<br />~456
<br /> e
<br /> 6/i'3/6O
<br /> ~ ,
<br /> .,- --.--
<br /> j r
<br /> THAT THE PHYSICAL EDUCATION CLASSES OF SOUTH EUGENE HIGH SCHOOL USE THE' STADIUM AREA ON THE WEST \,:
<br /> Ii
<br /> I SIDE OF THE PROPOSED PEARL STREET WHICH WOULD NECESSITATE THE CROSSING Of THE STREET AND WOULD I
<br /> I
<br /> II lNVeLVE"A NUMBER Of,PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENT PROBLEMS. IT WAS GENERALLY AGREED'THAT THE SAfETY fACTOR Ii
<br /> fOR STUDENTS CROSSING THE STREET OT PHYSICAL EDUCATION CLASSES, TO fOOTBALL PRACTICE AND TO REGU-
<br /> I
<br /> il LARLY SCHEDULED GAMES RRESENTS A SERIOUS PROBLEM AS DOES THE NECESSITY fOR ACCESS TO THE WAREHOUSE "
<br /> "
<br /> d BY SCHOOL DISTRICT EQUIPMENT AND DELIVERY EQUIPMENT DELIVERING SUPPLIES TO THE WAREHOUSE. ,To :i
<br /> Ii RESOLVE THIS PROBLEM AS fAR AS THE STUDmu TRAffiC IS CONCERNED, AN OVERPASS WAS SBGGESTED WHICH ~ I
<br /> I'
<br /> " WOULD SEPARATE AND BE DISTINCT fROM THE VEHICULAR TRAFfIC ACCESS TO THE WAREHOUSE STRUCTURE AND ;1
<br /> r i'
<br /> ,I SHOULD BE COMPLETE WITH CYCLONE fENCE TO PROHIBIT THE STUDENTS fROM CROSSING THE STREET AT GRADE I:
<br /> ,f LEVEL. I'
<br /> II ji
<br /> :'
<br /> :1 ,;
<br /> " IT WAS POINTED OUT THAT CONTROLLED ACCESS TO THE PROPOSED PEARL STREET IS A LONG TERM ISSUE, THAT !
<br /> ,;
<br /> II POSSIBLY LIGHTS MIGHT BE USED AT THE PRESENT TIME TO CONTROL THE PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENT ACROSS THE I,
<br /> t
<br /> II "
<br /> I STREET. IT WAS ALSO SUGGESTED THAT THE STREET MIGHT BE CONSTRUCTED BELOW THE EXISTING GRADE AL-
<br /> ii i'
<br /> THOUGH IT WAS POINTED OUT THAT A -NUMBER Of DRAINAGE PROBLEMS WOULD RESULT ON "
<br /> If THIS WERE DONE. "
<br /> "
<br /> i QUESTION THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS -, , i'
<br /> il INDICATED THAT THE MINIMUM fiGURE fOR CONSTRUCTION Of AN "
<br /> II OVERCROSSING fOR PEDESTRIAN USE WOULD BE $25,000. IN THE DISCUSSION THERE WAS ALSO SOME CONVER- I
<br /> II SAT ION REGARDING AN EXISTING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE SCHOOL DISTRICT AND THE CITY RELATING TO CER- :1
<br /> I i:
<br /> lAIN PROPERTIES PURCHASED BY THE SCHOOL DISTRICT IN THE GENERAL VICINITY Of 20TH AND PATTERSON. ,I e
<br /> I "
<br /> I I,
<br /> ; II
<br /> I FOLLOWI~G THIS DISCUSSION IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT PEARL STREE7 BE SO DESIGNED THAT AN OVERPASS ,!
