Item 2G: Res.on LID/West Univ. - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

themselves when asking questions. The first question was about speeding in the improved alleys and whether the City might put in speed bumps. Mr. Klope answered that the City had not planned for speed bumps, but that the city would work with any property owner who requested traffic calming devices to see if something might be included in the project. The next question was an inquiry about how the city had classified property that from a casual view appeared to be a single family residence, but was actually being used as a multi-family dwelling. Mr. Klope responded that the City relied on the zoning and use information that it had on file, and did not make a new investigation of properties for the purpose of assessment. Mr. Klope explained that under the Eugene Code up to five unrelated persons could reside in a single family residence. Mr. Jim Anderson asked why, if the purpose of the project was to improve the entire West University neighborhood, only the property owners abutting each alley were being asked to pay for the cost of improvements. Mr. Anderson acknowledged that the Eugene Code provided that the property owners along each alley should pay. However, he did not think that this was a fair or appropriate decision. If the motive behind the project was to improve the City, Mr. Anderson felt a portion of the City's general fund should have been used to support the project. Mr. Klope responded that there had been some discussion of this issue by the Council. During the work sessions the Council had considered the possibility of City subsidies for alley improvements, but after a discussion, the Council had decided that the property owners should be assessed costs without a City subsidy. Ms. Dorothy Cruickshank of the Eugene Garden Club was the next speaker. Ms. Cruickshank urged that the Garden Club be regarded as a special case. The Garden Club did not feel that it could afford the proposed assessment. Ms. Cruickshank stated that the Garden Club wished to be qualified for the city deferrals for low income and for old age, since most members of the Club were in their sixties. Ms. Cruickshank felt that the Garden Club did not fit any of the categories under the City assessment process, and should not be classified under these provisions. The Garden Club does rent the building and has raised the rent to cover the cost of past improvements, but they could not afford so much. If required to pay the Club would either have to move or would have to drop some of its projects. Ms. Cruickshank wanted to make it clear that the Garden Club was not opposed to the project. They very much wanted the alley to be paved. They just could not afford to pay the assessment. Mr. Klope responded that the Garden Club would not qualify for the deferral programs, since they were aimed at residences. Ms. Ruth Phelps of the Garden Club spoke next. Ms. Phelps indicated that while the Garden Club property is zoned R3, their use of the alley does not match other uses. Ms. Phelps indicated that the office building on the south side of the alley used it as an exit from their parking lot. Them were also several rentals on the alley that used it a