|
<br />rS52
<br />e
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />~~~,,7/_22/63 . ~_""". __~.. ~ _~~. '. _." ...." _. ~'"~'. __ _, . _ ~,.. ..'__ .,. ~
<br />
<br />.-,' --= ~ """'.____- _ -...._ ___ 0..-...... _""- "'-'-.""-'..z..- ---"--.. ,,~-~._._..d__._____~-_ ~-
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />MR. CHATT MOVED SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS THAT ITEMS I THROUGH 3H Of THE 'COMMITTEE REPORT
<br />. '.. '.- .' . ,.. .
<br />BE APPROVED. MOTI,ON <;:ARRIE.D. - .
<br />
<br />I J. REZONING TO R-3 MULTIPLE FAMILY AREA BETWEEN 26TH AND 27TH fROM PORTLAND .
<br />TO NORTH/SOUTH ALLEY BETWEEN WILLAMETTE AND PORTLAND, JESSEN & MARX
<br />(STUART)' (NO.63-114) -MR. STUA~TWAS PRESENT AND G~VE SEVERAL REASONS
<br />fOR HIS REZONING REQUEST AND GAVE A VERBAL PICTURE Of THE AREA IN QUESTION.
<br />THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAD RECOMMENDED DENIAL Of THE REQUEST, ANO MR.SWANSON
<br />MOVED SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS TO UPHOLD THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDA-
<br />TION.. .MOTI,ON CAI1RIED, MR.,CHATT VOTING 1':10. 1
<br />
<br />I MR. ST4~RT ~XPLAINEQ TH~T,.fU~THER PLANNING HAD BEEN DO~E .!NCONNECTION ~ITH THIS REZONING
<br />_I REQUEST AND PRESENTED A MAP, ASK I NG THAT TH I S REQUEST BE RETURNED TO THE PLANN ING COMM I S- _
<br />SION. MR. SWANSO~.MOV,ED SECONDED BY MR. CHATT .TO RE.fER I.TEM ~J BACK TO THE PLANNING COM- .,
<br />MISSION. .M0110t-.!C.ARR.IEO.., : '
<br />
<br />I .4' ,,'
<br />2 I K. ,VARI ANCE TQ ALLOW ADD I T 10NAL APARTMENTS AT 363 EAST I-6TH; BRENNEMAN
<br />,(NO.63-122) ~~R. S~ANSON MOV~D S~CONDED ~Y.MR~CR~K~S ~O UPHOLD THE
<br />I ~LANNING C<?MM.ISSION R~COMMENDATIO~ fC?R DE.":IIAL.. ,MOT~O.N _CARRI~~, ~~S~RS.
<br />CHATT AND,HAWK VOTING NO. I'
<br />
<br />II MR. SCHAUDT R~'QUESTE'D THE .COUNS I,L: T~ V I EW A PLAN Of ~.HE PROPOSED APART~ENT. BUI.L.D I NG, I
<br />STATING THAT THE VARIANCE REQUESTED WAS TO ALLOW 10 UNITS TO BE CQNSTRUCTED RATHER THAN I
<br />I THE 9 ALLQWED~ MR. CHATTMOVED ~ECONDEDBY MRS~ LAURIS TO REfER ITEM 3K BACK TO THE
<br />PLANNING COMMISSION~ MOTIQN CARRIED~'" ..- "",'-! -. ,. .,'-
<br />
<br />3 . L.:REZONINGTO .C-3P COMMERCIAL. AREA BETWEEN COBURG AND OAKWAY ROADS,. MCKAY I
<br />(NO.63-IOB)- MR~ M~KAY. W~S PRESENT A~D_EXP~AINEDTO. THE COUNC!L~Y MEANS Of I
<br />TWO MAPS THE AREA WH I CH HE .DES I RED TO IMPROVE. HE ALSO PO I NTED OUT THE I
<br />~Gf~~R ZONE~'HE HO~E~ TO PUT JN~O PLANTINGS, THE'~OCATio~ Of THE BUILDINGS I
<br />HE PROPOSED TO CONSTRUCT AND THEIR LOCATLON IN.RELATION TO'THE STREETS .AND II
<br />PROPE~TY .L! NE~, ~t-!E? GAYE _A IiER~AL: pi C1JlliJ~t':i:>'f' 'T~E GENE~AL: APPEARANC~-:.'Of THE
<br />PROJEpAfTER C9MPLET!QN~. .MR. .McKAY:STA'!ED THA!H'IS,CHIEf REQUE~T AT THIS
<br />TIME IS 7HE~VACATI0~ O~ A~ EXISTING ~g~DWAY ~~)CH ~UNS OBL~QU~~!.THROUGH
<br />T~E PROPER!Y.~NP STATE~ H~ WOULD.LIK~.TO HAVE A COMMITMENT ON THIS BEfORE
<br />HE PROCEEDED fURTHER. MR. CHATT MOVED SECONDED BY gR. PURDY TO RECOMMEND
<br />ISTART'NG ~Ro~iou~i"OR ;HE VACAT'ON Or.THE,O~i'~~AD W,TH THE DEDiCATION 0. I
<br />\ ANOTHER ROAD AROUND THE EDGE Of THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. MOTION CARRIED. 11
<br />I I
<br />MAYOR CONE SUGGESTED THE. COUNCIL GIVE SOME CAREfUL THOUGH TO THIS ITEM BECAUSE Of THE Ii
<br />DOWNTOWN.\;E'~~~f~NT'S' ~ND~T'HE. Efi~CTA::~~'RGt 'S'HOp"PI NG' 'CEN!ER,.M'IG~~ __HA~EON D'OWNTOWN SHOP- II
<br />PING. .MR.- DAVE VANF:'OSS~N 'APr;'EARED BEfORE ,1:HE.COUNCIL.STATING' THAT HE~ A'S AN INDUSTRIAL I
<br />I AND COMMERCIAL REALTOR, DID NOT THINK EUGENE IS LARGE'ENOUGH fOR THIS KIND Of DEVELOPMENT.