<br /> i I'
<br /> STRUCTURE COULD BE BUILT OVER PEARL STREET SOUTH Of 19TH AVENUE TO SERVE THE PEDESTRIAN TRAffiC II
<br /> II I:
<br /> GOING fROM SOUTH EUGENE HIGH SCHOOL TO THE CIVIC STADIUM. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. i;
<br /> r l[
<br /> IT WAS THN RECOMMENDED $HAT THE PEARL STREET DESIGN ALSO PROVIDE FOR ACCESS TO THE SCHOOL DISTRICT !:
<br /> , I'
<br /> #4 WAREHOUSE. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ,I
<br /> , !i I
<br /> I il
<br /> ,
<br /> , IT WAS THEN RECOMMENDED THAT THE CITY ATTEMPT TO BUILD THE OVERPASS OVER PEARL STREET FOR PED- II
<br /> , -I
<br /> I ESTRIAN TRAFFIC NOT LATER THAN THE END OF 1961. MOT-'ON' CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. )
<br /> I I ~
<br /> I ,I
<br /> I A LETTER FROM THE SCHOOL DISTRICT #4 WAS READ, INDICATING THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT WOULD GRANT 1:
<br /> I
<br /> ,f "
<br /> 'I RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR THE PROPOSED SKINNER'S BUTTE EXPRESSWAY OVER THEIR PROPERTY BETWEEN 19TH AND
<br /> II 24TH AVENUES, SUBJECT TO CERTAIN CONDITIONS AS fOLLOWS: I'
<br /> II ii
<br /> II
<br /> II I . THAT THE~IT~ WOULD P~OVIDE. AN. OVERPASSS FOR THE PHY~ICAL EDUCATION STU~ENTS SO THE Ii
<br /> I.
<br /> II II
<br /> I' GROUNDS IN THE STADIUM AREA MiGHT BE USED IN THE PHYSICAL EDUCATION PROGRAM, WI,THSUCH OVERPASS I
<br /> TO BE COMPLETED WHEN THE STREET IS EXTENDED AND OPENED fOR USAGE, SUCH OVERPASS ,TO BE SUITABLY Ii
<br /> I :t
<br /> \ LOCATED AND PROPERLY FENCED. '?'ii'I' 11
<br /> 2. PROVDE ACCESS TO THE FOODS WAREHOUSE SITE. ,'., S ),
<br /> I, 3. MAKE NO ASSESSMENT SAGA I NST iJlHE SCHOOL 01 STR I CT . :\
<br /> il 4. THE CITY WOULD WAIVE ITS CLAIM ON THE THREE LOTS LOCATED ON THE CORNER Of 20~H AND PAT- I'
<br /> 'j,
<br /> TERSON IN CONSIDERATION OFCERTA1N EXPENSES THE SCHOOL DISTRICT WILL INCUR IN BUILDING A NEW !I
<br /> i'
<br /> . II
<br /> I LOADING DOCK ON THE FOODS WAREHOUSE. "
<br /> I II
<br /> II
<br /> i IT WAS ALSOUNOs;:RSTOOD THAT A STORAGE SHED WOULD HAVE TO BE REMOVED FROM THE. RIGHT-OF-WAY LOCA- "
<br /> I' Il
<br /> II TION, TO BE DONE BY THE SCHOOL DISTRICT. By TELEPHONE IT WAS INDICATED THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT I,
<br /> 11 BOARD HAD APPROVED THE GRANT! NG OF THE RJ;GHT-Of-WA Y, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS ABOVE ENUMERATED~ I
<br /> IT WAS fURTHER INDICATED THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT HAD APPROVED THE,DEDICATION Of,A RIGHT-Of-WAY I;
<br /> I'
<br /> /I fOR CERTAIN PROPERTIES IN ITS OWNERSHIP FOR 24TH AVENUE BETWEEN CHAMBERS AND TYLER, STREET. "
<br /> ,I j;
<br /> II " I
<br /> I
<br /> THE COUNCIL HELD SOME DISCUSSION ON THESE ITEMS AND IT WAS SUGGESTED THAT THE FENCING REQUIRE- Ii
<br /> :1 MENTS FOR THE OPENING BETWEEN SOUTH EUGENE HIGH AND THE STADIUM AREA BE CONFINED TO A DISTANCE II
<br /> II
<br /> 'I 100' OR LESS ON EITHER SIDE OF THE OVERCROSSING. "
<br /> II Of ;,
<br /> :i II
