|
<br /> 391 ~
<br /> e
<br /> 12/22/58
<br /> ::::----::-=::...=_~~~_.;..-_=_::_:~.:_.:__ _.;..;:...._~_~_----=:-_-=-:..:._ ___-=-:__-'= _-:::-------:=:._ ~_----_--_-~~ ____n~. ---.- - ------ --- ~ --.- - --_._- ------ -"-.--...--- -----------~ ~--_. -- - ----
<br /> - -- -_. - --.- . - - - - - - ~ --
<br /> --- ---- r _._--- -- -- - , ' ~ , - .~ -.- - ---- '- , -- - -- - .;---
<br /> I
<br /> I I "ON REQUEST, A COMM I TTEE FROM THE EUGENE CONTRACTORS ASSN., I NC., WAS'
<br /> I
<br /> I COURTEOUSLY, GIVEN TIME FOR A MEETING WITH MR. ROBERT flNLAY'SON AND MR. .DAN I
<br /> 1 POTTER AT 9:30 AM, DECEMBER 17, 1958, TO INFORMALLY DISCUSS THE PROPOSED
<br /> I
<br /> I CONTRACTOR'S LICENSING ORDINANCE.
<br /> I I
<br /> I
<br /> I WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT YOU TABLE ANY ACTION ON THIS ORDINANCE
<br /> I ;'
<br /> I UNTIL AFTER OUR NEXT MEETING, JANUARY 8,1959. ,
<br /> j ,
<br /> ,
<br /> J OUR ORGANIZATION IS REPRESENTATIVE Of THE ENTIRE ,BUILDING INDUSTRY AND f
<br /> AS THIS ORDINANCE EFfECTS US ALL, WE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO I,
<br /> , I
<br /> I ,
<br /> I STUDY IT AND MAKE SOME RECOMMENDATIONS. I
<br /> WE WILL HAVE A REPRESENTATIVE AT YOUR NEXT MEETING WHO WILL BE VERY
<br /> II I
<br /> I) HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.
<br /> I WE SINCERELY HOPE YOU WILL GIVE OUR REQUEST FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION."
<br /> I
<br /> e II
<br /> No ACTION WAS TAKEN ON ITEM I OF THE :REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE Of THE WHOLE.
<br /> I! IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. McGAFFEY THAT ITEM 2 OF THE REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE
<br /> I
<br /> I OF THE WHOLE BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED.
<br /> I
<br /> ,
<br /> I I IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. MCGAFFEY THAT ITEM 3 A. Of THE REPORT Of THE COM-
<br /> lJ MITTEE Of THE WHOLE BE APPROVED AS READ.
<br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MR. MOLHOLM SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS THAT THE REPORT B6 AMENDED ,TO MAKE THE
<br /> II MAXIMUM fEE FOR EACH DISTRIBUTOR $75.00. AMENDMENT LOST.
<br /> VOTE WAS TAKEN ON THE ORIGINAL MOTION AND CARRIED. j
<br /> I, I
<br /> II IT WAS MOVED BY MRS. LAURIS SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOLM ,THAT ITEM 3 B. OF THE REPORT Of THE COM-
<br /> I
<br /> "
<br /> I MITTEE Of THE WHOLE BE AMENDED TO MAKE SWIMMING POOL ADMISSION fEE 10~ fOR CH,ILDREN AND RENT fOR !
<br /> ; SKINNERS BUTTE RECREA~ION CENTER $5.00. ,AMENDMENT LOST. I
<br /> I
<br /> ! .. I
<br /> 11 IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. MCGAFFEY THAT ITEM 3 B. OF THE REPORT OF THE COM-
<br /> MITTEE Of THE WHOLE BE APPROVED AS READ; MOTION CARRIED.
<br /> ,
<br /> I I
<br /> I IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED,BY MR. HARTMAN THAT ITEM 3 C. OF THE ,REPORT OF THE COM-
<br /> I MITTEE OF THE WHOLE BE APPROVED.. MOTION,CARRIED.
<br /> II !
