|
<br /> ?, '" ~
<br /> '" ,) -, '<1
<br /> I' j N
<br /> J':.J ...: ..1.
<br /> e
<br /> - - -.. .- -~ ---- - - -- . lO/2,~/59
<br /> -- ---- --
<br /> .-. __.___c ----- -.~- Tf-~' -- .----- --. - .-'-- -- ~ ___ _ _ n . n_ _ _ _ ___. --- - ~._- - --- -.-..- -- --- --- - - . -- . --
<br /> - ----- --- -~--- - -- - --- -- ------------------- - ---
<br /> r
<br /> '.
<br /> I
<br /> I i
<br /> IT WAS EXPLA.lNED THAT THERE ARE MINOR MODIFICATIONS TO THESE BOUNDARIES' OVER
<br /> i WHAT HAD BEEN PRESENTED AT THE COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 12, 1959, BUT ,
<br /> J THAT THESE MODIFICATIONS HAVE BEEN MADE TO HELP ESTABLISH BETTER SERVICE CON-
<br /> TROL FOR WATER AND ELECTRICAL CUSTOMERS. MR. RON BABCOCK APPEARED BEFORE THE
<br /> I COMMITTEE TO DISCUSS THE POSSIBILITY OF ADDING TO THE AREA WITH PARTICULAR
<br /> II ,
<br /> J REFERENCE TO SISTERS VIEW, SUNSHINE ACRES AND VANDUYN Loop AREAS. PETITIONS II
<br /> 00 \1 WERE ALSO PRESENTED TO THE COMMITTEE fOR THE INCLUSION OF BREWER, CURTIS, CORUM,
<br /> C\-~. Ii, INGLEWOOD AND LINDA IVENUES BEING TO THE NOR+H OF THE MAIN ANNEXATION AREA. II
<br /> 11
<br /> ~~ . A MOTION WAS THEN MADE TO ACCEPT THE PETITION AND PLACE ON fiLE FOR CONSIDERA-
<br /> ~i
<br /> ~,) P TION AT A SPECIAL MEETING TO DETERMINE THE BOUNDARIES, WHICH' MOTION WAS DEFEATED
<br /> ~ II WITH COUNCILMEN MCGAFFEY, CHATT AND MOYER' VOTING AYE;..COUNCILMEN SWANSON, LAURIS, II
<br /> ",
<br /> CO ~! MOLHOLM AND MAYOR CONE VOTING NAY. IT WAS THEN RECOMMENDED THAT THE BOUNDARIES 'I
<br /> BE ESTABLISHED AS AMENDED BY THE PLANNING CONSULTANT AND MR. GLEN PORTER AND AS I,
<br /> '" SHOWN ON A MAP DATED OCTOBER 16, 1959. FOLLOWING THIS' RECOMMENDATION IT WAS II
<br /> "
<br /> 'I RECOMMENDED THAT AN AMENDMENT BE INCLUDED TO TAKE IN THE SUNSHINE ACRES, SISTERS
<br /> e tl VIEW AND VANDUYN Loop AREAS WHICH AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ON VOTE ON THE I
<br /> " II
<br /> 11 ORIGINAL MOTION AS AMENDED IT WAS CARRIED WITH MR. MCGAffEY VOTING NAY.
<br /> I ~I 9. REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION OF SMALL TRACT OF LAND SOUTH OF THE CURRENT CITY LIMITS
<br /> fl I
<br /> ~ , JUST SOUTH OF 30TH AVENUE AND ON THE EAST SIDE OF MADISON STREET BY 100% CON-
<br /> ,;! SENT PETITION - THE PETITION FOR THE ABOVE ANNEXATIO~ BY 100% CONSENT WAS PRE- I
<br /> ,.
<br /> ,I SENTED AS WAS A MAP SHOWING THE PROPOSED AREA. FOLLOWING SOME DISCUSSION THE
<br /> l Ii
<br /> I d COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ACCEPTANCE OF THE PETITION FOR ANNEXATION. MOTION CAR-
<br /> r1 RIED UNANIMOUSLY. I
<br /> ,
<br /> 2 il 10. DISCUSSION REGARDING DISPOSAL OF THE FORMER LIBRARY PROPERTY AT THE SOUTHEAST
<br /> CORNER OF 11TH AVENUE AND W,LLAMETTE STREET AND ESTIMATED COST OF DEMOLITION -
<br /> il I~VAS EXPLAINED THAT AS OF THIS DATE APPRAISALS HAVE NOT BEEN RECEIVED ON
<br /> ~ I THE LIBRARY PROPERTY BUT THAT THEY ARE EXPECTED IN THE NEAR fUTURE. THE COM-
<br /> n MITTEE WAS REQUESTED TO INDICATE BY WHAT METHOD THE PROPERTY SHOULD BE SOLD,
<br /> 11 , AND IT WAS SUGGESTED THAT THIS BE DONE ON A BID BASIS SUBJECT TO THE CITY'S
<br /> RIGHT TO REJECT ANY AND ALL BIDS RECEIVED. A REPORT WAS ALSO HEARD AS TO THE I
<br /> II PROBABLE COST Of WRECKING THE BUILDING, AND TWO FIRMS AAD INDICATED A MAXIMUM I
<br /> ~ ! CHARGE OF $2000.00 PLUS ALL SALVAGE MATERIAL. No fORMAL ACTION WAS TAKEN.
<br /> " II
<br /> n IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONOED BY MRS. LAUR I S THAT ITEMS 5 THROUGH 10 Of THE COMMITTEE
<br /> 1,1
<br /> I, REPORT BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED.
