01/12/1959 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

e 407~ ---- -~----~- ---~--~- .~----- --~ ----- ---- - - - - _'/'2/~____ --~ ---- ----- ------ _._~T_ ____ _~~_ I e I 1 e I - "- -"~" - -~ . . I t II I II II II II I! Ij I' I II II III \i Ii 1\ II fi I' II II 11 Ii ,I II I: II I~ II ,I II ~ 'i " I, II Ii l:t I,' ; 1\ j' f! I Ii Ii ,I i _, -:i-.':'-.:'. -- IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. 'MCGArfEY THAT ITEM 2 OF THE REPORT Of THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. A REPORT Of THE COMMITTEE MEETING HELD JANUARY 2, 1959 WAS 'SUBMITTED ~ND' READ ~S FOLLOWS: "PRESENT: COUNCILMEN SHEARER, SHISLER, EDMUNDS, LAURIS, LINDEEN, MOLHOLM' AND MCGAfFEY; COUNCILMEN ELECT CHATT, MOYER AND WILSON; CITY MANAGER; CITY RECORDER; C,TY"' ATTORNEY; ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT; DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS; FRED BRENNE, EUGENE CHAMBER or COMMERCE; RICHARD C. CLARK, ARCHITECT; DAN WYANT, EUGENE REGISTER-GUARD. PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE I. PETITION- fOR PAVING OF POTTER STREET FROM UNIVERSITY STR~ET TO SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF LOT 10, BLO'CK 8, MILTON-REID ADDITION - REPRESENTATIVES OF THE COMMITTEE' VIEWED THE PROPOSED STREET EXTENSION WHICH EXTENDS THElEPTHOf ONE LOT fROM THE INTERSECTION Of UNIVERSITY AND POTTER STREETS fOR WHICH A PETITION HAD BEEN RECEIVED CONTAINING SIGNATURES OF OWNERS Of 75.5% OF ABUTTING PROPERTY. IT WAS RECOGNIZED-THAT THE ADDITION TO THE STREET IS 'NECESSARY TO,RESIDENTS Of "THE 'AREA fROMA'NACCESSIBILlTY STANDPO I NT AS WELL AS ASTANDPO I NT Of, SECURING AN FHA MORTG'AGE APPROVAL. FOR THIS REASON; IT WAS' RECOMMENDED THAT' THE REQUESTED' STREET PAV t'NG BE 'APPROVED' AND THAT THE NECESSARY ORDINANCES INIT/ATt'NG THE PROJECT BE 'PASSED. 2. PETITION fOR PAVING Of TYLER STREET fROM 26TH AVENUE SOUTH 118.92 fEET TO THE" SOUTH LINE OF LOT "10, BLOCK 7 , ELLEND,ALE ADD I T I ON - THE COMM I TTEE RECE I VED A PET 1- TION FOR' THE P~VING Of THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STREET CONTAINING SIGNATURES OF OWNERS OF 100% Of THE 'ABUTT I NG PROPERTY. " THE COMM I TTEE DROVE TO THE S /TE O'F THE' PRO- . POSED STREET IMPROVEMENT AND DISCUSSED THE POSSIBILITY Or EXTENDING THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT FROM 26TH AVENUE TO 27TH AVENUE. IT WAS, HOWEVER, RECOMMENDE,D THAT THE APPROXIMATELY ONE-HALF B'LOCK AS PETITIONED EXTENDrNG TO THE' SOUTHL'lNE OF LOT 10, BLOCK 7, ELLENDALE ADD'IT/ON, 'BE PAVED "AND THAT THE NECESSARY ORDINANCES INITIATING THE PROJECT BE P'ASSED. 3. PET rT ION FOR PAV I NGOf LAWR'ENCE STREET F'ROM SOUTH B'OUNDARY' OF' FRAS IER-HYLAND ADD/'- TION TO 27TH PLACE, AND 27TH PLACE fROM LAWRENCE TO WASHINGTON STREET - A PETITION fOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED IMPROVEMENT CONTAINING SIGNATURES Of OWNERS Of 85.93% Of THE TOTAL fRONT FOOTAGE TO BE ASSESSED WAS PRESENTED 'TO THE COMMITTEE. THE COM- MITTEE DROVE TO THE SITE Of THE PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENT