|
<br /> 12 fl~
<br /> e
<br /> - -- - - -.--- 7/27/59
<br /> - - - 0'-
<br /> . . - - -_. Ii - - - -- -~ . p- - . C'._ .n. C'" -.. - -,.c. . i' '.'
<br /> "( I
<br /> I II
<br /> 'I
<br /> I ~! II. PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT OF TAXI DRIVER LICENSE ENTERED BY WILLIAM J. LIGHT -
<br /> II IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT BY PREVIOUS ACTION OF THE COUNCIL MR. LIGHT'S TAXI DRIVER
<br /> \, I
<br /> ~ !
<br /> :.l LICENSE HAD NOT BEEN RENEWED, AND THAT HE, THROUGH HIS ATTORNEY, MR. KENNETH A. I
<br /> ;1 POOLE, HAD REQUESTED A REVIEW OF THE ACTION BY WHICH SUCH LICENSE WAS PERMA- Ii
<br /> ;';
<br /> I NENTLY REVOKED. MR. POOLE REVIEWED MR. liGHT'S DRIVING RECORD AND THE FACT
<br /> fi '.
<br /> II THAT HE HAD NOT BEEN ON DUTY WHEN HE WAS LAST PICKED UP IN AN IEBRIATED CONDI- II
<br /> 'I MR. POOLE FURTHER
<br /> Qt., it TION WHICH WAS THE REASON HIS LICENSE HAD BEEN REVOKED. I
<br /> " POINTED OUT THAT MR. LIGHT'S DRIVING RECORD ~AS COMMENDABLE AND THAJ HE PASSED
<br /> C\1 ,
<br /> ,; I
<br /> ~~:r 'I ALL TESTS EXCEPT THAT OF LICENSING BY THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, AND HAD HAD A !
<br /> i:i
<br /> (),' I COMMENDABLE DRIVING RECORD WHILE DRIVING SOME 40 TO 50 THOUSAND MILES A YEAR I
<br /> C1:;, II ON CITY STREETS. THE COMMITTEE DISCUSSED THIS PROBLEM AND RECOMMENDED THAT II
<br /> 1
<br /> en I, THE LICENSE BE REI~STATED ~OR MR. WILLIAM J. LIGHT ~S A TAXI DRIVER. MOTION
<br /> I II
<br /> t! CARRIED."
<br /> ~I ,I
<br /> 11
<br /> ., II
<br /> :1 IT WAS MOVED BY MRS. LAURIS SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOLM THAT ITEM II OF THE COMMITTEE REPO~T
<br /> e II BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED.
<br /> ) Ii
<br /> II
<br /> \:
<br /> il
<br /> , MR. DEARDORFF APPEARED BEFORE THE COMMITTEE TO DISCUSS A SEWER LINE BEING INSTALLED SOUTH OF I
<br /> 2 Ii
<br /> U KREATZ ROAD AND IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF MADISON TO JEFFERSON STREET. MR. DEARDORFF INDICATED I
<br /> ~ i THE CITY ENGINEER'S OFFICE HAD ESTIMATED THE COST PER FRONT FOOT AT $5.65 AND THAT H~ BELIEVES THIS I
<br /> ~f I
<br /> 1:1 IS AN EXCESSIVE ASSESSMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A SEWER. MR. DEARDORFF DREW A SKETCH ON THE
<br /> I
<br /> I COUNCIL CHAMBER BLACKBOARD GIVING A GENERAL IDEA OF THE PROPERTY WHILE EXPLAINING HIS COMP~AINT TO
<br /> I If
<br /> 'I THE COUNCIL. HE LIKEWISE INDICATED THAT IN HIS OPINION HE BELIEVES THERE ARE MORE ECONOMICAL WAYS
<br /> .' OF CONSTRUCTING THE SEWER THAN THAT WHICH IS BEING USED.
<br /> :I
<br /> " THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS EXPLAINED THE SYSTEM BEING INSTALLED CAN SERVE ONLY ONE SIDE AND
<br /> :1
<br /> I FOR THIS REASON IS MORE EXPENSI~E THAN A SYSTEM WHICH SERVES TWO SIDES. HE FURTHER EXPLAINED THAT
<br /> 'I
<br /> II THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT IS ATTEMPTING TO INSTALL SEWERS TO SERVE THE WHOLE AREA AND IN ORDER TO
<br /> tj
<br /> ;1 DO THIS UNDER CURRENT POLICY NO PROPERTY CAN EXCEED 160' FROM A SEWER LINE. HE FURTHER STATED THAT I
<br /> J
<br /> ,I THE SEWER INSTALLATIONSIN THE CITY ARE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH REGULATIONS ,ESTABLISHED BY THE I
<br /> I
<br /> :! OREGON STATE SANITARY AUTHORITY. !
