Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />~ <br />441 <br /> <br />2/9/59 <br /> <br />--- - ~~--- ----- -_. ------------~ ------- -------- <br />------ ---- _.--------..- -~ -~--------~- ~---~._~- <br /> <br />-- - .----------- --_.~----- _.~ -- --_._--------~_. ~._-------------~------ <br />- ._~--~_.__..~~~-~._--_.-~~._~ ---...,-,.-----. --~~.~----------- - ----------- <br />- - <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />~r. <br />'I <br />I <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />~ <br />Ii <br />I! <br />'I <br />11 <br />"I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br /> <br />~I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />I) <br />I, <br />il <br />II <br />~ <br />II <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I <br />II <br />11 <br />Ii <br /> <br />-....- -..:---:-~~~=---. ~ <br />i <br /> <br />fOLLOWING SOME DISCUSSION WITH RESPECT TO THE REQUESTED SEWER SYSTEM, IT WAS MOVED BY <br />MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. MCGAFFEY' THAT' THE "ITEM BE HELD OVER AND THAT THE PROPERTY <br />HOLDERS WHO REQUEST THE SEWER FACILITY MEET. WITH THE PRivATE LINE HOLDERS AND THE CITY <br />ENGINEER AND BE AWARE OF THE FACT THAT THE CITY MAY HAVE TO INSTALL SEWERS IN THE AREA <br />IF THE SEWER SITUATION CANNOT BE WORKED OUT AMONG ALL CONCERNED. IT WAS ALSO INDI- <br />CATED THAT CERTAIN STREET OPENINGS ARE NECESSARY IN THIS AREA AND THAT THESE STREET <br />OPENINGS BE MADE A MATTER OF THE SAME MEETING. MOT'ION CARRIED. <br /> <br />12. REQUEST MADE BY ADRIAN W. VAALER FOR SEWER EASEMENT OVER PROPERTY FORECLOSED <br />FOR NON-PAYMENT OF PAVING ASSESSMENT - THE COMMITTEE CONSIDERED A REQUEST FROM <br />MR. VAALER THAT HE BE ALLOWED AN EASEMENT FOR A SEWER LINE OVER LOTS 8, 9 AND <br />10, BLOCK 5, ONYX PLAT, BEING PROPERTY ON WHICH THE CITY HAS FORECLOSED FOR <br />NON-PAYMENT Of PAVING ASSESSMENT. COMMITTEE REPRESENTATIVES DROVE TO THE SITE <br />OF THIS PRO~ERTY, NOTED IT IS LOCATED ON A HILLSIDE AND IN CONSIDERATrO~ OF THE <br />REQUESTED EASEMENT WERE Of THE OPINION THAT SUCH AN EASEMENT MAY WELL OPERATE <br />TO THE DETRIMENT OF THE PROPERTY WERE THE CITY TO SELL IT SINCE ANY POTENTIAL <br />P'URCHASER WOULD HAVE THIS'OBLIGATlON ON THE PROPERTY... fOR THIS REASON TT WAS <br />RECOMMENDED THAT THE REQUESTED EASEMENT BE DENIED. <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. LINDEEN THAT ITEM 12 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE <br />APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED 5-2. <br /> <br />13. PETITION CONCERNING SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE IN AREA BETWEEN 24TH AND 25TH AVENUES <br />AND HILYARD AND HARRIS STREETS - THIS SUBJECT WAS BROUGHT TO THE COMMITTEE ON <br />THE BASIS OF A PETITION SIGNED BY 19 FAMILIES RESIDING IN THE AREA BETWEEN 24TH <br />AND 25TH AVENUES AND BETWEEN HILYARD AND HARRIS StREETS ~N WHICH IT WAS, INDI- <br />CATED THAT A LARGE AMOUNT Of SURFACE WATER ACCUMULATES IN THIS AREA AND THE <br />STORM SEWER SYSTEM IS INADEQUATE TO CARRY IT AWAY. THE DIRECTOR Of PUBLIC WORKS <br />INDICATED THAT IN ORDER TO PROPERLY DRAIN THIS AREA A LINE WOULD HAVE TO BE CON- <br />STRUCTED FROM THE AREA IN GENERAL TO THE AMAZON. IT WAS SUGGESTED THAT THIS <br />I <br />SHOULD BE GIVEN STUDY,TO ,DETERMINE IF IT IS POSSIBLE_TO INCLUDE IT IN THE DRAINAGE <br />PLANS. IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT THE ITEM BE HELD OVER. <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS THAT ITEM 13 OF THE, COMMITTEE REPORT BE <br />APPROVED.' MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />AT THIS POINT COUNCILMAN SHEARER LEFT THE MEETING. <br /> <br />14. REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION OF A PORTION OF LAURELWOOD GOLf COURSE - A PETITION RE- <br />QUESTING THAT THE NORTHWESTERLY SECTION Of THE LAURELWOOD GOLf COURSE BE ANNEXED <br />TO THE CITy WAS RECEIVEjD,BY THE,COMMITTEE. IT: WAS INDICATED THIS PETfT.lON IN- <br />CLUDES TEN LOTS, AND THAT ALL BUT TWO Of THESE LOTS COULD.BE SERVED BY AN EXTEN- <br />SION OF THE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM, BUT THAT TWO OF THE LOTS COULD NOT <br />BE SERVED BY THE SEWER SYSTEM AS IT, EXISTS,.AT THIS TIME. COMMITTEE REPRESENTA- <br />TIVES OBSERVED THE SITE OF THE, PROPOSED ANNEXATION AND fOLLOWING SOME DISCUSSION <br />IN THE MEETING IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT THE PETITION FOR ANNEXATION BE ACCEPTED <br />UNDER EXISTING LIMITATIONS FOR SAN1TARY SEWERS. <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. MOLHOLM SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS'THAT ITEM, 14 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE <br />APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />15. COUNCIL PRESIDENT SHEARER STATED HE HAD TALKED WITH OTHER MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL <br />AND WAS OF THE FEELING THAT ONE OR MORE MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL ARE FRUSTRATED IN <br />GETTING THEIR IDEAS ACROSS, AND HE HAS A FEELING THAT PAST ACTIONS OF THE COUNCIL <br />WERE ALL WRONG. TH I S HAS BEEN, MADE APPARENT BY CONSIDERABLE TIME BE I NG, SPENT ON <br />POST MORTEMSWHICH RESULT IN DELAYS TO WORK BEING' DONE BV THE COUNCIL AT THE <br />PRESENT TIME. HE THEN SUGGESTED THAT EACH COUNCILMAN PREPARE A REPORT STATING <br />,HIS IDEAS AND PHILOSOPHY, ANY PROGRAMS OR PROJECTS, WHICH HE MIGHT WISH TO SUG- <br />GEST TOGETHER WITH THE MEANS, OR METHODS OF FINANCING SUCH PROJECTS, AND THAT <br />THESE REPORTS BE MADE AVAILABLE TO. THE COUNCIL WITH1N THE NEXT 30 DAYS, FOR THE <br />COUNCIL'S CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE BUDGETARY CONSIDERATION." <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. LINDEEN SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOLM THAT ITEM 15 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT <br />BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />f <br />, <br />\ <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />1. <br />