Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />3/28/60 <br /> <br />'361~ <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />~J <br />CoJ <br /> <br />"<':' <br />C,)' <br />CO <br />cc <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />e <br /> <br /> I <br /> " <br /> Ii <br /> .1 <br /> , <br /> ': <br /> ,i <br /> , <br /> " <br /> (: <br /> .' <br /> ,I <br /> I <br /> "I <br /> , <br />I " <br />'I <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> .' <br />2 'i <br />I <br /> c; <br /> I <br /> ;1 <br /> I <br /> <br />h <br /> <br />~l <br />"I <br />~ , <br />i'l <br />I. <br />.1 <br />.1 <br />,I <br />:1 <br />" <br />'I <br /> <br />MRS. BILLMIRE INDICATED THAT IN HER BELIEF PEOPLE IN THE AREA WOULD BE LIVING IN FEAR AS <br />SHE INDICATED SHE IS OR WOULD BE WHEN THE SALVATION ARMY BUILDING PROGRAM IS COMPLETED. <br />SHE STATED IN HER BELIEF HOMES ARE THE MOST IMPORTANT THINGS IN AN' INDIVIDUAL'S LIrE AND <br />THAT THE LOCATION or A SALVATION ARMY MISSION OR HOSPITALITY 'HOUSE WOULD AID INMAKING <br />THE AREA A SLUM AREA. SHE READ LETTERS FROM THE SAFFRON SUPPLY' COMPANY AND DAMASCUS <br />SERVICE STATIONS, INC., IN SALEM, LOCATED ADJACENT TO MISSIONS WHICH GENERALLY STATED <br />REACTI~NS TO INDIVltiUALS DRAWN TO A MISSION WERE NOT PLEASANT. <br /> <br />:( <br />i <br /> <br />, <br />I <br />I <br />'.1 <br /> <br />MR. BILL McNUTT, CHAIRMAN OF THe SALVATION ARMY BOARD, STATED THE SALVATION ARMY IS <br />FULLY COGNIZANT OF WHAT THEY WERE DOING WHEN THEY PURCHASED THE LOTS, THEy BELIEVE THE <br />BUILDING THEy WOULD CONSTRUCT WOULD BE AN ADDITION TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD, THE HOSPITALITY <br />HOUSE WOULD BE WELL SUPERVISED, RUN IN AN ORDERLY FASHIO"N, AND WELL MAINTAINED. MR.McNuTT <br />INQUIRED AS TO WHERE THE SALVATION ARMY COULD GO AND FURTHER STATED THAT LAC~ or FUNDS <br />MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR THEM TO LOCATE IN THE CENTRAL BUSINESS AREA. HE ALSO STATED <br />THAT THE LACK OF FUNDS DOES NOT INDICATE THE CHARACTER OF A PERSON, THAT A~ FACTORS IN <br />THIS MUST BE LOOKED AT IN A REALISTIC WAY. IT WAS FURTHER POINTED OUT BY MR. McNUTT <br />IN ANSWER TO A QUESTION THAT THE AREA IS ZONED FOR 'COMMERCIAL USE, AND THAT RESIDENTS <br />GivE UP SOMETHING WHEN THEIR AREA IS ZONED FOR SUCH COMMERCIAL USE. <br /> <br />, <br />, <br />I' <br /> <br />., <br />, <br /> <br />:' <br />1 <br /> <br />~; <br />" <br />, <br />" <br />I <br />1 <br />tl <br />, <br /> <br />LT. STENY'CK OF THE SALVATION ARMY STATED THAT IT IS OBVIOUS THAT THE PEOPLE DO NOT <br />WANT THE SALVAT.lON ARMY IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND INTRODUCED MRS. GOFF WHO LIVES IMMEDIATELY <br />ADJACENT TO THE EXISTING SALVATION ARMY HEADQUARTERS. MRS. GOFF STATED SHE HAD LIVED IN <br />EUGENE FOR FORTY YEARS, FIFTEEN OF WHICH HAD BEEN ADJACENT TO THE SALVATION ARMY, AND <br />THAT THEIR ACTIVITIES HAD NOT BOTHERED HER IN ANY WAY, SHAPE OR FORM DURING THAT PERIOD. <br /> <br />'I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />VARIOUS SUGGESTIONS AND IDEAS WERE OFFERED, AMONG WHICH WERE THAT T~ HEADQUARTERS <br />SHOULD BE LOCATED NEAR A RAILROAD, THAT THE RELOCATION OF THE SALVATION ARMY HEADQUARTERS <br />ALWAYS CAUSES PROBLEMS AND HAS CAUSED PROBLEMS IN OTHER CITIES, BUT THAT NOT ALL NEW <br />MISSIONS ARE GOING INTO LOW VALUE AREAS. fURTHER, NO ONE HAD BEEN ABLE TO COME UP WITH <br />A CONSTRUCTIVE IDEA AS TO WHERE THE SALVATION ARMY HEADQUAR~RS COULD BE BUILT. <br /> <br />, <br />:! <br /> <br />': <br /> <br />:1 <br />I <br /> <br />SOME DISCUSSION WAS HAD AMONG PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT AS TO WHAT WOULD <br />HAPPEN IF THE ZONING WERE CHANGED. To THIS THE CITY ATTORNEY INDICAT~D IF THE LAW WERE <br />CHANGED BEFORE THE BUILDING IS CONSTRUCTED, THEY WOULO NOT BE ABLE TO BUILD A BUILDING <br />THAT DID NOT CONFORM TO ZONING REQUIREMENTS. IF THE LAW WERE CHANGED AFTER THE BUILD- <br />ING IS CONSTRUCTED, THEN THE BUILDING COULD EXIST AND THE USE CONTINUE AS A NON-CONFORMING <br />USE. <br /> <br />! <br />" <br /> <br />i <br /> <br />LT. STENV~CK EXPLAINED THE PURPOSE OF THE HOSPITALITY HOUSE WHICH WAS TO HOUSE FAMILIES <br />AND INDIVIDUALS ALLOWING THEM TO STAY LONG ENOUGH TO GET THEIR FEET ON THE GROUND AND <br />TO REESTABLISH AN ORDERLY LIFE. IT WAS STATED .THEY DO NOT AID MEN WHO MOVE AROUND <br />THE COUNTRY. THEiR MAIN PURPOSE IS THE REHABILITATION OF THE INDIVIDUAL. