<br /> rt~'o ,/] "'llll
<br /> a 1
<br />e
<br /> 7/25/60 -
<br /> - U. _ -- --
<br /> ~ - - -- --.- - , _=-n_ ___ - -- _. - - - _..:: - .- ..- - - - - - -- -- ___. ____ ~ - -- -- - -. -.. ---
<br /> -~ -- _ ......-""-_.. --.------ ~- -- --
<br /> i'l
<br /> ~
<br />I ~I TERMINATE. HE LIKEWISE I ND I CATtED T.F.lbH, ThlEfRE:::WASIIA. PR0PI3SAL:;.7r(Q)s'USE;:,TB IS:P.ROPERTY FOR A PURPOSE
<br /> :1 WHICH MIGHT BE HIGHLY DESIRABLE FOR TH I S AREA. IN FURTHER ELABORATION, MR. BUFORD INDICATED
<br /> ~ : THAT STUDIES HAVE SHOWN THAT TAVERNS LIVE ON HIGHWAYS AND THAT WHEN THEY ARE REMOVED FROM HIGHWAYS, !
<br /> 'Ii THEY LOSE BUSINESS.
<br /> ,I i
<br /> I'
<br /> I I
<br /> " IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER AND SECONDED BY MR. SWANSON THAT THE ORIGINAL APPROVAL GIVEN ,
<br /> 1
<br /> TO THIS LICENSE APPLICATION BE RECONSI DERED. MOTION LOST. II
<br /> I'
<br />Of) MR. WHITSON OF 130 WESTWOOD LANE APPEARED BEFORE THE COUNCIL TO EXPRESS HIS OPPOSITION TO II
<br /> I
<br />C\~; THE ESTABLISHMENT OF TAVERNS IN THE WILLAKENZIE AREA. I
<br /> I
<br />Y::,"r I
<br />C,,#i PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS
<br />,.".... 'I
<br />~"O/d.. II
<br />Ctd: I ApPLICATIONS FOR GARBAGE HAULERS LICENSES WERE SUBMITTED BY THE FOLLOWING: HANSEN'S SANITARY [I
<br /> SERVICE, ART'S GARBAGE SERVICE'ANDEMPIRE GARBAGE SERVICE.
<br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER AND SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS THAT THE APPLICATIONS BE APPROVED. :1
<br /> MOTION CARRIED. Ii
<br /> 'I
<br />e 2 ApPLICATIONS FOR HOTEL, APARTMENT HOTEL, MOTEL, ROOMING HOUSE, LODGING HOUSE AND TRAILER PARK I,
<br /> LICENSES WITHIN THE CITY OF EUGENE WERE SUBMITTED BY THE FOLLOW! NG: STELLA C. WATERS ROOM HOUSE, II
<br /> 'I
<br /> ,; WARREN'S R00MING HOUSE, TRAVEL INN MOTEL, MRS. BOYD,~ ADAM'S ROOMS, AND APPROVED BY THE HEALTH !I
<br /> I
<br /> ,I OFFICER, THE CHIEF OF POLICE, THE CHIEF OF THE FIRE DEPARTMENT AND THE SENIOR BUILD ING INSPECTOR. II
<br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER AND SECONDED BY MRS. LAUR*S THAT THE APPLICATIONS BY APPROVED.
<br /> MOTION CARRIED. .,
<br /> I
<br /> 'I
<br />I 3 A COMMUNICATION FROM THE OREGON STATE SANITARY AUTHORITY REGARDING A GRANT FOR SEWAGE TREAT- II
<br /> MENT PROJECT WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS. II
<br /> q
<br /> "JULY !!
<br /> 19, 1960 Ii
<br /> d HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
<br /> ! CITY OF EUGENE 'I
<br /> I EUGENE, OREGON I.
<br /> ,; II
<br /> RE: S-EUGENE 'I
<br /> ,I (WPC - ORE - 37) 1
<br /> " I
<br /> ., GENTLEMEN: i
<br /> WE ARE PLEASED TO INFORM YOU THAT AT THEIR MEETING ON JULY 14, 1960, THE mEMBERS OF THE STATE ,
<br /> ,
<br /> ,I !
<br /> , SANITARY AUTHORITY APPROVED THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF PRIORITY FOR A FEDERAL GRANT FOR i
<br /> ;1 I
<br /> THE CITY OF EUGENE IN THE AMOUNT OF $190,500 TO ASSIST IN FINANCING CONSTRUCTION OF YO~ SEWAGE il
<br /> TREATMENT WORKS PROJECT. :1
<br /> THE PRmORJTYYCERTIFICATE IS BEING SENT ON THIS DA~ TO THE U. S. PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE. II
<br /> ,\ I
<br /> VERY TRULY YOURS,
<br /> ,I /S/ KENNTH H. Sp IES
<br /> i
<br /> I DEPUTY STATE SANITARY ENGINEER"
<br /> j
<br /> I.~
<br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER AND SECONDED BY MRS. L~RIS THAT THE COMMUNICATION BE RECEIVED
<br /> AND PLACED ON FILE. MOTION CARRIED.
