, AND THE. CITY ATTORNEY DISCUSSED WI!H THE COMMITTEE THE IMPLICATION :i
<br />OF THESE INSTRUCTIONS. FOLLOWING ~OME,DIS~USSION AND. CONSIDERATIONJ TH~ CO~~ ~
<br />: MITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE ORIGINAL DECISION OF THE COUNCIL AWARDING THE BIDS II
<br />I ~':I
<br />BE UPHELD. MOTION C~R~IED, MR. LINDEEN VOtiNG NAY. 1
<br />
<br />e !: FOLLOWING THIS, IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT THE: ClTy'ATTORNEY DRAfT A RESOLUTION !i
<br />!..\,I REQUESTING THE LIBRARY BOARD TO PRESENT ALL REQUESTS TO THE CITY MANAGER IN 0
<br />: ADEQUATE TIME FOR THESE REQUESTS TO BE TAKEN TO A COUNCIL COMMITTEE BEFORE !
<br />~ PRESENTATION TO A FULL COUNCIL MEETING." '
<br />I I
<br />I t'
<br />! ,'.' ,. I
<br />1 IT WAS MOVED BY MR~ HARTMAN SECONDED BY MR. MCGAFFEY THAT ITEMS 2 THR6UGH 7 OF THE REPORT [Ii
<br />! Of THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE BE .APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. ij
<br />
<br />f i
<br />
<br />Ii A REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE MEETING OF OCTOBER 10, 1958-,- RE~: COMMITTEE,OFTHE WHOLE - DISCUSSION [I'
<br />~ REGARDING PURCHASE OF PROPERTY SOUTH O~ 7T~ AVENUE FOR EXTENSION Of. CHAMBERS STREET. (REXIUS PROPERTY); I
<br />I: CONS I DERAT I ON OF REQUEST FROM EUGENE WATER & ELECTR I C BOAR.D FOR EASEt-:'ENT; Re:,QUEST FROM EUGENE WATER & :j
<br />~ ELECTRIC BOARD FOR CITY OFfiCIALS TO EXECUTE QUITCLAIM DEED AND RELINQUISHMENT OF EASEMENT ON TWO ~
<br />j; SEPARATE PARCELS OF PROP-ERTY.; 01 SCUSSION, REGARDING CITY. OPERATION Of BUSSES,; CURB S:IDEWALK ON THE !I
<br />Ii EAST S I DE OF LAWRENCE STREET BETW.EEN 25TH AND 26,T~ AVENUES;, REQUEST Of, LANE PLYWOOD, I NC. BY MI LL I GAN il
<br />I I & BROWN FOR PERM I SS,I ON. TO C<?NSTRUCT A, CO~CRETE I N:rE~S~CT I Ot:' AC.~OSS BERT~LS?N ROAD AT THE. LANE PL YWOODi,1
<br />PLANT LOCATION; CONSIDERATION Of BOARD OF ApPEALS REPORT, OCTOBER 8, 1958.: (A) REQUE,S:r Of FRANK [,
<br />. , . . I
<br />BEAVER, 1666 WEST 6TH AVENUE, FOR VARIANCE fROM 3' ALLEY SETBACK TO ALLOW NEW CONSTRUCTION TO CONfORM :1
<br />"1
<br />WITH EXISTING CONSTRUCTION; (B) REQUEST OF A. G. AND PEARL. CISNEY, 2479. PORTLAND STREET, fOR VARIANCE .1
<br />FROM SIDE AND FRONT PROPERTY LINE S'ETBACKS TO ALLOW 'CONSTRUCTlOi,-i OF CARPORT; (C) REQUEST OF CARTER :!
<br />. . . . . ~ .j
<br />OIL COMPANY FOR VARIANCE TO ALLOW OVERSIZE SIGN AT PROPOSED SERVICE STATION TO BE LOCATED ON THE ~"
<br />NORTHWEST CORNER OF 19TH AVENUE AN~ AGATESTRE~T; ~ERMANENT R~PORT OF T~E PLANNJNG COMMI~SIONJ !I
<br />OCTOBER 7, 1958: (A) ZONINGN~WL:Y !'NNEXED: AREAS AT 2736 LAURELWOOD LAN(AND 29TH AVEN,UE AND CITY VIEW \
<br />
<br />e '1 STREET; (B) REQUESTED REZON I NG, OF 1459 AND 1473 :EA'ST 1:9TH AVENUE FROM R-4 RE'S I DE'NT rAL TO C-2 NE IGHBOR- t.l,.
<br />
<br />\.... .'..1.
<br />I I'
<br />Ii '
<br />:' !
<br />I, 1\
<br />I ~
<br />
|