<br />. '. .- t
<br />I ~~; , ~~A ~;R:~~~ ~SECONDED · Y MR:" L: URIS T HAT ITEM 3L O. THE COMM I mE REPORT .E AP PRO VE 0" II I
<br />
<br />
<br />41 . .M..REZONING TO CR COMMERCIAL-RESIDE-NT'I'Al AREA>ON WE'ST' SIDE 'Of VILlAR'D BETWEEN !I
<br />I 14TH AND 15TH, TRAGER, (No.63-111 )~- MR. TRA~ER. WA~ PR~SENT ,AND.~TATED HIS Ii
<br />I REA.SONS fO. R APP. EAR I NG AG. A I N BEfORE THE COUIIe I L WITH TH I S REQUEST. MR .SWANSON I'
<br />I _,' MOVED T9 UPH9LD. T~E PLANNING COMMISSION .R~COMME~DATION fOR DENIAL.' THERE I
<br />I ----. -. .,-, ',. .,... ,." :
<br />l' .WAS NO $.ECOND~ --, -:-- ~~ I
<br />
<br />1 UPON fURTHER DISCUSSION, MRS. LAURIS MOVED SECONDED BY MR.CRAKES TO OVER- I e
<br />j RULE THE PLANNING COMMISSION.RECOMMEN~~TIO~ AND APPROVE THE REQUESTED RE- ~
<br />I -- Z9NING. MO':(IO!'CC-ARR"~.o', MR.. SWANSON VO,T.I.~G NO.~~_~: --. __ .. I
<br />
<br />THE CITY MANAGER READ A LETT'ER fROM MR. A. ROBERT TH?MA~' IN::OPPO'SITIO~ Tf? T.~IS REZONING I
<br />REQUEST. THE LETTER STATED NO NEED HAD BEEN SHOWN fOR REZONING, THAT THE CR ZONING,
<br />WOULD INTRUDE INTO_A ~ES'DENTIAL'~~.E;A AND, THAT..IT WOULD ESTABLISH A PRECE?ENT:.. II
<br />
<br />I MR..McL~UG!:IL.lN9f T~E.'~~'I~~~SI:r'X~.O-;:9REGONSTA.TED THAT'!'H.E"UN'IVER'SI';.;,';; b'R~GON HAS AN !'
<br />I OPTION TO BUY THIS PROPERTY AND THAT ANY BUILDING GOING ON THIS LOT WOULD BE CONDEMNED :
<br />I N THE r~T~~E.. _ " . , __ .
<br />I ' -. . . . . - . , --
<br />
<br />I MR. CH~TTMOVE~.~ SEC.Q:ND~,D~BY. 'MR.."~~WA~,S:ON ~THAT. TH~COUNC I~L' UpHOLD 'THE' PL~NN'-N~G COMM I SS I ON 'I
<br />I RECOMMENDATION fO~. DENIAL Of THI:> REQUEST. MOTION !=A~R.IED. __ . !j
<br />
<br />I --
<br />~1:T.EM\.~~.Jl.lL '(. I~,. 1.9q~. .C;'QM~ I TTEEAGENDA N~.T: CO,NS IDERED ,~T :~HA~ T.~ME: II I
<br />
<br />I I. PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT -. JULY. 2, 1,963: II
<br />'A. REZON'ING.TOR-4 AREA AT 15TH,AND:ORCHARD, BERN.IK(No.'63-.119) - .THE PLAN-
<br />NI NG COMM.j SSI ON 'RECOMMENDED DENI AL. .
<br />
<br />MR. CHATT MOVED SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS TO UPHOLD THE PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF THE ij
<br />REZONING. MOTION CARRIED. / / 'II
<br />7 22 63 ~ 5 I
<br />jl -
<br />11 ..,
<br />~ r
<br />
|