|
<br />~412
<br />
<br />5/9/60
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />, '
<br />- - -- . . -
<br />~~-------_.._--- --~-
<br />
<br />-- - -
<br />- -
<br />------..---
<br />
<br />- - - . --
<br />.-- ------------
<br />
<br /> I
<br /> I
<br /> II
<br /> 'I
<br /> il
<br /> 11
<br /> I,
<br /> il
<br /> [I
<br />2 ,.
<br /> "
<br /> II
<br /> if
<br /> q
<br /> II
<br /> II
<br /> 'I
<br /> !I
<br /> I,
<br /> il
<br /> 'I
<br /> II
<br /> II
<br /> II
<br /> II
<br /> Ii
<br />3 !I
<br /> !\
<br /> II
<br /> II
<br /> lj
<br /> II
<br /> il
<br /> "
<br /> ,I
<br /> I'
<br /> ,!
<br /> ,I
<br /> II
<br /> "
<br /> II
<br /> n
<br /> 'I
<br /> II
<br /> II
<br /> I,
<br /> :!
<br /> I'
<br /> i!
<br /> !i
<br /> II
<br /> 'I
<br /> II
<br /> II
<br />4 il
<br /> :1
<br /> ~
<br /> II
<br /> I
<br /> \\
<br /> 11
<br /> I,
<br /> 'I
<br /> il
<br /> II
<br /> il
<br /> 'I
<br /> II
<br /> ;1
<br /> II
<br /> :1
<br /> 'I
<br /> il
<br /> ii
<br /> I
<br /> I
<br /> i
<br /> ,
<br /> 'I
<br /> I,
<br /> I'
<br /> I
<br /> 11
<br /> \\
<br /> i'
<br /> .i
<br />~ii
<br /> "
<br />
<br />AND THE OWNER Of THE VALLEY RENTAL SERVICE WERE IN CONCURRENCE WITHTHE ORDINANCE, AND
<br />IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT SUCH ORDINANCE BE ADOPTED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
<br />
<br />II. VARIOtBPROPOSED ORDINANCES CONCER~ING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY CODE REQUIRING CONNECTION
<br />WITH SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM; REGULATION Of ALLEYS AND PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS IN NEW PLATS;
<br />THE AMENDING AND RENUMBERING Of CERTAIN SECTIONS Of CHAPTER 18 Of THE'ELECTRICAL CODE; AND
<br />A COpy Of THE PORTLA~D ORDINANCE RELATING TO LEWD, OBSCENE AND LASCIVIOUS MATERIAL WERE
<br />PRESENTED TO THE COMMITTEE fOR THEIR PERUSAL AND fUTURE DISCUSSION. NOR fORMAL ACTION WAS
<br />, .
<br />TAKEN.
<br />
<br />12. REQUEST TO fiX SPECifiC DAY Of EACH WEEK fOR COMMITTEE MEETING - SOME DISCUSSION WAS HELD
<br />ON THIS ITEM, BUT IT WAS RECOMMENDED TO HOLD THE MATTER OVER. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLy.1I
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOLM THAT ItEMS 9, 10, II AND 12 Of THE COMMITTEE RE-
<br />PORT BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED.
<br />
<br />A REPORT Of THE COMMITTEE MEETING HELD MAY 5, 1960 WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS fOLLOWS:
<br />
<br />IIPRESENT:
<br />
<br />MAYOR CONE; COUNCILMEN .SHEARER, lAURIS, MOLHOLM, MOYER~ WILSONA NO SWANSON; CITY
<br />MANAGER; CITY RECORDER; CITY ATTORNEY; DIRECTOR Of PUBLIC WORKS; TRAffiC ENGINEER;
<br />ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT; PLANNING CONSULTANT; PLANNING ~OMMISSION MEMBERS NIVEN,
<br />MAXWELL AND PORTER; fRED BRENNE; DEAN WALTER GORDON; WENDY RAY, KUGN; OTI€R'
<br />INTERESTED CITIZENS.