AND NOTED THE L:OCATION Of THE STREETS AS PROPOSED FOR PAVING. IN THE DISCUSSION THERE WAS SOME QUEST/ON AS TO THE ACCESS I B I L I TY' OF 27TH PLACE' SI NCE I T DOE'S NOT TI,E I'N' WI THANY PAVED" STREET AND WOULD ONLY HAVE LAWRENCE 'STREET AS A MEANS Of I Na RESS' AND EGRE'SS. IT ' " , WAS THEREfORE RECOMMENDED THAT THE ITEM BE~LD OVER AND THAT THEPROPERTY OWNERS' ON 27TH PLACE BE CONTACTED TO DETERMINE If 27TH PLACE COULD BE PAVED 'FROM LAWRENCE STREET TO LINCOLN STREET. , I I' 2 " Ii I: I) It I; II I! I: , , I COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE I. CoNSIDERATIoN Of ARCHITECT'S AGREEMENT FOR"'COMPLETI'ON OF 'ADMINISTRAnON BUILDING' AT MAHLON-SWEET AiRPORT -A CONTRACT'B'ETWEEN'"THE"CITy'OF-EuGENE AND RICHARD' C. CLARK; "ARCH,HECT ,. WAS PRESENTED TO THE COMM I TTEE. THE CONTRACT" AGREEMENT" I S ' SUCH THAT THE ARCHiTECT WIL'L 'PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 'TOWARD 'THE DESIGN, 'SPECIFI- CAT ION PROPOSALS, CONTRACTS AND SUPERV I SION OF WORK NECESSARY FOR "THE COMPlET'ION OF THE ADMINISTRATION'BuiLDING AT MAHLON-SWEET 'AIRPORT. FOR THIS WORK 'THE ARCHI''; TECT IS TO BE PAID AT THE :RATE OF 6;'1/2'i. OF THE COST Of THE WORK. THE 'COMMt'TTEE DISCUSSED THE PROPOSED AGREEMENT AND RECOMMENDED ITS APPROVAt~ 2. SALARY STUDY - COPIES,OF THE'SALARY'STUDY'MADEcBY-T~ESPECIAL COMMITfiEWERE PRE-, SENTED TO THE MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL AND PROS~ECTIVE-MEMBERSOf THE.COUNCIL'WHO ~AD NOT HERE'TO~O-RERE'Ct;.IVED ,THP~'" :T~ER~ WAS ,SOM~ D I'SCUS~'I ON ';AS TO' WHAT ACT ION wAs TO BE TAKEN ON THE BAS IS Of THE STUDY, AND IT WAS 'R~COMMENDED AT 'THIS 'T'ME' THE I TEM BE HELD 'OVER. ' . '.. I I j li I" I i I I f1 II Ii I" 11 I I Ii 3. DISCUSSION OF POSSIBILlTY'OF BUDGETI'NG'FUNDS FOR 'UNANTICIPATED PROP.ERTY ACQUISI- l..!.9!:! - COUNCILWOMANLAURISINDICATED SHE'BEUEVES'SOME STUDY 'SHOULD BE GIVEN'TO THE POSS I Bill TY. OF DES I GNAT I NG SOME SUM Of MONEY I N THE BUDGET TO ALLOW FOR PUR- ,CHASE OF PROPERTY-WHEN,SUCH,PROPERTYCOMES.ON.THE MARKET UNEXPECTEDLY., THERE "WAS SOME "D I SCUSSI ON I N- THE. COMN ITTEE. ABOUT .THE- PROPR I ETY-, AND, THE, POS~ I B I LIlY OF HAVING 'SUCH A FUND, AND' THE, D!SCUSSrO,N t'NCLUDED THE' fACT 'THAT SUCH A t(IND MIGHT WELL SAVE THE -CITY MONEY ONA,'LONG TERM BAST~ If IT-WE-RE AVAILABLE;~'~ tHE possi- BILITY Of USING fUNDS'F'ROM 'BUDGETCARRYOVERS AT THE END OF EACH BUDGET YEAR WAS ADVANCED. 'IT'WAS EXPLAt'NED"THAT"IN'PRIOR YE"ARS'/T HAD ALWAYS PROVED NECESSARY TO USE BUDGET' CARRYOVERS TO BALANCE 'THE' PROSPECT I VE'BUDGET; FOLI:OW I NGTH IS' D IS- CUS"SION IT WAS RECOMMENOEDTHAT'THE' FINANCE'"COMMITTEE BE REQUE'STED TO'STUDY THE POSSIBILITY OF SETTING 'UP 'A 'PROPERTY ACQUI'SITION"F'UND AND BRI'NGBACK:j\' RECOMMENDA- TION WITHIN THIRTY DAYS." IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. MCGAFfEY THAT ITEM I Of THE REroRT Of THE PUBL\C WORKS COMMITTEE BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. ,I 'I )'1 ,I J: l. 'I II 1, I: I il "I I j: I I I I I 1 I, I i I !I ;, il II i I ) i \ , I I i! I I f .I !I :1 H ~:'I ~