Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />,- , <br />,j <br />~l <br />'I <br />!j <br />~I <br />t': <br />,I <br />" <br />I <br />[,\ <br />I <br />r' <br />:i <br />I <br />~l <br />:1 <br />'I <br />" <br />II <br />I <br />[I <br />'I <br />';1 <br />" <br />I <br />,[ <br />': <br />, <br />'I <br />'i <br /> <br />00 <br />(.\1> <br />~ <br />C;:r <br />.....~I~ <br />i....J~~ <br />CC <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />.' <br />" <br />" <br />:' <br />.' <br /> <br />tl <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />, <br />" <br />;1 <br />,I <br />:1 <br />" <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />" <br />'[ <br />,I <br /> <br />;! <br /> <br />., <br />~ : <br /> <br />,I <br /> <br />, <br />:; <br />I <br />" <br />~ ' <br />)1 <br />(I <br />i <br />" <br />.) <br />:1 <br />:1 <br /> <br />.1 <br />.1 <br />1 <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />ij <br />'I <br />! <br /> <br />i <br />;',1 <br /> <br />'i <br />" <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />" <br />" <br />'! <br />.1 <br />.;l <br />'" <br />" <br />,I <br />~ I <br />'! <br />t: <br />~ I <br />'i <br />Ii <br /> <br />;, <br />i! <br />'i <br />:i <br />. :1 <br /> <br />:i <br />II <br />J <br />:I <br />'I <br />~I <br />'I <br />"I <br />" <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />'I <br />'I' <br />II <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />il <br />i <br />'I <br />iI <br />;! <br />I <br />1:1 <br />" <br />" <br />, ,I <br />" <br />" <br />i <br /> <br />4/27/59 <br /> <br />;'l' <br /><:.") <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />THE PROBLEM Of MAINTAINING A PURE WATER SUPPLY AND IS NOW SUPER-CHLORINATING. HE <br />fURTHER STATED THAT IF THE MEANS Of REMOVING CHLORINE fROM THE WATER SUPPLY HAD <br />BEEN AVAILABLE WHEN SUPER-CHLORINATION BEGAN, THEY WOULD NOT BE ,CONCERNED WITH <br />THE CHLORINE PROBLEM AS IT NOW STANDS. <br /> <br />HE INDICATED THE PRESENT CHLORINE DOSE IS MORE THAN ADEQUATE TO KJLL THE VIRUS <br />Of THE MOST RESISTANT HEPATITIS, AND A SYSTEM Of CHLORINATION HAS BEEN DEVELOPED <br />WHICH IS MANY TIMES OVER THE, REQUIRED DOSAGE. THEY NOW PROPOSE AFTER THE <br />CHLORINATION HAS BEEN ACCOMPLISHED TO RETURN THE CHLORINE LEVEL TO A PALATABLE <br />STAGE. <br /> <br />IN RESPONSE TO SOME SPECifiC QUESTIONS ASKED BY MEMBERS Of THE COMMITTEE, MR.PRICE <br />INDICATED THE BACTERIA COUNT fOR THE PAST fiVE YEARS HAS BEEN SPOTTED AND THAT <br />IT SHOWED A RAPID INCREASE IN THE PERSISTENCE OF BACTERIA AND THE TIME REQUIRED <br />TO EffECTIVELY KILL SUCH BACTERIA, BUT THAT THE LEVEL Of THE COUNTY AVERAGE HAS <br />NOT CHANGED MATERIALLY. WITH RESPECT TO THE COST OF CHLORINATION HE STATED THAT <br />$10,918.00 HAD BEEN SPENT OVER A PERIOD Of fiVE YEARS, ENDING IN 1958, AND THAT <br />THIS COST HAS DROPPED DUE TO AN ARRANGEMENT WITH THE CITY Of EUGENE fOR LARGER <br />PURCHASES Of CHLORINE. <br /> <br />WITH REGARD TO THE COST Of THE CHLORINE REMOVAL EQUIPMENT SO THAT .2 PARTS PER <br />MILLION Of CHLORINE WILL BE RETAINED, THE EQUIPMENT WILL COST FROM $10,000.00 <br />TO $13,000.00 AND THE OPERATIONAL COST Of THE EQUIPMENT WILL APPROXIMATE $780.00 <br />PER YEAR. <br /> <br />A REPORT or THE COST Of THE EXTENSION Of THE WATER SYSTEM UPSTREAM WAS MADE AND <br />MR. PRICE STATED THAT TO GO TO THE OLD INTAKE WOULD COST APPROXIMATELY 1-1/2 <br />MILLION DOLLARS, TO GO TO WALTERVILLE BY PIPE, $2,880,000, AND THAT AN INVESTI- <br />GATION IS CURRENTLY BEING MADE TOWARD THE DEVELOPMENT Of A POWER P~TENTIAL AT <br />HAYDEN BRIDGE WHICH WOULD BRING WATER FROM UPSTREAM BY CANAL DOWN TO HAYDEN <br />BRIDGE AND WOULD ALLOW A POSSIBLE GREATER CONTROL Of THE BASIC WATER SOURCE. <br /> <br />IT WAS FURTHER INDICATED THAT AT THE PRESENT TIME THE SURfACE WATER EfFLUENT <br />WHICH HAD BEEN FOUND ABOVE THE EXISTING INTAKE IS BEING DIVERTED INTO THE <br />WEYERHAEUSER OUTFALL