|
<br /> 11 .~~
<br /> .'-
<br /> e
<br /> 7/13/59
<br /> --
<br /> - -..-=-.----.~-:O-IT.-,--~- -- --
<br /> . . --- - ~ - - ~ ~~ r" --
<br /> :1 .
<br /> I I
<br /> ,
<br /> f
<br /> (: MR. CALD,ER, PROPERTY HOLDER TO :THE SOUTH, QUESTI ONED THE REZON I NG AND APPEARED I
<br /> Ii TO OBJECT TO THE REZONING, STATED IN HIS OPINION IT IS SPOT ZONING, IT WOULD BE I,
<br /> " II
<br /> .,
<br /> n DETRIMENTAL TO B~S PROPERTY, AND IF THI~ AREA WERE TO BE REZONED, THE SOUTH !j
<br /> " SIDE OF 18TH AVENUE FROM HI~H STREET TO HILYARD STREET SHOULD BE IN THE SAME
<br /> " "
<br /> f CLASS I F'I CAT I ON. Ii
<br /> "
<br /> :i I'
<br /> I""v."""t ~ ! MR. BRA~SFORD OF THE PLANNING ,COMMISSIO~ STATED THE ,PLANNING COMMISSION HAD il
<br /> ...,,,-..1
<br /> Ck' BEEN OVER THIS ,MATTER A NUMBER Of" TlME.S, AND SINCE THE PETlT.lONER COULD MAKE ![
<br /> ~Y""~ USE OF THE PROPERTY UNDER ITS EXISTING R-3 ZONING FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF DOC- il
<br /> t'i' TORSr ~FFICES AND CLINIC IT pOES NOT SEE~ DESIRABLE NOR NECESSARY THAT THE LOT "
<br /> ~,~ II
<br /> ..........,
<br /> ~_Il'. BE REZONED.
<br /> c.c !I
<br /> MR. SCHNEIDER APPEARED AND REITERATED THE ITEMS STATED IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.
<br /> I,
<br /> I
<br /> AFTER AN EXTENSIVE DISOUSS10~ ON THE SUBJECT, A VOTE WAS TAKEN ON THE MOTION TO II
<br /> e APPROVE THE COMMITTEE REPQRT. MOTION CARRIED. II
<br /> I 3. MATTER OF REDUCED SPEED ON HILYARD STREET - COUNCILWOMAN LAURIS MADE INQUIRY I:
<br /> "
<br /> r:; AS TO WHAT WOULD BE NECESSARY TO REDUCE THE SPEED ON HILYARD STREET, AND IT II
<br /> '1 WAS EXPLAINED THAT THE SPEEDS SET ON HILYARD STREET AT THIS TIME WERE ESTAB- II
<br /> I,
<br /> 'i LISHED BY THE OREGON STATE SPEED CONTROL BOARD. 'I
<br /> , THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED [I
<br /> I, THAT THE OREGON STATE SPEED CONTROL BOA~ II
<br /> " BE REQUESTED TO REDUCE THE SPEED
<br /> ,.
<br /> I ON HILYARD STREET FROM 19TH AVENUE TO AMAZON CREEK, BEING BErWEEN 33RD AND II
<br /> 34TH AVENUES, FROM THE EXISTING SPEEDSTO 25 MILES PER HOUR. MOTION CARRIED !I
<br /> UNANIMOUSLY.
<br /> I:
<br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS THAT ITEM 3 OF THE COMMITTEE, REPORT II
<br /> BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. 'I
<br /> Ii
<br /> 2 4. BoARD OF ApPEALS REPORT -JULY 9, 1959: .
