Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~4' <br />15' <br /> <br />2/14/61 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />, 'I <br /> <br />Ii <br />II <br />I' <br />!; <br />I' <br />I ~ <br />I <br />I <br />I' <br />1 <br />~ : <br /> <br />16. DISCUSSION REGARDING OFFICIAL COUNCIL ATTENDANCE AT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS - THE <br />CITY MANA~E~INQUIRED IF ITIS THE DESIRE OF THE COUNCIL TO CONTINUE THE TWO MEMBER <br />PARTrCIPATION AT THE' VARIOUS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS WHICH ARE ~EL~EACH ~EEK.THE <br />COUNCIL INDICATED ITS DESIRE TO CONT1NUE TH1S REPRESENTATION AND FURTHER EXPRESSED ITS <br />WISH THAT MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION BE IN OFFICIAL ATTENDANCE AT THE VARIOUS <br />COUNCIL MEETINGS, INCLUDING THE COMMITTEE SESSIONS. No FORMAL ACTION WAS TAKEN ON <br />THIS MATTER. <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MRS. LAURIS SECONDED BY MR. CHATT THAT ITEM 16 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE APPROVED. <br />MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />17. CITy-COUNTY JAH EXPANSION AND NEGOTIATIONS - THE CITY MANAGER REPORTED THAT .FOR SOME <br />TIME HE AND ~EMBERS OF THE STAFF HAD BEEN HOLDING CONVERSAT10NS WITH REPRESENTATIVES <br />OF LANE COUNTY CONCERNING POSSIBLE EXPANSION OF THE EUGENE CITY JAIL, WHICH IS' NOW <br />OVERCROWDED DUE TO THE NUMBER OF COUNTY PRISONERS BEING HELD AT THE JAIL. IT WAS ALSO <br />EXPLAINED THAT 'ARtHITECTS HAVE DRAWN A PROPOSED SKETCH FOR ENLARGEMENT Of THE JAIL TO <br />THE NORTH INTO THE COMPOUND AREA. <br /> <br />VARIOUS ALTER~~TIV~SFOR,P9SSIBLE SOLUTIONS,WERE PRE?ENTED;' WHICH INCLUDED THE' IDEA THE <br />CITY MIGHT SELL THE JAIL TO THE COUNTY AND THE CITY BOARD ITS PRISONERS, THAT'A PORnON <br />OF THE BUILDING' NEEDED TO BE IMPROVED MIGHT BE SOLD, 'ALONG ,WITH OTHER POSSIBILITIES., <br />IT WAS ALSO STATED THAT BOTH THE CITY AND THE COUNTY WISH TO MAINTAIN THE EXISTING JAIL. <br />I NQU I RY WAS MADE OF :THE' .COUNC I L AS TO WHETHER THEY WI SH THE' STAFf TO CO NT I NUE TO PURSUE <br />THIS AND THE COMMITTEE ,RECOMMENDED THAT THE STAFr:CONTINUE TO NEGOTIATE. MOTION CARRIED <br />UNANIMOUSLy.1I <br /> <br />I~ WAS MOVED BY MRS. LAU~I~ SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOLM THAT ITEM 17 Or,THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE ,APPROVED~ <br />MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />A REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 2, 1961 WAS ,SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />I'PRESENT: MAYOR CONE; COUNCILMEN LAURrS, MOLHOLM CHATT, MOYER, CHRISTENSEN AND DEVERELL; <br />CITy'MANAGER; DEPARTMENT HEADS; I,NTERESTED CITIZENS; DAN WYANT, EUGENE R~GISTER-GU~RD. <br /> <br />I. REQUEST FOR SEWER SERVICE TO lOTS I THROUGH 4, BLOCK I, VICTORIA HEIGHTS, FRONTING ON <br />SKYLINE BOULEVAR'D - IT WAS' STATED THAT THE' CITY HAD RECEIVED A REQUEST ON BEHALF OF <br />MR. AND MRS. MAX RUBENSTEIN REGARDING THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. THE REQUEST INDI- <br />CATED THAT THE PROPERTY HAD BEEN ASSESSED FOR A SEWER AT ONE TIME BUT SINCE, PRESUMABLY, <br />THE LINE HAD BEEN I~ TALLED"OVER PRIVATE PROPERTY ON WHICH THE, CITY HAD NO EASEMENTS" <br />THE LINE WAS REMOVt~. