|
<br />r320
<br /> e
<br /> 10/ 13/58
<br />-------------------------------- -- --- --- --- ---- _ _____.u _______ - ~- - - - ----- --------- -- -- . - -- ---
<br /> ------_.-~-- -- - ~ --
<br />-- -. - - -~- -- - ---- --, -- -.- "
<br /> .. --- - -. - -. -.-- - -
<br /> 2. CONSIDERATION Of SIDEWALK LOCATION ON BOTH SIDES Of HIGH STREET fROM 34TH PLACE I
<br /> I TO 36TH AVENUE - A PETITION REQUESTING THAT SIDEWALKS BE LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE I
<br /> I I
<br /> CURB ON HIGH STREET BETWEEN 34TH PLACE AND 36TH AVENUE WAS PRESENTED TO THE COM- I
<br /> , M I T'TEE . IT WAS INDICATED THAT OWNERS OF 75.13% OF. THE. PROPERTY AFFECTED HAD RE- I
<br /> I j
<br /> QUESTED THA~ THE SIDEWALKS ~E LOCATED AT, TH~ CUR~ IN THIS AREA; THE COMMITTEE I
<br /> I DRO~E TO THE AREA AND INSPECTED TH I S PART I CULAR' STREET AS WELL ,AS OTHER STREETS. II
<br /> I
<br /> I I N THE AREA OF CRESTWOOD TERRACES"AND I,TS ,ADD I,T fONS,: BE I NG ,34TH PLACE, 36TH'AvENUE,
<br /> j AND HIGH, MI~L,AND FERRY STREETS. AFTE~ SOME DISCUSSION AND CONSIDERATI~NOF CURB I
<br /> SIDEWALK VERSUS S IDEWALK-S LOCATED BACK 'FROM THE CURB, IT' WAS"RECOMMENDED 'THATS I NCE I
<br /> THIS AREA HAS NO' SIDEWALKS' INSTALLED AT THE PRESENT TIME AND SINCE,WrrH:THE'EX- i
<br /> ! I
<br /> CEPT I ON OF fERRY STREET, THE PARK I NG STR I P WOULD BE. ONL Y'18," "N. WIDTH, ,THE' COUNCI L ~
<br /> I GIVE APPROVAL TO THE LOCATION OF CURB SIDEWALKS IN ALL OF THE CRESTWOOD TERRACES
<br /> I AREA TOGETHER :W I TH : ITS ,ADDTTI OlliS. MOnO'NC-ARRI ED W ITHMR.' ,LI NDEEN''VOT I NG. NAY.
<br /> I
<br /> I
<br /> I . ' , I
<br /> I
<br /> I 3. ADD I T 10NAL :CASH CONTR I BUT ION TOWAR-D', AMI\Z'ON :CRERK 'CONSTRUC,T'ION' COST ~ THE 'C ITY
<br /> J
<br /> , MANAGER ,EXPLA INED THAT THE: CITY ,OF' EUGENE W,I LL BE REQU IRED TO MAKE AN ADDI T I ON~L I
<br /> I
<br /> I CASH CONTRIBUTION TOWARD THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE AMAZON AND THAT IT WILL. BE, NECES- e
<br /> I SARY THAT THIS CASH CONTRIBUTION BE MADE IN THE IMMEDIATE FUTURE. THE ADDED COST I
<br /> r
<br /> i WILL BE APPROXIMATELY $8,500.00, AND SUCH ADDITIONAL CASH CONTRIBUTION MU~T BE !
<br /> I MADE, TO INSURE COMPLETION:OF THE"PROJECT NO,W UNDERWAY. I T 'WAS LI KE.W I SE: EXP,LA'I NED,
<br /> 1 THAT, IT IS POSS I BLE' ,THERE ARE ,ADEQUAT.E' FUNDS BUDGETED WI TH I N THE 1,958-51 BUDGET, I.
<br /> I TO COVER TH I S ADDED COST BUT THAT SUCH fUNDS. ARE DEP,ENDfjNT' UPO,N OTHER PROJECTS' !
