|
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />1/12/59
<br />
<br />-----_._-------~-_._----- ---- ---- ----. -------- ~,-- --.
<br />. - --- . - -. . --. - - - - ..
<br />
<br />f--- - - ~-T. WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR.
<br />WORKS COMMITTEE BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRiED.
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. MCGAFfEY THAT ITEM 3 Of THE REPORT Of THE PUBLIC
<br />WORKS COMMITTEE BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED.
<br />
<br />, ., : :, .." I " , ",..
<br />
<br />I
<br />I
<br />i
<br />I
<br />I
<br />i
<br />\
<br />\
<br />I
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />/:
<br />II
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />McGAffEY THAT ITEM 2 Of THE REPORT Of THE PUBLIC
<br />, ,
<br />
<br />I T WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MRS. LAUR I S THAT THE REPORT. Of THE COMM I TTEE Of THE WHOLE
<br />BE APPROVED. MOTI-ON CARRIED. -
<br />
<br />A REPORT Of THE COMMITTEE MEETING HELD JANUARY 9, 1959 WAS SUBMITTED AND,READ AS fOLLOWS:
<br />
<br />"PRESENT: MAYOR CONE; COUNCILMEN SHEARER, LAURIS, LINDEEN, MOLHOLM, M,CGAffEY, CHATT-"
<br />MOYER AND WILSON;.,.CJTY MANAGER; CITY RECORDER; DI.RECTOR oF' ':P'U'BLIC-WORKS; ;,'::
<br />. , - '.CITY 'ATTORNEY; -ADM'INI STRAT'I VE' 'Ass I:STA_NT-; :PlA'NNI NG' ~C~~SUL;;TANT; -MESSRS. CO'LEMAN',
<br />:F I SH -AN~ KESEY; R,EPRE.SENT'I NG M I:LK D I STRI:B:~T,ORS; DAN -WYA'NT';, "EUGENE REGI S'TE'R";GUARD.
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />C<A'411 TTEE'OF THE WHOLE ' " - -
<br />I. REQUEST F:OR PAYMENT'fOR'RIG'H'T-O'n-WAY,fOR WIL'LAMETTE: ST,R'EET INVI.CINITY OF 35TH AVENUE-
<br />IT WAS EXPLA,INED THAT THE CITY HAD LET A ,CONTRACT fOR PAVINGWILLAMETTE STREET fROM
<br />33RD TO 40'TH AVENUE ~ANi> 'THAT IT -'liAs THE 'CI-TY_'S ,CONTENTION THAT ALL THE' NEC'ESSAR.Y
<br />RIGHT-"OF-WAY WAS CONTAINE'D"IN 'A-~j:-ORME,R CqUNTY,ROA,'D; BU'T SINCE.THAT TI.ME 'THE ,COMPLETION
<br />Of ENGINEERING STUDIES H'AS SHOWN ADDI-T",ONAL 'A'NO sM'Ai..L'PO'RTI-ONS O'fRIG'HT';"'OF-WAYAR'E
<br />NECESSARY ON, tHE ,WESTERLY S I DE Of THE STREET. LT WAS F:.URTHER. EXPLA.I NED THAT I NEACH
<br />J NSTANCE - WHERE' REQU I RED - THE' PRqpERTY'-,HOL:.DER 'HAD'-DED', CATED -'THE NEC'E'SSARY' SMAll'STR I P'S
<br />Of 'RIGHT":Of":WAY AT 'NO 'CHARGE WITH'T'H'E"EXCEP'T'ION-Or.-PROPERTY-OWNED'-BY-W; A."AND'-BtANCH
<br />M. .S_WEET. MR. AND MRS. . SWEET HAV'EREQUESTE:D TtfATTHEY.' BE RE',MBUR'S'E'D fOR' THE IR PRO-
<br />PERTY I N 'THE SUM 'Of .$150. '
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />,
<br />
<br />THE COMM I-TTEE 'CONSI DERE'O, THE REQUE'ST ,f'OR RE:I.MBU'RSEME'NT fOR R...' Gtn-Of..-WAY ,AND WERE
<br />SHOWN A,'MA'P ON WHICH THE' RIG'HT":O'f";WAY WAS' P'fiOJECTED.' FOLLOWING,S'OMf'tj(sCUSSION,
<br />IT WAS RECOMMENDED 'niAT IT' BE EXPLA',NED' TO NR. AND'MRS. 'SWEET'rHAT OTHER' PROPERTY
<br />HOLDERS I N THE AREA HAD DEEDED THE I R PROPERTY AT 'NO coin -AND -THAT THE C'ITYREQUEST
<br />JHEY DEDICAr~ THEIR PROPERTY AT NO COST ,AND THAT A LEtTER TO THIS EFfECT BE SENT
<br />TO THEM~ -'MOT ION .CARR I EDIi/nH MR ;-LI NDEE:N7"VO'TI NG:-:NAY. - ~ -:-" - - -- .. -.. , , - -, .
