|
<br />e
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />Of)
<br />(;\}
<br />"ry"'
<br />r "
<br />~u-"'"
<br />,,,.,,....
<br />~~
<br />f4y""~
<br />~.-}.
<br />
<br />I 'I
<br />I
<br />,
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />I
<br /> 2
<br /> '\
<br /> I
<br /> "
<br /> 'I
<br /> q
<br /> I
<br /> 1
<br /> :1
<br /> ';1
<br /> i'
<br /> ,I
<br /> .1
<br /> :i
<br /> .!
<br /> r,
<br /> J
<br /> "
<br /> ;,1
<br /> ,\
<br /> i
<br /> ,
<br /> ,I
<br />I :i
<br /> i
<br /> r'
<br /> 3 :i
<br /> I'
<br /> ,'j
<br /> ,:
<br /> ,I
<br />e ,-
<br /> :1
<br /> I
<br /> .I
<br /> ;1
<br /> "
<br /> ,
<br /> "
<br /> ,
<br /> "
<br /> ,
<br /> "
<br />
<br />I
<br /> ~I
<br /> "
<br /> "
<br /> "
<br /> U
<br /> :!
<br /> 'I
<br /> ..
<br />- :'1
<br />'I
<br />n
<br /> ;1
<br /> :!
<br /> 1
<br />
<br />3/14/60
<br />
<br />;)" 4' .-~, ~
<br />,-<;.
<br />U
<br />
<br />---
<br />- - - --- - ,-- . ~
<br />
<br />:r
<br />r,j
<br />q
<br />tl
<br />\,
<br />;1
<br />;1
<br />;1
<br />:1
<br />Ii
<br />I
<br />'i
<br />,j
<br />"
<br />j
<br />,
<br />
<br />STREET AND FAIRMOUNT BOULEVARD IN THE VICINITY OF ROSE STREET. IT WAS INDICATED
<br />THAT PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE PLAT HAD BEEN OBTAINED AND THAT THE SUBDIVIDERS
<br />ARE ANXIOUS FOR STREET AND SEWERS TO THE AREA AND ARE HOPING rOR UNDERGROUND
<br />UTILITIES (TELEPHONE AND ELECTRICAL CONNECTIONSt TO THE AREA. THE .DIRECTOR OF
<br />PUBLIC WORKS INDICATED THERE IS SOME PROBLEM WITH SEWERS IN THIS AREA BUT THAT
<br />HE HAD NOT HAD THE REQUEST FOR ,SEWERS AN ADEQUATE LENGTH OF TIME TO DETERMINE
<br />WHAT ErFECT THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE AREA WOULD HAVE ON SEWERS SERVING THE AREA.
<br />IT WAS RECOMMENDED THE MATTER BE HELD UNTIL THE COMMITTEE MEETING or MARCH 10,1960.
<br />
<br />.)
<br />
<br />17. DISCUSSION REGARDING PROPOSED SIDEWALK ORDINANCE - MRS. BETTY NIVEN, MEMBER or
<br />THE PLANNING COMMISSION, APPEARED BEfORE THE COMMITTEE AND EXPLAINED THAT THE
<br />PLANNING COMMISSION HAD PROPOSED A SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION ORDINANCE, AND THAT SHE
<br />WISHED TO DRAW THIS ORDINANCE TO THE ATTENTION or THE COUNCIL. No fORMAL ACT(~ON
<br />WAS TAKEN ON THIS MATTER."
<br />
<br />"~I
<br />!
<br />"
<br />,
<br />"
<br />"
<br />:i
<br />i
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED,BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS THAT ITEMS 16 AND 17 Of THE COMMITTEE
<br />REPORT BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED.