<br /> f AND THAT IT MIGHT BE NECESSARY fOR THE COUNCIL TO AUTHdRIZE TRANSfER OF FUNDS
<br /> AT SOME TIME IN THE FUTURE, :WHEN ,THE COMPLET,E FI.SCAL OUTLOOK ,IS BETTER KNOWN. 1 I
<br /> i SINCE THIS WAS NOTifiCATION ONLY, NO fORMAL ACTION WAS TAKEN WrTH RESPECT,.TO,THE
<br /> I
<br /> I MATTER. IT WAS UNDERSTOOD THAT THE CITY OF NECESSITY MUST CONTINUE THE ~ROJECT.
<br /> I
<br /> I I
<br /> i
<br /> I 4. CONSIDERATION OF PURCHASE OF PROPERTY fOR THE EXTENSION Of CHAMBERS STREET NORTH I
<br /> I Of 7TH AVENUE -THE SUBJECT Of POTENT I AL P:URCHASE Of P,ROPERTY FROM N. A. . WARD AND
<br /> i ZETA WARD WAS AGAIN .DISCUSSED'.: .REPRES'ENTATlVES':OF,:THECOMMITTEE :IND.ICATED THEY - ' II
<br /> I
<br /> HAD DONE SOME INVESTIGAT(NG,OF THIS PROPOSED PURCHASE AND CERTAIN SUGGESTIONS WERE !
<br /> I I
<br /> , MADE -WHICH INC~UDED ~HAT THE-CITY MIGHT E~IMINATE THE~URCHASE OF THE BUILnlNG
<br /> i AND AGREE: TO MOVE, THE, BUI L:-DI'NG; -AND THAT, 'A COUNTER OFFER BE MADE. , I TWAS fl:NALL Y
<br /> I RECOMMENDED THAT A, COUNTER, OF-FER ,BE MADE TO.CHANGE ,THE OPTION AGREEMENT IN ONE
<br /> 'I
<br /> j RESPECT BY OFFERING $1,000.00 ~ORTHE EXISTING BUILDING RATHER ~HAN $[,500.0Q,CUR-
<br /> i RENTLY SHOWN ON THE OPTION.
<br /> ,
<br /> i 5. CON~IDERATI6N ~f,STATEMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN tHE ,VOTERS PAMPHLET FOR NOVEMBER ,4, .
<br /> j
<br /> I 1958 ELECTION - THE COMMITTEE HEARD PREPARED. S~ATEMENTS OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL " I
<br /> PROPOSED fOR INCLUSION IN THE VOTERS PAMPHLET FAVORING ADOPTION Of A $175,000.00 II
<br />II LEVY EACH YEAR fOR fIVE YEARS FOR EXTENSION Of THE SEWAGE AND DRAINAGE SYSTEM, I.
<br /> ANDfO~ A,$109,Ol;>O.OO ~QND:ISSUE' TO fINANCE THE CONSTRUCTION OF.,AflRE:STATION AT.. II
<br />! BROADWA Y ANDMcK I NLEY STREET AND' :EXTENS I ON OF THE. f I REALARM SYS.TEM. THE COMMITTEE Ii
<br /> APPROVED THE PROPOSED STATEMENT WITH RESPECT TO THE:SEWAGE AND DRAINAG~ lSSUE AND ,I
<br /> Ii
<br />!I LIKEWISE APPROVED WITH ONE:'AMENDMENT THE:PROPOSED:STATEMENT REGARDING :THE.ADDI- II
<br /> TIONAL fiRE STATION AND FACILITIES, THE AMENDMENT TO ,THIS STATEMENT PROVIDING FOR
<br />'j INCLUSION Of THE AMOUWf PAID IN RENTAL 'Of, EXISTING FACILI.TI-ES AT THE SENECA ,STATION.
<br /> I THE COMM I TTEE RECOMMENDED THAT BOTH STATEMENTS BE 'I NCLUDED IN ,THE VOTERS PAMPHLET, I I
<br /> AND IT WAS RECOGNIZED THAT SUCH STATEMENTS Of NECESSITY WOULD HAVE TO BE PLACED IN I
<br /> i THE PAMPHLET IMMEDIA,TEI.Y IN ORDER TO-HAVE IT.. PR I NTED IN ADEQUATE TIME,TO MEET
<br /> I CERTAIN .LEGAL,REQUIREMENTS. '. 'l. ' ,
<br /> I ' ..
