<br />e
<br />
<br />3/28/60
<br />
<br />'361~
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />~J
<br />CoJ
<br />
<br />"<':'
<br />C,)'
<br />CO
<br />cc
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br /> I
<br /> "
<br /> Ii
<br /> .1
<br /> ,
<br /> ':
<br /> ,i
<br /> ,
<br /> "
<br /> (:
<br /> .'
<br /> ,I
<br /> I
<br /> "I
<br /> ,
<br />I "
<br />'I
<br /> I
<br /> !
<br /> .'
<br />2 'i
<br />I
<br /> c;
<br /> I
<br /> ;1
<br /> I
<br />
<br />h
<br />
<br />~l
<br />"I
<br />~ ,
<br />i'l
<br />I.
<br />.1
<br />.1
<br />,I
<br />:1
<br />"
<br />'I
<br />
<br />MRS. BILLMIRE INDICATED THAT IN HER BELIEF PEOPLE IN THE AREA WOULD BE LIVING IN FEAR AS
<br />SHE INDICATED SHE IS OR WOULD BE WHEN THE SALVATION ARMY BUILDING PROGRAM IS COMPLETED.
<br />SHE STATED IN HER BELIEF HOMES ARE THE MOST IMPORTANT THINGS IN AN' INDIVIDUAL'S LIrE AND
<br />THAT THE LOCATION or A SALVATION ARMY MISSION OR HOSPITALITY 'HOUSE WOULD AID INMAKING
<br />THE AREA A SLUM AREA. SHE READ LETTERS FROM THE SAFFRON SUPPLY' COMPANY AND DAMASCUS
<br />SERVICE STATIONS, INC., IN SALEM, LOCATED ADJACENT TO MISSIONS WHICH GENERALLY STATED
<br />REACTI~NS TO INDIVltiUALS DRAWN TO A MISSION WERE NOT PLEASANT.
<br />
<br />:(
<br />i
<br />
<br />,
<br />I
<br />I
<br />'.1
<br />
<br />MR. BILL McNUTT, CHAIRMAN OF THe SALVATION ARMY BOARD, STATED THE SALVATION ARMY IS
<br />FULLY COGNIZANT OF WHAT THEY WERE DOING WHEN THEY PURCHASED THE LOTS, THEy BELIEVE THE
<br />BUILDING THEy WOULD CONSTRUCT WOULD BE AN ADDITION TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD, THE HOSPITALITY
<br />HOUSE WOULD BE WELL SUPERVISED, RUN IN AN ORDERLY FASHIO"N, AND WELL MAINTAINED. MR.McNuTT
<br />INQUIRED AS TO WHERE THE SALVATION ARMY COULD GO AND FURTHER STATED THAT LAC~ or FUNDS
<br />MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR THEM TO LOCATE IN THE CENTRAL BUSINESS AREA. HE ALSO STATED
<br />THAT THE LACK OF FUNDS DOES NOT INDICATE THE CHARACTER OF A PERSON, THAT A~ FACTORS IN
<br />THIS MUST BE LOOKED AT IN A REALISTIC WAY. IT WAS FURTHER POINTED OUT BY MR. McNUTT
<br />IN ANSWER TO A QUESTION THAT THE AREA IS ZONED FOR 'COMMERCIAL USE, AND THAT RESIDENTS
<br />GivE UP SOMETHING WHEN THEIR AREA IS ZONED FOR SUCH COMMERCIAL USE.