LINE AND THAT THIS PRESENTS NO PROBLEM AT THE PRESENT <br />TIME ALTHOUGH WORK IS CONTINUING TO ALLEVIATE THE SITUATION ON A MORE PERMA- <br />NENT BASIS. <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. CHATT THAT ITEM 3 Of THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE <br />APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />4. PRESENTATION Of PLANS AND SPECifiCATIONS fOR TRICKLING fiLTER AT SEWAGE TREAT- <br />MENT PLANT BY RALPH RODERICK OF CORNELLJ HOWLAND, HAYES & MERRYfiELD - MR.RoDERICK <br />APPEARED BEfORE THE COMMITTEE TO DISCUSS THE PLANS AND SPECifiCATIONS fOR THE <br />TRICKLING fiLTER ADDITION TO THE SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT. HE STATED THAT THE <br />BASIC REASON fOR THE CONSTRUCTION Of THIS TRICKLING fiLTER WAS THE LARGE AMOUNT <br />OF INDUSTRIAL WASTE WITH HIGH CHLORINE DEMAND COMING TO THE PLANT WHICH MADE IT <br />NECESSARY TO ADD A BIOCHEMICAL PROCESS. To GIVE A PROPER ANALYSIS fOR THE CON- <br />STRUCTION Of THIS TRICKLING fiLTER, A PILOT PLANT TO AID IN PLANNING WAS BUILT <br />AND OPERATED IN THE SUMMER Of 1958, AND THE TRICKLING fiLTER DESIGN IS PLANNED <br />AS A MEANS OF REDUCING BACTERIA fOLLOWED BY A CONTACT CHLORINE BASIN WITH A fiLTER <br />DESIGNED TO REDUCE BY 85% THE OXYGEN DEMAND AS REQUIRED BY THE STATE. HE FURTHER <br />STATED THEY ALSO PROPOSE CONVERSION Of THE EXISTING DIGESTERS TO INCREASE CAPACITY <br />AND THE ADDITION Of A DEWATERING PROCESS FOR SLUDGE. <br /> <br />IT WAS MR. RODERICK'S ANALYSI~ THAT THESE ADDITIONS WILL MAKE THE PLANT ~VAILABLE <br />TO 75,000';TO 80,000 PEOPLE PLUS INDUSTRIAL WASTES WHILE AT PRESENT IT IS AVAIL- <br />ABLE TO 50~OOO PEOPLE PLUS INDUSTRIAL WASTES. <br /> <br />FOLLOWdNG THIS SOME GENERAL QUESTIONS WERE ASKED OF MR. RODERICK AS THEY RESPECT <br />THE OVERALL SEWER PROBLEM IN EUGENE. IN MR. RODERICK~S REPLIES HE INDICATED <br />THE BASIC PROBLEM EUGENE HAS IS IN ITS COLLECTION SYSTEM. HE fURTHER STATED <br />THAT wE WILL HAVE TO SEPARATE OUR STORM AND SANITARY SEWERS AND ,THAT WE MUST <br />BEGIN fACING THE SANITARY SEWAGE PROBLEM NOW, ESPECIALLY AS THE INTERCEPTORS <br />ARE CURRENTLY DESIGNED ON A COMBINATION BASIS. <br /> <br />IN REPLY TO A QUESTION MR. RODERICK STATED THAT THE EXISTING SEWAGE DISPOSAL <br />PLANT IS SO CONSTRUCTED THAT WITH ADDITIONS TO POPULATION IT NEED NOT BE <br />COMPLETELY REBUILT BUT ONLY NEEDS ADDITIONS. <br /> <br />AGAIN IN REPLY TO SPECifiC QUESTIONS, MR. RODERICK STATED THAT A STORM SEWER <br />SYSTEM CANNOT BE DESIGNED TO SERVE MASIMUM RAINfALL AS OCCURRED IN EUGENE <br />IN JANUARY 1959. <br /> <br />IT WAS STATED THAT THE CITY OF CORVALLIS HAS RECENTLY COMPLETED A STUDY TO <br />SERVE A CONSIDERABLE AREA AROUND THE PRESENT CITY AND TO SEPARATE THE COM- <br />BINATION SYSTEM IN THE,CITY, AND THE ESTIMATED COST Of THIS IS 2-1/2 MILLION <br />DOLLARS TO BE SPENT OVER A PERIOD OF 15 YEARS. <br /> <br />:1 <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />,I <br />I: <br />;1 <br />I <br />11 <br />:1 <br />'I <br />11 <br />II <br />II <br />" <br />II <br />,I <br />II <br />,I <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />11 <br />il <br />,I <br />Ii <br />II <br />:1 <br /> <br />:1 <br />I' <br />II <br />II <br />I' <br /> <br />, <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I' <br />I, <br />'I <br />II <br />,i <br />" <br />'I <br />r <br />i <br />I' <br />II <br />'I <br />II <br />Ii <br />:j <br />\1 <br />" <br />!I <br />'I <br />I. <br />'I <br /> <br />II <br />I, <br />II <br />I, <br />,I <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />~ I <br />!I <br /> <br />I- <br /> <br />II <br />\1 <br />II <br />IJ <br />Ii <br />II <br />'I <br />II <br />II <br />:1 <br />~ I <br />il <br />I' <br />II <br />I <br />I, <br />Ii <br />I <br />Ii <br />" <br />;1 <br /> <br />" <br />Ii, <br /> <br />" <br />., <br />il <br />'I <br />II <br />I, <br />,I <br />!I <br />i! <br /> <br />~ <br />