<br /> i IT WAS MOVED BY MR. WILSON SECONDED BY MR. SWANSON THAT THIS MATTER BE REFERRED TO COMMITTEE
<br /> \1 I
<br /> I FOR STUDY, ESPECIALLY FOR THAT SEWER FROM KREATZ ROAD TO THE SOUTH AND CONCERNING THE EAST AND WEST I
<br /> ::1 PART. MOTION DEFEATED, MESSRS. WILSON AND SWANSON VOTING AYE; COUNCILMEN MOLHOLM, LAURIS AND MOYER 1
<br /> t! VOT I NG NA Y . I,
<br /> "
<br /> 'J I
<br /> ,I I
<br /> "
<br /> ~! A REPORT OR THE COMMITTEE MEETING HELD JULY 24, .1959 WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS:
<br /> " I
<br /> .1 I
<br /> I' "PRESENT: MAYOR CONE; COUNCILMEN SHEARER, LAURfS, MOLHOLM, MCGAFFEY, CHATT, MOYER !
<br /> , AND SWANSON; CITY MANAGER; CITY RECORDER; CITY ATTORNEY; DIRE;CTOR OF I
<br /> "
<br /> " PUBLIC WORKS; CHIEF OF POLICE; SUPERINTENDENT OF PARKS & RECREATION; I
<br /> I,
<br /> I ACTING TRAFFIC ENGINEER; FRED BRENNE, EUGENE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE; DAN I
<br /> 'j WYANT, EUGENE REGISTER-GUARD; JACK CRAIG; MR. HRUZA, PLANNING COMMISSION. II
<br /> I 3 ' I . IT WAS ANNOUNCED THAT THE JOINT MEETING ,OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ORIGINALLY 'I
<br /> ~ I SCHEDULED FOR MONDAY, JULY 20, 1959, HAS BEEN RESCHEDULED FOR MONDAY, AUGUST 3, II
<br /> '1
<br /> L 1959, AT '7:30 PM IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER. II
<br /> ~ I II
<br /> i
<br /> 4 ~! 2. CONSIDERATION OF RELOCATION OF BUS STOPS AND LOADING ZONES AT 11TH AVENUE Ii
<br /> II ANDCHARNELTON STREET AND .5TH AVENUE AND OLIVE STREET - A RECOMMENDATION
<br /> " I
<br /> "
<br /> ;i OF THE ACTING TRAFFIC ENGINEER CONCERNING BUS STOP LOADING ZONES WAS READ I
<br /> ,I TO THE COMMITTEE I
<br /> ., IN WHICH IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT THE BUS STOP LOCATED ON
<br /> e ,i I
<br /> THE NORTH SIDE OF 11TH AVENUE IMMEDIATELY EAST OF CHARNEL TON STREET BE RE- I
<br /> :i I
<br /> LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 11TH AVENUE IM~EDIATELY WEST OF CHARNELTON I
<br /> " II
<br /> I STREET TO ALLOW FOR A THROUGH TRAFFIC LANE, AND THAT THE BUS STOP LOCATED ON il
<br /> ~ ~
<br /> :1 THE EAST SIDE OF OLIVE STREET IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF 5TH AVENUE BE RELOCATED
<br /> " ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 5TH AVENUE JUST WEST OF OLIVE STREET. THE LATTER
<br /> ~t II
<br /> ,I RECOMMENDATION WILL ELIMINATE THE NECESSITY FOR THE BUSSES TO CUT ACROSS
<br /> ,I TWO LANES OF TRAFFIC TO GO WEST ON 5TH AVENUE. IT WAS POINTED OUT THAT II
<br /> THE BUS COMPANY HAD APPROVED THESE CHANGES, AND THE COMMITTEE RECOMMEN~EO ,
<br /> f! I
<br /> ~ '~ THAT THE RECOMMENDATION.OF THE ACTING TRAFFIC ENGINEER BE APPROVED. MOTION
<br /> P
<br /> CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. I
<br /> ~ f I,
<br /> I IT WAS MOVED BY MRS. LAURIS SECONDED BY MR. MOYER THAT ITEM 2 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE \1
<br /> I,
<br /> .,1 APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED.
<br /> ;'l
<br /> 'I II
<br /> 5 r' 3. PETITION FOR CURB SIDEWALK (LOCATION ONLY) ON BOTH SIDES Of 27TH PLACE It
<br /> J
<br /> I :, BETWEEN LAWRENCE AND WASHINGTONSTREETS, NORTH SIDE ONLY OF 28TH AVENUE
<br /> " I
<br /> ';
<br /> :1 BETWEEN LAWRENCE AND WASHINGTON STREETS, AND WEST SIDE OF ADAMS STREET II
<br /> \' I'
<br /> :1 BETWEEN 23RD AND 24TH AVENUES - A PETITION FILED BY THE SUBDIVIDER Of
<br /> ') PROPERTY IN THIS AREA WAS PRESENTED TO THE COMMI!TEE AS WAS THE RECOM- Ii
<br /> "
<br /> '.. MENDATION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT THAT CURB SIDEWALKS BE ALLOWED
<br /> ~ ~ AS REQUESTED BECAUSE OF THE HILLSIDE LOCATIONS. IN THIS AREA. THE COM- II
<br /> Ii
<br /> :1 MITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT~CURB SIDEWALKS BE APPROVED IN THE AREA AS 'NDI- I
<br /> Ii CATED ABOVE. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. \
<br /> 1: Ii
<br /> ,1
<br /> e :1 IT WAS MOVED BY MRS. LAURIS SECONDED BY MR. MOYER THAT ITEM 3 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE
<br /> "
<br /> " I
<br /> ,1 APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. 11
<br /> I:
<br /> I( \: .
<br /> , ~
<br /> II
<br />
|