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION WAS HELD ON A NUMBER OF ITEMS COMPARABLE TO THOSE REPORTED ABOVE, AND THE <br />PLANNING CONSULTANT WAS ASKED AS TO POSSIBLE AREAS IN WHICH MISSION MIGHT BE ALLOWED <br />IN THE EVENT ZONING IS CHANGED, OR THE METHOD BY WHICH THE ZONING MIGHT BE CHANGED <br />TO DISALLOW MISSIONS IN THOSE AREAS IN WHICH THEY ARE NOW ALLOWED. THE PLANNING CON- <br />SULTANT INDICATED THIS COULD BE DONE BY MODIFICATIONS TO THE ORDINANCE, FOLLOWING <br />WHICH IT WAS RECOMMENDED THE MEETING ADJOURN." <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOLM THAT ITEMS 7 AND 8 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE <br />APPRovED. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />A REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE MEETING HELD MARCH 24, 1960 WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />"PRESENT;, COUNCILMEN SHEARER, LAURIS, MCGAffEY, CHATT, MOYER, WILSON AND SWANSON; CITY MANAGER; <br />CITY RECORDER; CITY ATTORNEY; CHIEF OF POLICE; CITY ENGINEER; SUPERINTENDENT OF PARKS <br />,& RECREATION; TRAFFIC ENGINEER; ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT; MRS. DE~N PAPE; fRED BRENNE; <br />LEROY BURCHAM; DAN WYANT, EUGENE REGISTER-GUARD; AND OTHER INTERESTED CITIzeNS. <br /> <br />I. REQUEST BY MR. CARL M. NIELSEN, 3560 KNOB HILL LANE, FOR CURB SIDEWALK IN FRONT Of HIS <br />PROPERTY - A REQUEST BY MR. NIELSEN WAS PRESENTED AND A RECOMMENDATION BY THE PUBLIC <br />WORKS DEPARTMENT WAS ALSO PRESENTED WHICH RECOMMENDATION WAS FOR CURB SIDEWALK ON KNOB <br />HILL BETWEEN 35TH AND 37TH AVENUES. COMMITTEE MEMBERS DROVE TO THE SITE AND THE COM- <br />MITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT CURB SIDEWALKS BE' APPROVED fOR KNOB HILL BETWEEN 35TH AND 37TH <br />AvENUES. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. <br /> <br />2. REQUEST BY MANOR MOTEL FOR OVERLENGTH CURB CUT ON EAST BROADWAY - IT WAS EXPLAINED <br />THAT THE COUNCIL HAD PREVIOUSLY VIEWED THE SITE Of AN OVERLENGTH CURB CUT REQUESTED <br />BY THE MANOR MOTEL ON EAST BROADWAY, AND THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT HAD CONTACTED <br />THE OREGON STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT WHO, BY LETTER DATED MARCH 17, 1960, STATED THAT <br />THE 82' OPEN ACCESS AREA REQUESTED BY THE MANOR MOTEL WAS FAR IN EXCESS OF THE 35' <br />WHICH IS ALLOWED BY THE CITY AND ALSO EXCEEDS THE REGULATIONS OF THE HIGHWAY DEPART- <br />MENT, AND FURTHER THAT THE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT WILL NOT CONDONE A DRIVEWAY OF SUCH <br />WIDTH.. IT WAS FURTHER STATED IN THE LETTER THAT THIS PARTICULAR SECTION OF EAST <br />BROADWAY WAS PURCHASED BY THE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT, AS ADDITIONAL RIGHT-Of-WAY AND THE <br />MATTER OF DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION AND ACCESS CONTROL IS UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE <br />HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT. THIS DIFfERS fROM THE CASE WHERE A STATE HIGHWAY IS ROUTED OVER <br /> <br />I~ \ <br /> <br />II <br />II <br />11 <br />II <br />II <br />" <br />I) <br />!I <br />ii <br />:! <br />I' <br />,i <br />;1 <br />I: <br />;1 <br />I! <br />II <br />II <br />\1 <br />I <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />11 <br />II <br />Ii <br />II <br />II <br />I' <br />.1 <br />'I <br />Ii <br />I: <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />!I <br />'I <br />II <br />Ii <br />11 <br />'I <br />II <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />II <br />Ii <br />Ii <br />Ii <br />II <br />II <br />,I <br /> <br />" <br />I: <br /> <br />II <br />11 <br />I' <br />!I <br />II <br />!I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />!I <br />II <br />,I <br />Ii <br />Ii <br />II <br />Ii <br />II <br />,I <br />II <br />j <br />I <br />Ii <br />II <br />II <br />I <br />Ii <br />,I <br />"~ <br />