|
<br /> rt 12
<br /> e
<br /> - 7~ 13/5,9 ,
<br /> ,~ ~ 1 ~.- ~----_._---- --------- .-. .
<br /> .,
<br /> 1:
<br /> "
<br /> o' j
<br /> j I
<br /> E. REQUEST BY MR. AND MRS. JAN ONSRUD, 3497 KINCAID STREET, fOR VARIANCE I
<br /> 1 IN 1
<br /> fENCE HEIGHT REGULATIONS TO CONSTRUCT A fENCE 7' HIGH ON THE SIDE LINE.
<br /> I AND 5-1/2' HIGH IN FRONT - IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT REQUIREMENTS FOR :FENCES
<br /> I "
<br /> ARE ~, ON THE SIDE LINE AND 3-1/2' I~ THE FRONT, AND THAT THE B6~RD OF I,
<br /> "
<br /> ApPEALS HAD RECOMMENDED' DENIAL Of THE REQUEST. COMMITTEE MEMBER'S VISITED I:
<br /> THE SITE OF THE FENCE AND IT WAS STATED THAT IT APPEARED SUCH FENCE CON- ,I
<br /> H
<br /> STRUCTION AS REQUESTED WOULD BE A DETRACTION FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD. IT i:
<br /> I WAS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THE BoARD OF ApPEALS REPORT DENYING THE REQUEST !'
<br /> 'I BE SUSTAINED. MOTION CARRIED, MRS. LAURIS VOTING NAY, MR. WILSON ABST-AINING. I'
<br /> "
<br /> i -- ,
<br /> I IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. CHATT THAT ITEM ,4E OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE I;
<br /> Ii
<br /> I
<br /> ) APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. Ii
<br /> "
<br /> 2 I "
<br /> f. REQUEST 'BY HAROLD JOHNSON ON BEHALF OF MURIEL E. KRITCH FOR VAR(ANCE I.N Ii
<br /> I LOT REQUIREMENTS TO CONSTRUCT RESIDENCE ON A LOT AT 18TH AVENUE AND ,
<br /> "
<br /> I "
<br /> HAYES STREET WITH A FRON~AGEOf 56.83 FEET - IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT THE (I
<br /> 'I I,
<br /> ! TOTAL LOT AREA IS 7300 SQUARE FEET AND THAT ~HE HOUSE ON ADJACENT PRO- e
<br /> I PERTY HAD BEEN CONSTRUCTED SOME TIME IN 1930 AND DID NOT CONFORM TO THE 11
<br /> PRESENT 5' SETBACK ON SIDE PROPERTY LINES.. IT WAS LIKE WISE POINTED 'OUT \',
<br /> II
<br /> II THAT TO ISSUE A BUILDING PERMIT THE PROPOSED RESIDENCE WOULD HAVE TO BE H
<br /> DESIGNED TO MEET ALL PRESENT BUILDING SET BACK REQUIREMENTS. THE BOARD I:
<br /> OF ApPEALS RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST, AND THE COMMITTEE RECOM- "
<br /> I ii
<br /> I MENDED THAT THE BOARD Of ApPEALS DECISION BE SUSTAINED. MOT ION CARR,J:ED
<br /> I UNANIMOUSLY. I
<br /> I ,!
<br /> 11
<br /> 'i
<br /> I i,
<br /> I IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. CHATT THAT ITEM 4F OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE .11
<br /> I APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. l
<br /> I ;,
<br /> I'
<br /> 31 5. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSAL CONCERNING POLK STREET AND GARFIELD STREET IN CON- 1\
<br /> I,
<br /> NECTION WITH THE 11TH-13TH AVENUE ONE-WAY COUPLET -'A LETTER., FROM THE,OREGON Ii
<br /> \I
<br /> I' STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT WAS READ TO THE COMMITTEE INWHICH IT WAS INDICATED ':
<br /> "
<br /> I
<br /> THE CITY HAD REQUESTED APPROVAL OF ITS PROPOSE,D ONE-WAY COUPLET FQR 11TH AND il
<br /> I 13TH AVENUES AT PRESENT TO EXTEND TO' CHAMBERS STREET ON THE WEST WITHULTI- Ii
<br /> i MATE EXTENSION OF THE COUPLET TO GARFIELD STREET ,SINCE THAT PORTION OF'IITH il
<br /> Ii
<br /> I AVENUE BETWEEN POLK AND GARFIELD STREET INVOLVES THE,ROOTE OF THE RICHARDSON- "
<br /> il
<br /> I "
<br /> EUGENE SECONDARY STATE HIGHWAY. iI
<br /> i II
<br /> I