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR ALSO PRESENTED A REPORT WHICH rURTHER EXPLAINED THAT IN 1927 <br />A SEWER LINE HAD BEEN BUILT TO THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY, THAT IN 1949, IT HAD TO BE <br />REMOVED SINCE PRESUMABLY NO EASEMENT HAD BEEN OBTAINED FOR THE LOCATION or THE LINE ALONG <br />PRIVATE PROPERTY. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS FURTHER STATED:THAT THE PUBLIC WORKS DE- <br />PARTMENT HAS AT VARIOUS TIMES ATTEMPTED TO OBTAIN THE NECESSARY EASEMENTS TO RELOCATE <br />THE LINE AND RESTORE SERVICE TO THE AREA IN QUESTION. IT IS THE ESTIMATE OF THE PUBLIC <br />WORKS DEPARTMENT THAT: THE ,PROJECT WOULD COST APPROXIMATELY $1700 WHICH WOULD NOT BE, <br />ASSESSABLE TO ANY RROPERTY. IT WAS FURTHER RECOMMENDED THAT THIS RECONSTRUCTION BE <br />RECOMMENDED TO THE BUDGET COMMITTEE TO BE INCLUDED IN THE 1961-62 BUDGET. <br /> <br />, . <br />THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE NECESSARY SEWER BE.RECONSTRUCTED.: MOTION CARRIED~ <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MRS..LAURIS SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOLM THAT. ITEM' OF 'THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE APPROVED. <br />MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />2. SUGGESTED ORDINANCE TO ALLOW FRANCHISE HOLDERS TO REPAIR PAVEMENT CUTS - A SUGGESTED <br />ORDINANCE WHICH HAD BEEN PREPARED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY AND WHICH WOULD ALLOW VALID <br />FRANCHISE HOLDERS TO RE~AIR PAVEMENT CUTS IN ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PAVING WAS PRESENTED <br />TO THE COMMITTEE.1T WAS INDICAT~D,THAT TH1S DEPARTURE FROM THE EXIST1NG POLICY THAT <br />ALL STREET CUTS ARE REPAIRED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT WOULD SUBSTANT1ALLY AID <br />THE DEPARTMENT AND WOULD IMPLEMENT THE REPAIR OF THESE CUTS. FOLLOWING SOME DISCUS- <br />SION THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED 'THE, APPROVAL OF THE PRINCIPLE OF SUCH AN ORDINANCE. <br />MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY MRS'. LAURIS SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOLM THAT THE"ADMINIS.TRATION PROCEED WITH STUDY OF THE <br />PROPOSED ORDINANCE. MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />3. RECONSIDERATION OF REQUEST ENTERED BY HAZEN L. AND DOROTHY H.OLSEN REGARDING ASSESS- <br />MENT fOR SIDEWALK CONSTRUCT/ON ON 18TH AVENUE - THE, CITY ATTORNEY INDICA,TED BY LETTER <br />THAT HE HAD REVIEWED THE HISTORY OF THE STREET PAVING ON 18TH AVENUE ADJACENT TO THE <br />OLSEN PROPERTY. HE CITED SECTIONS OF THE CITY CHARTER AND SUPREME COURT OPINIONS, AND <br />FURTHER STATED T~~T ~ECA~SE THE OLSE~ PROPERTY IS BOTH ABUTTING AN~ ADJOI~ING ~~E DE~I-. <br />CATED STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY, THEY MAY BE LEGALLY AND LAWFUlLY: 'ASSESSED~ FOR THE SIDEWALK' <br />THAT ADJOINS THEIR PROPERTY. A MAP OF THE AREA IN QUESTION SHOWING THAT PART WHI~H HAD BEEN <br />VACATED AND THAT PART WHICH HAD BEEN DEDICATED IN EXCESS, OF THE PRESENT REQUIREMENTS FOR <br />18TH AVENUE WA~ SHOWN. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />II <br />II <br />Ii <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />i; <br />i' <br />" <br />, ~ <br />,I <br />, <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />.1 <br />!! <br />~ I <br />I, <br />:: <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />I: <br />I: <br />;! <br /> <br />e <br />