<br /> I' II
<br /> 3 ~l II. DISCUSSION REGARDING PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE WATER USER CHARGE - A PROPOSED
<br /> II
<br /> I; AMENDMENT TO THE EXISTING WATER USER CHARGE ORDINANCE AS PREPARED BY THE CITY I,
<br /> I ATTORNEY WAS PRESENTED TO THE COMMITTEE. THIS AMENDMENT INDICATES A RATE FOR
<br /> . :1 A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL US~R OF $2.00 PER MONTH, DEFINES A SINGLE FAMILY I'
<br /> i"
<br /> " RESIDENTIAL UNIT AS A DWELLING ARRANGED, INTENDED AND DESIGNATED EXCLUSIVELY
<br /> ~l FOR ONE FAMILY, AND ESTABLISHES RATES FOR OTHER USERS ON A SIX STEP BASIS WITH I
<br /> II ALL SUCH USERS TO PAY A MINIMUM OF $2.00. THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT FURTHER INDI- I
<br /> ,
<br /> J CATES THAT THOSE MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCES, MOTELS, OTHER BUILDINGS WITH AIR CON- il
<br /> I ~l DITIONING SYSTEMS AND/OR IRRIGATION OR WATERING SYSTEMS SHALL BE CHARGED fOR THE
<br /> n QUANTITY USED DURING THE MONTHS OF APRIL THROUGH NOVEMBER ON THE BASIS Of THE
<br /> tl AVERAGE MONTHLY DELIVERY Of WATER TO THE PREMISES DURING THE MONTHS Of DECEMBER I
<br /> :, THROUGH MARCH. THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT fURTHER STATES THAT ANY PROPERTY CON- I
<br /> 't NECTED TO A SEWER WHICH DOES NOT OBTAIN THE ENTIRE AMOUNT Of WATER USED UPON' 'I
<br /> II THE PREMISES FROM THE CITY WATER SYSTEM SHALL REQUIRE A METER TO BE
<br /> ~I INSTALLED I
<br /> ~ AT THE OWNER'S EXPENSE SO THAT THE ACTUAL FLOW Of WATER INTO THE SEWER CAN BE
<br /> J DETERMINED. IT fURTHER PROVIDES THAT If WATER IS USED IN THE MANUFACTURE Of
<br /> e 11 COMMODITIES FOR SALE OR fOR OTHER INOUSTRIAL MANUFACTURING OR IRRIGATION PUR-
<br /> ii POSES AND DOES NOT REACH THE SEWER SYSTEM, THEN THE fLOW INTO THE SEWER SHALL 1
<br /> 1,1 BE METERED, AND THE RATE SHALL BE BASED UPON SUCH fLOW. THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE I'
<br /> '" ALSO CONTEMPLATED THAT THE RATES WILL BE EFfECTIVE AS Of JULY 1959 AND THAT
<br /> 1\ I,
<br /> :1 ANY OVERPAYMENTS BASED UPON THE RATES IN THE EXISTING ORDINANCE, BEING ORDINANCE II
<br /> d
<br /> ,I #11548, SHALL BE CREDITED UPON fUTURE BILLINGS AND SHALL NOT BE REfUNDED IN CASH.
<br /> 'j
<br /> ~I A LETTER fROM COUNCILMAN MOYER ALSO WAS READ SETTING FORTH THE SIX STEP RATE
<br /> - ~I II
<br /> t/ AS CONTAINED IN THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT PREPARED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY WITH A !i
<br /> SINGLE fAMILY RESIDENCE RATE AT $2.00 AND MINIMUM OF $2.00 PER MONTH, BUT CON- \,
<br /> 11 Ii
<br /> TEMP.LATING THAT COMMERCIAL USERS USING WATER FOR IRRIGATION BE ALLOWED A fLAT :1
<br /> RATE DISCOUNT FOR THE MONTHS OF MAY THROUGH SEPTEMBER WITH A RATE TO BE FIGURED
<br /> ~ i ON THE SQUARE FOOTAGE.OF LAWN TO BE IRRIGATED, TO BE: APPLIED FOR BY THE INDI- 11
<br /> f VIDUALS, AND FOR PERIODS OTHER THAN MAY THROUGH SEPTEMBER, THE STANDARD RATE BE II
<br /> k APPLIED. MR. MOYER .fURTHER SUGGESTED A FLAT RATE DISCOUNT FOR AIR CONDI~IONING I
<br /> 11 DURING ,THE MONTHS OF MAY THROUGH SEPTEMBER WITH SUCH fLAT RATE DISCOUNT TO BE
<br /> I COMPUTED ON THE BASIS Of SQUARE FOOTAGE TO BE COOLED OR THE EXACT fOOTAGE Of I
<br /> fl WATER USED FOR OPERATING EACH MACHINE, ANY fUTURE INSTALLATION OF THIS TYPE OF j
<br /> AIR CONDITIONING TO BE ON A STRAIGHT COMMERCIAL RATE. ,
<br /> I' il
<br /> ,1
<br /> II CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSION WAS HAD ON TH.IS SUBJECT AND ON THE VARIOUS RATES PRO-
<br /> POSED. IN THE DISCUSSION IT WAS STATED THERE IS SOME DANGER Of lOSING SIGHT
<br /> I
<br /> I' Of THE ORIGINAL INTENT OF THE WATER USER CHARGE AND THE NECESSITY FOR IN-
<br /> t STALLATION OF A PROPER AND COMPLETE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM. IT WAS ALSO STATED
<br /> i
<br /> " THAT THE COUNCIL HAS A GREAT RESPONSIBILITY TO ALL PEOPLE AND NOT JUST TO THE
<br /> 'e ~
<br /> ~ [I
<br /> ii
<br /> tf
<br /> ,/ I~
<br /> I
<br />
|