|
<br /> r96,
<br /> e
<br /> 8/13/62
<br /> _",-_~_c.....-..__.._.",........____.,....-...--,-______-._.,--~~_. ~-.~ ......-~_"....____~__""___~____________________~_.~._~_______-____:. _. _ - '~""... ... '."'~ -.-. -.""-
<br /> ...,..",..~.~-""'-;~___- _ .-~_.. ~'" _ "'__ -_ -_... . ",--._,_ "" .__ -"',.- _ _ -'" ..,- - "''''' - _. -"""""~'. ___.. ....". >="""'- ._" .......,.0<::0._.. - _ _ ..----- ~___ ",-"_,.' _ "...., >"<..- -. . -" - ".- ""... ""'0 '=" , _ --c..,.... _~_- -- "',.... -------....------ '""..------.'-----. '---.--- ~...__._----._~_._----....,.~---..- .---....-.----- -.~.--------.'- ------- - -".---~ ---'. ,.-..---.----- .-. ..... -,-- .-.-------------.--
<br /> .~_. '>._...__'"--'---~____~J... -"*O-...-............_,.~_._'--"'"__~.....,~-_....._...'"'''-....,-..:-._-._:o....-, ._____"-"""--"'--:~._',.... _~.....-_._=______"'.:._"_-c,."'___.....~""__="'________ "--'...........,.,-~_~___.<.,.__._,.-~,_. .........._..."""...~_=-.,.~___.--'-.___~L ....__......__..-_. _ ~-..~....__ _~, ~........=_-_"'"'"'"
<br /> SIDEWALKS I
<br /> WEST SIDE POLK FROM 20TH TO 24TH--
<br /> K. A. WARDELL ( Low) $ 2,803.40 $ 1.82
<br /> FRED STUBBERT 2,888.40
<br /> 22ND AVENUE FROM JEFFERSON TO MONROE I
<br /> K. A. WARDELL (Low) 2,605.94 2. '5 I
<br /> FRED STUBBERT 2,629.54 I
<br /> 36TH FROM WILLAMETTE TO 37TH I
<br /> FRED STUBBERT ( Low) 3,287.68 1.76 I
<br /> K. A. WARDELL 3,328.00
<br /> STORM SEWER
<br /> 43RD TO Fox HOLLOW ROAD FROM EAST OF ALDER
<br /> INTER-CITY CONSTRUCTION CO. ( Low) 36,388.48 36,388.48 45,000.00
<br /> JESKE BROS. CONSTRUCTION CO. 3.6,828.46 e
<br /> PAUL W. FERNEDING 45,629.48 '
<br /> ABRAMS CONSTRUCTION CO~ 53,236.10
<br /> JAMES G. ROBERTSON 53,842.40
<br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MRS. LAURIS SECOND~D BY MR. MOLHOLM THAT CONTRACTS BE ~~ARDED TO THE LOW BIDDER
<br /> ON EACH OF THE PROJECTS, EXCEPT THE PAVING OF POTTER STREET FROM 35TH TO 37TH AVENUE AND ALSO BETWEEN
<br /> THE NO~TH AND SOUTH BOUNDARIES OF 3RD ADDITION TO SOUTHERN OAKS AN~SANITARY SEWER RELATED THERETO. I
<br /> I T. WAS_ GENERALL Y. UNDERSTOOD HtE: PAV lNG, QF 30TH A\f. NUE WOULD B.E C?NA 15" BASE ~T THE LOW BID PRic~ OF
<br /> $24,500.00. RO.LLCALL ~OTE. ALL COUNC~LMEN PRESENT VOTING AYE, MOTION CARRIED.
<br /> I IN THE MATTER OF PAVING POTTER STR~ET, MR. CRAWFORD LYLE PROTESTED THE PAVING OF THIS STREET, SPEAK-,
<br /> ING ALSO FOR MR. TOM RIGBY WHO COULD NOT BE PRESENT. MR. CARL JONES ALSO PROTESTED THE PAVING, STATING
<br /> HE DID NOT\FEEL THE PAVING WAS NEEDED AT THIS TIME. T~E DJ~E~TOR OF PUBLIC W~RKS P~INTED OUT THAT A
<br /> PE.T I T ION WAS ON ,FI LE_W I TH S I G~I\TURE:S OF ,OWNERS, OF 52% OF -THE PR~PERTY ABUTT I N~ THE PROPOSED PROJ_EC~.
<br /> IT WAS MOVED BY MRS. LAURIS SiCO~DE~ BY ~R.CHATT TO PROCEED WITH THE PAViNG ~F.POTTER STREET AS
<br /> SCHEDULED, AND THAT THE CONTRACT BE AWA~DE~ TO. THE LOW BIDDER. ROLLCALL VOTE. ALL COUNCILMEN PRESENT I
<br /> VOTING AYE, MOTION CARRIED.
