My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/25/1960 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1960
>
01/25/1960 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2007 1:58:24 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 3:36:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/25/1960
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />30 l)~ <br /> <br />1/25/60 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />j'j-- <br /> <br />:" <br />!'j <br />I- <br />I <br />'I <br />:1 <br />" <br /> <br />'I <br />" <br />" <br />1 <br />Ii <br /> <br />'I <br />" <br /> <br />ING BE RAZED, THAT THE LOT B~ PUT INTO CONDITION fOR PARKING PURPOSES, THAT <br />A LETTER BE SENT TO THE BIDDER EXPRESSING APPRECIATION fOR HIS BID, AND THAT <br />PROPER CITY OffiCIALS AT A LATER DATE RECOMMEND TO THE COUNCIL WHICH-TYPE Of <br />PARKING WOULD BE MOST ADVISABLE ON THE LOT. MOTION CARRIED, MR. MCGAffEY AND <br />MR. MOLHOLM ABSTAINING. <br /> <br />I <br />,I <br />:1 <br />!I <br />I' <br />il <br />Ii <br />'I <br />II <br />II <br />I, <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />I <br /> <br />ct) <br />C\} <br />~,'" <br />t.) <br />f"'y-' <br />I,..J...... <br />........ <br />~;..J <br /> <br />'I <br />~ I <br />.' <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. SWANSON THAT ITEM 5 Of THE ~OMMITTEE REPORT <br />BE RECEIVED AND PLACED ON fiLE. MOTION CARRIED. (ACTION TAKEN ON THIS ITEM UNDER BID <br />OPENING EARLIER IN THE MEETING.) <br /> <br />" <br />" <br />Vi <br />'i <br />, <br />I <br />~- \ <br /> <br />, <br />ft <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />'I <br />" <br />I <br />.! <br />:! <br /> <br /> ,[ <br />I ! <br />2 ;! 7. <br /> ,I <br /> 'I <br /> ~'l <br /> , <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />:i <br /> <br />4 ;~ <br />i <br />(I <br />Ii <br />i <br />,; <br />'i <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />" <br />" <br />I <br /> <br />! <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I <br />, <br />'I <br /> <br />5 ' <br /> <br />'I <br /> <br />,I <br />" <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />! <br />-, <br />'I <br />._,-1 <br />i <br /> <br />:1 <br />,I <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />>i <br />~ ! <br /> <br />::: <br /> <br />6. REPORT BY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ON SECURING EASEMENTS fOR WEST SIDE SEWER <br />BETWEEN NORTH POLK STREET PUMP, STATION AND 6TH AVENUE AND FILLMORE STREET - <br />THE DIRECTOR Of PUBLIC WORKS EXPLAINED THAT HE HAD BEEN ATTEMPTING fOR SOME <br />TIME TO SECURE,EASEMENTS fOR:THE ABOVE SEWER PROJECT AND THAT A NUMBER Of <br />PEOPLE ARE REfUSING TO GIVE EASEMENTS WITHOUT SOME TYPE Of REMUNERATION. THE <br />COMMITTEE WAS SHOWN AERIAL PHOTOS Of TWO PROPOSED ROUTES THROUGH WHICH THE <br />SEWER COULD RUN. THE DIRECTOR Of PUBLIC WORKS RECOMMENDED THAT THE TWO PRO- <br />JECTS BE PUT OUT fOR BID, THAT THE PROPERTY BE APPRAISED AND THEN A DECISION <br />COULD BE MADE ON WHICH WOULD BE THE LEAST EXPENSIVE, TO PAY fOR THE RIG~T-Of- <br />WAY OR USE AN ALTERNATE ROUTE. THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT BIDS BE OB- <br />TAINED ON BOTH ROUTES AND THAT MR. C. A. BARNES BE AUTHORIZED TO NEGOTIATE <br />WITH PROPERTY OWNERS fOR EASEMENTS THROUGH THEIR PROPERTY. MOTION CARRIED <br />UNANIMOUSLY. <br /> <br />CONSIDERATION Of HEATING CODE fOR THE CITY Of EUGENE - IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT <br />A GAS CODE COMMITTEE HAD BEEN WORKING fOR SEVERAL YEARS TO PERfECT A WORKABLE <br />GAS CODE fOR THE CITY Of EUGENE IN ANTICIPATION Of NATURAL GAS BEING BROUGHT <br />INTO .THE