|
<br />~5( "
<br /> ~ )~
<br /> e
<br />--- --- 7/~5/60 ,-
<br /> - -
<br /> --, -
<br /> 0
<br /> THE CITY OF EUGNE INTENDS TO BUILD THE NEW CITY HALL AS SOON AS IT IS PRACTICABLE FOLLOWI NG !,
<br /> THE ANNOUNCEMENT OF THE WINNDER.AND RIS APPOINTMEN~ AS THE ARCKITECT. THE APPOINTMENT AND ACTUAL II I
<br /> COMMENCEMENT OF BU I LD IN G IS SUBJECT TO PASSAGE OF A BOND ISSUE BY THE VOTERS OF THE CITY TO FINANCE Ii
<br /> I THE PROJE CT. SHOULD THE VOTERS OF THE CITY NOT AUTHORIZE THE BOND I SS UE, OR SHOULD THE DEV~LOP-
<br /> !I
<br /> MENT OF THE PROJECT BE DELAYED LONGER THAN THREE YEARS By A.CTS OF GOD, WAR OR ECONOMIC FACTORS .,
<br /> ~ I
<br /> RENDERING THE UNDERTAKING UNWISE, THE CITY WILL DISCHARGE-'TS OBLIGATION TO THE WINNING ARCHITECT ,I
<br /> I,
<br /> BY AN ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION NOT TO EXCEED $2,000, THE fiNAL AMOUNT TO BE REACHED BY NEGOTIATIONS "
<br /> I il
<br /> IN A MANNER MUTUALLY AGREEABLE AND REASONABLY FAIR. ITHE ARCHI~CTWILL ALSO BE RELIEVED OF ANY I'
<br /> I Ii
<br /> , ,
<br /> LEGAL OBLIGATIONS TO COMPLETE HIS DESIG~AFTER THE THREE YEAR PER 10D HAS PAS SED. AFTE R THE ANNOU NC-E- 1:
<br /> I MENT OF THE WINNER, AND THE SUCCESSFUL PASSAGE OF THE.BOND ISSUE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EUGENE i;
<br /> 'I WILL AUTHORIZE THE WINNING ARCHITECT TO PROCEED BEYOND HIS COMPETfTION DRAWINGS AND T~ CITY WILL I'
<br /> II ENTER A CONTRACT WITH THE WINNING ARCHITECT. I:
<br /> \ II
<br /> Ii
<br /> 'I
<br /> COMPENSATION TO COMPETITORS Ii
<br /> ii
<br /> THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EUGENE AGRE~S TO PAY TO THE. SUCCESSFUL COMPETITOR, WITHIN 10 11
<br /> I Ii
<br /> I DAYS OF THE JUDGEMENTS, AN AWARDOF $2,500. IN ADDITION THE COUNCIL WILL, AFTER SUCCESSFUL PASSAGE II
<br /> :1
<br /> 1-
<br /> OF THE BOND ISSUE TO FINANCE THE PROJECT, COMPLETE THE AGREEMENT EMPLOYING THE SUCCESSFUL COMPETI-
<br /> I TOR AS ARCHITECT FOR THE PROPOSED BUILDING. FURTHERMORE I T AGREES 10 PAY AS SOON AS FEASIBLE ;1 e
<br /> "
<br /> , I'
<br /> I THEREAFTER, ONE-TENTH OF HIS TOTAL. ESllM\TED FEEf.' Ii
<br /> ) IN FULL DISCHARGE OF THE OBLIGATION T0 THEM,.THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EUGENE AGREESTO "
<br /> I'
<br /> II
<br /> I IN THE FINAL STAGE OF THIS COMPETITION, .,
<br /> PAY TO EACH OF THE ~NSUCCESSFUL COMPETITORS TAKING PART A ;i
<br /> I FEE OF $2,000 WITHIN '10 DAYS AFTER THE AWARD.. ::
<br /> "
<br /> i IT SHOULD BE POINTED OUT TO THE COUNCIL THAT THE PROBLEM OF ,
<br /> I THINK FAIR COMPENSATION TO .,
<br /> I THE ARCHITECT IN THE EVENT OF NON-PASSAGE OF THE BOND ISSUE, OR OTHER REASON FOR NOT PROCEEDING I'
<br /> Ii
<br /> (ASSUMING HE HAD CARRIED TH DESIGN ALMOST TO COMPLETION OF THE PRELIMINARY PHASE), WOULD EXIST I. I
<br /> I ,
<br /> WHETHER A COMPETITION IS HELD OR NOT. I F AN ARCHITECT WERE APPOINTED DIRECTLY, AND HE CARRIED HIS I
<br /> i:
<br /> DESIGN AS FAR AS THE COMPETITION CALLS FOR, THEN, IF THE BUILDING P~ECT COULD Ncr PROCEED, HE I!
