Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~5( " <br /> ~ )~ <br /> e <br />--- --- 7/~5/60 ,- <br /> - - <br /> --, - <br /> 0 <br /> THE CITY OF EUGNE INTENDS TO BUILD THE NEW CITY HALL AS SOON AS IT IS PRACTICABLE FOLLOWI NG !, <br /> THE ANNOUNCEMENT OF THE WINNDER.AND RIS APPOINTMEN~ AS THE ARCKITECT. THE APPOINTMENT AND ACTUAL II I <br /> COMMENCEMENT OF BU I LD IN G IS SUBJECT TO PASSAGE OF A BOND ISSUE BY THE VOTERS OF THE CITY TO FINANCE Ii <br /> I THE PROJE CT. SHOULD THE VOTERS OF THE CITY NOT AUTHORIZE THE BOND I SS UE, OR SHOULD THE DEV~LOP- <br /> !I <br /> MENT OF THE PROJECT BE DELAYED LONGER THAN THREE YEARS By A.CTS OF GOD, WAR OR ECONOMIC FACTORS ., <br /> ~ I <br /> RENDERING THE UNDERTAKING UNWISE, THE CITY WILL DISCHARGE-'TS OBLIGATION TO THE WINNING ARCHITECT ,I <br /> I, <br /> BY AN ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION NOT TO EXCEED $2,000, THE fiNAL AMOUNT TO BE REACHED BY NEGOTIATIONS " <br /> I il <br /> IN A MANNER MUTUALLY AGREEABLE AND REASONABLY FAIR. ITHE ARCHI~CTWILL ALSO BE RELIEVED OF ANY I' <br /> I Ii <br /> , , <br /> LEGAL OBLIGATIONS TO COMPLETE HIS DESIG~AFTER THE THREE YEAR PER 10D HAS PAS SED. AFTE R THE ANNOU NC-E- 1: <br /> I MENT OF THE WINNER, AND THE SUCCESSFUL PASSAGE OF THE.BOND ISSUE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EUGENE i; <br /> 'I WILL AUTHORIZE THE WINNING ARCHITECT TO PROCEED BEYOND HIS COMPETfTION DRAWINGS AND T~ CITY WILL I' <br /> II ENTER A CONTRACT WITH THE WINNING ARCHITECT. I: <br /> \ II <br /> Ii <br /> 'I <br /> COMPENSATION TO COMPETITORS Ii <br /> ii <br /> THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EUGENE AGRE~S TO PAY TO THE. SUCCESSFUL COMPETITOR, WITHIN 10 11 <br /> I Ii <br /> I DAYS OF THE JUDGEMENTS, AN AWARDOF $2,500. IN ADDITION THE COUNCIL WILL, AFTER SUCCESSFUL PASSAGE II <br /> :1 <br /> 1- <br /> OF THE BOND ISSUE TO FINANCE THE PROJECT, COMPLETE THE AGREEMENT EMPLOYING THE SUCCESSFUL COMPETI- <br /> I TOR AS ARCHITECT FOR THE PROPOSED BUILDING. FURTHERMORE I T AGREES 10 PAY AS SOON AS FEASIBLE ;1 e <br /> " <br /> , I' <br /> I THEREAFTER, ONE-TENTH OF HIS TOTAL. ESllM\TED FEEf.' Ii <br /> ) IN FULL DISCHARGE OF THE OBLIGATION T0 THEM,.THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EUGENE AGREESTO " <br /> I' <br /> II <br /> I IN THE FINAL STAGE OF THIS COMPETITION, ., <br /> PAY TO EACH OF THE ~NSUCCESSFUL COMPETITORS TAKING PART A ;i <br /> I FEE OF $2,000 WITHIN '10 DAYS AFTER THE AWARD.. :: <br /> " <br /> i IT SHOULD BE POINTED OUT TO THE COUNCIL THAT THE PROBLEM OF , <br /> I THINK FAIR COMPENSATION TO ., <br /> I THE ARCHITECT IN THE EVENT OF NON-PASSAGE OF THE BOND ISSUE, OR OTHER REASON FOR NOT PROCEEDING I' <br /> Ii <br /> (ASSUMING HE HAD CARRIED TH DESIGN ALMOST TO COMPLETION OF THE PRELIMINARY PHASE), WOULD EXIST I. I <br /> I , <br /> WHETHER A COMPETITION IS HELD OR NOT. I F AN ARCHITECT WERE APPOINTED DIRECTLY, AND HE CARRIED HIS I <br /> i: <br /> DESIGN AS FAR AS THE COMPETITION CALLS FOR, THEN, IF THE BUILDING P~ECT COULD Ncr PROCEED, HE I! <br /> I' <br /> I WOULD EXPECT AN APPRECIABLE PERCENTAGE OF HIS PRELIMINARY FEE, AN AMOUNT WHICH WOULD UNDOUBTEDLY " <br /> BE GREATER THAN THE COMPETITION PRIZE. I' <br /> , I T SEEMS TO ME THAT WE SHOULD ESTABLISH THE ESSENTIAL FACT THAT WE INTEND 10 HANDLE THE I! <br /> I " <br /> " <br /> I ARCHITECT AND TO THE CITY. WE " <br /> COMPETITION IN A MANNER THAT I S FA I RAND MUTUALLY AGREEABLE TO THE I, <br /> I WANT THE ARCHITECTS TO HAVE ENOUGH INCENTIVE TO DO THEIR BEST AND COME UP WITH AN OUTSTANDING ,. <br /> I ~ <br /> , DES I GN FO R THE C'I'TY HAtL.. BUT, WE ALSO WANT THE ARCHITECTS TO UNDERSTAND THAT THE COUN[IL MUST I: <br /> I <br /> I BE ABLE TO DISCHARGE ALL OBLIGATIONS TO THE ARCHITECT