<br /> II
<br /> A. REQUEST BY DELBERT SMITH, 1225 A~DER STREET, FOR VARIANCE FROM BUILDING il
<br /> CODE REGULATIONS TO CONSTRUCT MARQUEE IN FRONT OF BOOK STORE AT 1225
<br /> ALDER STREET - IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT THE PRESENT MARQUEE STRUCTURE HAD 'I
<br /> BEEN BUILT' OF COMBUSTIBLE MATERIAL WITHOUT A BUILDING PERMIT AND DOES II
<br /> II
<br /> NOT MEET HEIGHT REGULATI~NS WHICH STIPULATE THAT MARQUEES ARE REQUIRED Ii
<br /> TO BE 8 FEET FROM THE SIDEWALK. IT WAS STATED THAT THE. BOARD OF ApPEALS ;1
<br /> HAD RECOMMENDED THE REQUEST BE DENIED, AND, IN CONSIDER1NG THE MATTER
<br /> 'I
<br /> .. AND AFTER CERTAIN COMMITTEE MEMBERS HAD VIEWED THE STRUCTURE, IT WAS II
<br /> RECOMMENDED THAT THE BOARD OF ApPEALS DECISION BE UPHELD DENYI~ THE Ii
<br /> REQUEST. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
<br /> II
<br /> '! IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR.' CHATT THAT ITEM 4A OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT Ii
<br /> "
<br /> i BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. II
<br /> "
<br /> .! \I
<br /> , Ii
<br /> "
<br /> 3i B. REQUEST BY EDWIN AND 6~EL MINER, 1740 AUGUSTA STREET, FOR VARIANCE IN Ii
<br /> "
<br /> ;1 LOT REQUIREMENTS TO BUILD A RESIDENCE ON LOT 50'XI50' - IT WAS STATED 'I
<br /> I THAT THE BOARD OF ApPEALS HAD RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST AL- II
<br /> I "
<br /> , THOUGH' THE LOT ,WOULD BE 10 FEET SHORT I N fRONTAGE. THE COMMITTEE RECOM-
<br /> :1
<br /> " MENDED THAT THE DECISION qf THE BOARD Of ApPEALS BE SUSTAINED. MOTION I!
<br /> '"
<br /> "
<br /> :1 ~ CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ,I
<br /> I II
<br /> 'I IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECON~ED BY MR. CHATT THAT ITEM 48 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT li
<br /> I !I
<br /> ,I BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED.
<br /> q
<br /> e 4 :: C. REQUEST BY MR. BILL THOMPSON, 590 WEST 25TH AVENUE, FOR VARIANCE TO il
<br /> I
<br /> 1 CONSTRUCT A CARPORT AT 592 EAST 15TH AVENUE 1/'8" FROM THE PROPERTY I,
<br /> I,
<br /> , LINE ON PATTERSON STREET - IT WAS INDICATED THAT THE BOARD Of ApPEALS II
<br /> "
<br /> ;:1 HAD RECOMMENDED APPROVAL Of' THE VARIANCE FROM 20' SETBACK PROVIDED il
<br /> :i II
<br /> " THE POSTS IN fRONT Or THE CARPORT ARE KEPT,IN LINE WITH THE FRONT OF
<br /> I THE HOUSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SKETCH SHOWN. THE COMMITTEE RECOM-
<br /> ~ : MENDED THE ACTION OF THE BoARD Of ApPEALS BE UPHELD IN LINE WITH THE 'I
<br /> I
<br /> ABOVE RECOMMENOATION.. MOTION CARRIEO UNANIMOUSLY. I
<br /> ::
<br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. CHATT THAT ITEM 4C OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT I
<br /> ,
<br /> " BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. II
<br /> 'I
<br /> ,I II
<br /> 5 ii D. REQUEST BY MR. ROBERT PIPER, ARCHITECT FOR McKAY'S MARKETS, FOR
<br /> .1 I!
<br /> . > VARIANCE IN BUILDING CODE REGULATIONS TO ALLOW USE OF PLAIN GLASS
<br /> ~,~ 'I
<br /> 'I
<br /> :'t INSTEAD Of WIRE GLASS ON THE EAST PROPERTY LINE OF THEIR NEW STORE II
<br /> "J ON HILYARD STREET - IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT THE PROPOSED GLASS USAGE 1\
<br /> I :) WOULD BE ON THE EAST SIDE Of THE NEW STORE LOCATED AT 30TH AVENUE
<br /> r; AND HILYARD STREET AND THAT THE BUILDING CODE REQUIRES WIRE GLASS IN II
<br /> .; II
<br /> I FIRE ZONE I If THE STRUCTURE IS LOCATED LESS THAN 20 FEET fROM THE
<br /> >i "
<br /> > PROPERTY LINE. THE PLAN fOR THIS STRUCTURE SHOWS THAT THE AREA IN WHICH II
<br /> I! "
<br /> ~ I THE GLASS WOULD BE INSTALLED IS LOCATED 5 FEET FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. !I
<br /> ; THE COMMITTEE CONSIDERED THE REQUEST IN LIGHT OF THE BUILDING CODE RE- Ii
<br /> II
<br /> " QUIREMENTS AND RECOMMENDED THE REQUEST BE DENIED. THE BOARD OF ApPEALS II
<br /> ,
<br /> j HAD RECOMMENDED APPROVAL. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
<br /> rl
<br /> e ',\ II
<br /> I IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. CHATT THAT ITEM 40 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT
<br /> " 11
<br /> 'J
<br /> BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. II
<br /> :1
<br /> II
<br /> :~
<br />
|