<br /> I'
<br /> I WOULD EXPECT AN APPRECIABLE PERCENTAGE OF HIS PRELIMINARY FEE, AN AMOUNT WHICH WOULD UNDOUBTEDLY "
<br /> BE GREATER THAN THE COMPETITION PRIZE. I'
<br /> , I T SEEMS TO ME THAT WE SHOULD ESTABLISH THE ESSENTIAL FACT THAT WE INTEND 10 HANDLE THE I!
<br /> I "
<br /> "
<br /> I ARCHITECT AND TO THE CITY. WE "
<br /> COMPETITION IN A MANNER THAT I S FA I RAND MUTUALLY AGREEABLE TO THE I,
<br /> I WANT THE ARCHITECTS TO HAVE ENOUGH INCENTIVE TO DO THEIR BEST AND COME UP WITH AN OUTSTANDING ,.
<br /> I ~
<br /> , DES I GN FO R THE C'I'TY HAtL.. BUT, WE ALSO WANT THE ARCHITECTS TO UNDERSTAND THAT THE COUN[IL MUST I:
<br /> I
<br /> I BE ABLE TO DISCHARGE ALL OBLIGATIONS TO THE ARCHITECT IN A REASONABLY FAIR MANNER IN THE EVENT,THAT ,
<br /> THE CITY HALL CANNOT BE BUILT BECAUSE OF FAILURE OF THE,BOND I,
<br /> I I SSLE OR SOME OTHER COMPELLING. REASON. I'
<br /> I I REGRET THAT I CANNOT BE ORESENT AT TODAY'S METING AND BE AVAILABLE FOR DISCUSSION OF THIS "
<br /> Ii
<br /> I MATTER. I HAD LONG pLANNED TO TAKE A VACATION, BEGINNING JULY 24TH, A~ TO BE AWAY FROM EUGENE ji
<br /> I UNTIL AUGUST 22ND. HOWEVER, MR. CASTNER AND I HAVE DISCUSSED THIS POINT THOROUGHLY. I AM CONF.I- I:
<br /> DENT THAT THE COUNCIL WILL COME TO A REASONABLE CONCLUSION. AFTER THE COUNCrL1S POLICY DECISION I,
<br /> II
<br /> IS REACHED, MR~ CASTNER WfLL BE ABLE TO INCLUDE IT I N THE COMPETITION PROGRAM. I HA VE ASKED MR. I ~
<br /> i CASTNER THEN IMMEIDATELY TO RELAY THE WORDING OF IIINTENTION TO BUILD" TO THE HEADQUARTERS OF THE ,
<br /> AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, IN ORDER TO MAKE CERTAIN THAT THE INSTITUTE1S APPROVAL OF OUR !:
<br /> I
<br /> I PROGRAM WILL NOT BE AFFECTED BY THIS FURTHER ELABORATION OF THE PROBLEM OF DISCHARGE OF OBLIGATIONS.
