|
<br />~'l6
<br />
<br />2/8/60
<br />
<br />I
<br />,
<br />,
<br />I
<br />i
<br />1
<br />11
<br />II
<br />!I
<br />;1
<br />
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />!I
<br />!,
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />1
<br />II
<br />II
<br />I
<br />i
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />,
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />Ii
<br />r
<br />I
<br />i
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />11
<br />I
<br />,
<br />,
<br />,
<br />I
<br />II
<br />I
<br />
<br />QUESTIONS WERE RAISEO WITH RESPECT TO INFORMATION AS TO WHAT OTHER AREAS IN
<br />THE NATION ARE DOING ON THIS SUBJECT, AND WITH RESPECT TO THE COORDINATION
<br />NECESSARY IT WAS SUGGESTED THAT PERHAPS THE CENTRAL LANE COUNTY PLANNING AGENCY
<br />MIGHT BE THE COORDINATING FACTOR.
<br />
<br />THE QUESTION OF DEVELOPMENT OF PARK AREAS OUTSIDE THE CITY WHERE SCHOOL flACILITIES
<br />MIGHT DEVELOP WAS RAISED, AND SOME DISCUSSION WAS HAD ON THIS SUBJECT. IN THIS
<br />RESPECT IT WAS POINTEO OUT THAT IF JOINT USE Or fACILITIES WOULD DECREASE THE COST,
<br />THE IDEA COULD UNDOUBTEDLY BE SOLD TO THE CITIZENS. MAYOR CONE FURTHER STATED THAT
<br />SUCH JOINT DEVELOPMENT OF SINGLE AREAS WOULO UNDOUBTEDLY CUT DOWN THE AMOUNT OF
<br />LAND BEING RETAINED IN PUBLIC OWNERSHIP AND OFF THE TAX ROLLS. IT WAS FURTHER
<br />SUGGESTED THAT JOINT SCHOOL ANO PARK DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM COULD WELL APPRECIATE
<br />PROPERTY-VALUES ,IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF THE SCHOOLS.
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVEO AND SECONOEO THAT THE ADMINISTRATIVE STAFFS OF THE CITY ANO SCHOOL
<br />DISTRICT PREPARE A JOINT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR SCHOOL FACILITIES AND P~RK FACILI-
<br />TIES ANO PRESENT SUCH A PROGRAM BACK TO THE TWO GOVERNING BODIES. To THIS END IT
<br />WAS SUGGESTED THAT THE QUEENS WAY SITE MIGHT WELL BE A PILOT PROGRAM.
<br />
<br />3. DISCUSSION OF COORD1NATED EFFORTS IN PROVIDING SAFE ACCESS TO SCHOOLS SUCH AS
<br />LOCATIONS OF STREETS ANO SIDEWALKS, INCLUDING OVER AND UNDER PASSES, ANO-
<br />TRAFFIC REGULATIONS,- VARIOUS FACTORS IN CONNECTION WITH THIS SUBJECT WERE PRE-
<br />SENTED BY REPRESENTATIYES OF THE SCHOOL ~OAR~ AND THE CITY COUNCIL. TH~SEFACTORS
<br />INCLUDeD PROPOSEO SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS, THE 1DEA OF MANDATORY SIDEWALK CON-,
<br />STRUCTION WITH THE PLATTING OF SUBDIVISIONS, PEDESTRIAN_ CROSSING PROBLEMS ON ,30TH
<br />AVENUE IN THE VICINITY OF HARRIS SCHOOL. AND OVER THE PROPOSED SPENCER BUTTE Ex-
<br />PRESSWAY, ANO THE NECESSITY FOR LONG RANGE PLANNING BY THE CITY, BY THE SCHOOL
<br />DISTRICT IN RELATION TO SCHOOL LOCATION, STREET LOCATION, SIDEWALKS, TR~FFIC
<br />REGULATIONS, AND OTHER FACTORS.
<br />
<br />SOME DISCUSSION WAS ALSO GIVEN TO THE NEEDS OF SCHOOL DISTRICT #4 IN THE WILLA-
<br />KENZIE AREA AS IT RESPECTS A SEWER SYSTEM TO THE AREA. DISCUSSION WAS ALSO HAD
<br />, ,
<br />ON THE LICENSING OF LIQUOR OUTLETS IN THE VICINITY OF SCHOOLS AND THE FACT THAT
<br />SINCE THE ATTORNEY GENERAL HAS RULEO THAT DRY ZONES ARE EXTRA LEGAL, THE COUN~IL
<br />HAS BASICALLY ACTED FAVORABLY ON MOST APPLICATIONS WHERE APPLI.cANTS HAVE BEEN
<br />APP-ROVED BY THE POLICE DEPARTMENT.
<br />
<br />THE ~UBJECT OF JOINT PURCHASING BETWEEN THE CITY AND SCHOOL DISTRICT #4 WAS
<br />ALSO DISCUSSED. No FORMAL ACTION WAS TAKEN ALTHOUGH IT WAS SUGGESTED THAT
<br />THE ADMINISTRATIVE STAFFS WORK CLOSELY TOGETHER ON THESE PROBLEMS."
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MRS. ~AURIS THAT THE REPORT OF THE JOINT COU~CIL-
<br />SCHOOL DISTRICT MEETING BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED.