<br />
<br />. ' . .~-
<br />-:___.._ _.. ___ ___ _ J~" _....
<br />
<br />. . - ..
<br />.. __.. - i_ _ _ __ . _ _ _ _. ~ . - .-. - _ _._
<br />
<br />1
<br />I:
<br />/1
<br />
<br />I'
<br />,I
<br />I
<br />Ii
<br />1,
<br />I
<br />L
<br />J:
<br />II
<br />II
<br />'\
<br />I,
<br />'!
<br />I,
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />. . .. -
<br />2. DtSCUSS I'ON REGARD I NG URBAN RE'NEWALP-RO'JECT"- :A 'iiLEGRAM' fROM THE HOUSI'NG 'ANO"HoME
<br />FINANCE AGE,NC": DATED DECE~BER 31, 195_8 ,'ND'CAtiNG THAT AN'ALLO'CATJO'N 0.f$57,6,9cj~bo
<br />ADVANCE fUNDS HAD BEEN APP-ROVED fOR =THE MULL I GAN-SKI i,iNER _UR'B'AN -RE'NEWAL PROJECT, 'WAS
<br />REA'D TO niE COMMITTEE. IT WAS "N'D'CATED 'THAT_.IT"WOULD BE DESIRAB,LE T'O'ME'ET.WITH
<br />A REPR~SENTAT I v~', 'Of., -HHFA TO DISCUSS 'FURTHE'R STEPS _WH'I CH i'-HE 'C I'TY, 'SHOULD T-AK'E, 'AND
<br />IT WAS AGREED THAT MR. JAMES OF' ,HHFA SHoULD ,BE 'CONTACTED AND :AMEEr'ING SHOUL'O'-BE:
<br />:SET FO~ MONDAY' EVEN ING; 'JANUARY - I 9, ,...959, SUBJ'ECT:'TO THE ,AVA I',LAB I L ITYOf 'MR., 'JAMES.
<br />- ~. ~ - __ _.. ' . I . _ . ,.. '_ . .-'.,. . --. .
<br />
<br />I
<br />"
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />!
<br />I
<br />j
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />!
