Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> !'< ,..> ~ <br /> tjb <br />e <br /> 6/2?/59 <br /> - . . - --~ ---- <br /> -~------ <br /> .1 -- . <br /> I <br /> \ <br /> , <br />I I: <br /> , THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT SINCE THIS PROUECT IS SLATED FOR CONSTRUCTION I <br /> i <br /> II THIS SUMMER, AND SINCE MOST OF THE PROPERTY OF MRS. COLWELL HAS ALREADY RE- II <br /> ,I <br /> d CEIVED A SEWER ASSESSMENT, AND SINCE THE REMAINING PORTION OF THE PROPERTY II <br /> :1 <br /> WILL RECEIVE NO BENEFIT, MRS. COLWELL'S REQUEST FOR AN EXEMPTION FROM A CON- I! <br /> .'1 NECTION CHARGE BE ALLOWED SUBJECT TO THE CITY ATTORNEY'S APPROVAL. I, <br /> .. :1 <br /> ./ <br /> .1 :1 <br /> " <br /> :i IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. MCGAFFEY THAT ITEM 9 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT I, <br />00 :1 BE HELD FOR FURTHER REPORT. MOTION CARRIED. il <br />C\l J, <br />~ I <br /> I i 10. REQUEST BY SENIOR BUILDING INSPECTOR TO ENFORCE SECTION 11.36 OF EUGENE CITY <br />C) q Ii <br />r~ CODE ON LOT 2, BLOCK 5, ORIGINAL PLAT TO EUGENE, LOCATED AT 335 FERRY STREET - il <br />fY'\ iI PART OF THE COMMITTEE VIEWED THE STRUCTURE WHICH IS LOCATED AT 335 FERRY I, <br />....... il <br /> , STREET AND RECOMMENDED THAT THE PROPER CITY OFFICIALS PROCEED WITH ABATEMENT Ii <br /> ~ I OF NUISANCE PROCEEDINGS SINCE THE PROPERTY IS UNOCCUPIED AND IS IN A DE- d <br /> .j 'I <br /> 1 PLORABLE CONDITION. II <br /> , <br />e II II <br /> t: IT WAS MOVED BY MRS. LAURIS SECONDED BY MR~ CHATT THAT ITEM 10 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT <br /> :' MOTION CARRIED. <br /> 'I BE APPROVED. Ii <br /> 2 ;1 I I. REQUEST BY MARVIN PIQUET FOR CURB SIDEWALK ON 26TH AVENUE BETWEEN LAWRENCE <br /> I AND WASHINGTON STREETS - PART OF THE COMMITTEE VIEWED THE AREA OF THE PRO- 'I <br /> !, <br /> '., POSED CURB SIDEWALK AND RECOMMENDED THAT CURB SIDEWALK BE ALLOWED ON 26TH :1 <br /> II <br /> " AVENUE FROM LAWRENCE TO WASHINGTON STREET. tl <br /> i' <br />I 'i II <br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MRS. LAURIS SECONDED BY MR. CHATT THAT ITEM II OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT il <br /> 'I BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. II <br /> ,t <br /> :1 12. REQUEST FROM LANE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS FOR RECOMMENDATION ON VACA- <br /> 3 I <br /> :j TION OF STREET OUTSIDE CITY LIMITS IN COLLEGE CREST PLAT - THE CITY MANAGER i <br /> I <br /> , 1 <br /> ., ~EAD A LETTER FROM THE LANE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WHICH REQUESTED A RECOM- i <br /> i\ I <br /> I MENDATION FROM THE CITY COUNCIL IN THE MATTER OF THE VACATION OF A 20' WIDE <br /> , <br /> " ROADWAY ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 2 AND 3 IN THE PLAT OF COLLEGE CREST. II <br /> ,I <br /> I THE LETTER REQUESTED A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE COUNCIL SINCE THIS AREA MAY <br /> i <br /> , IN THE NEAR FUTURE BECOME A PART Of THE CITY OF EUGENE. THE COMMITTEE RECOM- il <br /> " <br /> r! <br /> MENDED APPROVAL OF THE REQUESTED VACATION SUBJECT TO RESERVATION FOR EASEMENT :i <br /> I' <br /> RIGHTS AS RECOMMENDED BY THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS AND THE PLANNING CON- il <br /> SULTANT." II <br /> I, <br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MRS. LAURIS SECONDED BY MR. CHATT THAT ITEM 12 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT :1 <br /> BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> !, <br /> :1 <br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MR. WILSON SECONDED BY MR. MCGAFFEY THAT A ROLLCALL Of VOTES CAST IN COMMITTEE JI <br /> MEETINGS BE SHOWN ON COMMITTEE REPORTS fOR EACH ITEM BEfORE THE COMMITTEE, ESPECIALLY IF THERE IS 'I <br /> A SPLIT VOTE. MOTION CARRIED. II <br /> I A REPORT OF T~E COMMITTEE MEETING HELD ~UNE 18, 1959 WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS: :1 <br /> 'i <br />I 'I "PRESENT: MAYOR CONE; COUNCILMEN SHEARER, LAURIS, MOLHOLM, MCGAFFEY AND MOYER; II <br /> ,. <br /> I <br /> I <br /> " CITY MANAGER; DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS; CITY RECORDER; CITY ATTORNEY; <br /> , I' <br /> .1 HENRY BEISTEL AND MR. RINARD, EUGENE WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD; RALPH II <br /> '.1 <br /> J RODERICK OF CORNELL, HOWLAND, HAYES & MERRYFIELD; To~ JAQUES, EUGENE II <br /> ., REGISTER-GUARD. :1 <br /> :i Ii <br /> I' <br /> 5 :! I. DISCUSSION Of REVJSED DRAFT OF ORDINANCE TO INCREASE WATER USER CHARGE ~THE II <br /> CITY ATTORNEY EXPLAINED THAT HE HAD REVISED THE INITIAL SECTIONS OF THE PRO- <br />e POSED ORDINANCE TO INCREASE THE WATER USER CHARGE. ONTTHE BASIS OF THIS RE- il <br /> VISED DRAFT, WATER USERS INSIDE THE CITY LIMITS WOULD PAY $2.00 PER MONTH <br /> FOR THE FIRST 1000 CUBIC FEET OF WATER WITH THE NEXT 4000 CUBIC FEET BEING <br /> AT THE RATE OF 10~ PER 100 CUBIC FEET AND ALL OVER 5000 CUBIC FEET AT THE II <br /> ,I <br /> RATE OF 6~ PER 100 CUBIC FEET, WITH BILLINGS TO BE DETERMINED ON THE BASIS II <br /> OF WATER USED IN THE MONTHS OF DECEMBER THROUGH MARCH JUST PREVIOUS. THE [I <br /> PROPOSED ORDINANCE ALSO EXCLUDES WATER WHICH DOES NOT REACH THE SEWER SYSTEM <br /> WHEN USED FOR COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRI~L PURPOSES. THOSE RislDENTS WHO RE- I: <br /> CEIVE WATER FROM THE CITY BUT WHO ARE OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS WOULD HAVE NO II <br /> CHANGE IN RATES FROM THOSE CURRENTLY IN EFFECT. [I <br /> ii FOLLOWING THE READING OF THE DRAFT THERE WAS CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSION WITH II <br /> " I, <br /> I <br /> I RESPECT TO CHARGES WHICH MIGHT BE LEVIED FOR SUCH INDUSTRIES AS lAUNDRIES II <br /> I <br /> 1 AND CREAMERIES, AND IT WAS ~EQUESTED THAT INFORMATION BE GAINED ON WHAT <br /> ,I I, <br /> THE PROPOSED CHARGE WOULD BE FOR THESE AND ANY EQUIVALENT INDUSTRIES. II <br /> " <br /> d 'I <br />I , II <br /> , THE QUESTION WAS ALSO RAISED AS TO THE PROCEDURES OR METHOD TO BE USED IN <br /> , II <br /> ;1 LEVYING WATER USER CHARGES ON HOTELS, MOTELS, NURSING HOMES, DORMITORIES I' <br /> ,I AND amBER NON-FAMILY WATER USERS. IT WAS SUGGESTED THAT THE TOTAL POPULA- II <br /> 'j <br /> "' <br /> 't T ION OF THE ABOVE L I V I NG AREAS M I'GHT BE CONVERTED TO FAM I L Y UN I TS ON THE ! <br /> II BASIS OF 3.7 'PERSONS PER FAMILY UNIT. SOME CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSION WAS 1 <br /> (, \ <br /> :1 HAD ON THIS, AND A NEW IDEA WAS BROUGHT FORWARD IN WHICH IT WAS SUGGESTED <br /> I, I <br /> >, <br /> ,I THAT EACH OF THE ABOVE LIVING AREAS HAVE A CLASSIFIED RATE ESTABLISHED <br /> ..\ BASED ON THE ~OLUME OF WATER USED ON THE NATIONAL AVERAGE. THIS WOULD II <br /> ~! :1 <br />e \! MAKE IT POSSIBLE TO DETERMINE THE CHARGE BASED ON WATER USAGE WITHOUT THE <br /> " !I <br /> :1 II <br /> 1 <br /> I II <br /> , <br /> ti j, <br /> i> :~ <br /> " <br />