|
<br />~'
<br />374
<br />e
<br />
<br />10/23/61
<br />
<br />)-' ~ ~.
<br />I . '
<br />
<br />I' REPORTS OF BOARDS ~ND CQI.t.1"ISSIONS II I
<br />
<br />I ~: A REPORT_Of THE A)RPORT C~MMIS$ION MEETING HELD OCTOBER. 9, 1961 ~AS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS: '
<br />
<br />"PRESE'NT: COMMISSION CH'AIRMAN HENRY EATON AND MEMBERS .HAROLb EDMUNDS AND EHRMAN
<br />GIUSTINA; CITY MANAGER; CITY ATTORNEY; DIRECTOR_OF P0BLIC WORk$.
<br />- ,
<br />:1 II
<br />'I MR. EATON OPENED THE MEETING WITH THE DISCUSSION Of THE NEED Of AIRPORT RUNWAY EXTENSION '
<br />POINTING OUT THAT. THE FAA HAD RECOMMENDED A 700' EXTENSION TO THE PRESENT MAIN NORTH/
<br />I SOUTH RUNWAY AND THAT WEST COAST AIRLINES 'HAD INDICATED THE NEED fOR SUCH ADD'ITIONAL RUN-
<br />WAY WITHIN THREE.TO FOUR YEARS~ MR. EA~ON FURTHER POINTED OUT THAT THE FEDERAL'AvIATION
<br />AGENCY COULD APPROVE FEDERAL PARTICIPATION IN CERTAIN ~ROJECTS REQUIREb FOR THE SAfE AND
<br />f EffiCIENT USE Of A'IRCRA'fT .YP TO NOT TO EXCtED_75% 'Of THE ALLOWABLE COSTS. THE DIRECTOR i:
<br />[' OF PUBLIC WORKS PRESENTED A COST ES11IMATE FORTHE 700' EXTENSION 'Of THE RUNWAY SOUTH fROM ,
<br />THE NORTH/SOUTH RUNWAY WHICH TOTALED $138,128.00. IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT SA'ID RUNWAY EX- :
<br />TENSION BE DE.SIGNED TO THE SOUTH IN ORDER TO AVOID THE NECESSARY RELOCATION Of LANDING 'i
<br />- - II
<br />LIGHTS I NSTALLED AT THE 'NORTH 'END. ' . - ' , , ' . . i' A
<br />I~ .
<br />AFTER DI_SCUSS'ION A MOTION WAS MADE, SECONDtD AN'D PASSED TO 'PROCEED WITHT'HE EXT.E,N,SION Of
<br />THE RUNWAY 700' TO TH'E SOUTH A'ND TO ApPLY TO THE' FEDERAL AV,I,ATlON AGENCY' 'fOR FEDE~AL fUNDS
<br />, TO THE EXTENT THAT THEY ARE AVA.ILABLE.
<br />I:
<br />I ' -
<br />i DISCUSS'ION WAS OPENED REGARDING 'THE NEED fOR"fUTURE EXPANSION 'Of RUNWAY FAC-IL'ITIES TO THE
<br />" NORTH WITH THE GENERA'L fEE'L'ING BEING THAT PROBABLY A TOTAL R'UNWAY LENGTH Of 8000 TO 10,000 I
<br />fEET WOULD BE DESIFABLE AT SOME FUTURE DATE. IT WAS MOVED AND SECONDED THAT A STUDY BE
<br />MADE Of fHE EV,EN,TUAi., ULT IMATE LENGTH OfTHER'~NWAY WH I C'H WOUlb B:E -DES:' R'A~lE" FO,RTH'E [UGE'NE
<br />MUNICIP.~L AIRP_ORT AND THAT ,SUCH STUDY BE PRESE.NTED TO THE AIRPORT 'CO~MISSION WITHIN Sr~TY
<br />DAYS. MOTION ~ARRIE6.
<br />
<br />
<br />. , - . . . ... . . . :1
<br />MR. EATON REQUESTED INFORMATION CONCERNING THE fINANCIN,G OF THE PRO'POS'ED NEW'TER,MINAL "
<br />BU I LD I NG AND I T WAS SUGGESTED THAT AfTER 'THE COST ES'T! MATES WERE AVA' LABLETHECOMM 155 I ON :i
<br />CONSIDER MAKING A RECOMMENDATION TO THE COUNCIL THAT A BOND ISSUE BE SUBMITTED TO THE I
<br />PEOPLE WITH ~HE HOPE, THAT SAID ELECTION COULD OCCUR AT THE MAY PRIMARY Of 1962.
