|
<br />r37'O
<br />e
<br />
<br />aL 12L63
<br />
<br />-""""".. --. =.-
<br />
<br />. -
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />
<br />MANAGER REPORTED THAT THE SAN FRANC I SCo OFf I q:OF THE_ NAT I ONAL BOARD ,Of
<br />FIRE UNDERWRITERS ,SAI-D NO DEFICIENCY POINTS WOULD BE RECEIVED FOR FAILURE
<br />. . -.
<br />TO ENFORCE ~HE UNIFORM BUiLDING CODE AT T~ETIME Or:THE NEXT FIRE RATING.
<br />MR. JIM LONGWOOD EXPLA I NED THE D I FFERENCEBETWEEN VAR 10'US TYPES OF MATER I ALS
<br />WHICH ~ULD BE USED FOR THE SCREE~, INCLUDING ,LAMINATED tiMBERS, CEDAR
<br />TIMBERS, OR ALUMINUM. MRS. LAURIS MOVEOSECOND~D BY MR. CHATT TO APPROVE
<br />THE USE OF THE CEDAR TIMBERS AS THE WOOD SCREEN,ON THE NEW CITY HALL. MOTION
<br />CARRI ED.
<br />
<br />MR. TOM COCHRAN OF THE CHAMBER OF COMMERC~ TIMBER COMMITTEE THEN COMMENDED
<br />THE CITy-COUNCIL IN THEIR DECISION IN FAVO~ OF ~HE CEDAR TIMBERS~,
<br />
<br />MR. CHAT,T MOVED ,SECONDED BY MR. DEVERELL TO APPROVE ITEM 3 OF THE COMM I TrEE REPORT. _
<br />MOTION CARRIED, MR. GHRISTENSEN VOTING-NO. ~
<br />
<br />I 4. DIAGONAL PARKING FORD'S DRIVE IN, Moss AND FRANKLIN - THE TRAFFIC ENGINEER
<br />PRESENTED A REPORT ON THE REQUEST OF FORD'S DINN6R HOUSE FOR DIAGONAL PARK-:- .'
<br />ING ON Moss STREET ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF THEIR PROPERTY; THE REPORT STATED
<br />DIAGONAL PARKING WOULD CREATE MORE 'OF 'A HAZARD THAN PARALLEL PARKING SI,NCE
<br />CARS WOULD BE BACKING INTO TRAFFr'C, AND DIAGONAL PARKING WOULD NOT LEAVE SUFFI- .
<br />CIENT ROOM FOR 2-WAY TRAFFIC. MR. BRAILSFORD OF FORD'S SUG'GESTED THAT ,THEY I
<br />BE ALLOWED TO TRY THE DIAGONAL PARKI'NG, STAT~NG THAT HE WOULD PAY FOR PAINT-
<br />ING THE PARKING'SPACES AND REMOVAL-OF THE PAINT IF THE DIAGONAL PARKING,IS
<br />FOUND TO BE IMPRACTICAL. AFTER SOME DISCUSSION BY THE COUNCIL, MR. SWANSON -"
<br />'MOVED SECONDED BY MR~ CHRISTEN~EN TO DENY THE REQUESTED DIAGONAL PARKING.
<br />MOTION DEFE~TED."
<br />
<br />MRi'CHATi"MOVED SECONDEDB~ MR. CRAKES TO A~PROVE'THE DIAGONAL PARKING PRO-
<br />VIDING IF IT IS FOUND rO BE U~SATISFACTORY ~T WILL BE REMOVED AT THE EXPENSE
<br />OF MR. BRAILSFORD. MOTION CARRIED, MESSRS. SWANSON, CHRISTENSEN, AND PURDY
<br />VOTING NO.
<br />
<br />MR. CHATT MOVED SECONDED BY MR. HAWK TO APPROVE ITEM 4 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT. MOTION
<br />CARRIED, MR. SWANSON VOTING NO.
<br />
<br />2 '5. 'RECONSIDERATION OF REZONING 3190cWILLAMETTETO'R-3G, HAWTHORNE (No.63-lla) .,.