<br />
<br />,
<br />,
<br />I'
<br />
<br />.,
<br />,
<br />
<br />:'
<br />1
<br />
<br />~;
<br />"
<br />,
<br />"
<br />I
<br />1
<br />tl
<br />,
<br />
<br />LT. STENY'CK OF THE SALVATION ARMY STATED THAT IT IS OBVIOUS THAT THE PEOPLE DO NOT
<br />WANT THE SALVAT.lON ARMY IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND INTRODUCED MRS. GOFF WHO LIVES IMMEDIATELY
<br />ADJACENT TO THE EXISTING SALVATION ARMY HEADQUARTERS. MRS. GOFF STATED SHE HAD LIVED IN
<br />EUGENE FOR FORTY YEARS, FIFTEEN OF WHICH HAD BEEN ADJACENT TO THE SALVATION ARMY, AND
<br />THAT THEIR ACTIVITIES HAD NOT BOTHERED HER IN ANY WAY, SHAPE OR FORM DURING THAT PERIOD.
<br />
<br />'I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />
<br />VARIOUS SUGGESTIONS AND IDEAS WERE OFFERED, AMONG WHICH WERE THAT T~ HEADQUARTERS
<br />SHOULD BE LOCATED NEAR A RAILROAD, THAT THE RELOCATION OF THE SALVATION ARMY HEADQUARTERS
<br />ALWAYS CAUSES PROBLEMS AND HAS CAUSED PROBLEMS IN OTHER CITIES, BUT THAT NOT ALL NEW
<br />MISSIONS ARE GOING INTO LOW VALUE AREAS. fURTHER, NO ONE HAD BEEN ABLE TO COME UP WITH
<br />A CONSTRUCTIVE IDEA AS TO WHERE THE SALVATION ARMY HEADQUAR~RS COULD BE BUILT.
<br />
<br />,
<br />:!
<br />
<br />':
<br />
<br />:1
<br />I
<br />
<br />SOME DISCUSSION WAS HAD AMONG PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT AS TO WHAT WOULD
<br />HAPPEN IF THE ZONING WERE CHANGED. To THIS THE CITY ATTORNEY INDICAT~D IF THE LAW WERE
<br />CHANGED BEFORE THE BUILDING IS CONSTRUCTED, THEY WOULO NOT BE ABLE TO BUILD A BUILDING
<br />THAT DID NOT CONFORM TO ZONING REQUIREMENTS. IF THE LAW WERE CHANGED AFTER THE BUILD-
<br />ING IS CONSTRUCTED, THEN THE BUILDING COULD EXIST AND THE USE CONTINUE AS A NON-CONFORMING
<br />USE.
<br />
<br />!
<br />"
<br />
<br />i
<br />
<br />LT. STENV~CK EXPLAINED THE PURPOSE OF THE HOSPITALITY HOUSE WHICH WAS TO HOUSE FAMILIES
<br />AND INDIVIDUALS ALLOWING THEM TO STAY LONG ENOUGH TO GET THEIR FEET ON THE GROUND AND
<br />TO REESTABLISH AN ORDERLY LIFE. IT WAS STATED .THEY DO NOT AID MEN WHO MOVE AROUND
<br />THE COUNTRY. THEiR MAIN PURPOSE IS THE REHABILITATION OF THE INDIVIDUAL.
<br />
<br />DISCUSSION WAS HELD ON A NUMBER OF ITEMS COMPARABLE TO THOSE REPORTED ABOVE, AND THE
<br />PLANNING CONSULTANT WAS ASKED AS TO POSSIBLE AREAS IN WHICH MISSION MIGHT BE ALLOWED
<br />IN THE EVENT ZONING IS CHANGED, OR THE METHOD BY WHICH THE ZONING MIGHT BE CHANGED
<br />TO DISALLOW MISSIONS IN THOSE AREAS IN WHICH THEY ARE NOW ALLOWED. THE PLANNING CON-
<br />SULTANT INDICATED THIS COULD BE DONE BY MODIFICATIONS TO THE ORDINANCE, FOLLOWING
<br />WHICH IT WAS RECOMMENDED THE MEETING ADJOURN."
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOLM THAT ITEMS 7 AND 8 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE
<br />APPRovED. MOTION CARRIED.
