02/24/1959 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

e 451~ ._--~_.- -. --- ------------.- -~--- ----.- ... ---------- ---- -- -~-----_.,---- -- ----- -----------------~-~~~_. --~- ~----- --'- -~ ~ ---- - -- ---- -~------------ --- _._- -'. -- 2/24/59 I I I I i II 1 I I I I i I e I I I I 1 I I " I I I I '! I I 'I Ii 1'1 ! ! j I I i , j " I I , I 1 ! , I I I ,! i i , e I )1 I I ! ,I ! il , ,I I I I 1 ) t ij i I ,J Ij " II Ii II " " e C. PAVING or GARrlELD STREET rROM 5TH TO 7TH'AvENUE - IN THIS INSTANCE THE ORIGINAL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT GARrlELD STREET TO 7TH AVENUE WHICH HAS NOT YET BEEN ACCOMPLISHED. RECOMMENDATION THIS CARRIED THE PAVING TO THE NORTH COMMITTEE I~ THIS INSTANCE rELT THAT THIS SHOULD ~E iST AVENUE: OR TO THE: PRESENT NORTH CITY LIMITS. . BE PAVED rROM 5TH AT THE TIME or THIS CITY LIMITS. THE EXTENDED TO AT LEAST D. PAVING or CHAMBERS STREET rROM 18TH TO 24TH AVENUE - THIS AGAIN IS ONE or THE PROJECTS WHICH HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED BUT. WHICH IS ANTICIPATED TO' BE BUDGETED lN THE 1959-60 rlSCAL YEAR AT A~ ESTIMATED COST TO THE CITY or $24,000 SINCE ONE SIDE ABUTS UPON THE PARK-AIRE SUBDIVISION IN CITY OWNERSHIP, AND THIS CAN BE EXPECTED TO BE COMPL~TED WITHIN THE TEN YEAR PROGRAM. E. 24TH AVENUE rROM JErFERSON TO TYLER STREET - THIS AGAIN IS ANOTHER PROJECT WHICH HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED AS or THIS DATE. THE CITY'S COST IN THIS INSTANCE PAST PARK PROPERTY WOULD BE APPROXIMATELY $35,000. IT WAS ALSO' EXPLAINtD THAT AT THE PRESENT TIME THE PAVING OF 25TH AVENUE AND ITS ,EXTENSION FROM CHAMBERS STREET TO 29TH AVENUE IS BEING CONSIDERED WHICH IS A PART OF THE OVERALL CHAMBERS STREET, 25TH TO 29TH AVENUE AND BLOOM- 'BERG ROAD PROJECT. r. PAVING or PEARL STREET rROM 19TH TO 24TH AVENUE - THIS ITEM WAS ORIGINALLY BUDGETED IN THE 1958-59 rlSCAL YEAR BUT WAS REMOVED FROM. THE BUDGET BY THE BUDGET COMMITTEE. IT WAS rURTHER EXPLAINED THAT THE CITY'S COST IN THIS INSTANCE WOULD BE APPROXIMATELY $35,500" or WHICH ONE-HALr COULD BE SAVED Ir THE PROJECT WERE" PUT orr UNTIL 1962 WHEN BY AGREEMENT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT COULD BE ASSESSED. G. EXTENSION OF 30TH AVENUE rROM ALDER STREET TO BETWEEN ONYX AND AGATE' STREETS CONNECTING WITH BLOOMBERG ROAD - AGAIN IT WAS INDICATED THAT THIS IS A NECESSARY CONNECTION TO CONNECT THE CITY'S ARTERIAL SYSTEM TO THE PROPOSED COUNTY ROAD WHICH WOULD IN TURN CONNECT WITH HIGHWAY 99 SOUTH." IT WAS MOVED BY MRS. LAURIS SECONDED BY MR. CHATT THAT ALL OF ITEM 6 OF THE REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE BE REFERRED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION' TO BE" REVISED IN LIGHT or THE PRESENT DAY SITUATION. MOTION CARRIED. A REPORT or THE COMMITTEE'MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 20, '1959 WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS: "PRESENT: COUNCILMEN'LAURIS, LrNDEEN, MOLHOLM, McGArrEY, CHATT AND WILSON; CITY MANAGERj CITY RECORDER; CITY ATTORNEY; DIRECTOR OF PUBL.IC WORKS; ADMINI- 'STRATIVE ASSISTANT; PARKS &~ RECREATION SUPER I NTENDENTr CITY LIBRARIAN; LIBRARY BOARD MEMBERS LEMON, ATKINSON AND CAMPBELL; MR. CRAMERj FRED BRENNE, EUGENE CHAMBER or COMMERCEj DAN WYANT, EUGENE REGISTER-GUARD; WENDY RAY, KUGN. I. A TELEGRAM rROM THE TRIANGLE CONDUIT & CABLE CO., INC., PLASTIC PIPE DIVISION, WAS 'RE~D TO THE COMMITTEE. ' THE TELEGRAM CON'CERNED THE LIBRARy'SPRINKLING SYSTEM AND STATED "WE ARE SENDING DATA WHICH-WE FEEL WILL CONVINCE YOU KRALASTIC SEMI-RIGID PIPE MEETS SPECifiCATION AND IS EQUAL IN EVERY RESPECT TO POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE rOR THIS SYSTEM". IT WAS INDICATED THAT TO DATE THE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE HAD NOT RECEIVED THE INFORMATION REFERRED TO IN THE ~ELEGRAM. No ACT I ON WAS' TAKEN ON ITEM lor' THE REPORT or THE COMM I TTEE. 2. REQ'UEST FOR 'INCREASE IN GARBAGE RATES BY SANITARY LOCAL DRIVERS No. 57 - THIS ITEM WAS NOT BROUGHT TO THE COMMITTEE fOR ACTION BUT A RESUME OF THE PRESENT RATE AND REQUESTED RATE WAS GIVEN TO THE COMMITTEEFfjOR THEIR THOUGHT AND FOR FUTURE ACTION. IT WAS MOVED BY MRS. LAURIS SECONDED BY MR. CHATT THAT ITEM 2 OF THE REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE BEl APPROVED. Mon ON CARR I ED. 3. REQUEST rOR EXTENSION Of PAV'ING ON 32ND AVENUE rROM UNIVERSITY STREET TO ONYX STREET AND REQUEST FOR STORM SEWER - I.T WAS STATED A PET I T ION HAD BEEN "RE- . CEIVED CONTAINING SIGNATURES or OWNERS OF 74.539% Of THE TOTAL rRONT FOOTAGE Of PROPERTY TO BE ASSESSED. WITH THIS PETITION IT WAS FURTHER REQUESTED THAT THE 'STORM SEWER BE EXTENDED 'FROM THE R't:AR 'OF-BLOCK B, MIL TON-RE I 0 ADD I T ION, TO THE REAR Of" BL.OCK' 9 -fN T.HE' PROPOSED 4TH ADDITION TO KNOB Hlu:. ON QUESTION THE DfREC"TOR OF PUSL'le WORK'S fNDICATED'THAT THISE.XTENSIDN TO TH:: STORM SEWER WOULD COST BETWE'EN '$2000 AND. $3000. THE' COMM I TTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THe' ST.REeT BE PAVED' AND' THE- STO'RM SEWER BE I NSTAllED "AS REQUESTED AND THAT THE NECESSARY ORDINANCES INITIATING THE STRE~T PAVING PRO~ECT B~ PASSED. ( I I I I. I I I I 1\ \1 ~