<br />I
<br />
<br />3. DISCUSSION REGARDING fINANCING OF URBAN RENEWAL DEfiCIT': 'Ii WAS EXPLAiNED THAi'''
<br />THE URBAN RENEWAL APPLICATION SENT TO THE HOUSING AND HOME FINANCE AGENCY INDICATED
<br />A DEfiCIT TO BE PAID BY THE CITY_Of EUGENE IN THE SUM o.f,$'-60,0c50.00~-,'rHE-CI,T'y". ,:
<br />MAN~GER' EXPLA INED - THAT 'HE -HAD' REtE I \€I)JA,FHONECAl:.L fROM- THE' JiHFA,MAK I NG' I NQ..lil RY' AS TO '
<br />THE METHOD-IN ,WHICH THE-$160,OOO OEF.lCiT \"OULO.'SE. REPAID_AND'THAT HE--HAD-BEEN"RE'-',
<br />Q,UESTED TO 'REPLY .1:0 'THI'S LETTER. ' HE INDICATED HE WOULD S,TATE THAT 'AN 'ATTEMPT WOULD
<br />BE MADE TO BUDGET $40,000 PER - YEAR' F.'OR 'A FOUR, YEAR PER I OD .TO REPAY 'SUCH DEfI'C IT: O'R,
<br />f . _ . _ , .'. . _. .", ., .- . "" L ,
<br />If THIS WERE NOT POSSIBLE, THEN THE MATT~R WOULD BE PRESENTED TO ,THE PEOPLE FOR A
<br />BONDI SSUE. _ IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT -SUCH A LE,TTER BE 'SENT. MOT i,oN CARRIED WI'TH
<br />M~. LIN~EEN-VOTI~G NAY:' ,
<br />
<br />4. PERMANENT REPORT OF' THE .PLANNING COMMISSION, JANUARY 6, 1959:" _
<br />A. ZON I NG OF' NEWL Y ANNEXED AREAS - _THE' MATTER OF.' ZONI NG 'NEWL Y -ANIiIEXED 'AREAS 'WAS-'" ,
<br />BROUGHT BEfORE THE COMMITTEE, ,niESE AREAS I'NCL\JDiNGFLORAL HILL;"RivERVI'EW AREA,
<br />ELECTiON OCTOBER 28, '1958; 'Fox HOLL'ow AREA; ELECT"ON 'NOVEMBER 20, 'f95f3';SUNSET
<br />Row-LoRANE HIGHWAY AREA, ELECTION DECEMBER i6; 1958. 'IT "WAS INDiCATED THAT _IN
<br />EACH INSTANCE THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAD RECOMMENDED THE NEWLY ANNEXED AREAS'
<br />_, BE ZONED RA OUTER RES IDENT I AL. THE COMM I TTEE _RECOMMENDED THAT THE REPORT Of .
<br />'THE' PLANNING COMMiSSION ZON',NG- THESE- AR'EAS-'io'- RA'OUTER-'RESIDENTIAL' BE APPROVE'D.
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />B. REQUEST BY RICHAROB. HILL, 2790 PORTLAND STREET, .FOR' REZONING LOTS '19, 20', -21,
<br />22, BLOCK 19, fRASIER-HYLAND ADDITION, fROM_RAOUTER_RESIDENT.IAL ',ToR-3 MULTiPLE
<br />FAMILY - 'T WAS INDICATED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAD RECEIVED A REQUEST
<br />_fOR SUCH 'RE~ON lNG, ..TH,AT. ~HEY. HAD - CoONS II)EREOTHEMA!i'ER AND, HAD RECO~MENDEDTHAT
<br />THE REQUESTED CHANGE BE DENIEO. IT WAS fURTHER STATED THAT' A PETiT"O~ '~ADBEEN
<br />PRESENTED TO THE PLAN'NING"COMMISSI,ONSTATING THAT THE ADD!TIONAL TR-AfflC 'WHICH
<br />" WOULD -UNDOUBTEDLY BE ,CR'EAT'E'D,'BY,SlICH REZONING WOULD BE 'DETR'IMENTAL .TO 'THE i'N-"
<br />TERESTS Of, SURROUND i NGPROPERTY - .IOLDERS: ,THE ,COMM ITTEE CONS I DE'REO -THE MATTER,'
<br />AND 'RECOMMENDED THAT THE REPORT Of THEPLANNI'NG 'C'OMMISSION'DENYING THE PETITION
<br />, ~ . . I . '
<br />BE UPHELD.
<br />
<br />! "
<br />
<br />I
<br />:1
<br />II
<br />!!
<br />1
<br />i).
<br />
<br />I'
<br />.'
<br />
<br />!I
<br />
<br />!
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />-,
<br />, ..J ,.,
<br />
<br />I
<br />~,.J:
<br />
<br />I
<br />./
<br />II
<br />"
<br />
<br />e
<br />
|