Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~i44, <br /> <br />3/14/60 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />,I <br />I <br />, <br />, <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> I' <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> 1 <br /> I <br /> I <br />2 I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />3 11 <br /> II <br /> I <br /> I <br /> 1 <br /> I <br />4 ; <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> , <br /> , <br /> I <br /> i <br /> i <br />5 I <br />I <br /> \ <br /> I <br /> Ii <br /> I <br /> I <br /> 1 <br /> , <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />\ <br />1 <br />~,' <br />'I <br />,i <br /> <br />IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT ANEW SEWER BE INSTALLED IN THE AREA IN QUESTION AS OUT~ <br />LINED BY THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS AND THAT, SUBJECT TO AN OPINION FROM THE :.,,' <br />CITY ATTORNEY, THIS SEWER BE ASSESSED TO THE OWNERS OF ABUTTING PROPERTY. MOTION <br />CARRIED WITH MR. WILSON OBJECTING TO TH~ REASSESSMENT PROCEDURE. <br /> <br />\ <br />J <br />\\ <br />I: <br />II <br />II <br />,) <br />I <br />i! <br />'I <br />Ii <br />" <br />j, <br />" <br />II <br />'I <br />II <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />AFTER THE COMMITTEE REPORT WAS READ, THE CITY ATTORNEY REPORTED HE HAD INVESTIGATED THE <br />CHARTER OF THE CITY TO DETERMINE IF SEWERS CAN BE REASSESSED .AFTER THEY HAD ONCE BEEN BUILT, <br />AND IT IS HIS OPINION THAT SEWERS CAN BE REASSESSED SUBJECT TO THE CITY'S BEING, ABLE TO <br />PROVE A BENEFIT BY SUCH RECONSTRUCTION AND REASSESSMENT TO PROPERTY SO REASSESSED. IN <br />CONNECTION WITH THIS IT WAS POINTED OUT IT WOULD BE NECESSARY TO ESTABLISH PROCEDURES AND <br />F'ORMULA F"OR SUCH REASSESSMENT PROCESSES. ALSO, IT WAS SUGGESTED THAT A SEWER D,ISTRICT <br />MIGHT BE ESTABLISHED UNDER SOME OTHER AUTHORITY THAN THE CITY OF' EUGENE F"OR THE SEWER <br />OPERATION. <br /> <br />iI' <br />I' <br />'I <br />Ii <br />II <br />" <br />II <br />~ I <br />II <br />:1 <br />'I <br />d <br />II <br />i' <br />,I <br />!i <br />!: <br />I'! <br />I' <br />i <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />IT WAS THEN MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOLM THAT THE ITEM 2 OF THE COMMITTEE <br />REPORT BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED, MESSRS. WILSON AND SWANSON VOTING NAY, MOYER ABSTAIN- <br />ING. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />3. REQUEST BY EUGENE WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD FOR PROPER CITY OFFICIALS TO EXECUTE <br />DEED CONVEYING PROPERTY IN THE NORTH BANK PARK AREA TO LANE COUNTY - IT WAS EX- <br />PLAINED THAT THE EUGENE WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD HAS.ACQUIRED CERTAIN PROPERTY <br />F"ROM THE EUGENE SAND & GRAVEL COMPANY WHICH WILL BE IN THE NORTH BANK PARK. AREA, <br />AND THAT THEY DESIRE TO MAKE PROVISION FOR RIGHTS-OF-WAY FOR ELECTRICAL TRANS- <br />MISSION LINES AND THEN SELL THE REMAINDER OF THE PROPERTY TO LA~E COUNTY AT AN <br />AGREED PRICE OF' $12,000. FOR THIS REASON IT IS NECESSARY FOR THE PROPER CITY <br />OFFICIALS TO EXECUTE A DEED CONVEYING THE PROPERTY TO LANE COUNTY. THE COMMITTEE <br />RECOMMENDED THAT THE PROPER CITY OFFICIALS BE AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE NECESSARY. <br />DOCUMENTS. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS THAT ITEM 3 'OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE <br />APPROVED. ROLLCALL VOTE. ALL COUNCILMEN PRESENT VOTING AYE, MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />, <br />II <br />,\ <br />:I <br />j: <br />I: <br />t! <br />:t <br />H <br />!I <br />~ <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />Ii <br />I: <br />;.: <br />, <br />'I <br />il <br />'i <br />II <br />Ii <br />Ii <br />l' <br />Ii <br /> <br />1; <br />, <br /> <br />j <br />I, <br />;i <br />it <br />il <br />:1 <br />I, <br />II <br />II <br />Ii <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />4. DISCUSSION REGARDING PETITION TO PAVE BAKER STREET FROM 28TH AVENUE TO 29TH <br />PLACE - IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT.A PETITION HAD BEEN RECEIVED TO PAVE BAKERSTREET <br />F"ROM 28TH AVENUE TO 29TH PLACE AND THAT THIS PETITION CONTAINED SIGNATURES OF" <br />OWNERS OF" 54.8% OF THE PROPERTY TO BE ASSESSED. THE COMMITTEE DISCUSSED THIS' <br />AND RECOMMENDED THAT BAKER STREET BE PAVED FROM 28TH AVENUE TO 29TH PLACE AND <br />THAT THE NECESSARY ORDINANCES INITIATING THEPROJECT BE PASSED. MOTION CARRIED <br />UNANIMOUSLY. <br /> <br />5. PETITION TO PAVE 29TH PLACE FROM UNIVERSITY STREET TO ONYX STREET - IT WAS <br />EXPLAINED A PETITION CONTAINING SIGNATURES OF OWNERS. OF 55.97~ OF THE PROPERTY. <br />TO BE ASSESSED F'OR THE PAVING OF 29TH PLACE FROM UNIVERSITY STREET TO ONYX <br />STREET HAD BEEN RECEIVED. SOME DISCUSSION WAS HELD ON THIS SUBJECT AND IT WAS <br />RECOMMENDED THAT,29TH PLACE F"ROM UNIVERSITY STREET TO ONYX STREET BE PAVEO AND <br />THAT THE NECESSARY ORDINANCES INITIATING THE PROJECT BE PASSED. MOTION CA~-~ <br />RIED UNANIMOUSLY. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />6. PETITION FOR THE PAVING OF GRANT STREET FROM. 6TH TO 7TH AVENUE - IT WAS EX- <br />PLAINED THAT A PETITION CONTAINING SIGNATURES OF OWNERS OF" 51.1% OF THE PRO- <br />PERTY TO BE ASSESSED FOR THE PAVING OF GRANT STREET FROM 6TH TO 7TH AVENUE HAD <br />BEEN RECEIVED. THE COMMITTEE AFTER CONSIDERATION RECOMMENDED THAT GRANT STREET <br />BE PAVED FROM 6TH TO 7TH AVENUE AND THAT THE NECESSARY ORD.INANCES INITIATING <br />THE PROJECT BE:PASSED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED By-MR. MOLHOLM THAT ITEMS 4, 5 AND 6 Of THE COMMITTEE <br />REPORT BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. . <br /> <br />7. DISCUSSION REGARDING PAVING Of GRANT STREET FROM 5TH TO 6TH AVENUE - IN CON- <br />NECTION WITH ITEM 6 SOME DISCUSS.ION WAS GIVEN TO THE PAVING OF GRANT STREET <br />FROM 5TH TO 6TH AVENUE. IN THE DISCUSSION IT WAS POINTED OUT THAT THE PAVING <br />OF ' THIS BLOCK WOULD BE Of LITTLE VALUE If 5TH AVENyE WERE NOT PAVED FROM <br />GRANT STREET TO THE EAST. IT WAS SUGGESTED THAT A STUDY BE MADE OF THE PAVING <br />OF 5TH AVENUE fROM GRANT STREET TO THE EAST AND RECOMMENDED THAT GRANT STREET. <br />BE PAVED FROM 5TH AVENUE TO 6TH. AVENUE AND THAT THE NECESSARY ORDINANCES INI- <br />TIATING THE PROJECT BE PASSED. MOTION CARRIED, MESSRS. MOlHOLM AND SWANSON <br />VOTING NAY. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />!: <br />I. <br />'I <br />II <br />" <br />iI <br />!I <br />'I <br />,I <br />Ii <br />l' <br />,I <br />:1 <br />II <br />Ii <br />I ~ <br />I' <br />,I <br />ii <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. MCGAFFEY THAT ITEM 7 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE <br />HELD OVER. MOTION CARRI~D. <br /> <br />8. REQUEST .BY WAYNE AND MAR I EM BRUMBACH fOR ANNEXAT I ON OF CERT A I N AREA I H <br />VICINITY OF COLLEGECREST ADDITION - A 100% PETITION fROM WAYNE B. AND MARIEM <br />BRUMBACH WAS PRESENTED TO THE COMM ITTEE FOR THE ANNEXAT ION OF. A PARCEL Of <br />PROPERTY APPROXIMATELY 117'XIOO' IN THE VICINITY OF COLLEGE CREST ADDITION. <br />THE COMM I TTEE CONS I DERED THE REQUESTED ANNEXST ION PET I T I ON AND RECOMME.NDED <br />IT BE REFERRED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR STUDY AND RECOMME~DATION. <br />MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. <br /> <br />I <br />