<br /> I
<br /> :
<br /> 4 COMMUNICATION FROM THE ARCHITECTURAL ADVISOR FOR THE CITY WALL COMPETITION WAS SUBMITTED 1
<br /> : AND READ AS FOLLOWS: il
<br /> ,\
<br />I SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE AND ALLIED ARTS II
<br /> i "
<br /> EUGENE, ORE. 'I
<br /> , UNIVERSITY OF OREGON II
<br /> '1 JULY 22, 1960 II
<br /> I,
<br /> i Ii
<br /> ROBERT A. FINLAYSON li
<br /> t 11
<br /> CITY MANAGER
<br /> " CITY HALL II
<br /> , I'
<br />e :'! EUGENE, OREGON II
<br /> .: II
<br /> , DEAR MR. FINLAYSON:
<br /> ,
<br /> II II
<br /> .'
<br /> , 'I
<br /> :! THE DESIGN COMPETITION TO SELECT AN ARCHITECT FOR THE PROPOSED NEW CITY HALL HAS PROGRESSED I,
<br /> I'
<br /> 'j TO THE STAGE OF FINAL WORDING OF THE PROGRAM, IT IS NOW PRACTICALLY REA~, WITH THE EXCEPTION \1
<br /> " AND
<br /> i: OF ONE POINT, FOR MAILING TO THE COMPETING ARCHITECTS ON OR ABOUT AUGUST 1ST. CONS I:ERABLE :1
<br /> I INTEREST HAS BEEN SHOWN BY ARCHITECTS THROUGHOUT THE STATE, AS EVIDENCED BY THE LETTERS ALREADY
<br /> I I,
<br /> : RECEIVED, REQUESTING THE PROGRAM. I
<br /> ,
<br /> ! IN ATTEMPTING 10 CLARIFY THE PROGRAM ON ONE POINT, THE CITY ATTORNEY, MR. LLOYDOCASTNER AND I i
<br /> :1 HAVE RUN INTO A MATTER OF POLICY WHICH CAN ONLY BE DECIDED BY THE COUNCIL. THIS POINT CONCERNS I
<br /> "
<br /> THE SITUATION WHICH CONCEIVABLY MIGHT ARISE IN THE EVENT OF THE BOND I SSLE NOT PASSING, EVEN WITH !i
<br /> 'I I,
<br /> i SEVERAL ELECTIONS, AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF THIS WOULD INVOLVE BOTH THE CITY AND THE ARCHITECT WHO :1
<br /> !I
<br /> ,I ~ NS THE COMMISSION. THE PROBLEM IS: HOW IN THIS EV~NT TO DISCHARGE FINALLY THE CITY'S OBLIGATION I,
<br /> I
<br /> I TO THE ARCHITECT, AND ALSO HOW TO RELIEVE THE ARCHITECT OF THE LEGAL OBLIGAT10N TO BE CONTINUOUSLY !I
<br /> :\ PR8PARED TO COMPLETE THE BUILDING EVEN AFTER CONSIDERABLE TIME HAS PASSED. WE SHOULD HAVE THIS I,
<br />I II MATTER CLEARLY PHRASED SO THAT I:F. IS REASONABLY FAIR BOTH TO THE ARCHITECT AND TO THE CITY. 1\
<br /> I
<br /> \ IN MIND THAT THE AlA COMPETITION CODE REQUIRES THAT THE
<br /> AFTER CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSffiON, KEEPIN:i I'
<br /> ARCHITECT BE FAIRLY COMPENSATED FOR HIS EFFORTS (REALIZING, OF COURSE, THAT NO PROBLEM IN THIS II
<br /> RESPECT EXISTS IF THE BUILDING PROJECT PROCEEDS AND THE ARCHITECT RECEIVES HIS FE~), AND THAT ALL :1
<br /> ,I COMPEIl T ION PRECEDENT S, PART I d,!t.1iXRL Y THE TORONTOPANb"W'1 NN I PEG COMPET I T IONS, HAVE STIPULATED THAT A 1\
<br /> i SPECIAL ARRANGEMENT MUST BE MADE, INCREASING THE ARCHITECT'S PRIZE I N THE EVENT THE BUILDING SHOULD
<br /> ;I
<br /> ~ I NOT GO AHEAD, , WOULD THEREFORE PROPOSE THAT THE PHRASEOLOGY IN OUR PROGRAM CONCERNED WITH THIS
<br /> i \
<br /> ,I POINT OF THE DISCHARGE OF OBLIGATIONS READ AS FOLLOWS: I
<br /> ~ !
<br />e 'I I
<br /> " INTENTION TO BUILD
<br /> ., II
<br /> "
<br /> I
<br /> '1 "
<br /> '. Ii
<br /> 1:~
<br />
|