Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ""'llll <br /> 33 <br />e <br /> 9/13/60 <br /> - - --- - -, <br /> !.! <br /> " <br /> . THE PROBLEM OF UTILITIES UNDER THE STREET COULD BE SOLVED. <br />I THE COMMITTEE RECOMMME~DED THAT NO ACTION BE TAKEN, PENDING A MEETING WITH THE PLAN~ING COMMIS- <br /> SION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. <br /> IT WAS MOVED B~ MR. SHEARER AND SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS THAT ITEM I OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT <br /> BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> I 2. CONSIDERATION OF THE PURCHASE OF ADDITIONAL PROPERTY FOR PARK BURPOSES, TO ADD TO PROPERTY <br /> SET ASIDE BY LANE COUNTY FOR A PARK IN THE VICINITY OF RUSTIC LANE - SEVERAL COMMITTEE MEMBERS <br /> VIEWED THE PROPERTY WHICH LANE COUNTY HAS OFFERED TO DEED TO THE CITY FOR PARK PURPOSES. THE Sl,IPER- <br /> INTENDENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION RECOMMENDED THAT THE CITY ACQUIRE ADDITIONAL RIGHT-SF-WAY TO THE <br /> PROPERTY FOR PROPER ACCESS AND FOR PARKING PURPOSES. <br /> AFTER SOME DISCUSSION, THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THIS ITEM BE HELD OVER FOR ONE WEEK, <br /> PENDING NEGOTIATJONS FOR RJGHT-OF-WAY TO THE PROPOSED PARK. MOTJON CARRIED UNANJMOUSLY. <br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER AND SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS THAT ITEM 2~OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT ~ <br /> APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. <br />e 2 3. REQUEST FOR GRAVEL PATH ON POTTER STREET BETWEEN 36TH AND 35TH AVENUE EAST, BY FRED JONES - <br /> SEVERAL MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE VIEWED THE AREA WHERE THE GRAVEL PATH IS REQUESTED, AND WERE ADVISED <br /> BY THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS THAT GRAVEL WALKS ARE EXPENSIVE TO MAINTAIN, THAT GRANTING OF THIS <br /> REQUEST WOULD LEAD TO MANY SIMILAR REQUESTS FOR GRAVEL' WALKS, THAT THERE IS A STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY <br /> WHERE THE GRAVEL WALK IS REQUESTED, THAT THIS STREET SHOULD BE OPENED AND PAVE~ DURING .T~E ~EXT CON- <br /> STRUCTION SEASON. <br /> THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED, THAT THE REQUEST BE DENIED, AND THAT THE PARKS DEPARTMENT PROVIDE <br />I C HIPS FROM THEIR TREE CHIPPING OPERATION TO PROVIDE A TEMPORARY WALK THROUGH THE AREA IN QUESTION. <br /> MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. <br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER AND SECONDED BY MRS.,LAURIS THAT iTEM 3 OF. THE COMMITTEE REPORT <br /> BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. <br />~ 3 4. DISCUSSION CONCERNING RESUGE LANES AND CURB CUTS FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS TO MCKAY'S PARKING <br />en LOT ON THE SOUTHt~AST CORNER OF HILYARD STREET AND 80TH AVENUE - A MEMORANDUM FROM THE DIRECTOR OF <br />C"J PUBLIC WORKS WAS READ TO THE COMMITTEE, IN WHICH HE STATED THN HIS OFFICE HAD H~LD A MEETING, WITH MR ;1 <br />~ MILES MCKAY IN REGARD TO ESTABLISHING DESIGN OF THE PORTION OF HILYARD STREET ADJACENT TO HIS MARKET <br />CO BETWEEN 30TH AND 31ST AVENUES. HE STATED THAT MR. McKAY IS DESIROUS OF HAVING A 42 FOOT SECTION OF : <br />~ PAVEMENT ADJACENT TO HIS PROPERTY. THE MEMORANDUM FURTHER STAl'E D THAT THE PRPOSED ._REARRANGEMENT 'OF <br /> CURB CUTS ALLOWING ACCESS TO MR. McKAY'S PROPERTY WOULD BE FURTHER NEGOTIATED, AND THAT MR. MCKAY IS <br /> AGREEABLE TO ANYTHING WITHIN REASON IN RELOCATING THE EXISTING CURB CUTS. <br /> AFTER SOME DISCUSSION, THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT HILYARD ST~ ET BE PAVED FROM 30TH TO 31ST <br /> AVENUES TO A WIDTH OF 42'. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. <br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER AND SECONDED BY MRS. LAUR I S THAT ITEM 5 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE <br /> APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. <br /> 4 5. PETITIONS FOR CURB SIDEWA[KS ON JEFFERSON STREET BETWEEN 24TH PLACE AND 25TH AVENUE - SEVERAL <br /> ,MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE VIEWED THE TERRAIN IN THE AREA WHICH IS REQUESTED FOR CURB SIDEWALKS, AND <br /> 'AFTER SOME DISCUSSION REGARDING THE MOVING OF UTILITY POLES LOCATED ADJACEN~~TO THE CURB, THE COMMITTEE <br /> RECOMMENDED THAT THE .REQUEST FOR CURB SIDEWALKS BE GRA~TED AND THAT CURB SIDEWALKS BE ALLOWED BETWEEN <br />I 24TH AVENUE AND 27TH AVENUE. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. <br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER AND SECONDED BY MRS. LAUR I S THAT ITEM 5 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE <br /> APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> 5 6. PETITION FOR CURB SIDEWALKS ON THE NORTH'SI"DE OF EAST 39TH AVENUE BETWEEN DILLARD ROAD' AND <br /> WEST AMAZON DRIVE - SEVERAL MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE VIEWED THI S AREA AND RECOMMENDED THAT THE REQUEST <br /> FOR CURB SIDEWALKS BE APPROVED. MOT I (}.J CARR I ED UNAN IMOUSL Y. <br />e IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER AND SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS THAT "ITEM 6 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE <br /> APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. 6- <br /> 6 7. R~QUEST TO PURCHASE A SMALL PIECE OF CITY-OWNED PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE <br /> AMAZON CHANNEL, LOT 2 BLOCK 6, LIZZIE LUCKEY ADDITION TO EUGENE - SEVffiAL MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE <br /> VIEWED THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION, AND AFTER SOME DISCUSSION REGARDING THE POSSIBIO(TY OF A FUTURE <br /> STREET ADtlACENT TO THE AMAZON CHANNEL AT THIS POINT, THE COMM I TTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE OFFE'R BE <br /> REJECTED, BUT THAT AN ATTEMPT BE MADE TO PROVIDE AN EASEMENT WHICH WOULD GIVE ACCESS TO THE PROPERTY. <br /> MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUS~Y. <br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER AND SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS THAT ITEM 7 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE <br /> APPROVED. 'MOTI~ CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. . . . - <br /> I <br /> 7 8. REQUEST BY THE UNIVERSITY OF OREGON TO VACATE THE ALLEY RUNNING NORTH FRnM I"lTU ^"-E+/oUE EAST :! <br />.i.,' TO FRANKLiN BOULEVARD. BE~EN E~RALD AND BEECH STREETS - A LETTER WAS READ FROM THE BUSINESS MANAGER <br />I 'OF THE UNIVERSITY OF OREGON, REQUESTING THAT THIS ALLEY BE VACATED'SO THAT THE UNIVERSITY COULD <br /> DEVELOP A PARKING LOT BETWEEN EMER~LD STREET AND BEECH STREET. 'THE LETTER FURTHER STATED THAT TWO <br /> PROPERTY OWNERS WHO HAVE PROPERTY ADJACENT TO THE ALLEY HAD'GIVEN WRITTEN CONSENT n THE CLOSURE. AFTER <br /> 'SOME DISCUSSION, THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE REQUEST BE GRANTED. MOTION CARRIED, MR. McGAFFEY <br /> VOTING NO. IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER AND SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS THAT ITEM 8 OF THE COMMITTEE, <br /> REPORT BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED, MR. McGAFFEY VOTING NO. <br /> B 9. DISCUSSION REGARDING THE POSSIBILITY OF SECURING AN AGREEMENT WITH THE'UNIVERSITY OF OREGON I' <br /> " <br /> IN SOLVING TRAFFIC PROBLEMS - fHE COMMITTEE DISCUSSED THE POSSIBILITY OF CITY OFFICIALS CONFERRING <br />e WITH UNIVERSITY OFFICIALS IN ORDER TO SOLVE MUTUAL PROBLEMS. IT WAS STATED THAT THE CITY CONTINUALLY <br /> I: <br /> : <br /> ~ <br />