<br />
<br />,I
<br />
<br />A REPORT Of THE COMMITTEE MEETING HELD MARCH 10, 1960 WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS:
<br />
<br />t1PRESENT: MAYOR CONE; COUNCILMEN SHEARER, LAURIS, MOLHOLM, MCGAffEY,CHATT, WILSON
<br />AND SWANSON; ,CITY MANAGER; CITY RECORDER; DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS; CHIEf
<br />or POLICE; CITY ATTORNEY; ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT; TRAFFIC E~INEER; MRS.
<br />DEAN PAPE; MESSRS. RON,HuSK, DONALD McDONALD AND FRED BRENNE; DAN WYANT,
<br />EUGENE REGISTER-GUARD.
<br />
<br />I. ~OMMUNICATION fROM EUGENE HIGHLANDERS BAGPIPE BAND - A COMMUNICATION rROM THE
<br />EUGENE HIGHLANDERS BAGPIPE BAND WAS READ TO THE COMMITTEE. IN GENERAL THIS
<br />COMMUNICATION STATED THE EUGENE HIGHLANDERS BAGPIPE BAND HAS BEEN INVITED TO
<br />PARTICIPATE IN THE ROSE FESTIVAL PARADE TO BE HELD IN 1960 BY THE PORTLAND
<br />ROSE FESTIVAL. IT WAS INDICATED THE BAGPIPE BAND HAS BEEN INVITED TO PARTICI-
<br />PATE WITH OR WITHOUT A fLOAT AND ARE INTERESTED IN DETERMINING IF THE CIVIC
<br />AND BUSINESS LEADERS IN THE COMMUNITY CONSIDER THERE IS ANY POSSIBILITY Of
<br />EUGENE'S'ENTERING A' fLOAT IN,THE GRAND fLORAL PARADE. IF NO rLOAT IS ENTERED,
<br />THE HIGHLANDERS BAGPIPE BAND WILL MARCH,UNDER THE, BANNER or THE PORTLAND
<br />SCOTTISH BAGPIPE BAND AS THEY 010 IN 1959.
<br />
<br />FOLLOWING THE READING OF THE COMMUNICATION SOME DISCUSSION WAS HELD ON THE
<br />IDEA OF ENTERING A fLOAT, THERE WAS SOME fEELING EXPRESSED THAT THE CITY or
<br />EUGENE SHOULD BE REPRESENTED, BUT IT WAS INDICATED THAT THE COST fACTOR HAS
<br />BEEN A MAJOR'~BSTACLE,THECITY HAVING NO fUNDS. IN PRIOR YEARS THE CHAMBER
<br />Of COMMERCE HAS QUESTIONED THE USE Of $5000 OR $6000 or CHAMBER FUNDS fOR A
<br />FLOAT ENTRY.
<br />
<br />FOLLOWING SOME DISCUSSION' IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT A LETTER,BE SENT TO THE
<br />EUGENE CHAMBER or COMMERCE RECOMMENDING THAT A fLOAT BE ENTERED IN THE ROSE
<br />PARADE IN 1960. MOTION CARRIED, MR. WILSON VOTING NAY.
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY .MR. WILSON THAT ITEM
<br />APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED.
<br />
<br />~f THE COMMITTEE REPO RT BE
<br />
<br />2. REQUEST BY MRS. DEAN PAPE FOR. SEWER IN PROP9SEiD:., NEW SUBD I VI 51 ON LOCATED. ON:
<br />NORTH SIDE OF SUMMIT AVENUE AND EAST Of FAIRMOUNT BOULEVARD ~ A LETTER fROM
<br />MRS. PAPE WAS READ IN WHICH IT WAS REQUESTED THAT SEWERS AND,STREETS:BE BUILT'
<br />IN A PROPOSED SUBDIVISION TO BE KNOWN AS PARKSIDE TERRACE IN THE AREA BORDERED
<br />BY SUMM /1- AVENUE AND HENDRI CKS PARK AND ADJACENT TO SUNSET AND FA I RMOUNT BOULE-
<br />VARDS. THE LETTER INDICATED FURTHER THE PARKSIDE TERRACE SUBDIVISION CONTEM~
<br />PLATES TEN LOTS BUT DOES NOT CONTEMPLATE RAPID BUILDING ON THE TEN LOTS. THE
<br />REQUEST IS ENTERED AT THIS TIME SO THAT WORK MAY FOLLOW A LOGICAL SEQUENCE
<br />WITH THE SEWERS BEING-CONSTRUCTED BEfORE ROADS ARE BUILT INTO THE AREA.
