Laserfiche WebLink
<br />45"1"~ <br />e <br /> <br /> <br />6/13/60 <br /> <br />~ . - - - ~ : <br />II IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER AND SECONDED BY MR. CHATT THAT ITEM 2 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE II <br />I I! APPROVEIA MOTION CARRIED. :1 <br /> <br />'I. ' <br />I ' 3. REQUEST fOR AUTHORIZATION fOR PROPER CITY OffiCIALS TO SIGN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE STATE HIGHWAY Ii <br />.I I <br />., .cOMMISSION, THE UNIVERSITY Of OREG<l'l. THE CITY Of SPRINGfiELD, LANE COUNTY AND THE CITY OF II <br />II EUGENE COVERING AN OVERALL TRANSPORTATION STUDY TO BE MADE IN THE EUGENE-SPRINGfiELD AREA - II <br />I ' <br />THE COMMITTEE CONSIDERED THIS. AND R,ECOMMEND,ED THE RROPER CITY Of'f'ICIA1.S BE AUTHORIZED--}TO EXE- il <br />:1 CUTE THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. :i <br />, 'I <br />I ,. <br />00 ' IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER AND SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOLM THAT ITEM 3 Of THE COMMITTEE REPORT Ii <br />C~ BE APPROVED. MOT I ON CARR I ED. ~! <br />~ Ii <br />(..) Ii <br />0: 2 'I 4. REQUEST BY RAYMOND l. REXIUS FOR VARIANCE IN PLANNING SIDEWALK AND/OR STREET CONSTRUCTION IN ii <br />00 ',FRONT OF 205 WEST 31ST AVENUE IN ORDER TO SAVE A PINE TREE 30" IN DIAMETER AND 70' HIGH - II <br />MR. REXIUS' REQUEST WAS PRESENTED TO THE COMMITTEE; SOME DISCUSSION WAS HAD.ON IT IN WHICH IT il <br />WAS INDICATED THAT If THE ROOT SYSTEM WERE DISTDRBED~:r,HE TREE WOULD PROBABLY NOT LIVE ANY PERIOD III <br />OF TIME AND IT WAS ALSO SUGGESTED THAT A NEW TREE MIGHT BE GIVEN TO MR. REXIUS TO REPLACE THE : <br />EX I ST I NG TREE. I T WAS RECOMMENDED THE REQUEST BE DEN I ED AND THE I TEM BE REfERRED TO THE PARKS Ii <br />e DEPARTMENT fOR AN EXPLANAT ION AS TO THE PROBABLE STAT'US OF THE TREE I f THE STREET WERE I NSTALLED. Ii <br />MOT I ON CARR I ED UNAN I MOUSL Y. ': <br />i I: <br />I II <br />i IT WAS MOVED BY MRS. LAURIS AND SECONDED BY MR. CHATT THAT THE REQUEST AS ENTERED BY RAYMOND ii <br />I l. REXIUS BE GRANTED AND THE STREET BE CURVED TO MISS THE TREE. IT WAS MOVED BY MR. MCGAFfEY 'I <br />I C' I <br />I AND SECONDED BY MR. SWANSON THAT TH I S I TEM BE HELD OVER fOR STUDY BY THE OMM I TTEE Of THE WHOLE. Ii <br />! MOTION CARRIED. ii <br /> <br />I 3 ': 5. PETITION TO PAVE ALLEY fROM CHAMBERS TO GRANT STREET BETWEEN 7TH AND BTH AVENUES - A LETTER fROM 11 <br />:1 MR. LOWE REPRESENTING WYATT'S TIRE SHOP WAS READ TO THE COMMITTEE IN WHICH MR. LOWE INDICATED il <br />:i THAT THE LARGE TRUCKS WH I CH COME TO HIS PLA CE Of BUS I NESS HAVE 01 f'f' I CUL TY ENTER I NG THE SERV I CE Ii <br />AREA WITHOUT RUNNING OVER THE SIDEWALK AND If A CAR IS PARKED ADJACENT err THE ALLEY, EXTREME Ii <br />': DIFfiCULTY IS EXPERIENCED IN ENTERING OR LEAVING HIS PLACE Of BUSINESS. HE INDtCATED THAT AT II <br />I THE PRESENT TIME THEY ARE BUILDING ADDITIONAL fACILlTES TO HANDLE TRUCK SERVICE AND THAT TRJCKS I:! <br />:1 BEING SERVICED IN THE NEW AREA WOULD BE ABLE TO TURN AROUND ON THE PROPERTY AND DRIVE fORWARD Ii <br />.1 ONTO WEST 11TH AVENUE. HE REQUESTED AN EXTENSION OF THE EXISTING CURe CUT TO THE ALLEY IN THE Ii <br />,I INTEREST Of PUBLIC SAfETY. THE TRAf'f'IC ENG,INEER RECOMMENDED THE ADDITIONAL CUT BE ALLOWED. Ii <br />MOTION CARR lED UNAN IMOUSL Y. !I <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER AND SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOLM THAT;ITEM 5 OF THE COMMITTEE REP~T ;i <br />BE, APPROVED. MOT I ON CARR I ED. 1 <br />.! II <br />I 'I <br />4 7. CONSIDERATION Of AND AUTHOmlZATION fOR EXECUTION Of AGREEMENT WI$H WILLAKENZIE fiRE DEPARTMENT - :i <br />i THE CITY ATTORNEY REPORTED THAT REPRESENTATIVES OF THE CITY OF EUGENE AND THE WILLAKENZIE il <br />,I RURAL fiRE PROTECTION DISTRICT HAD WORKED OUT AN AGREEMENT fOR THE DIVISION Of THE ASSETS AND !I <br />, LIABILITIES Of THE fiRE DISTRICT TO BE EfFECTIVE JULY I, 1960. As A PART OF THIS AGREEMENT AND Ii <br />'I BASED ON APPRAISALS Of PROPERTY OWNED BY. THE WILLAKENZIE fiRE DISTRICT, THE WILLAKENZIE fiRE II <br />,I DISTRICT HAS A CREDIT Of A TOTAL SUM Of' $15,260.21 WHICH IS TO BE PAlliD IN .THE TERMS Of fiRE I' <br />q PROTECTI ON OVER A TWO-YEAR PER I 00 WI TH $8,000 BE I NG APPL I ED TOWARD FIRE PROTECT I CN FOR THE 1960- II <br />61 fiSCAL YEAR AND A $7,260.21 APPLIED TO THE ,1961-62 fl SCAL YEAR. IT WAS fURTHER POINTED OUT, I, <br />Ii: THAT THE AGREEMENT IS CANCELABLE UPON WRITTEN NOTICE Of EITHER PARTY PROVIDING NOTICE IS GIVEN ill <br />i 90 DAYS PRCIlOR TO JUL Y I, 196 I . II <br />'I :1 <br />,; I TWAS THEN EXPLA I NED THAT A STANDARD CONTRACT HAD BEEN PREPARED FOR FI RE PROTECT ION fOR THE il <br />:'\ WILLAKENZIE RURAL fiRE PROTECTlION DISTRICT,WHICH REMAINS OUTSIDE THE CITY Of EUGENE,WITH SUCH :: <br />:: CONTRACT TO BE AT THE RATE Of 6 MILLS ON THE ASSESSED VALUATION SUBJECT TO THE CREDITS EXPLAINED II <br />i ABOVE. I <br />I !I <br /> <br />; THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE AGREEMENT AND THE CONTRACT BE APPROVED AND THE PROPER CITY:! <br />.. ,'OfFICIALS BE AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE .THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS. MOT ION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. :1 <br />., I :1 <br />I, <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER AND SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS THAT ITEM 7 Of THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE :[ <br />APPROVED. fOLLCALL VOTE. ALL COUNCILMEN PRESENT VOTING AYE,.MOTION .CARRIEDUNANIMOUSLY. :! <br /> <br />5 8. DISCUSSION REGARDING GARBAGE DUMP - IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT IN THE PRIMARY ELECTION ON MAY 20, 1960 Ii <br />I <br />:: T':iE COUNTY TAX LEVY FOR GARBAGE DUMP,OPERATION HAD BEEN DEFEATED. IT WAS fURTHER INDICATED.THAT. 1\ <br />,I SOME PRIVATE fiRMS ARE INTERESTED IN LOCATING IN THIS AREA AND fURNISHING GARBAGE "SERVICE INCLUDING: <br />I THE DISPOSAL Of THE GARBAGE. DISCUSSION WAS HAD ON THIS AT WHICH TiME IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE !I <br />CITY WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT ~ITH ONE FIRM SINC~'A CHARTER AMENDMENT CURRENT- II <br />L Y I N THE EUGENEC I TY CHARTER MAlES IT I MPOSS I BLE fOR THE COUNC I L TO GRANT A MONOPOL Y FOR THE RE- :1 <br />MOVAL Of GARBAGE. No fORMAL ACTION WAS TAKEN ON THIS MATTER. ii <br />II <br />i1 <br />.f Ii <br />IT. WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER AND SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS THAT ITEM 8 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT :1 <br />BE APPROVED. II <br />u t <br />I " <br />I 6" 9. LETTER Of PROTEST CONCERN I NG SEWER ASSESSMENT AT 2795 EMERALD STREET BY SCOTT D. WALTON - il <br />MR. WALTON BY u: TTER STATED THAT HE HAD PURCHASED A HOUSE AT 2795 EMERALD STREET WITH THE UNDER- ii <br />'I <br />, STANDING THAT THE HOUSE WAS CONNECTED TO A SEWER LINE, THA.T SINCE THAT TIME THE CITY HAS CON- :; <br />STRUCTED A LINE ~ND HAS ASSESSED H 1M fOR SUCH LINE EVEN THOUGH THE HOUSE WAS OR I G I NALLY CONNECTED Ii <br />,I TO A SEWER LINE AND A PREVIOUS OWNER HAD NOT PAl'lll AN ASSESSMENT. IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT THE I <br />,I PREV 10US OWNER OF THE WALTON PROPERTY HAD RUN A PRI VATE LINE FOR SOME 0 I STANCE CONNECT ING TO A 11\ <br />:: CITY SEWER, THAT HIS PROPERTY WAS NOT ASSESSABLE AT THE TIME UNDER THE CHARTER PROVISIONS fOR il <br />:1 It <br />" ASSESSMENT FOR .SEWER LINE, AND THAT WITH THE RECENT CONSTRUCT ION OF A SEWER LINE THE OR I G I NAL AND Ii <br />e II ONL Y ASSESSMENT fOR SEWER WAS BE I NG PLACED AGA I NST THE WALTON PROPERTY. :1 <br /> <br />, 'I <br />" I: <br />~I j <br />~ t \ \ <br />, I <br />i~ <br />