|
<br />r4S8
<br /> e
<br /> 6/13'/60
<br /> - ~
<br /> [ - ,.
<br /> F
<br /> il
<br /> ,FOLLOWING SOME DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM IT WAS RECOMMENOED THE COMMUNICATION BE RECEIVED AND I
<br /> II
<br /> I PLACED ON FILE. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. I
<br /> 'I
<br /> I IT WAS MOVED BY MR,. SHE,ARER AND SECONDED BY MR.. CHATT T,HAT ITEM'9 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT I
<br /> BE APPROVED. MOT I.ON CARR I,ED. I,
<br /> I I I'
<br /> I Ii
<br />I II 10. COOPERATION AND.COORDINATION OF ACTIVITIES BETWEEN THE EUGENE CITY CO'UNCIL AND THE EUGENECIT'Y "
<br /> il PLANNING COMMISSION. - MRS. NIVEN, REPRESENTATIVE OF THE EUGENE CITY PLANNING COMMISSON, APPEARED
<br /> BEFORE THE COMMITTEE TO INDICATE THAT TWO BROCHURES WERE RECENTLY MAILED lO THE COMMITTEE, ONE A
<br /> I BOOKLET ON REZONING I NFORMAT ION WH I CH IS PROPOSED ~BE HANDED TO CITIZENS WHO DESIRE TO REZONE'
<br /> PROPERTY, THE SECOND THE MINUTES OF THE LATEST MEETING. MRS. NI VEN SUGGESTED THAT THE COUI'C I L II
<br /> I IN THOSE CASES WHERE THE COUNCIL OVERRULES THE PLANNING COMMISSION, AN AUTO- :j
<br /> I, ADOPT~A POLICY THAT "
<br /> MATIC REFE,R-'~.AL OF THE MATT,E,R TO A JOINT PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL MEETING WOULD OCCUR. i'
<br /> I' Ii
<br /> ; SHE lNDI~ATED THAT THIS DOES NOT TAKE AUTHORITY AWAY FROM THE COUNCIL AND THAT I T WAS PROPOSED il
<br /> 1 THAT THE THIRD MONDAY LUNCHEON OF THE PLANNING COMMISS10N BE SET. ASIDE FOR DISCUSSION OF T~ESE
<br /> I I'
<br /> I
<br /> I PROBEEMS. DISCUSSION WAS HAD ON THIS AND IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT THE ABOVE POLICY OF AUTOMATIC 1:
<br /> I RE FERRAL BE ACCEPTE'D. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. It
<br /> II
<br /> 1 ~
<br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER AND SECONDED BY MR. MCGAFFEY THAT ITEM 10 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT " e
<br /> I,
<br /> BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. I'
<br /> , I:
<br /> i
<br /> I I'
<br /> I I ~
<br /> A REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE MEETING HELD JUNE 9, 1960 WAS PRESENTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS: I.
<br /> I'
<br /> Ii Ii
<br /> II
<br /> i' II
<br /> II PRESENT: COUNCILMEN SHEARER, LAURIS, MCGAFFEY, CHATT, MOyER, SWANSON; CITY MANAGER; CITY
<br /> RECORDER; DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS; CHIEF OF POLICE; CITY ATTORNEY; PLANNING CONSULTANT; TRAF- I' I
<br /> Ii ,I
<br /> I,
<br /> II FIC ENGINEER; ~UPERINTENqEN1: .~r:: PARKS AND RE.CREA-r:I,~N;.:"ADM.iJiNI,STRATIVE, ASSISTA.NT; MR. PAUL W. Ii
<br /> . , , I:
<br /> CAMPBELL; MRS. NIVEN OF THE EUGENE PLANNING COMMISSION; DON BONHAM AND DAN WYANT OF THE EUGENE
<br /> REGISTER-GUARD; AND OTHER INTERESTED CITIZENS. Ii
<br /> II Ii
<br /> I,
<br /> I'
<br />2 ;1 i'
<br /> CONSIDERATION OF BIDS RECEIVED ON MAHLON SWEET AIRPORT PROJECT - IT WAS, REPORTED THAT BIDS WERE !'
<br /> I . il
<br /> I I!
<br /> t OPENED ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 9, 1960 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TAX.I-WAY AND ,INSTALLATION OF A WIND
<br /> I !'
<br /> TEE AT MAHLON SWEET AIRPORT., THOSE BIDDING AND THE BIDS RECEIVED ARE A~FOLLOWS: W IL E Y I S :t
<br /> , I'
<br /> j CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, ALTERNATE No. I" $78,955.80, ALTERNATE ,NO.2, $85,,145.80; CEl'IRAL PAVING II
<br /> I COMPANY, ALTERNATE No. 1,$86,015.20, ALTERNATE ~O. 2,$92,965~20; BYRNES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Ii
<br /> !I I,
<br /> ALTERNATE No. I, ~89.365.60, ALTERNATE NO.2, $95,545.60. IT WAS ,EXPLAINED THAT ALTERNATE I:
<br /> "
<br /> No. I PROVIDED FOR THE CITY FURNISHING THE WIND TEE AND CONTROL PANEL WITH THE CONTRACTOR TO Ii
<br /> " :!
