|
<br />~410
<br />e
<br />
<br />10/14/63
<br />
<br />""',,..-=-......__,,,_ -... .......-~ ~.-- .,.- ~=-::.. ~ -. C*.=:":,~_,,,,,,,, -~ .-""- _.,-w- _ -~...,. - "'" -~- '.- -'--"- -~-...-....~~~~~--~
<br />
<br />'-" "0__ _ _ """'-._ -... .._ -.....01<- _'......._._ '"""- _ _ . ..-."-_"'........... ....--.-.-. _~=';:""H or .- ,::",-"",,,,,,,,,<_~";':';:,_.... -;.._,..~...~...:::~ "":'~'_ _=.._~__":""~:- -"' ""_""
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />, , III
<br />I I 0-
<br />
<br />1 5. Auditors, 1963-64 - An agreement was pres~nt~d between ~inn.& Co.,~certified i
<br />public accountants, and the City of Eugepe for a~dit work to be conducted by i
<br />Winn & Co. for the City of Eugene beginn~ng July 1, 1963 and ~nding ~une 30, I
<br />1964, said work to be conducted in accordance with the pr~scribed minimum
<br />standards of audit reports. The agreement contained rates for the audit
<br />work to be done and the conditions to be carried out by the firm:of Winn&
<br />Co. Mr .., Christen,sen moved, seconded by:' D'r. Pur~y' to approve '.the . agreement I
<br />between Winn & Co., certified public accountants, and the City of Eugene.
<br />Motion carried. I
<br />
<br />Mrs. Lauris moved seconded by Mr. Swanson that Item 5 of the Committee report be approved.
<br />Rollcall vote. All councilmen p~esent voting aye, motipn c~rried.
<br />
<br />2 6. Traffic and Retaining Wall , 22nd and .Fri~ndly -' The City Manager .and .staff e
<br />had investigated and surveyed the situation with regard to pedestrian and I
<br />automobile traffic at the cor:ner of 22nc~ anq Friendly in the vicinity of
<br />certain concrete wall on the'nortneast'corner of the intersection. Based
<br />upon his investigation and availapJe traffic acc:idej:lt records:, tt .W8;S: the
<br />recommendation of the City Manager that. the wall be allowed to remain.
<br />Mrs. Cooley, a resident in the area, wa:s .present and st,ated s,everal. :reasons "I"
<br />.' why the neighborh,oodthought the wall should be ,at. least lowered to give a
<br />better view' of the intersect:iop from' appr.oac:hing, traffic and f?r the protec-
<br />tion of school children, using the crossing. Mr. Swanson mpved :seconded by ".
<br />Mr. Christensen to uphold the recommendation of the City M&nager and allow
<br />the wall t~ rem~~n._ Motion. carried.
<br />~..- .._--.- .~.----_.--.--~_.. -....--.
<br />
<br />Mr. Swapsonmoyed, s.econd~d by Mr. C,hristensen, that .Item 6 oJ the Committee..:, repo.rt be ap-
<br />proved.
<br />. .
<br />
<br />
<br />Mrs. Jane :Coo~ey :again s:poke asking thc:it the Council reconsider, find as.king ,that the re- II
<br />taining wall at le,ast b.e r:educed in heigh):. . II
<br />
<br />A vote. was taken, OIl; the motion, and motiop carti.ed,.Mrs~ Lauris and Mr,.. Crakes, voting. no. II
<br />
<br />3 7. Civic AUdito.rium committe,e Appointment - Mayor Cone apP9inted Councilman ,'I
<br />. C. :p'an Chri:stenseIl; as: delegat.e. to the c.ommittee..investigating. the Civic .
<br />Auditorium proposal, with, COll;ncilwoman Lauris. .named' a.s alternate.
<br />
<br />.4 Mayor Cone al:s~ annoll~ced that John Luyaas_ was ,named chairman of a com-
<br />mit tee to worJ<. in opposition to, the commillttee'kn6ylll .,asthe '''Save Our'
<br />Parks C,ommittee" -: I
<br />I
<br />5 .8. Underground wir. in~ for Street Lights - In,discus~ing ~he p~~b~em of.~nder- 11
<br />~ ground wiring_,inresidential subdivisions, .it was .sugge.sted that th~ addi- II I. .
<br />tiopal ch,arge f.or this type of s):reet 1 ight ing service' over. ,the: exis:t,ing ...
<br />.type of ipstallation be: at'leas:t partially abso:rbed by the property o~er, .
<br />relieving the City of having to absorp th,? full apl~unt.?.f the additional I _.'
<br />monthly amortization charge. It was recommended by the Council that the
<br />.' City 11.a:nager hav:e 'further: discussion y.rith the, E~gene Water & Electric I
<br />Board regarding,rate~ ~nd the possible location of the utility to, the rear I
<br />--L~ :~ ~h~a~::i~::~~:~.lots instead of on the street, with a report to he made I ' .
<br />
<br />
<br />6 9. Selection of Architect, Swimming. Pools and Community Buildings -. ,It W(3,S
<br />propose.dby tJ:le, ,City Manager that a committee .compo:sed .of two. members of
<br />the City CQu:ncil, ):he Di,rector of Public WorJcs, the Director of Park s &. Re-
<br />cre~tion,: and the City tl~nager review ~he qu~lifications: of archit~cts,in
<br />the Eugene area with a view to making a ~eco~endat~on to. th~ City Council
<br />for the designing of two indoor swimming pools and three community center I
<br />buildings. ~embers o~ the Council: concurred in.the,proposal, and. Mr.Chatt,
<br />Mr. SWflnson, a.nd Mr. Deverell. wer.e selected .to beth,e Cou).1c.il. r.~presenta-.
<br />tives on the committee.
<br />
<br />7 10:. Pearl Street Extension ,-Mrs. Anna Jeppe:sQn w.as_ r~.c:~~nized .~~ _~,:Y;~: ,Co~e,. I
<br />and sh~ aga~n ~pok~.on the City's proposal to ipstall a roftd~~ythrough a
<br />sec,tion.: of Ama:zon Park. Mrs. Jepp.eson was. very much oppos~d to this road- 'I
<br />way and voiced .several ~easons as to why~the ~ity shouJd not continue with
<br />its pr:ogr.am.o.finstalli.ngZ;the roa~way~ After several comment!> fro!ll members I .1..
<br />of the Co~nci1, Maypr Cone thanked Mrs. Jeppeson for her remarks.. !_
<br />
<br />
<br />10/14/63 C] I
<br />
<br />
<br />I .
<br />~ ~
<br />
|