Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />00 <br />C',g> <br />~~ <br />(~) <br />c:.::. <br />~ <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />411~ <br /> <br />5/9/60 <br /> <br />__~________4________~__'~__ <br />- -. . ... , - - - -. -- .. - <br /> <br />, <br />'i <br />\' <br />.I <br />~I <br />,i <br />I' <br />~ : <br /> <br />II <br />II <br />i' <br />d <br />I, <br />i' <br />,I <br />Ij <br />Ii <br />Ii <br />I <br />:i <br />I! <br />" <br />H <br /> <br />" <br />:! <br />I <br /> <br />PETITIONS WERE ALSO PRESENTED FOR CURB SIDEWALKS ON DONALD STREET BETWEEN 32ND AND 33RD <br />AVENUES AND 33RD AND 34TH AS WELL AS PETITIONS AGAINST THE INSTALLATION OF SIDEWALK ON <br />THE WEST SIDE OF DONALD STREET. ANOTHER PETITION FOR CURB SIDEWALK ON THE NORTH SIDE <br />OF 33RD AVENUE FROM DONALD TO fERRY WAS LIKEWISE PRESENTED" AND A PETITION FOR CURB <br />SIDEWALK ON 34TH AVENUE ON THE NORTH SIDE BETWEEN DONALD AND fERRY AND ON THE SOUTH SIDE <br />BETWEEN DONALD AND fERRY WAS PRESENTED. LETTERS OF PROTEST ON THE INSTALLATION OF SIDE- <br />WALKS ON 34TH PLACE WERE PRESENTED FROM MR. ROBERT D. CLOW AND ROBERT A. SMITH, AND ONE <br />LETTER FROM MR. AND MRS. GAIL CARD AT 510 EAST 34TH AVENUE WAS PRESENTED PROTESTING THE <br />INSTALLATION OF SIDEWALKS BETWEEN 34TH PLACE AND 34TH AVENUE. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />i <br />I! <br /> <br />i <br />,I <br />Ii <br /> <br />rGL~aw~NG THE PRESENTATION OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS AND <br />THE PETITIONS, THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE SIDEWALKS BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE <br />WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. <br /> <br />;.; <br />, <br />!: <br />,I <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. MCGAFFEY THAT ITEM 7 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE APPROVED. <br /> <br />'/ <br /> <br />:: <br />II <br />fOUR PROPERTY OWNERS RES I 0 I NG ON THE WEST S I DE OF DONALD STREET BETWEEN 33RD AND THE ALLEY BETWEEN ii <br />34TH AND 34TH PLACE APPEARED TO PROTEST THE INSTALLATION OF SIDEWALKS. ONE SUCH PROPERTY OWNER RE- :1 <br />QUESTED THAT THE COUNC I L MOVE TREES CURRENTLY I N THE PUBL I C RIGHT-OF-WAY I F SUCH SIDEWALK I S INSTALLED. :: <br />!I <br />'I <br />" <br />Ii <br />:' <br />il <br />I! <br />II <br />, <br />Ii <br />Ii <br />II <br />" <br />il <br /> <br />J <br />i <br />I <br /> <br />IT WAS THEN MOVED BY MR. McGAFFEY SECONDED BY MR. SWANSON THAT THE MOTION TO APPROVE THE COMMITTEE <br />REPORT BE AMENDED TO HOLD OVER ACTION ON THE SIDEWALK INSTALLATION ON THE WEST SIDE OF DONALD STREET <br />BETWEEN 33RD AVENUE AND THE ALLEY BETWEEN 34TH AVENUE AND 34TH PLACE. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />,I <br />I <br /> <br />ON VOTE ON THE ORIGINAL MOTION AS AMENDED, MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />I .! <br /> <br />8. PUBLIC WORKS RECOMMENDATION FOR INSTALLATION OF SIDEWALKS ON 22ND AVENUE FROM LINCOLN <br />TO JACKSON - A 'RECOMMENDATION FROM THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS WAS PRESENTED FOR THE <br />INSTALLATION OF SIDEWALKS BETWEEN LINCOLN AND JACKSON STREETS AS FOLLOWS: CURB SIDE- <br />WALKS ON BOTH SIDES OF 22ND AVENUE FROM LINCOLN TO JEFFERSON, EXCEPT FOR EXISTING WALK, <br />AND THE SOUTH SIDE BETWEEN LINCOLN AND LAWRENCE; STANDARD SETBACK SIDEWALKS ON THE <br />NORTH SIDE OF 22ND FROM JEFFERSON TO MONROE STREET. SIDEWALKS ON THE SOUTH SIDE WILL <br />REQUIRE CONSIDERABLE FILL AND THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS RECOMMENDS THE FILL BE MADE <br />IN