<br /> I RESeECTFULLLY YOURS,
<br /> I /S/WALTER GORDON
<br /> ,
<br /> I DEAN"
<br /> I
<br /> I SOME DISCUSSION WAS HAD ON THE PRIZE TO BE PAID TO THE
<br /> I FOUR FINALISTS" IN WHICH IT WAS "
<br /> , INDICATED THE WINNER WOULD RECEIVE A PRIZE OF $2,500 AND THE THREE OTHER I
<br /> II INFALISTS WOULD RECEIVE i: I
<br /> II $2,000 EACH. IN ADDITION TO THIS, AND ON ~HE BASIS OF DEAN GORDON'S LETTER, IF THE CITY HALL WAS ,
<br /> I:
<br /> 11 NOT CONSTRUCTED FOR SOME REASON INA THREE-YEAR 'PERfOD, THEN THE WINNER WOULD RECEIVE AN ADDITIONAL ,
<br /> "
<br /> I' AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $2,000. ji
<br /> 'I
<br /> II IT WAS MOVED BY MRS. LAURIS AND SECONDED BY MR. SHEARER THAT THE RECOMMENDATION PREPARED II
<br /> I.
<br /> i:
<br /> BY DEAN GORDON BE ADOPTED. MOTION LOST, WITH COUNCILMEN SHEARER, LAUR I S, AND SWANSON VOTING AYE :i
<br /> "
<br /> r AND COUNCILMEN MCGAFFEY, CHATT, MOYER AND WILSON VOTING NAY. .,
<br /> II
<br /> "
<br /> I AT THIS POINT MAYOR CONE LEFT THE MEETING AND COUNCILMAN SHEARER ASSUMED THE CHAIR. II e
<br /> I I:
<br /> ! I!
<br /> I
<br />I I A COMMUNICATION FROM ABAR TV CABLE COMPANY DATED JULY 25, "
<br /> 1960, REQUESTING A NEW FRANCHISE :,
<br /> FOR A 20 YEARS PERIOD, WITH A COpy OF A PROPOSED FRANCHISE, WAS PRESENTED TO THE COUNCIL. ,i
<br /> il
<br /> I "
<br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MRS. LAUR I S AND SECONDED BY MR. MCGAFFEY THAT A HEAR I NG BE CALLED ON THIS ;,
<br /> I ;.
<br /> FRANCHISE FOR JULY '22, 1960. MOTION CARRIED. 'I
<br /> I I,
<br /> I I:
<br />2 I A COMMUNICATION FROM LEONARD L. BRANEN REQUE ST I NG VACAT ION OF A 10 ' . ' Ii
<br /> PUBLIC UTILITY EASE-
<br /> I MENT WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS: "
<br /> .,
<br /> I IIJULY 25, Ii
<br /> 1960 .'
<br /> 1 MR. ROBERT FINLAYSON, C,TY MANAGER I:
<br /> I I
<br />! 'I
<br /> AND CITY COUNCIL Ii
<br /> CITY OF' EUGENE -
<br />I
<br />1 EUGENE, OREGON - . ........ :1
<br />I il
<br />I "
<br /> ,( I'
<br />I GENTLEMEN: I,
<br />I Ii
<br /> As 10 I (TEN FOOT) I!
<br /> IS SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAP, THERE IS AT PRESENT A PUBLIC UTILITY EASE- 'I
<br /> I.
<br />I MENT LOCATED ON MY PROPERTY WHICH IS A PORTION OF LOT 8 BLOCK 4 1ST ADDITION OF CAL YOUNG HOMESTE~D "
<br /> I
<br /> ,I
<br />I AND A PORJ~ON OF LOT 3 BLOCK 10 - 2ND ADDITION OF CAL YOUNG HOMESTEAD. II
<br /> IN !I
<br />j ITS PRESENT LOCATION, THIS EASEMENT 1$ HINDERING MY HOME BUILDING PLANS IN ADDITION TO ,I
<br /> Ii
<br />I RENDERING A PORTION OF MY PROPERTY USELESS FOR BUILDING PURPOSES. II
<br />il II
<br />II )1 e.:
<br /> \ "
<br /> I
<br /> :1 I'
<br /> "
<br />~:Il "
<br />
|