CITY. MR. LEACH Of THE NORTHWEST NATURAL GAS COMPANY EXPLAINED THAT <br />HIS COMPANY IS VERY MUCH IN fAVOR Of A GAS CODE, BUT THEY ARE ALSO RECOMMEND- <br />ING THAT A HEATING CODE BE ADOPTED AT THE SAME TIME WHlEH WOULD REGULATE ALL <br />TYPES Of HEATING DEVICES. MR. MARLATT, CHAIRMAN Of THE GAS CODE COMMITTEE, <br />EXPLAINED THAT THE INSTRUCTIONS TO HIS COMMITTEE <br /> <br />,6. REQUEST BY SCHOOL BoARD fOR CERTAIN WALKWAYS IN VICINITY Of 36TH TO 39TH <br />AVENUES AND HILYARD STREET - A LETTER WAS READ TO THE COMMITTEE fROM THE <br />BoARD Of SCHOOL DISTRICT #4 IN WHICH THEY REQUESTED CERTAIN WALKWAYS IN <br />~HE VICINITY Of 36TH TO 39TH AVENUES AND HILYARD STREET fOR THE BENEfiT <br />Of CHILDREN ATTENDING ELLIS PARKER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. THE COMMITTEE RECOM- <br />MENDED THAT THIS ITEM BE HELD UNTIL PROPER CITY OffiCIALS CAN STUDY THE <br />WALKWAY NEEDS INlHE AREA AND BRING A RECOMMENDATION BACK TO THE COMMITTEE. <br />MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. <br /> <br />9. CONSIDERATION Of PLACING ON BALLOT Of MAY 20, 1960 PRIMARY ELECTION A <br />CHARTER CHANGE TO INCREASE AND CONTINUE A SPECIAL LEVY fOR CROSSTOWN <br />STREETS - THE PLANNING CONSULTANT OUTLINED TO THE COMMITTEE A, BROAD. PROGRAM <br />fOR ARTERIAL OR CROSSTOWN STREETS IN THE CITY Of EUGENE, AND ESTIMATED THE <br />COST WOULD BE APPROXIMATELY $306,000 PER YEAR fOR A 10-YEAR PERIOD., HE EX- <br />PLAINED THAT THIS PROGRAM WOULD COST APPROXIMATELY 4.74 MILLS AT PRESENT AND <br />COULD DROP TO 3.25 MILLS AS THE ASSESSED VALUATION Of THE CITY INCREASES <br />fROM YEAR TO YEAR. HE STATED THAT THIS PLAN HAD BEEN RECOMMENDED BY THE <br />PLANNING COMMISSION, THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AND OTHER CITY OffiCIALS. <br />HE STATED THAT COUNTY OffiCIALS ARE THINKING IN TERMS Of A CONTINUATION <br />Of ARTERIALS INTO THE COUNTY fROM THE CITY LIMITS. THE PLANNING CONSULTANT <br />STATED THAT IN HIS OPINION THE VOTERS SHOULD BE fULLY INfORMED Of THE PRO- <br />POSED CROSSTOWN STREET PROGRAM AS TO ITS NECESSITY IN'ADEQUATElY M~ ING <br />TRAffiC THROUGH THE CITY. THE COMMITTEE DISCUSSED SEVERAL ASPECTS Of THE <br />PROPOSED CROSSTOWN STREET PROGRAM. No ACTION WAS TAKEN. <br /> <br />10. CONSIDERATION Of PLACING ON BALLOT Of MAY 20, 1960 PRIMARY ELECTION A <br />CHARTER CHANGE TO I NCREASE AND CONTI NUE, A SPEC,I AL LEVY fOR PARKS PROGRAM !" <br />THE SUPERINTENDENT Of PARKS & RECREATION SUBMITTED TO THE C~MMITTEE A DE- <br />TAILED REPORT AND EXPLAINED THE BASIC PLANS fOR A PARKS & R CREATION PRO- <br />GRAM fOR THE NEXT TEN YEARS. HE STATED THAT THIS ,IS A GOAL-TO,WARD. WHICH <br />TO WORK, AND THAT THE COUNCIL MUST DETERMINE A fUTURE POLICY ON PARKS & <br />RECREATION fACILITIES AND A fiRM PROGRAM MUST BE LAID OUT fOR JOINT SCHOOL <br />AND CITY PARTICIPATION IN THE USE Of rACILITIES. HE STATED THAT ONE BIG <br />PROBLEM IS IN DETERMINING WHICH WAY THE CITY WILL GROW AND ACQUIRING LAND <br />NOW fOR PARK PURPOSES BEfORE IT IS DEVELOPED. IN HIS OPINION-THE COUNCIL <br />SHOULD DETERM I NE NOW If AVA I LABLE fUNDS ARE TO BE USED fOR ACQUI,R I NG <br />PROPERTY fOR fUTURE PARKS OR DEVELOPING PRESENT PARKS. THE COMMITTEE DIS- <br />CUSSED VARIOUS ASPECTS Of THE PARKS & RECREATION PROGRAM. No ACTION WAS <br />TAKEN." <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOLM THAT ITEMS 6, 7, 8, 9 AND 10 Of THE <br />COMMITTEE REPORT BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />I <br />II <br />II <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />II <br />I, <br />II <br />II <br />il <br />II <br />:1 <br />II <br />I <br />!I <br />\\ <br />~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.