<br />MR. HAWTHORNE HAD PETITIONED FOR R-3G ZONING WH)CHHAD, BEEN DENJED..' HE IS
<br />NOW REQUESTING A VARIANCE FROM T~E EXISTING RA ZONE TO ALLOW HIM TO HAVE
<br />RENTAL SPACE'ON THE LOWER LEVEL-OF HIS HOUSE. MR.,CR.AKES, MOVED SECO_NDED BY
<br />'DR. PURDY TO ~ECONSIDER THE PREVIOUS AtTION OF THE,COUNCIL DENYING THE RE-
<br />ZON1NG. M~TIONC~RRIED. -
<br />
<br />DR. PURDY'MOVED ~ECONDED BY MR. DEVERELL, TO REFER THE MATTER BACK TO THE
<br />PLANNING COMMISSION FOR RECONSIDERATION. MOTION CARRIED."
<br />
<br />MR. CHA TT MOVE 0 SE CONDE 0 BY MR. CRA K~ 5 TO A PPROVE ITEM , OF THE COMM f TTE E ROORTo MOT f ON I
<br />CARRIED. _.
<br />
<br />
<br />ITEMS ON AUGUST a, '963 COMMITTEE AGENDA NOT CONSIDERED AT THAT TIME:
<br />
<br />3 I. PROTE'CT'ION OF CH'I LDR(N, 30TH A'VENUE --THE' 1[:R7H'F:l,Ci,jENGi~NEERREPORTED A CON-
<br />, TINUAL'I NCREASE' IN TRAFF I C. C'OUNT- ON 30TH AVENUE BOTH FOR' WEEK DAYS AND WEEK- e
<br />ENDS." MR. -LE,WIS WARD, 3150 EMERALD STREE'T, STATED HE WAS SPEAKING FOR THE
<br />NEIGHBORS AND 'AS :A'.RE'P.RESENTATIVE OF THE HARRIS PTA, AND THAT PARENTS AND
<br />StHOOL PEOPLE ARE'CONCERNED REGARD I NG THE SPEE-D OF TRAFF I CENTER HG EUGENE ON
<br />30TH AVENUE. 'HE STATED' IT IS HIS BELIEF THAT THES,IGNING' SYSTEM NOW USED
<br />I S NOT ADEQUATE TO CONTROL THE SPEED, AND THAT THEY, RECOMMENDED FI RST :AN
<br />OVERHEAD CROSSING, AND SECOND, SOME TYPE OF PATROL, EITHER SCHOOL BOY PATROL
<br />OR ADULT UNI'FORMEDCROSSING GUARD. MAYO.R CONE S:rATED IT,WOULDBE A MAJOR
<br />PROBLEM ;);0 SLOW MOTORISTS COMING INTO EUGENE ON 30TH TO THE DESIGNATED ,25 MPH
<br />SPEED. THE CITY MANAGER STATED THE CITY WOULD CHECK OUT THE POSSIBILITY OF
<br />ADDITI' NAL SIGNING' FOR TRA:FFICCO'NTROL WITH THE AID OF THE COUNT,yCOMMIS.-'
<br />SIONERS,THAT THE STATE SPEED CONTROL BOARD SHOULD BE CONTACTED WITH,REGARD
<br />TO' A SURVEY AND' RECOMMENDAT I ON :FOR TH IS APPROACH TO ,THE C I TY~ - THAT HE. WOULD
<br />DISCUSS WITH THE POLICE DEPAR~MENT THE POSSIB~E PLAC1NG OF A UNIFORMED OFFICER
<br />AT' THE CROSSING AND THE USE OF ADDIT'IONAL C.ROSSING: GUARDS, PERHAPS, USING SOME
<br />'Q-F 'THE PEOPLE I N THE -I MMED lATE AREA. TH I S PR'OP,OSAL WAS APPROVED BY MEMBERS I
<br />OF THE COUNCIL AND MR.,WARD.
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />a/ I 2/63 - I I
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />" e
<br />~
<br />
|