<br />
<br />A REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE MEETING HELD MARCH 24, 1960 WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS:
<br />
<br />"PRESENT;, COUNCILMEN SHEARER, LAURIS, MCGAffEY, CHATT, MOYER, WILSON AND SWANSON; CITY MANAGER;
<br />CITY RECORDER; CITY ATTORNEY; CHIEF OF POLICE; CITY ENGINEER; SUPERINTENDENT OF PARKS
<br />,& RECREATION; TRAFFIC ENGINEER; ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT; MRS. DE~N PAPE; fRED BRENNE;
<br />LEROY BURCHAM; DAN WYANT, EUGENE REGISTER-GUARD; AND OTHER INTERESTED CITIzeNS.
<br />
<br />I. REQUEST BY MR. CARL M. NIELSEN, 3560 KNOB HILL LANE, FOR CURB SIDEWALK IN FRONT Of HIS
<br />PROPERTY - A REQUEST BY MR. NIELSEN WAS PRESENTED AND A RECOMMENDATION BY THE PUBLIC
<br />WORKS DEPARTMENT WAS ALSO PRESENTED WHICH RECOMMENDATION WAS FOR CURB SIDEWALK ON KNOB
<br />HILL BETWEEN 35TH AND 37TH AVENUES. COMMITTEE MEMBERS DROVE TO THE SITE AND THE COM-
<br />MITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT CURB SIDEWALKS BE' APPROVED fOR KNOB HILL BETWEEN 35TH AND 37TH
<br />AvENUES. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
<br />
<br />2. REQUEST BY MANOR MOTEL FOR OVERLENGTH CURB CUT ON EAST BROADWAY - IT WAS EXPLAINED
<br />THAT THE COUNCIL HAD PREVIOUSLY VIEWED THE SITE Of AN OVERLENGTH CURB CUT REQUESTED
<br />BY THE MANOR MOTEL ON EAST BROADWAY, AND THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT HAD CONTACTED
<br />THE OREGON STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT WHO, BY LETTER DATED MARCH 17, 1960, STATED THAT
<br />THE 82' OPEN ACCESS AREA REQUESTED BY THE MANOR MOTEL WAS FAR IN EXCESS OF THE 35'
<br />WHICH IS ALLOWED BY THE CITY AND ALSO EXCEEDS THE REGULATIONS OF THE HIGHWAY DEPART-
<br />MENT, AND FURTHER THAT THE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT WILL NOT CONDONE A DRIVEWAY OF SUCH
<br />WIDTH.. IT WAS FURTHER STATED IN THE LETTER THAT THIS PARTICULAR SECTION OF EAST
<br />BROADWAY WAS PURCHASED BY THE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT, AS ADDITIONAL RIGHT-Of-WAY AND THE
<br />MATTER OF DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION AND ACCESS CONTROL IS UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE
<br />HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT. THIS DIFfERS fROM THE CASE WHERE A STATE HIGHWAY IS ROUTED OVER
<br />
<br />I~ \
<br />
<br />II
<br />II
<br />11
<br />II
<br />II
<br />"
<br />I)
<br />!I
<br />ii
<br />:!
<br />I'
<br />,i
<br />;1
<br />I:
<br />;1
<br />I!
<br />II
<br />II
<br />\1
<br />I
<br />II
<br />II
<br />II
<br />11
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />II
<br />I'
<br />.1
<br />'I
<br />Ii
<br />I:
<br />II
<br />II
<br />II
<br />II
<br />II
<br />!I
<br />'I
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />11
<br />'I
<br />II
<br />
<br />II
<br />
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />Ii
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />II
<br />,I
<br />
<br />"
<br />I:
<br />
<br />II
<br />11
<br />I'
<br />!I
<br />II
<br />!I
<br />i
<br />I
<br />I
<br />II
<br />!I
<br />II
<br />,I
<br />Ii
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />,I
<br />II
<br />j
<br />I
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />II
<br />I
<br />Ii
<br />,I
<br />"~
<br />
|