<br />
<br />I. REPORT fROM THE MANAGER Of THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE - MR. fRED BRENNE, MANAGER Of THE EUGENE
<br />CHAMBER Of COMMERCE, REPORTED THAT A CHAMBER fORUM WILL BE HELD ON fRIDAY, MAY 13, 1960,
<br />TO PRESENT THE BALLOT MEASURES fOR THE CITY Of EUGENE. HE INDICATED HE DESIRES COUNCIL
<br />REPRESENTATIVES TO BE PREPARED TO SPEAK ON THE VARIOUS SUBJECTS AT THIS fORUM~
<br />
<br />SOME DISCUSSION WAS ALSO HAD ON THE CURRENT fEDERAL DECENNIAL CENSUS, AND IN THE DISCUS-
<br />SION IT WAS POINTED OUT THIS CENSUS IS TO BE COMPLETED IN THE NEXT TEN DAYS.
<br />
<br />AfTER THE PRESENTATION THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THATTHEIR NEXT COMMITTEE SESSION BE
<br />HELD THURSDAY, MAY 12, 1960, SO THAT COUNCIL REPRESENTjTIVES MAY ATTEND THE fORUM MEETING
<br />Of THE CHAMBER Of COMMERCE ON fRIDAY; MAY 13.
<br />
<br />fOLLOWING THIS SOME DI,SCUSSION WAS HAD ON THE: POSSIBILITY Of GIVING A PRIZE fOR EACH
<br />UNCOUNTED PERSON THAT MAY NOT HAVE BEEN COUNTED THUS fAR IN THE CENSUS PROGRAM. SOME
<br />CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSION WAS HAD ON THE LEGALITY Of THE CITY'S PAYING A PRIZE SINCE THIS
<br />IS A fEDERAL CENSUS.
<br />
<br />MR. PATRICK fLYNN, PRESIDENT Of THE fiREfiGHTERS ASSOCIATmN, VOLUNTEERED THE SER~ICES
<br />Of THE ASSOCIATION TO AID"N GETTiNG OUT THE CENSUS. fOLLOWING SOME DISCUSSION AND
<br />THE fACT THAT THE fEDERAL CENSUS HAS. NOT BEEN COMPLETED IN THE CITY Of EUGENE IT WAS
<br />RECOMMENDED THAT THE OffER Of THE fiREfiGHTERS ASSOCIATION BE ACCEPTED If NEEDED.
<br />MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MRS. lAURIS THAT ITEM I Of THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE APPROVED.
<br />MOTION CARRIED.
<br />
<br />. .
<br />
<br />2. REPORT CONCERNING RECOMMENDATION' fROM PUBLIC SAfETY SUBCOMMITTEE Of THE BUDGET COMMITTEE -
<br />IT WAS STATED THAT THE PUBLIC SAfETY COMMITTEE Of THE BUDGET COMMITTEE IN DISCUSSiNG fiRE
<br />DEPARTMENT SALARIES AND OTHER SALARIES HAD RECOMMENDED THAT ALL EMPLOYEES Of THE CITY RE-
<br />CEIVE A ONE-STEP 5-1/2% INCREASE IN PAY TO BE EffECTIVE WITH THE BUDGET YEAR 1960-61. IN
<br />ORDER THAT THIS BE ACCOMPLISHED, THE SUBCOMMITTEE Of THE BUDGET COMMiTTEE HAD RECOMMENDED
<br />THAT AN ITEM BE PLACED BEfORE THE VOTERS OF THE CITY Of EUGENE TO EXCEED THE 6% LIMITATION.
<br />INASMUCH AS TIME IS Of THE ESSENCE, THE QUESTION WAS BROUGHT TO, THE COUNCIL COMMITTEE AS TO
<br />WHETHER THE COUNCIL WISHES TO GO BEfORESTHE PEOPLE fOR AN INCREASE IN TAXATION ABOVE THE
<br />6% LIMITATION.
