Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />, - <br />~ . - - - -. - <br />---_._-- <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />00 <br />, C-J <br />~ <br />C,,) <br />CO <br />CO <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />e <br /> <br /> ,.--- - - <br /> ~l <br /> ~l <br /> f <br /> ~. <br /> "~I <br /> , <br /> :! <br /> .' <br /> ,I <br /> ;1 <br /> '1 <br /> ~ i <br /> :1 <br /> :\ <br /> '1 <br /> I <br /> " <br /> " <br /> :1 <br /> Ii <br /> I <br /> (, <br /> , <br /> .1 <br /> :I <br /> " <br /> n <br /> '" <br /> il <br /> ~ I <br /> .1 <br /> I <br /> .' <br /> II <br /> d <br /> q <br />2 \1 <br />;, <br /> " <br /> 'I <br /> I <br /> q <br /> ;1 <br /> :1 <br /> :, <br /> 'I <br /> I <br /> ;'1 <br /> 1 <br /> ,I <br /> :i <br /> .; <br /> i <br /> ~ ~ <br /> ~I <br />3 fl <br /> '1 <br /> ;1 <br /> / <br /> Ij <br /> I <br /> I <br /> .1 <br /> , <br /> r; <br /> ~I <br /> :! <br /> , <br /> I <br /> lj <br /> ~! <br /> I <br /> :,1 <br /> .'1 <br /> ~! <br /> " <br /> r' <br /> ,I <br /> \ <br />4 ,I <br />:! <br /> ;1 <br /> " <br /> :1 <br /> ;i <br /> :1 <br /> ;.j <br /> <br />~j <br />~I <br />u <br />;1 <br />"I <br />I, <br />'I <br />;1 <br /> <br />" <br />" <br />J <br />II <br />~ :1 <br />, <br />,) <br />II <br />'! <br />if <br /> <br />" <br />I <br />'I <br />I; <br /> <br />6/8/5?_ <br /> <br />{"g' ~ <br />o <br /> <br />~ ,.-_. : <br /> <br />10. CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST TO ACCEPT RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR STORM AND SANITARY SEWER <br />ACROSS JACKSON B. HINDS PROPERTY BETWEEN 26TH AND 28TH AVENUES ON THE WEST <br />SIDE Of EMERALD STREET - IT WAS INDICATED THAT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT <br />HAD BEEN NEGOTIATING WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS BETWEEN 26TH AND 28TH AVENUES <br />ON THE WEST SIDE OF EMERALD STREET FOR RIGHT-Of-WAY FOR STORM AND SANITARY <br />SEWERS AND THAT MR. AND MRS. HINDS HAVE AGREED THEY WILL GIVE THE CITY A <br />20' EASEMENT ACROSS THEIR PROPERTY FOR THE PURPOSE Of CONSTRUCTING A STORM <br />AND SANITARY SEWER PROVIDING NO ,ASSESSMENT OF ANY KIND IS MADE AGAINST MR. <br />AND MRS. HINDS. IT WAS THE CONTENTION Of THE HINDS' ATTORNEY THAT CONSIDER- <br />ABLE DAMAGE TO THE REMAINING LAND WOULD BE HAD BY VIRTUE OF THE CONSTRUCTION <br />, ,- <br />Of THE SEWER LINES AND, FURTHER, THEY WERE NOT WILLING TO CONCEDE THAT A <br />NECESSITY EXISTS fOR THE SEWERS. <br /> <br />THE COMMITTEE CONSIDERED THIS REQUEST AND RECOMMENDED THAT THE REQUEST BE <br />DENIED, THAT NEGOTIATIONS BE CONTINUED AND CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS BE IN- <br />STITUTED IF NECESSARY. <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. CHATT THAT ITEM 10 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE <br />APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />I I. STUDY Of POSSIBILITY Of OBTAINING ADDITIONAL REVENUE FROM THE EUGENE WATER <br />& ELECTRIC BOARD, POSSIBILITY OF CHANGING METERED RATE TO fLAT RATE FOR <br />TRAFfiC SIGNAL ENERGY CHARGE, AND REMOVAL OF DEMAND CHARGE FOR LIGHTING <br />BASEBALL DIAMONDS - CONSIDERATION WAS GIVEN TO THESE VARIOUS ITEMS WHICH <br />HAVE BEEN ADVANCED fROM TIME TO TIME, AND fOLLOWING A GENERAL DISCUSSION ON <br />THESE ITEMS, IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT THE CITY NEGOTIATE WITH THE EUGENE <br />WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD TOWARD THE REMOVAL OF THE DEMAND CHARGE OR A DE- <br />CREASE IN THE DEMAND CHARGE FOR LIGHTING THE BASEBALL DIAMONDS AND TOWARD <br />THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A fLAT RATE fOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION. <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. CHATT THAT ITEM II OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE <br />APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />12. DISCUSSION REGARDING LOADING ZONES ON PARK STREETS - MAYOR CONE INDICATED <br />THAT SOME CITIZENS HAD APPROACHED HIM AS TO WHY IT IS NECESSARY TO HAVE SO <br />MANY NON-METERED LOADING ZONES AROUND THE PARK BLOCK AREA. SOME DISCUSSION <br />WAS HAD ON THIS SUBJECT, AND IT WAS RECOMMENDED AN INVESTIGATION BE MADE AS <br />TO THE NUMBER AND NECESSITY Of SUCH LOADING ZONES AND THAT A RECOMMENDATION <br />BE MADE AS TO THE POSS I B I L I TY OF METER I NG THESE LOAD I NG ZONES." <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. CHATT THAT ITEM 12 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE <br />APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />A REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE MEETING HELD JUNE 4, 1959 WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS fOLLOWS: <br /> <br />"PRESENT: MAYOR CONEj COUNCILMEN SHEARER, LAURIS, MOLHOLM, MCGAFfEY, CHATT, MOYER <br />AND SWANSONj CITY MANAGER; DIRECTOR Of PUBLI CWORKSj CITY RECORDERj CITY <br />ENGINEER; CITY ATTORNEYj ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEERj ADMINISTRATIVE ASSIS- <br />TANT; CIVIL ENGINEER Illj MR. RALPH RODERICK OF CORNELL, HOWLAND, HAYES <br />& MERRYFIELDj DONN BONHAM AND DAN WYANT, EUGENE REGISTER-GUARD. <br /> <br />I. PRESENTATION Of COMPREHENSIVE STUDY Of EXISTING AND FUTURE SANITARY AND STORM <br />SEWER SYSTEMS BY THE DIRECTOR Of PUBLIC WORKS - THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS <br />OPENED THE MEETING BY EXPLAINING THE ORGANIZATION AND DUTIES Of THE PUBLIC <br />WORKS DEPARTMENT AND ITS VARIOUS DIVISIONS. <br /> <br />THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS THEN EXPLAINED THE COMPREHENSIVE STUDY Of EXIST- <br />ING AND fUTURE SANITARY AND STORM SEWER SYSTEM WHICH HAD BEEN MADE BY THE <br />PUBL I C WORKS DEPARTME,NT AND PRESENTED I N THE SPR I NG OF 1959. <br /> <br />HE EXPLAINED THAT THE SEWER SITUATION IN EUGENE HAS LONG BEEN Of CONCERN TO <br />THE ADMINISTRATION AND THAT WORK HAD BEEN ACCOMPLISHED ON THE EAST SIDE OF <br />THE CITY, AND THIS REPORT WHICH WAS PREPARED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT <br />EMBODIES A STUDY OVER A THREE MONTH PERIOD Of THE WEST SIDE OF THE CITY. IT <br />WAS FURTHER EXPLAINED THAT THE REPORT AS PRESENTED IS NOT AS COMPREHENSIVE <br />AS THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT WOULD LIKED TO HAVE ~D, BUT THEY DO HAVE <br />KNOWLEDGE Of THE TROUBLED AREAS AND KNOW WHERE THE PROBLEMS ARE AND fOR THIS <br />REASON fEEL THE REPORT IS VALID. <br /> <br />IT WAS rURTHER INDICATED THE DEPARTMENT HAD PRESENTED A NUMBER or POSSIBLE <br />STUDIES AND SOLUTIONS AND THAT THEY HAD DONE THIS PURPOSELY SO THAT THE <br />LOGICAL SOLUTIONS COULD BE CONSIDERED AND WOULD BE A MATTER Of RECORD. BASED <br />ON THE EXIST~NG SYSTEM AND THE riVE PROPOSALS WHICH HAD BEE~ MADE, EACH or <br />WHICH HAS ITS OWN DESIGN FEATURES, THE RECOMMENDATIONS BECOME MORE SELf- <br />EVIDENT WHEN A NUMBER OF STUDIES ARE MADE. <br /> <br />,I <br />II <br />!\ <br />II <br />II <br />1\ <br />Ii <br />II <br />I <br /> <br />II <br />I, <br />Ii <br />II <br />,i <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />[I <br />11 <br />'I <br />II <br />II <br />,I <br />II <br />!I <br />!' <br />1 <br />I <br />, <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />I <br />II <br />II <br />1/ <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I, <br />'I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />I, <br />II <br />'I <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />!I <br />II <br />II <br />Ii <br />!I <br />I <br />,I <br />il <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />II <br />il <br />11 <br />Ii <br /> <br />i\ <br />II <br />;1 <br />\1 <br />II <br /> <br />11.... <br />