<br /> 2 CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSION ~AS HELDC~NCERNING THE ~A~ING OF ~OTH AVENUE ~ROM ALDER STREET TO
<br /> UNIVERSITY STREET. DR. STANS~UR~ ASKED WHY THE STREET WAS BEING PAVED TO A WIDTH OF 48', IF THE PRO-
<br /> JECT NEEDED TO BE DONE THIS SUMMER, AND .WHY~ I F THE COUNTY IS DOING PART OF T~EWORK, THE INDIVIDUAL
<br /> I PROPERTIES WOULD BE ASSESSED FOR A PART .OF rHE COST. THE CITY MANAGER EXPLAINED THE SITUATION, AND,
<br /> I ALSO STATED AN AGREEMENT HAD BEEN REACH~D B~TWEEN THE CITY AND THE COUNTY WHE~EBY THE COUNTY HAD AGREED
<br /> TO PAY ONE-HALF THE COST OF A 48' PAVEMENT (ESS THE CURBS. THE QUESTION WAS ALSO RAISED CONCERNING
<br /> HARRIS SCHOOL CHILDREN CR~SSING THIS STREET, AND IT WAS EXPLAINED A RECOMMENDATION HAD BEEN MADE BASED
<br /> ON A TRAFFIC STUDY THAT AN OVERHE~D CROSSING IS NOT WARRANTED~ BUT THAT SIGNALS AN~ AN A~ULT CONTROL-
<br /> OFFICER AT THIS LOCATION WOULQ BE SATIS~ACTqRY. IT WAS SUGGEStED THAT SHOULD THE-SCHOOL BOARD FEEL-AN
<br /> OVERHEAD CROSSING IS MANDATORY, THE CITY WO~LD NOT PART~IPATE IN ITS CONSTRUCTION COST. I
<br /> I
<br /> COMMITTEE REPORTS I
<br /> , I
<br /> COMMITTEE MEETING HELD JULY 26, 1962:
<br /> !
<br /> ~PRESENT: MAYOR CONE; COU~CILMEN LA~RIS, MOLHOLM, CHATT, MO~ER, WILSON, SWANSON- AND DEVERELL~
<br /> - ,
<br /> CITY MANAGER; CITY RECORD~R; CITY ATTORNEY; ADMINISTRATIVE ASSI~TANTS; METRO CIVIC e
<br /> CLUB TAX BASE COMMITTEE MEMBERS LENHART, WILLIAMS AND SPENCER; . -
<br /> .
<br /> 3 I. TAX BASE - THE CITY MANAGER STA1ED rHIS WAS A JOINT MEETING WITH THE METRO CIVIC GLUB
<br /> I COMMITTEE TO DISCU~S THE PROPOS~D NEW TAX BASE FOR THE C'TY OF EUGE~Ei AND~THAT
<br /> I MR. DOUGLAS SPENCER, CHAIRMAN OF THE METRO CLUB STUDY COMMITTEE, WOULD MAKE THE REPORT
<br /> TO THE COUNCIL MEMBERS AND OTHERS PRESENT.
<br /> MR. SWANSON MOVED SECQNDED BY M~. CHATT THAT THE COMMITTEE of THE M~TRO CIVIC CLUB BE
<br /> COMMENDED FOR THE EXCELLENT REP~RT .PRESENTED TO THE CLUB, COPIES OF WHICH WERE BEFORE
<br /> EACH COUNCIL MEMBER. MOTION CA~RIED. ~
<br /> MR. SPENCER THEN REVIEWED THE REPORT OF THE STUD~ COMMITTEE, POINTING OUT THAT, WITH f
<br /> A NEW TAX BASE AND THE ELIMINATION OF ALL THE ~PECIAL LEVIES, TH~ CITY COUNCIL WOULD
<br /> HAVE MORE FLEXIBLE US~ OF THE CQNSOLIDATEDjU~DS-AND WOULD BE MORE CERTAIN THAT THIS
<br /> MONEY WOULD BE AVAILABLE FOR INCLUSION IN ANY LONG RANGE PLANS. IT WAS CONCEDED BY
<br /> SOME MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL THAT CONSIDERABLE EFFORT WILL HAVE TO -BE GIVEN TO EDUCAT- I I-
<br /> . '.
<br /> ING THE CITIZENS OF THE NEED FOR -A NEW TAX BASE IN ORDER TO GET VOTER APPROVAL OF-THE
<br /> BALLOT MEASURE. MR. MOLHOLM MOVED SECONDED BY MR. CHATT TO APPROVE "THE RECOMMENDATION I
<br /> OF THE STUDY GROUP AND TO PUT THE TAX BASE MEASURE ON THE NOVEMBER 6, 1962 ELECT-ION I "- ---.:
<br /> -. j
<br /> BALLOT. MOTleN CARRIED UNANIMOUSCr.
<br /> 4 2. EXPRESSWAY AMENDMENT - SOME DISCUSSION WAS HELD CONCERNING THE REPEAL OF THE EXPRESSWAY
<br /> AMENDMENT AND WHETHER THE MATTER SHOULD BE PLACED ON THE NOVEMBER BALLOT. COUNciLMEN_
<br /> CHATT AND DEVERELL STATED THEY FELT THE EXPRESSWAY QUESTION SHOULD NOT BE ON THE SAME
<br /> BALLOT WITH THE TAX BASE QUESTION. No DECISION WAS MADE ON THIS DISCUSSION. e
<br /> ~" !
<br />
|