<br /> I i
<br /> I IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED'BY MR. MCGAFFEY THAT ITEM'.3 D. ,O,F THE.REPORT OF THE COM- I
<br /> I MITTEE OF THE WHOLE BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. i
<br /> I I
<br /> I ...... I
<br /> ! No ACTION WAS TAKEN ON ITEMS 3 E., F., G. I
<br /> I I
<br /> I ,
<br /> I IT WAS MOVED BY MR. MOLHOLM SECONDED BY MR. MCGAFfEY THAT 'ITEM 3,H. Of THE REpORT Of THE COM- i
<br /> I I MITTEE OF THE ,WHOLE BE HELD OVER UNTIL COUNCIL MEETING Of JANUARY 26, 1959. MoTION ,CARRIED. !
<br /> ,i
<br /> '/ I
<br /> I.
<br /> II I
<br /> ..
<br /> II A REBORT Of THE MEETING HELD DECEMBER 15, 1958 BETWEEN MEMBERS OF STATE LEGISLATURE, COUNTY
<br /> 2 I' COMMISSIONERS AND CITY COUNCIL WAS SUBMI~TED AND,READAS fOLLOWS:
<br /> ,I -
<br /> "PRESENT: STATE SENATORS STRAUB AND HUSBAND; STATE RE~RESENTATIVES KIEtH SKELTON,
<br /> II AND. CARL fiSHER; COUNTY COMMISSIONERS RALPH PETERSEN AND KENNETH NIELSEN;
<br /> e Ij MAYOR CONE; COUNCILMEN SHEARER, SHISLER, LAURIS, ,LINDEEN, MOLHOLM AND,
<br /> 'j
<br /> Ii McGAFFEY; COUNC I LMEN ELECT CHATT AND WI LSON; CITY MANAGER;: CI TY RECORDER;
<br /> II DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS; CITY ATTORNEY; PLANNING CONSULTANT; TRAffiC
<br /> ~ ENGINEER; PARKS & RECREATION SUPERINTENDENT; MESSRS. fRED BRENNE AND
<br /> ROBERT BoOTH; DAN WYANT, EUGENE REGISTER-GUARD. _l"
<br /> II THE MEETING WAS OPENED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT SHEARER WHO EXPLAINED THAT THE
<br /> CITY NOW HAS A TRAFflCPROBLEM,WHICH JS ANTICIPATED TO BECOME MORE ACUTE WITH
<br /> !' THE OPENING OF "Q" STREET AND THE NEW HIGHWAY 99, THAT BEING THE AREA OF THE
<br /> I fERRY STREET BRIDGE AND ITS CONNECTIONWITH 6TH AND 7TH AVENUES. PRESIDENT
<br /> \ SHEARER FURTHER REMARKED HE THOUGHT IT fEASIBLE TO CONFINE DISCUSSION TO THE
<br /> \ 6TH AND 7TH AVENUE AND, fERRY STREET BRIDGE PROBLEM AND THE 1ST TO 4TH CON-
<br /> NECTOR WHICH WOULD RELIEVE TRAFfiC COMING OFf Of THE fERRY STREET BRIDGE. HE
<br /> FURTHER STATED'THATTHE CITY DOES NOT NOW HAVE~FUNDS NOR 'ARE fUNDS IN SIGHT
<br /> 1 FOR PROJECTS ,OF THE MAGNITUDE NECESSARY TO ALLEVIATE THE PROBLEMS WHICH ARE
<br /> I
<br /> , CONFRONTING THE CITY WITH RESPECT TO TRAFFIC. ' '
<br /> I 11 A REV'EW OF THE VARIOUS ACTIONS WHICH HAD BEEN TAKEN TOWARD ALLEVIATION
<br /> OF THE PROBLEM WAS PRESENTED BY THE PLANNING CONSULTANT, AND HE INDICATED THAT
<br /> I: THE CITY HAD IN APRIL 1958 PETITIONED THE OREGON STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT fOR
<br /> II THE CLASS1FICATI0~ OF FOUR STREETS, FOR SECONDARY URBAN CLASSIFICATION SO
<br /> fEDERAL AID COULD BE SECURED. THESE STREETS ARE AS fOLLOWS:
<br /> e I
<br /> II !
<br /> /1 ~.~
<br /> L.1
<br />
|