<br /> 'I INSTALL, AND THAT ALTERNATE. NO.2 PROVIDED F.oR THE CONTRACiI'.OR TO FURNISH, AND INSTALL THE WIND I
<br /> II 'I
<br /> TEE AND CON~ROL PANEL. THE CITY'S COST FOR THE WIND TEE AND CONTROL PANEL WOULD BE $6,180.00. I:
<br /> 'I :;
<br /> [I
<br /> II BASED ON THE ABOVE_~IDS WHICH HAVE BEEN.RECEIVED"IT,~AS BEEN RECOMMENDED THAT THE'BID OF 11
<br /> !t
<br /> i! WILEY'S CONSTRUCTION COMPANY BE APPROVED, SUBJECT 10 THE ,APPROVAL OF THE FEDERAL AERONAUT I CS ,. 'I
<br /> :1 'I
<br /> ADMINISTRAT,ION ON ALTERNATE No. 2. ,MOT-I,ON CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. II
<br /> r II
<br /> ,I II
<br /> 'I IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER AND SECONDED BY MRS. LAUR I S THAT ITEM I OF THE COMMITTEE
<br /> " I,
<br /> il REPORT BE APPROVED~ i'
<br /> 11 :1
<br /> " II
<br />3 \, 2. CONSI,DERAT,ION OF BIDS ON PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS.- BIDS WERE RECEIVED ON JUNE 8, 1960 FOR ONE
<br /> Ii SAN I TARYSEWER PROJECT, ONE STORM SEWER PROJECT AND FOUR PAV I,NG PROJECTS. THE SANITARY SEWER "
<br /> '1 ,I
<br /> PROJECT WAS BID BY ONE BIDDER, BEING INTER-CITY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, BIDDING ON A SANITARY q I
<br /> II SEWER BETWEEN OAK AND HIGH STREETS FROM 5TH AVENUE TO 6TH AVENUE. AT A PRICE OF $9,303.90. ii
<br /> ,I
<br /> I TH~ COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THIS BID aE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. "
<br /> 1
<br /> I !I
<br /> BIDS -WERE RECEfvED ON A STORM SEWER PROJECT, BEING 27TH AVENUE FROM ALDER TO POTTER STREET,
<br /> I "
<br /> WITH WILDISH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY BEING THE LOW BIDDER AT $4,904.01. COMMITTEE APPROVED AND /:
<br /> II "
<br /> I RECOMMENDED THAT THE BID BE AWARDED TO THE LOW BIDDER. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 'I
<br /> I il
<br /> i II
<br /> I FOUR ,PAVING PROJECTS WERE ALSO CONSIDERED BY THE COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT ;1 -
<br /> \1 EACH PROJECT BE AWARDED TO THE LOW BIDDER. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. II
<br /> II < IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEAR~R AND SECONDED BY MRS..LAURIS THAT I~EM' 2 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT 11
<br /> II BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. ij
<br /> I,
<br /> !, I:
<br />4 II 3. CONSIDERATION OF BIDS RECEIVED BY THE PARKS DEPARTMENT FOR THE PURCHASE OF A PORTABLE VACUUM Ii
<br /> SWEEPER FOR THE AMAZON POOL AND A TRIPLEX POWER LAWN MOWER. - THE :PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT II
<br /> IN.DICATED' THEY HAD RECEIVED BIDS FOR A PORTABLE VACUUM CLEANER FOR AMAZON POOL, THE LOW BID' II
<br /> I BEINe RAMSEY-WAITE COMPANY BIDDING $227~20. IT :ALSO RECEIVED BIDS ON A TRIPLEX POWER LAWN lj
<br /> I MOWER WITH THE LOW BIDDER BEING THE f'. ,K. BREWER COMPANYAT,A BID PRICEor,$1,29.5.00. THE COMM IT -I
<br /> I TEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE BIDS BE AWARDED TO THE LOW BIDDERS FOR THE PURCHASE OF EACH ITEM OF il
<br /> li EQUIPMENT. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. II
<br /> 'I
<br /> I I
<br /> I T WAS MOVED BY MR. SI-E ARER AND SECONDED BY MRs. LAURIS THAT ITEM 3 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT ,I
<br /> iI
<br /> Ii
<br /> I BE APPROVED~ MOTION CARRIED. II
<br /> II 'I I
<br /> 'I
<br /> , , , . "
<br />5 I' 4; REQUEST ,FOR PROPER CITY OFFICIALS TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT WITH WINN, SHINN AND COMPANY FOR AUDITS Ii
<br /> II I'
<br /> OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNT~ FOR FISCAL PERIOD OF 1959-60 AND 1960-61. - IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT A LEG- ,I
<br /> ;!
<br /> ISLATIVE ENACTIVE OF THE 1959 LEGISLATURE REQUIRED WRITTEN CONTRACTS FOR AUDIT SERVICES AND "
<br /> I THAT WINN, SHINN AND COMPANY ,HAD PRESENTED THE CITY WITH A STANDARD AUDIT CONTRACT COVERING THE !I
<br /> Ii
<br /> I TWO FISCAL PERIODS, 1959-60 AND 1960-6 I . ,t
<br /> ,
<br /> 1 :1
<br /> I THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE PROPER CITY OFll'TCIALS BE AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE NECESSARY
<br /> "
<br /> \ ii -
<br /> t . .~~f.R I "
<br /> I:
<br /> \:
<br /> ,\ II
<br />~':
<br />
|