Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ~2~' 2 <br /> ., j 1 . <br /> e <br /> _ -c~ .12/~/59 _ ___ <br /> ~~. __=-;~_~~-=~~_~_._- _: ~-=__~-_:-_~~~_- _~-=_ =-__~~_-=-~~~=~-~__-~-_~__~---_-~;~~u3--_--~:= -_.~~_-~~~~_- ~- _ ~~~:~-_:~=~_ :-~--~ _ '~__ - -__---~!::--- __-~-~~=-=-~~-~_~~;~~~~~--.-. ~_-~_~,~~--:~_ ~~_ <br /> '1 <br /> ! <br /> I I <br /> OBJECTORS. IN THIS RESPECT, IT WAS FURTHER STATED THAT THE CITY IS NOT SELLING I <br /> A COMMODITY IN THIS PARTICULAR INSTANCE BUT IS PERFORMING A NEEDED SERVICE. <br /> I <br /> 1 <br /> FOLLOWING THE DISCUSSION IT WAS RECOMMENDED THE PROPOSED AMENDED RATE FOUR AS t <br /> j <br /> DISCUSSED AT THE COUNCIL_ MEETING OF OCTOBER 12, 1959 BE ADOPTED WITH A SINGLE :1 <br /> FAMILY RESIDENCE FLAT RATE OF $2.00 PER MONTH AND ALL OTHER WATER USERS TO BE ON <br /> THE FOLLOWI NG SCHEDUJ.,E OfRAJES: - - j <br /> I <br /> - II <br /> F)RST 1000 CU. FT. 8 20~ PER C CU.FT. I! <br /> NEXT 4000 CU.FT. 8 15~ PER C CU.FT. II <br /> NEXT 5000 CU.FT. @ 10~ PER C CU.FT. '! <br /> I, <br /> 'I <br /> NEXT 15,000 CU.FT. @ 7-1/2~ PER C CU.FT. I! <br /> NEXT 25,000 CU. FT. 8 5~ PER C CU.FT. II <br /> ALL OVER 50,000 CU.FT. 8 3~ PER C CU.FT. i <br /> , <br /> ALL WATER USERS TO PAY A MINIMUM CHARGE OF $2.00 PER MONTH AND ADJUSTMENTS FOR I <br /> I AIR, CONDITIONING AND IRRIGATION TO BE MADE ON THE BASIS OF COUNCILMAN MOYER'S ! e <br /> I <br /> LETTER AS OUTLINED ABOVE. MOTION CARRIED, MR. CHATT VOTING NAY." I <br /> IT WAS MOVED-BY MR. SHE'ARER-SECONDED BY MR. MCGAFFEY THAT ITEM II OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT II <br /> BE APPROVED. MOTION-CARRIED, MR. CHATT VOTING NAY. <br /> 11 <br /> I AiREPORT ~f THE COMMITTEE MEETING HELD OCTOBER 23, 1959 WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS fOLLOWS: Ii I <br /> II <br /> I "PRESENT: MAYOR CONE; COUNCILMEN SHEARER, LAURIS, MOLHOLM, MCGAFFEY, CHATT, MOYER, Ii <br /> WILSON-AND SWANSON; CITY MANAGER;- CITY RECORDER; CITY ATTORNEY; DIRECTOR ,I <br /> 11 <br /> OF PUBLIC WORKS; TRAFFIC ENGINEER; CHIEF OF POLICE; ADMINISTRATIVE ASSls-- I <br /> I' <br /> -- TANT; LT. SMARTT; ASSISTANT CITY RECORDER; RALPH RODERICK OF CORNELL, 11 <br /> HOWLAND; HAYES & MERRYfiELD; BVRON PRICE AND RALPH PATTERSON OF EUGENE II <br /> WATER & ELECTRIC 8oARD;fRED BRENNE, EUGENE CHAMBER OF' COMMERCE; PAUL <br /> LAFFERTY; MR. HUGGINS AND TWO ASSOCIATES OF U. S. NATIONAL B~NK; RALPH I' <br /> COBB, WILLAKENZIE ANNEXATION COMMITTEE; JACK CRAIG, OREGON SPECTATOR; II <br /> i DAN WYANT, EUGENE REGISTER-GUARD; AND OTHER INTERESTED CITIZENS. il <br /> \ Ii <br /> It <br /> I I. REPORT ON THE PROPOSED RELOCATION OF REED LANE, BEING 27TH AVENUE, FROM I <br /> AGATE TO COLUMBIA STREET - THE DIRECTOR-OF PUBLIC WORKS -REPORTED THAT HIS DEPART- I <br /> MENT HAD CONTACTED THE PROPERTY OWNERS ON THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STREET -CONCERNI'NG I <br /> A PROPOSED RELOCATION OF THIS STREET AS PROPOSED BY MR. OPENSHAW. IT WAS FURTHER <br /> EXPLA I NED THAT "DR-. OVERSTREET, ONE OF THE PR I NC I PAL LAND HOLDERS ON THE. SOUTH 1 <br /> .