IN A REASONABLY FAIR MANNER IN THE EVENT,THAT , <br /> THE CITY HALL CANNOT BE BUILT BECAUSE OF FAILURE OF THE,BOND I, <br /> I I SSLE OR SOME OTHER COMPELLING. REASON. I' <br /> I I REGRET THAT I CANNOT BE ORESENT AT TODAY'S METING AND BE AVAILABLE FOR DISCUSSION OF THIS " <br /> Ii <br /> I MATTER. I HAD LONG pLANNED TO TAKE A VACATION, BEGINNING JULY 24TH, A~ TO BE AWAY FROM EUGENE ji <br /> I UNTIL AUGUST 22ND. HOWEVER, MR. CASTNER AND I HAVE DISCUSSED THIS POINT THOROUGHLY. I AM CONF.I- I: <br /> DENT THAT THE COUNCIL WILL COME TO A REASONABLE CONCLUSION. AFTER THE COUNCrL1S POLICY DECISION I, <br /> II <br /> IS REACHED, MR~ CASTNER WfLL BE ABLE TO INCLUDE IT I N THE COMPETITION PROGRAM. I HA VE ASKED MR. I ~ <br /> i CASTNER THEN IMMEIDATELY TO RELAY THE WORDING OF IIINTENTION TO BUILD" TO THE HEADQUARTERS OF THE , <br /> AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, IN ORDER TO MAKE CERTAIN THAT THE INSTITUTE1S APPROVAL OF OUR !: <br /> I <br /> I PROGRAM WILL NOT BE AFFECTED BY THIS FURTHER ELABORATION OF THE PROBLEM OF DISCHARGE OF OBLIGATIONS. <br /> I RESeECTFULLLY YOURS, <br /> I /S/WALTER GORDON <br /> , <br /> I DEAN" <br /> I <br /> I SOME DISCUSSION WAS HAD ON THE PRIZE TO BE PAID TO THE <br /> I FOUR FINALISTS" IN WHICH IT WAS " <br /> , INDICATED THE WINNER WOULD RECEIVE A PRIZE OF $2,500 AND THE THREE OTHER I <br /> II INFALISTS WOULD RECEIVE i: I <br /> II $2,000 EACH. IN ADDITION TO THIS, AND ON ~HE BASIS OF DEAN GORDON'S LETTER, IF THE CITY HALL WAS , <br /> I: <br /> 11 NOT CONSTRUCTED FOR SOME REASON INA THREE-YEAR 'PERfOD, THEN THE WINNER WOULD RECEIVE AN ADDITIONAL , <br /> " <br /> I' AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $2,000. ji <br /> 'I <br /> II IT WAS MOVED BY MRS. LAURIS AND SECONDED BY MR. SHEARER THAT THE RECOMMENDATION PREPARED II <br /> I. <br /> i: <br /> BY DEAN GORDON BE ADOPTED. MOTION LOST, WITH COUNCILMEN SHEARER, LAUR I S, AND SWANSON VOTING AYE :i <br /> " <br /> r AND COUNCILMEN MCGAFFEY, CHATT, MOYER AND WILSON VOTING NAY. ., <br /> II <br /> " <br /> I AT THIS POINT MAYOR CONE LEFT THE MEETING AND COUNCILMAN SHEARER ASSUMED THE CHAIR. II e <br /> I I: <br /> ! I! <br /> I <br />I I A COMMUNICATION FROM ABAR TV CABLE COMPANY DATED JULY 25, " <br /> 1960, REQUESTING A NEW FRANCHISE :, <br /> FOR A 20 YEARS PERIOD, WITH A COpy OF A PROPOSED FRANCHISE, WAS PRESENTED TO THE COUNCIL. ,i <br /> il <br /> I " <br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MRS. LAUR I S AND SECONDED BY MR. MCGAFFEY THAT A HEAR I NG BE CALLED ON THIS ;, <br /> I ;. <br /> FRANCHISE FOR JULY '22, 1960. MOTION CARRIED. 'I <br /> I I, <br /> I I: <br />2 I A COMMUNICATION FROM LEONARD L. BRANEN REQUE ST I NG VACAT ION OF A 10 ' . ' Ii <br /> PUBLIC UTILITY EASE- <br /> I MENT WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS: " <br /> ., <br /> I IIJULY 25, Ii <br /> 1960 .' <br /> 1 MR. ROBERT FINLAYSON, C,TY MANAGER I: <br /> I I <br />! 'I <br /> AND CITY COUNCIL Ii <br /> CITY OF' EUGENE - <br />I <br />1 EUGENE, OREGON - . ........ :1 <br />I il <br />I " <br /> ,( I' <br />I GENTLEMEN: I, <br />I Ii <br /> As 10 I (TEN FOOT) I! <br /> IS SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAP, THERE IS AT PRESENT A PUBLIC UTILITY EASE- 'I <br /> I. <br />I MENT LOCATED ON MY PROPERTY WHICH IS A PORTION OF LOT 8 BLOCK 4 1ST ADDITION OF CAL YOUNG HOMESTE~D " <br /> I <br /> ,I <br />I AND A PORJ~ON OF LOT 3 BLOCK 10 - 2ND ADDITION OF CAL YOUNG HOMESTEAD. II <br /> IN !I <br />j ITS PRESENT LOCATION, THIS EASEMENT 1$ HINDERING MY HOME BUILDING PLANS IN ADDITION TO ,I <br /> Ii <br />I RENDERING A PORTION OF MY PROPERTY USELESS FOR BUILDING PURPOSES. II <br />il II <br />II )1 e.: <br /> \ " <br /> I <br /> :1 I' <br /> " <br />~:Il " <br />