<br />
<br />2 THE CITY MANAGER REPORTED AN IN'QUJi~y FR'OM MR. BOB DANIELS REQUEST I NG- THAT HE BE PERMITTED
<br />TO PURCHASE LAND ON THE A_I RPORT fOR CONSTRUCT ION Of A HANGAR, I N ORDER THAT HE COULD BqRROW Ii
<br />MONEY WHICH ,wOULD BE ~ECURE~ ,BY',A'MOR~GAG;E-9N'r.HE HA'NGA,RA:ND",THE PROPERT'y,i'. MR.-DANIElS'- 'I
<br />SECOND_ CHO I CE,I F THE fiRST WERE NOT ACCEPTABLE, WA.S TO BUY A PORTION OF THE A I,RPORT CAN- '
<br />I, TONMENT AREA A'CROSS THE ROAD fROM THE AI RPORT TO THE EAST. HI $ ,PLANE WOUL'D BE 'TOWED ACROSS
<br />I . . -. . . . . '
<br />THE ROAD~ TO 'THE AIRPORT PROPER WHE'N NEEDED. HIS THfRDREQUEST WAS THAT 'HE B"E PERMI,TTED TOI
<br />STORE HIS OWN'GASOLINE AT THE. AIRPORT. . THE C/TY MANAGER WAS INSTRUCTED 'rOTEll MR-.DANIElS
<br />THAT THESE 'R'EQUESTS COULD NOr BE GRANTED.AND 'THAT HE _SHOULD CONTACT MR.' HENRY EATON FOR
<br />,: fURTHER 0 I SCUSS ION IN TH I S REGARD. ,
<br />
<br />THERE.,BEING NO fURTHER BUSINESS THE MEETJNG WAS ~pJOURNED AT 1.:,15 PM."
<br />
<br />i' - ~ - - . ,- -" ' , . , . ' - - - . --,- .
<br />
<br />'T WAS MOVED BY MRS. 'LAURIS SECONDED BY MR. MOUIOLM THAT, THE REPORT OF THE AIRPORT COMMISSION BE RE-
<br />FERRED TO THE COHM I TTEE or THE WHOLE. MOT I ~N CARR I EO. .. .". .:." .. . . .. I
<br />
<br />
<br />3 :i A REPORT Of THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS Of OCTOBER 3 AND 9, 196/, AND A ~EPORT OF THE :'
<br />I PLANN I NG COMM J ss,i ON MEET I NG Of OCTOBER 2, 1961 ~E~RE PRESENTED AS FOLL.OWS: :~
<br />"
<br />- "
<br />OCTOBER '3 AND.9 , ,96' " !;
<br />"AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EUGENE PL'ANNING COMMISSION 'OCTOBER 3, 1961, THE PLANNING '
<br />!, COMMISSION MADE THE fOLLOWI~G RECOMMENDATION'S: ' - . ' e
<br />
<br />THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS,THAT THE FOLlO,WING DESCRIBED ARF;A BE REZONED TO R-3G
<br />GARDEN APARTMENT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT: ." -
<br />
<br />.' ' . 'I
<br />:: RECOMMENr.:5AT ION Of THE PLANN I NG COMM I SS ION I,
<br />BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER Of THE INTERSECTION OF PEARL STREET AND 2ND,
<br />AVENUE A~m RUNN I.NGTHENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WEST L '-NE, OF PEARL STREET 4,29- ;/2' ,I
<br />fEET, PLUS OR MINUS, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TAX LOT 460~;'THENCE WEST ,150 f~; :
<br />THE~CE NORTH'73050~ WEST 194.4 rT; THENCE NORTH 99f.T.j THENCE SOUTH 890361 EAST,
<br />, _ _ _ .. , '. . . t!
<br />189 ,F"T; THENCE NORTH, PARALEEL TO AND ,150 ,FTWtST Of Tl-f.E WEST - L INE,OF PEARL STREET :i
<br />TO THE NORTH LINE .OF 2ND AVENUE EXTENDED WEST; TH~NCE ~AST TO THE POINT OF" BEGINNING. :i
<br />;)
<br />
<br />BE$NGOTHE PROPERTY ON THE WEST Slot Of PEARL STREET BETWEEN THE NORTH LINE Of 2ND
<br />STREET' EXTENDED WEST A'NO 3RD STREET :
<br />
<br />RECOMMEND CHANGE FROM R-2 Two FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO R-3G GARDEN APARTMENT RESI- :: I
<br />DENTIAL DISTRICT 'I
<br />
<br />, ," - .,' . -- ;1 ~
<br />AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDS THAT,THE fOLlOWINGREQ~EST, WHICH WAS DENIED BY THE '
<br />PLANNING ~OMMISSION IN JULY 1961 BUT REfERRED BACK TO THE PLA(:JNING COMMISSION BY THE COUNCIL,
<br />, - ",.' " I
<br />BE REZONE~ TO C-3P COMMERCIAL DIS!R,ICT SUBJECT TO PRESENTAT.IO,,! Of A SATISfACTqRY.PLAN FOR ,I
<br />SCREENING THE PROPERTY FROM THE EAST AND THE fiLING OF THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS TO ASSURE THAT '
<br />I
<br />,A PERMANENT BUFFER WI LL BE INSTALLED AND.MA.I NTA I NED PR lOR TO USE Of THE LAND FOR COMMERC I AL ::
<br />PURPOSES: .
<br />!! e
<br />"
<br />!i
<br />
<br />
<br />l
<br />
|