<br /> \1 IT WAS THEN MOVED BY MR. SHEARER AND SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS THAT THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE II
<br />:1 I[
<br /> APPROVED AND THE CITY ATTORNEY BE INSTRUCTED TO WORK OUT AN AGREEMENT WITH THE SCHOOL BOARD h
<br /> 1I
<br /> ATTORNEY WITH REfERENCE TO THE FENCING AND OVERCROSSING. MOTION CARRIED. II
<br /> !, '[
<br /> II
<br />II II e
<br /> , CONSIDERATION Of STATUS OF URBAN RENEWA AGENCY - IT WAS AGAIN POINTED OUT THAT AT THE ELECTION' "
<br />I ~ ~ 2. ,
<br /> 'I HELD MAY 20, 1960, THE MULLIGAN-SKINNER URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT HAD BEEN DEfEATED BY THE VOTERS OF I,
<br /> 'I Ii
<br />: ~
<br />'I THE CITY Of EUGENE. A REPORT fROM THE CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON URBAN RE~WAL RECOMMENDING
<br />II :i
<br />f: THE RESUBMISSION Of THE MULLIGAN-SKINNER URBAN RE~AL PROJECT TO THE VOTERS AT THE NOVEMBER "
<br /> 'i Ii
<br />" ELECTION WAS _READ, F:OLLOWING WHICH THERE WAS SOME GENERAL DISCUSSION ON. THE ADV.lSABILITY Of SUCH I'
<br />I'
<br />il DURING THE DISCUSSION IT WAS GENERALLY INDICATED THAT THE COUNCIL HAS NO RECOURSE "
<br /> RESUBMISSION. 'I
<br />:/ IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT THE REPORT OF THE CITIZENS AOVISORY COMMITTEE :,
<br /> BUT TO ACCEPT THE VOTE. "
<br />Ii ii
<br />, ON URBAN RENEWAL BE RECEIVED AND PLACED ON fiLE. MOT ION CARR lED UNANIMOL6 L Y. ,: " ,
<br />I I:
<br /> 1!
<br />, !I
<br />I IT WAS THEN RECOMMENDED THAT THE URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY BE DISSOLVED AT THE EARLIEST POSSIBLE "
<br /> II
<br />'I DATE, INCLUDING fiNAL ACCOUNTING AND AN AUDIT. MOTION DEfEATED, MR. WILSON VOTING AYE. il
<br />II
<br /> "
<br />11 II
<br /> THERE WAS THEN SOME DISCUSSION REGARDING THE POSSIBILITY OF. THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HOLDING fUNDS Ii
<br />il IN RESERVE UNTIL SUCH TIME AS A DEfiNITE CONCLUSION ON THE URB~ RENEWAL PROJECT MIGHT BE fORTH- II
<br />II COMING. 'EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE URBAN RENEWAL AGNECY STATED THAT UNDER THE STATE LAW EACH il
<br />;1 I:
<br />I' CITY COUNCIL COULD CONSTITUTE ITSELf AS AN URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY AND THAT THERE WOULD BE NOTHING 'I I
<br />:1
<br /> TO LOSE IN KEEPING THE fRAMEWORK OF THE ORGANIZATION IN A DORMANT STAGE WHICH WOULD REQUIRE ONLY il
<br />'I ONE MEETING PER YEAR, THIS BEING THE ANNUAL BUSINESS MEETING Of THE AGENCY. :1
<br />!I I,
<br /> SOME DISCUSSION WAS ALSO HAD ON A POSSIBILIW OF AN INITIATIVE PETITION BEING CIRCULATED TO PLACE (,
<br /> I'
<br /> "
<br /> THE URBAN RENEWAL ISSUE ON THE BALLOT AT SOME TIME I N THE fUTURE. FOLLOWING SUCH DISCUSSION IT I,
<br />il II
<br /> WAS RECOMMENDED THAT THE URBAN RENEWAL OFFICE BE CLOSED AT THE EARLIEST POSSIBLE DATE INCLUDING \1
<br /> fiNAL ACCOUNTING AND AN AUDI~~ MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. i'
<br />'I I'
<br />1,\ ,( e
<br />), !f
<br />:! ;:
<br />"
<br />:1
<br />~ ",
<br />
|