<br />
<br />THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS REPORTED IT WOULD BE NECESSARY TO RECONSTRUCT
<br />THE SEWER NOW IN EXISTENCE ON ORCHARD STREET FROM, 17TH AVENUE Ta FAIRMOUNT
<br />BOULEVARD AND ON FA-JRMOUNT BOULEVARD FROM ORCHARD STREET TO SUMMIT AVENUE.
<br />HE STATED THAT CONSIDERABLE MAINTENANCE WORK HAS BEEN DONE ON THIS SECTION
<br />OF SEWER IN THE PAST rE~ YEARS, AND THE LINE SHOULD BE CONSIDERE~FOR' RECON-
<br />STRUCTION AT AN ESTIMATED COST Of $14,130. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS, fUR-
<br />THER STATED THAT A FIELD SURVEY TAKEN ON MARCH 7, 1960 SHOWS A CLAY TILE
<br />SEWER LINE. CONSTWUCTED iN 19J3 :IS SURCHARGING AT A MANHOLE BETwEEN 17TH AND
<br />19TH AVENUES ON ORCHARD STREET, THIS BEING THE LINE ON WHICH THE PUBLIC
<br />WORKS DEPARTMENT HAS HAD A MAJOR MAINTENANCE PROBLEM fOR SOME TIME. SOME
<br />DISCUSSION WAS ALSO HEL~ ON THE POSSIBILITY OF RECONSTRUCTING LINES WHI~H
<br />HAVE DETERIORATED IN THIS AREA ON'AN ASSESSMENT BASiS SINCE TH~ LINES WERE
<br />BUILT IN 1913 AND" THE SEWERS HAVE NOW DETER.IORATED .TOTHE POINT, WHERE RE- :
<br />CONSTRUCT ION ,I S NECESSARY. SOME QUEST IONS WERE: ALSO ASKEO REGARD I NG THE
<br />SANITATION ASPECT OF THE WHOLE AREA If A PORT10N OF IT IS NOT SERVED WITH
<br />SEWERS, AND' WHAT' RELATION CONSTRUCTION or SEWERS IN THIS AREA MAY HAV,E WITH
<br />CONSTRUCTION OF SEWERS IN THE WEST END or THE CITY, PAR:rICULARL.Y AS ,IT, RE-
<br />LATES TO BRYCLER PARK AREA.
<br />
<br />\
<br />I
<br />II
<br />1
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />II
<br />
<br />'I
<br />II
<br />!I
<br />II
<br />II
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />I
<br />!
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />II
<br />1\
<br />11
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />II
<br />I:
<br />Ii
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I,
<br />II
<br />II
<br />II
<br />11
<br />!I
<br />II
<br />11
<br />'i
<br />II
<br />1,
<br />I'
<br />'I
<br />II
<br />
<br />II
<br />II
<br />11
<br />II
<br />1\
<br />'I
<br />:1
<br />'I
<br />"
<br />Ii
<br />I:
<br />II
<br />11
<br />,I
<br />'I
<br />"
<br />Ii
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />'I
<br />II
<br />"
<br />'I
<br />II
<br />:1
<br />
<br />II
<br />II
<br />I,
<br />;,
<br />Ii
<br />,I
<br />II
<br />q
<br />Ii
<br />,I
<br />il
<br />II
<br />1\
<br />I,
<br />II
<br />il
<br />I!
<br />i\
<br />:~
<br />
|