<br />
<br />MAYOR CONE INDICATED THAT THE EXPANSION Of THE CITY AND THE CONSEQUENT INCREASE IN THE
<br />ASSESSED VALUATION DOES NOT MEET THE ADDED SERVICE REQUIREMENTS BROUGHT ON BY SUCH IN-
<br />CREASE IN, ASSESSED VALUE. HE fURlliER STATED HE BELIEVES IT TO BE A MISTAKE TO LOOK UPON
<br />THIS ITEM ON A SHORT TIME BASIS AND INDICATED HE WOULD PREfER A LONG TIME STUDY ON THE,
<br />TAX BASE WITH A POSSiBILITYlTHAT A TAX BASE INCREASE M!GHT BE PREPARED fOR THE NOVEMBER
<br />BALLOT. IT WAS POINTED out THAT fOR IT TO BE CERTifIED fOR THE NOVEMBER BALLOT, SUCH
<br />MEASURE WOULD HAVE TO BE PREPARED BY LAtE AUGUST. IN THE fURTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS
<br />SUBJECT, IT WAS RECOGNIZED THERE IS A NEED fOR AN INCREASE IN fUNDS TO OPERATE THECITY,
<br />ESPECIALLY WITH REGARD TO SALARIES, AND INCREASING THE TAX BASE WITH THE IDEA THAT A
<br />BALLOT MEASURE WOULD BE PREPARED fOR THE NOVEMBER 1960 GENERAL ELECTION. MOTION CARRIED
<br />UNANIMOUSLY.
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER"SECONDED BY MR. CHATT THAT ITEM 2 Of THE COMMITTEE REP9RT BE APPROVED.
<br />
<br />COUNCILWOMAN lAURIS THEN STATED THAT AfTER RE-READING THE BUDGET MESSAGE AND RE-APPRAISING SALARIES
<br />AS CONTAINED IN THE PRELIMINARY BUDGET, SHE IS Of THE OPINION THAT THE CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION
<br />fOR A STUDY Of THE TAX BASE SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED, AND THAT WH I LESUCH STUDY IS BE,HiG CARR I ED ON A
<br />VOTE SHOULD BE HAD TO EXCEED THE 6~ LIMIT fOR THE 1960-61 BUDGET YEAR.
<br />
<br />:1
<br />I'
<br />\; 1
<br />,I
<br />':
<br />'I
<br />i
<br />"
<br />"
<br />"
<br />!
<br />,;
<br />I'
<br />"
<br />,I
<br />,
<br />!,
<br />"
<br />,I
<br />:i
<br />"
<br />,I
<br />"
<br />tl
<br />q
<br />"
<br />I:
<br />
<br />~ I
<br />I'
<br />;1
<br />It
<br />I
<br />!:
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />.
<br />,
<br />r
<br />I
<br />i,
<br />"
<br />,
<br />"
<br />,
<br />I!
<br />I;
<br />I'
<br />ii
<br />)1
<br />1:
<br />Ii
<br />i:
<br />II
<br />I:
<br />"
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />,I
<br />I'
<br />'j
<br />I
<br />Ii
<br />,I
<br />I ~
<br />!j
<br />I:
<br />'I
<br />\1
<br />;f
<br />Ii
<br />'I
<br />;:1
<br />11
<br />,I
<br />Ii
<br />'i
<br />"
<br />Ii
<br />'!
<br />
<br />1
<br />
<br />-
<br />
<br />J
<br />"
<br />
<br />I:
<br />'I
<br />I
<br />II
<br />q
<br />II
<br />:/
<br />"
<br />" I
<br />I:
<br />'j
<br />i;
<br />;1
<br />I
<br />I'
<br />I;
<br />l:
<br />Ii
<br />/I
<br />"
<br />II
<br /> e
<br />
|