<br /> 1/ THE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT, HOWEVER, INDICATED THE ,PROPOSAL WOULD MEAN THE ADDI- I:
<br /> I "
<br /> I TION OF SOME TEN BLOCKS TO THE STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM AND WOULD ALSO MEAN .AN Ii
<br /> ! ADDITIONAL TRAVEL DISTANCE FOR A PORTION OF TRAf'f'IC MOVING ON THE -HIGHWAY II
<br /> \ ROUTE. THE LETTER THEN SUGGESTED THE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT'S OBJECTIONS COULD ii
<br /> ! BE'ELIMINATED IF THE CITY WOULD AGREE 1'0 THE REROUTING AND DESIGNATION OF I'
<br /> Ii
<br /> ! THE HIGHWAY ROUTE ON GARf'IELD STREET RATHER THAN POLK STREET WHICH WOULD DE- ;1
<br /> I LETE POLK STREET BETWEEN 11TH AND 6TH AVENUES AND 11TH AVENUE BETWEEN GARFIELD Ii
<br /> 1 AND POLK STREETS FROM,THE STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM. SUCH ACTION WOULD AL.SO,~OUTE Ii
<br /> THE RicHARDSON-EUGENE HI GHWA Y OVER. GARf' I ELD . STREET. FROM I I TH ' TO 6TH' A VENUE. ;1
<br /> I I
<br /> UNDER THESE REROUTING SUGGESTIONS, THE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT WOULD NOT OBJECT II I
<br /> ,I
<br /> I:
<br /> I T~ T~E IITH-13THA~ENUE 'ONE-WAY COUPLET. THE COMMiTTEE CONSIDERED THIS ITEM II
<br /> \ AND AfTER SOME DISCUSSION ON THE SUBJECT RECOMMENDED THAT GARFIELD STREET BE :1
<br /> "
<br /> j I'
<br /> I DESIGNATED AS THE STATE SECONDARY HIGHWAY FROM 6TH TO-IITHAvENUE, AND THAT J
<br /> II POLK STREET BETWEEN 6TH AND 11TH AVENUES AND 11TH AVENUE FROM POLK TO GAR- II
<br /> fIELD STREET:REVERT TO CITY STREET STA1'US. MOTION'CARRIED.UNANIMOUSLY."
<br /> I,
<br /> I IT WAS MOVED BY MR. MOLHOLM SECONDED BY MR. CHATT THAT ITEM 5 Of THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE L
<br /> "
<br /> i
<br /> APPROVED. MO'T tON CARR I ED.. ii -
<br /> Ii
<br /> ,j , . - 'I
<br /> REPORTS Of BOARDS AND CQMI.1I SS IONS, I)
<br /> I,
<br /> 411 L
<br /> A REPORT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING:OF JULY 7, 1959 WAS SUBMITTE~ AND:READ AS FOLLOWS: il
<br /> , .' , - II
<br /> \ ,I
<br /> "As A PERMANENT REPORT, PURSUANT TO THE RESOLUTION OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE II
<br /> j CITY OF EUGENE, DIRECTING THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION TO PREPARE A REPORT UPON j!
<br /> I CERTAIN REQUESTS FOR REZONING WITHIN THE CITY, THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION HEREBY I'
<br /> I!
<br /> j ADOPTS AS ITS PERMANENT REPORT THE FOLLOWING: "
<br /> 'I
<br /> i 'I
<br /> I,
<br /> ! I
<br /> THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS THAT THE FOLLOWING REQUESTS fOR REZONING II
<br /> iI
<br /> I BE DENIED: I:
<br /> t II
<br /> ,. . ii
<br /> , RAYMOND E. MCGOWAN - ET AL
<br /> I - - . . . - - I:
<br /> LOTS 3, 4'AND 5, BLOCK'2, LIZZIE LUCKEY ADDITION OR I'
<br /> ,I
<br /> I LOTS 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7, BLOCK 2, LIZZIE LUCKEY AODITION !i I
<br /> I "
<br /> (DEPENDING UPON NEED FOR BUFFER STRIP) Ii
<br /> I LOCATED ON WEST SIDE OF W,LLAMETTE STREET BETWEEN 18TH AND 19TH AVENUES~
<br /> I jl
<br /> REQUESTS CHANGE Of ZONE FROM CR COMMERCIAL RESID~~TIAL TOC-3P ,
<br /> ! CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT II
<br /> ,I
<br /> I,
<br /> j!
<br /> II
<br /> Ii -
<br /> I'
<br /> I~
<br /> Ii
<br /> I I,
<br /> I, "
<br /> "
<br /> ~ :1
<br /> "
<br />
|