Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />4/27/59 <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. MOLHOLM SECONDED BY MR. WILSON THAT THE COUNCIL'S ACTION <br />Of APRIL 13, 1959 BE RESCINDED. IT WAS THEN MOVED BY MR. LINDEEN SECONDED <br />BY MR. MCGAffEY THAT THIS MATTER BE TABLED UNTIL THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING, <br />APRIL 27, 1959. ON VOTE ON THE MOTION TO TABLE, THE MOTION WAS DEFEATED 5-3. <br />A VOTE WAS THEN TAKEN ON THE MOTION TO RESCIND THE ACTION OF THE COUNCIL AND <br />THIS MOTION WAS DEfEATED 4-4. <br /> <br />/1 <br />II <br />ii <br />p <br />1[ <br />I, <br />ii <br />:1 <br />I' <br />,I <br />,II <br />It <br />I, <br />II <br />I <br />I, <br />!i <br />II <br />i <br />Ii <br />Ii <br />II <br />I! <br />'! <br />:i <br />I, <br />il <br />!i <br />!I <br />Ii <br />" <br />" <br />" <br />1i <br />Ii <br />'I <br />I' <br />II <br />I' <br />I <br />I <br />, <br />i <br />i <br />J <br />I <br />" <br />II <br />I' <br />)' <br />11 <br />il <br />Ii <br />II <br />:, <br />il <br />!I <br />II <br />I, <br />II <br />'I <br />II <br />I <br />II <br />Ii <br />II <br />Ii <br />II <br />!: <br />'I <br />!I <br />!: <br />!I <br />I, <br />,I <br />)' <br />I <br />Ii <br />il <br />Ii <br />:1 <br />I; <br />I: <br />I' <br />\1 <br />'\ <br />II <br />\1 <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />l~ <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Fi <br />\1 <br />~l <br />;'1 <br />,J <br />',\ <br />I, <br /> <br />MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION, OF WHICH HE IS ONE, WERE REFERRED TO AS DOING THE BIDDING <br />Of THE UNIVERSITY. HE SAID HE DID NOT BELIEVE THIS CEMETERY SITUATION IS STRICTLY <br />A UNIVERSITY PROBLEM BUT IS A COMMUNITY PROBLEM AND A ENIGHBORHOOD PROBLEM, BUT <br />THAT If THE DIRECTORS WERE DOING THE BIDDING OF THE UNIVERSITY, HE WOULD BE PROUD <br />BECAUSE OF THE POSITION THE UNIVERSITY HA~ IN THE COMMUNITY BOTH CULTURALLY AND <br />ECONOMICALLY. MR. EDMUNDS ALSO STATED THAT THEY HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO GET <br />APPROVAL OF THE VARIOUS VETERANS' ORGANIZATIONS AND OTHER GROUPS BECAUSE OF THE <br />NATURE Of THE MATTER BEING DISCUSSED, BUT THAT HE fELT THE PROGRAM OF REINTER- <br />MENT EITHER AT THE PRESENT SITE IN A REDUCED AREA OR AT ANOTHER SITE IS WORTH <br />WHILE, AND THE PROGRAM BEING CONSIDERED IS THE ONLY ONE WHICH HAS MADE PROGRESS <br />AND IS FELT TO BE PRACTICAL AND BENEfiCIAL. <br /> <br />00 <br />N' <br />~. , <br />(,)! <br />F"1-' <br />....... <br />CO' <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />" <br />, <br /> <br />DR. EARL PALLETT APPEARED BEFORE THE COMMITTEE AND STATED THAT THE UNIVERSITY <br />AND THE OREGON STATE BOARD Of HIGHER EDUCATION WAS SURPRISED AT THE COUNCIL'S <br />ACTION. HE ALSO INDICATED THE PIONEER MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION HAS A PROGRAM <br />BENEFICIAL TO THE UNIVERSITY, TO THE CITY, TO THE PIONEER MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION <br />AND TO THE STATE BOARD OF HIGHER EDUCATION WHO IS INTERESTED IN THE SITUATION. <br />HE EXPOUNDED THE, THESIS THAT EUGENE IS A RAPIDLY GROWING COMMUNITY AND THAT <br />THE UNIVERSITY WILL GROW ALONG WITH THE COMMUNITY, AND IN TEN TO FifTEEN YEARS <br />THE UNIVERSITY EXPECTS AN ENROLLMENT OF 10,000 TO 12,000 STUDENTS. BECAUSE Of <br />THIS POTENTIAL ENROLLMENT, THE UNIVERSITY IS CONCERNED WITH LAND ACQUISITION <br />AND TH I S AREA I S ONE Of THE MOST HAS I BLE fOR UN I VERS I TY EXPANS I ON /!"ROM/:ASCOST <br />SWANOPOINT. UNDER THE ARRANGEMENT WHICH IS CONTEMPLATED IF THIS PROPERTY IS <br />ACQUIRED THE OREGON STATE BOARD Of HIGHER EDUCATION WOULD PARTICIPATE IN THE <br />COST OF REINTERMENT Of THOSE BODIES BURIED IN THE CEMETERY. <br /> <br />;1 <br /> <br />" <br />.' <br />,! <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />,I <br />I <br />;! <br /> <br />'! <br /> <br />DR. PALLETT ALSO STATED THAT THE ONLY THING SB 304 WOULD ALLOW THE COUNCIL <br />TO DO WOULD BE TO PROHIBIT BURIALS IN THE CEMETERY; THESE BURIALS HAVE BEEN <br />LIMITED IN THE PAST YEARS. <br /> <br />': <br />'I <br />,Ii <br /> <br />MR. JOHN LUVAAS THEN SPOKE TO THE COMMITTEE. HE INDICATED HE WAS DISAPPOINTED <br />IN THE COUNCIL'S ACTION AND FURTHER STATED THAT IN 1943 AT THE REQUEST OF THE <br />COUNCIL HE SPENT A MONTH BRIEfiNG THE STATUS OF THE CEMETERY ASSOCIATION AS <br />THEN EXISTED. MR. LUVAASSTA'iTED THAT AFTER EXTENSIVE RESEARCH THE PIONEER <br />MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION BELIEVES THERE ARE 4000 BODIES BURIED IN THE CEMETERY; <br />OF THESE 4000 THEY HAVE THE NAMES OF 1,986 BUT DO NOT KNOW WHERE THE REMAINDER <br />ARE BURIED AND IT IS POSSIBLE THERE IS A TOTAL OF 6000 BURIED IN THE CEMETERY. <br />HE fURTHER STATED THAT THE CEMETERY HAS BEEN IN A STATE Of DISREPAIR FOR SOME <br />TIME AND IS DANGEROUS TO THE ~ORALS AND MORALE Of STUDENTS AT THE UNIVERSITY. <br /> <br />WITH REGARD TO THE PROGRAM OUTLINED BY SB 304, IT WOULD TAKE A LONG PERIOD TO <br />COMPLETE AND THE MAJOR,OPPOSITION IS fROM WIDOWS AND SPOUSES OF THOSE BURIED <br />IN THE CEMETERY WHO THEMSELVES WISH TO BE BURIED ALONGSIDE THEIR LOVED ONES. <br /> <br />fOLLOWING THESE STATEMENTS THERE WAS A CONSIDERABLE AMOUNT OF DISCUSSION fROM <br />MEMBERS Of THE COMMITTEE WITH REGARD TO THE ACTION TAKEN AT THE COUNCIL MEET- <br />ING ON APRIL 13, 1959 TO OPPOSE THE PASSAGE OF SB 304. ALSO DISCUSSION WAS <br />HAD AS TO THE PLANS Of BOTH THE GROUPS COMPETING FOR CONTROL OF THE CEMETERY <br />AND WHAT THE PROPOSAL WOULD BE IF THE PLANS TO BE INTUATEO BY SB 304 WERE <br />STARTED. IN THIS DISCUSSION, IT WAS REITERATED THAT SB 304 WOULD ALLOW THE <br />COUNCIL TO STOP BURIALS ONLY. IT WAS ALSO POINTED OUT THAT THIS COULD BE <br />ACCOMPLISHED UNDER EXISTING LAW PROVIDING NO BURIALS HAD BEEN MADE fOR A <br />PERIOD or riVE YEARS, BUT THAT A LIMITED NUMBER OF BURIALS WERE MADE EACH <br />YEAR WHICH MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO USE THIS PARTICULAR SECTION OF THE LAW. <br />THE PROPOSAL NOW IS FOR A PERPETUAL CARE ARRANGEMENT WHERE THESE BODIES ARE <br />REINTERRED. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />i <br /> <br />'I <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. MOLHOLM SECONDED BY MR. WILSON THAT THE COUNCIL RECONSIDER ACTION WITH <br />RESPECT TO SB 304 TAKEN AT THEIR MEETING Of APRIL 13, 1959. <br /> <br />I <br />1,/ <br />, <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. LINDEEN SECONDED BY MR. MOYER THAT THE MATTER BE TABLED. MOTION CARRIED <br />4-3, MR. SHEARER ABSTAINING. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />:, <br />:, <br />'J <br />, <br />, <br />" <br /> <br />8. PERMANENT REPORT Of THE PLANNING COMMISSION - APRIL 7, 1959 <br />A. REQUEST BY JOHN SCOFIELD TO REZONE R-2 TO R-3 AREA BOUNDED ON THE NORTH <br />BY 14TH AVENUE, ON THE SOUTH BY AMAZON SLOUGH, ON THE EAST BY OLIVE STREET <br />AND ON THE WEST BY LINCOLN STREET - THE REQUESTED REZONING WAS CONSIDERED <br />BY THE PLANNING COMM1SS$ON AND IT WAS THEIR RECOMMENDATION THAT THE RE- <br />QUEST BE GRANTED. COMMITTEE MEMBERS VIEWED THE AREA AND RECOMMENDED THAT <br />THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION BE UPHELO GRANTING THE REQUESTED REZONING." <br /> <br />I , <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />;1 <br />:i <br />I <br />I <br />~I <br />" <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. CHATT ~HAT ITEM 8A OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE <br />APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />I <br />