<br />
<br />REPORTS OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
<br />
<br />A REPORT OF THE AIRPORT COMMISSION WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS (MEETING OF FEBRUARY I,
<br />1960) :
<br />
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />t
<br />I
<br />
<br />\
<br />!I
<br />~ '.I
<br />~I:
<br />
<br />"PRESENT: CHAIRMAN EATON AND MEMBERS EDMUNOS, VIK, SHISLER; .MAYOR CONE; CI'TY MANAGER;
<br />:CITY RECORDER; CITY ATTORNEY; AIRPORT MANAGER; DAN WYANT,EUGENE REGISTER-
<br />GUARD.
<br />
<br />THE MEETING ,WAS CALLED TO DISCUSS THE ,PR~POSALS CONTAINEO, IN THE REPORT SUBMIT.TED BY
<br />LEIGH FISHER & ASSOCIATES WHICH WAS PRESENTED ON JANUARX 25, 1960.,
<br />
<br />CHAIRMAN EATON REVIEWED THE BACKGROUND AND RECOMMENOATIONS OF THE REPORT MADE BY
<br />LEIGH FISHER ~ ASSOCIATES WHICH INDICATES THE COUNTY SHOULD TAKE OVER AND OPERATE
<br />THE MAHLON-SWEET AIRPORT. THE CHAIRMAN FURTHER STATED THAT INA MEETING WITH THE
<br />COUNTY IT HAD BEEN INDICATED IN ALL PROBABI,LITY, THE .cOUNTY COULD BUDGET THE SUM
<br />OF $100,000..00 IN THE 1960-61 BUDGET YEAR, WHICH ,,:UNDS TOGETHER WITH EXISTING CITY
<br />FUNDS COULD START THE PRO,JECT ON THE AIRPORT ADMI,NISTRATION BUILOING. THE ~HAIRMAN
<br />FURTHER POINrED OUT THAT THE CITY IS PROTEC~ED AGAINST CLOSURE OF THE AIRPORT BY
<br />EX I ST I NG FAA GRANT AGREEMENTS, WH I CH ,REQU I RE,THE SPONSOR -TO MAl NTA I N THE A I RPORT
<br />FOR A PERIOO OF 20 YEARS FROM THE ,LATEST GRANT AGREEMENT AND, BY CONTRACT STIPULA-
<br />TIONS, THE CITY WOULD HAVE RECOURSE FOR RECLAIM~N~ THE'AIR~ORT ,FROM THE COUNTY
<br />OURING THE FIRST 5-YEAR PERIOD BUT WOULD HAVE TO DEED THE AIRPORT NOW SINCE THE
<br />COUNTY CQULD NOT SPEND MONEY ON THE AIRPORT UNLESS IT IS IN THEIR OWNERS~IP4 IN
<br />THE COURSE OF THE QISCUSSION IT WAS SUGGESTED THAT A LETTER OF INTENT TOWARD THE
<br />RELINQUISHMENT OF MAHLON-SWEET AIRPORT TO_THE COUNTY BE GIVEN TO THE COUNTY, ~HAT
<br />THE LEGAL DETAILS BE WORKED OUT, AND THAT A DEED BE PREPARED TRANSFERRING THE AIR-
<br />PORT TO THE COUNTY.
<br />
<br />MAYOR CONE POINTEO OUT THAT THE CITY HAS A LARGE NUMBER OF NECESSARY PROJECTS AND
<br />WOULD HAVE TO ,GO TO THE PEOPLE FOR FUNDS FOR THESE PROJECTS. HE AGREED THAT THE
<br />BROAD BASE THEORY FOR OPERATION OF THE AIRPORT IS PROPER. SOME DISCUSSION WAS
<br />HAD ON THE TIMING OF COUNTY PARTICIPATION IN THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE AIRPORT, AND
<br />THERE WAS GENERAL AGREEMENT ON THE PROVISIONS OF LEIGH FISHER'S REPORT IN WHICH
<br />THE COUNTY WOULD, IN THE NEXT FIVE YEARS, MATCH FUNDS THE CITY HAS INVESTED IN
<br />MAHLON-SWEET AIRPORT SINCE THE END OF WORLD WAR II.
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />Ii
<br />,I
<br />I!
<br />II
<br />\!
<br />"
<br />"
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I;
<br />;1
<br />I'
<br />i[
<br />~ 1
<br />Ii
<br />ii
<br />II
<br />H
<br />i ~
<br />"
<br />i'
<br />'I
<br />i;
<br />I!
<br />Ii
<br />I
<br />Ii
<br />"
<br />Ii
<br />!i
<br />"
<br />I'
<br />,I
<br />II
<br />:1
<br />"
<br />t
<br />
<br />;1
<br />Ii
<br />I,
<br />i
<br />Ii
<br />il
<br />I:
<br />II
<br />I:
<br />:1
<br />ii
<br />Ii
<br />il
<br />I:
<br />il
<br />;,
<br />,/
<br />'I
<br />II
<br />,I
<br />Ii
<br />11
<br />'i
<br />!i
<br />'1
<br />!I
<br />Ii
<br />i'
<br />!I
<br />,I
<br />'I
<br />!i
<br />I,
<br />II
<br />"
<br />II
<br />
<br />;i
<br />II
<br />'I
<br />II
<br />:1
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />,;
<br />1:
<br />
<br />'i
<br />'I
<br />I,
<br />I,
<br />"
<br />"
<br />II
<br />
<br />il
<br />
<br />Ii
<br />
<br />I]
<br />ii
<br />!!
<br />1;
<br />!i
<br />;1
<br />ii
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />~ I
<br />,
<br />II
<br />I'
<br />
<br />e
<br />
|