<br /> I 6. CONSIDERATION,Of AND INfORMAL HEARING ON ,PROPOSED GAS ORDINANCE - THE COMMITTEE
<br /> ,I AND THE MAYOR'S GAS.CODE~COMMITTEE.MET WITH ,OTHER INTERESTED PEOPLE, REPRESENTING I
<br /> ! THE GAS I NDUSTRY AND 01 SCUSSED .THE 'PROPOSED: ORDI NANCE. WH I CH WO.ULD REGULATE GAS
<br /> I INSTALLATION O~ A~L7TYPES IN THE,CITY OF EUGENE:. MR. "MARLATT, CHAIRMAN Of THE
<br /> I MAYOR'S COMMITTEE, INDICATED THEIR COMMITTEE HAD HELD 21,MEETINGS AND HAD MADE e
<br /> I EIGHT REVISIONS OF A PROPOSED ORDINANCE AS A RESULT OF THESE MEETINGS AND CERTAIN
<br /> CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED BY THEM. THESE 21 MEETINGS INCLUDED MEETINGS .WITH RE-,
<br /> I . . -. -
<br />I PRESENTAT I VESOF-' THE G'AS -I NpU?Jj~Y, O~_,.HE_'~HE~T_ M~TAL' AND _, ~ARMA IR _ HEAT !N9_':NDU~-
<br /> i TRIES, OF CITY PERSONNEL.:,THE PLUMBING rNDUSTRY,GENERAL CONTRACTORS AND ,OTHERS. I
<br /> i INTERESTED~ THE MAYOR'S ,COMMITTEE CONSIDERED RECOMMENDATIONS Of THESE GROUPS,' I
<br />I I
<br /> RECE I VED V I EWS OF ALL CONCERNED AND, 'I N LJ I GHT Of 'THESE' RECOMMENDAT IONS AND V I EWS, I
<br />j MADE CERTAIN CHANGES IN THE PROPOSED CODE AND RECOMMENDED SUCH CODE FOR THE 'I
<br /> I'
<br />I SAfETY Of THE CITIZENS Of THE CITY Of EUGENE AND.FOR ADVANCE KNOWLEDGE. OF MEMBERS i'
<br /> !i
<br />'I Of THE INDUSTRY WHO WILL BE GIVING GAS SERVICE. :1
<br />{ II
<br />I REPRESENTATIVES OF THE INDUSTRY WHO WERE PRESENT AT THE MEETING MADE CERTAIN COM-
<br />I
<br />I
<br />i MENTS AND SUGGESTIONS WI~H:RESPECT,TO THE~ROPOSED ORDINANCEi AND'~HESE ,COMMENTS I
<br /> INCLUDED THE,fOLLOWING:
<br /> -
<br /> - ~
<br /> IT WAS 'fELT THAT IT IS A~COMPREHENSIVE ORDINANCE ,BUT THAT: IT DOES NOT INCLUDE I
<br /> INDUSTRIAL SAfETY FEATURES WHICH MIGHT WE~L BE.INCLUDED. IN THE ,ORDINANCE; . ,
<br />I !I
<br />I IT WAS LIKEWISE INDICATED THAT, THE NUMBER.OF INSPECTIONS Of EQUIPMENT AND PRE-
<br />I INSPECTIONS MIGHT POSE SERIOUS PROBLEMS. THE THOUGHT WAS ALSO ADVANCED THAT'
<br />I
<br />I THERE IS NO fEE FOR AN APPEAL TO THE APPEAL BOARD AS ESTABLISHED IN THE ORDINANCE
<br />j AND THAT SUCH A fEE MIGHT WELL BE REQUIRED. ALSO NO METHOD WAS GIVEN FOR THE
<br />( APPROVING OF TYPES~OF EQUIPMENT UNLISTED BY. UNDERWRITERS, AND SUCH EQUIPMENT I
<br /> .'" . -
<br />I
<br />\ :1
<br />~
<br />
|