THIS PROJECT AND THE WALKS INSTALLED THE FOLLOWING YEAR WHEN SETTLEMENT IS COM- <br />PLETED; CURB SIDEWALKS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 22ND AVENUE BETWEEN MONROE AND fRIENDLY <br />STREETS. RECOMMENDATION WAS NOT MADE TO INSTALL A SIDEWALK ON THE NORTH SIDE SINCE IT <br />WOULD REQUIRE HEAVY EXCAVATION AND REMOVAL OF SEVERAL LARGE TREES FOR THE SIDEWALK; <br />STANDARD SETBACK LOCATION SIDEWALKS ON BOTH SIDES OF 22ND AVENUE FROM fRIENDLY TO <br />JACKSON STREET. <br /> <br />~t <br /> <br />'I <br /> <br />; <br />" <br /> <br />:1 <br /> <br />A LETTER REQUESTING CURB SIDEWALK IN FRONT OF PROPERTY LOCATED BETWEEN ADAMS AND <br />fRIENDLY STREET ON 22ND AVENUE WAS PRESENTED BY MR. PHIL A. HARVEY. <br /> <br />:i <br /> <br />THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS BE <br />APPROVED AND THE SIDEWALKS INSTALLED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. <br /> <br />" <br />" <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. MOYER THAT ITEM 8 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE APPROVED. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MRS. LAURIS SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOLM THAT THE ORIGINAL MOTION BE AMENDED'TO ALLOW CURB <br />SIDEWALK ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 22ND AVENUE BETWEEN ADAMS AND fRIENDLY STREETS (HARVEY PROPERTY). <br />MOTION DEREATED. <br /> <br />!( <br /> <br />I <br />'I <br />" <br />2 <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MRS. LAURIS SECONDED BY MR. MCGAFFEY THAT THIS MATTER BE REFERRED TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE <br />WHOLE FOR FURTHER STUDY. MOT ION CARR I ED !i <br />, <br />" <br />'I <br /> <br />'i <br /> <br />9. DiSCUSSION CONCERNING PROPOSED NEW CITY HALL IN CONNECTION WITH ARCHITECTS' COMPETI- <br />TION - A REPORT ON THE PROPOSED BUILDING SIZE AS CONTEMPLATED BY THE ADMINISTRTION <br />~PRESENTED WHICH INCLUDED 95,000 SQUARE FEET FOR A CITY HALL, PLUS CONTINGENCIES, <br />COMPETITION FEE, LAND ACQUISITION, ARCHITECT'S FEES~ PARKING STRUCTURE, AND EQUIPMENT. <br />AN ESTIMATE WAS ALSO GIVEN BASED ON THE COST Or CONSTRUCTION OF THE COURTHOUSE, BEING <br />$18.63PE~ SQUARE FOOT, AND AN ESTIMATE WAS LIKEWISE GIVEN WITHOUT PARKING STRUCTURE <br />AND WITH ASPHALTED ONE~HALF BLOCK FOR PARKING. fOLLOWING THIS PRESENTATION IT WAS <br />REQUESTED THAT THE COMMITTEE INDICATE THE MAXIMUM COST PER SQUARE FOOT WHICH SHOULD <br />BE USED IN PRESENTING THE PROBLEM TO THE ARCHITECTS FOR THE COMPETITION. IT WAS <br />THEN RECOMMENDED THAT THE CONSTRUCTION COST Or THE CITY HALL BE HELD TO $15.00 PER <br />SQUARE FOOT MAXIMUM WHICH MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. <br /> <br />" <br />'i <br /> <br />'1 <br /> <br />fOLLOWING THIS IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT A PARKING STRUCTURE B E PLANNED AND CONSIDERED <br />AS AN ALTERNATE BUT THAT INITIALLY THE ARCHITECTS SHOULD PRESUME A PARKING LOT WOULD <br />BE USED. THIS MOTION WAS ALSO CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. <br /> <br />1: <br /> <br />IT WAS THEN SUGGESTED THAT DEAN GORDON BE ASKED TO ATTEND ONE OF THE COMMITTEE MEET- <br />INGS fOR rURTHER IDEAS FROM THE COUNCIL. <br /> <br />3 10. PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER sA Or THE EUGElSE CITY CODE ENTITLED "AMBULANCES" <br />AND ADDING A NEW SECTION DEFINING AND LICENSING INVALID COACHES - A PROPOSED ORDI- <br />NANCE DEFINING AND LICENSING INVALID COACHES FOR OPERATION WlTHIN THE CITY OF EUGENE <br />WAS PRESENTED TO THE COMMITTEE. IT WAS INDICATED THAT THE CURRENT AMBULANCE OPERATOR <br /> <br />~ <br />