|
<br />r'34,
<br />. \ ~
<br />
<br />6/271f>6
<br />._~-,-- ____ _____.,,~...__..~"'--_._,-..-. --:~____,__",.__ .----.-.- -_._-~-- ----. --- --- - --T -----.--- ___ --~ - --- ---- - -
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />Mrs. Lauris moved seconded by Mr. Crakes to ap~rov:e Item 1 o.~ "t:e Conunittee report. Motion carried. I. .
<br />
<br />1 2. Urban Beaut'ification Federal Grant - The Director of' Parks and Recreat.ion reviewed'
<br />the steps requ-ired to make ~his applica'tion. Copies of the Urban Beautificat'ion
<br />Program for the City were .districtued to Council members. '
<br />
<br />Councilman Crakes entered the Conunitteemeeting at this time.'
<br />
<br />Dr. Purdy moved seconded by Mr. Lassen that the Beautification Program be accepted
<br />and the application {or Federal f'unds be filed. Motion ,carried.
<br />
<br />The P1an~ing Commission recommende? filing the application with the understanding it could be amended.
<br />
<br />- .
<br />
<br />Mrs. Lauris moved seconded by Mr. Crakes to approve Item 2 of -the Conunittee report w{th the under":
<br />standing the application cou1~ be amended. Motion carried.
<br />
<br />2 3. Funds, Lane .County Council on Alcoholism - A letter ,was re'ad from Mrs. Hazel Foss,
<br />execut.ive secretary, a'nd Carlton C. Buck, chairma,n, Lane County Cou,nci1 o'n Alco'ho1ism, . tit
<br />requesting $~500 to help with continued operat~on of the Council on Alcoholism. The
<br />present operation a-nd future p1a'ns of the. Alcoholism Council were: explained :by Ed.,
<br />Fadeley, a director. Councilman Anderson asked that a copy"of the Alcoholism Council's
<br />budget be s.ubmnted to the CityCou~cil. Mrs. Gladys Fletcher, treasurer of the' A1- -
<br />coho1ism Counc'i1, expl'ained how last year's contribut ion was use.d: Literature and Racks,
<br />$300; $25.per month toward salary of Executive Secretary; Emergency Fund, '$300; ,
<br />General Fund, $300. It was agreed that a financial report for last. year and a pro- I'
<br />posed budget for the next fiscal year would be submitted to the City Council at its .
<br />June 27, 1~66 meeting. No action was taken. .
<br />
<br />The City Manager reported that Mrs. Foss had requested ,that this item be postponed.
<br />
<br />Mrs. Lauris moved seconded by Mr., Crakesto table Item 3 of the Conunittee report. Motion -carried.
<br />
<br />3 4. Planning Commission Re'port :- ,June, 7, 1966 .
<br />a. Zoning New1y,Annexed,Areas - The Planning Commission,reconunended zoningi1ew1y
<br />annexed areas as follows: '
<br />South side Interstate 5 at Henderson Avenue - C-1 Limited Conunercia1
<br />Edgewood Estates 10th Addition - R-1 Single-Family Residential
<br />South of Kingswood Avenue and west of Fox Hollow Road - R-1, Single-Family Residential
<br />South of Snelling Drive (Portions 1st and 2nd Additions Crescent Park) - RA
<br />- Outer Residential' - ' ,
<br />East of Calvin Street' near Wes,tern Drive - RA Outer 'Residential
<br />Between Central and Spring Boulevards at Chu1a Vista Boulevard - RA Outer Residential
<br />South of Harlow Road west of Honeysuckle Lane - RA Outer Residential
<br />Between Fox Hollow Road and Talisman Street - R-1 Single-Family Residential
<br />Eas.t of Willameite Street a,t about ,50th Avenue - R-1 Sing1e-Family',Residentia1
<br />West of City View Street and sout~ of 18th Avenue - RA Outer Residential
<br />- West of Saratoga Street. and northwest of Fox Hollow Road -R":l Single-Family,
<br />Residential west of Donald Street; C-3P Commercial' e.ast of Donald Street
<br />
<br />Mr. Ch.at-t moved sE7conde.d by Mr. Anderson that the P1anning.Co.~fssion reconunenda- ,I.
<br />tions be approved. Motion carried.
<br />
<br />. - . . . .
<br />4 b. Rezoning to C-2 area on west side Adkins Street at'Wi11akenzie, Planning:Com~ '
<br />mission (66-086) . - The Planning Conunission recommended rezoning this area, from
<br />RA Outer Residential to C-2 Neighborhood Commerciai. Mr. Anderson moved'
<br />seconded by Dr. Purdy to, approve the reconunendation. Motion carried.
<br />
<br />5 c. Annexation area east of Interstate 5 south of Judkins Road, ~eaver (Judkins) , . I e
<br />(66-076) - The Planning Conunission reconunended approval of this annexation if
<br />the petitioner, Sarah Land Company, enters into an agreement. with the .City
<br />whereby the petitioner would pay the cost of ext'ending: sewers through 'County
<br />property to serve ,the area to be annexed., Dr. Purdy moved seconded by Mr.Crakes
<br />to approve the' reconunendation. Motfon carri'ed. " --.
<br />I "
<br />
<br />Mrs. Lauris moved seconded by Mr. Crakes to approve Items 4a, 4b, and 4c of the Committee report.
<br />Motion carried. . , .
<br />
<br />6 d. Study Report, Area ,south ,of 18th west of Chambers -, The Planning C'onunission's
<br />study of this area was explained which reconunended the area' be considered for
<br />nothing but single~family use. Dr. Purdy moved seconded by Mr. Crakes to ac-
<br />cept the Planning Commission repor~. After a general discussion, there ap-
<br />peared to be ai need for c1afifi'cation of the :Conunission' s reconunendat ion." '
<br />Mr. Ande'rson moved second~d by'Mr. Chatt that this ,item be tabled until the I' .
<br />June 27, ,1966 Council meeting.
<br />tI
<br />
<br />Mrs. Lauris moved seconded by Mr. Lassen t,hat the single-fan i1y character of the area south of 18th
<br />west of Chambers be preserved. .
<br />
<br />The City Manager cominented that the Planning Conuniss ion recommendation was to retai n 't.he area as
<br />single-family residen tial. This would' not preclude future:. conside'ratio'n of. planned unit developments
<br />
<br />when and if the zo~ing ordinance is amended to provide for such in R-l or RA zones. Kenneth Slayton
<br />George Keating, and a Mrs. Broders spoke in opposition to the zoning recomm.~ndation. A yote was It
<br />taken on the motion, and motion carried.
<br />
<br />~ !. 6/27/66 - 4
<br />... i: I
<br />
|