-' -- '. - I <br /> SIDE OF 27TH AVENUE, HAD CQNTACT-ED THE PUBLiC-WORKS DEPARTMENT AND INDICATED HE <br /> HAD NO DESIRE TO PARTICIPATE IN THE RELOCATION OF THE STREET SINCE IT WOULD RE- I <br /> QUIRE A DEDiCATION OF A LARGE PORTION Of HIS LAND. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS Ii . <br /> STATED IN HIS OPINION THIS TYPE OF RELOCATION SHOULD ONLY BE MADE IF 100% AGREE- <br /> I ME NT AMONG THE INDIVIDUALS CONCERNED IS REACHED. SINCE SUCH AGREEMENT IS NOT <br /> I II <br /> I FORTHCOMING, IT APPEA~S THAT NO FURTHER-ACTION CAN BE TAKEN ON SUCH RELOCATION II <br /> I AND THE STREET SHOULD REMAIN AS ORIGINALLY PLATTED. THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED <br /> THE REPORT OF' THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS BE ACCEPTED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. I I <br /> J <br /> IT WAS MO~ED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED ~Y MRS. LAURIS THAT ITEM I OF THE COMMI,TTEE REPORT BE <br /> APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> 2 2. PETITION FOR fENCING ALONG AMAZON CHANNEL BETWEEN TAYLOR AND GRANT STREETS - ~ <br /> REPRESENTATIVES OF THE COMMITTEE DROVE TO AND VIEWED THE SITE OF THE PROPOSED <br /> FENCING AS REQUESTED BY PETiTION. SOME DISCUSSION WAS HAD ON THIS INCLUDING- <br /> THE"POSSIBILITY THAT THE AMAZON CHANNEL MIGHT BE LINED BY CONCRETE THROUGH THIS II e <br /> AREA AND, iF-SO~ SUCH FENCING WOULD OF' NECESSITY BECOME A PART OF THE LINING <br /> PROJECT. IT WAS ALSO POINTED OUT THAT IT WOULD COST APPROXIMATELY $12,000.00 I; <br /> TO INSTALL SUCH FENCING. fOLLOWING THE DISCUSSION IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT NO I <br /> FENCE BE INSTALLED AT THE PRESENT TIME AND THAT THE CITY MANAGER WRITE A LETTER . <br /> TO THE PETITIONERS EXPLAINING THAT THERE IS A GOOD POSSIBILITY OF CHANNEL LINING .I <br /> AND THIS ACTION HAD BEEN TAKEN fOR THAT REASON. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I T WAS MOVED BY MR '. SHEARER SECONDED BY. MRS ~ LAUR I S THAT ITEM 2 OF THE COMM I,TTEE REPORT I <br /> BE APPROVED. ,MOTION CARRIED, "MR. McGAHEY VOTING NAY. I <br /> 3 2. BoARD OF AppEALS REPORT- OCTOBER 14, 1959: II <br /> I A. REQUEST BY O. O. YOUNG FOR VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT SECOND RESIDENCE AT 820 WEST <br /> 23RD AVENUE - IT WAS tXPLAINED THAT THE BOARD OF-ApPEA6S HAD CONSIDERED A RE- I <br /> QUEST FROM MR. YOUNG TO CONSTRUCT A NEW RESIDENCE ON A LOT 60'XI50' BY DIVID- j <br /> iNG THE PROPERTY INTO TWO LOTS, EACH HAVING AN AREA OF' 4500 SQ.FT. 'THE BOARD <br /> OF ApPEALS IN THIS INSTANCE HAD TAKEN ACTION DEN~ING THE REQUESTED VARIANCE. 1 I <br /> COMMITTEE- REPRESENTATIVES HAD VIEWED THE AREA AND THERE WAS SOME DISCUSSION <br /> REGARDING THE PROPRIETY OF CONSTRUCTING A HOUSE ON THE CORNER LOT CURRENTLY \ <br /> VACANT AND ON WHICH IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO ADO PROPERTY. IT WAS POINTED OUT <br /> THAT A HOUSE IN THJS AREA WOULD UNDOUBTEDLY BENEFIT THE AREA AS A WHOLE, AND <br /> IT W~S RECOMMENDED THAT THE REQUESTED YARIANCE BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED <br /> UNANIMOUSLY. <br /> ) - <br /> Ii <br /> " <br /> ~ll Ii <br /> 'I <br /> ,: <br /> , <br />