My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/24/1967 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1967
>
07/24/1967 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2007 1:19:23 AM
Creation date
11/2/2006 3:55:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
7/24/1967
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />~~;2 <br />. <br /> <br />_7l~~L~L.____~.____, '.' '.. _.____.~- .,.~ ....,___ _._ _ __T' __ ,__, -' ___.. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />of existi~g sew~rs., Mr. Farina said th.e developme.nt, contains t~o many units, but I <br />Mr; Chown~ng ma~nta~ned any less wou1d.not be econom1ca11y feas~b1e for the de- <br />veloper. No action was taken. <br /> <br />Noble ChowniQg read a statementc.oncerning the proposed development and, with the help cf. Lloyd 'Bond, <br />landscape architect, showed slides of the layout. He asked that if the R-3 is not approved the re- <br />quest be referred back to the Planning Commission for consideration of R-2 or planned unit deve1bpment <br />under R-2. <br /> <br />The City Manager read the minutes of the Planning Commission at which ~he request was considered, ~nd <br />Vince Farina, Planning Commission chairman, compared density permitted for a planned unit development <br />under R-1 with that permitted in a normal subdivision. He further explained the basis of the Planning <br />Commission recommendation for denial. <br /> <br />Mrs. Lauris moved seconded by Mr. Wingard to refer the item back to the Planning Commission for con- <br />sideration of R-2. <br /> <br />Councilman Anderson said he would not want to recommend consideration of R-2 when they are in effect i~ <br />denying R-3. <br /> <br />Councilman Wingard said he would second ,if the motion were to simply, .refer bac'k to the- ,Planning <br />Commission with no recommendation. Councilwoman,Lauris approved. Motion .defeated,Mrs. Lauris and <br />Mr. Wingard voting ~es; Councilmen Purdy, Anderson, Lassen, Hayward, and McDonald voting no. <br /> <br />Dr. Purdy moved seconded by Mr.: Anderson 'to deny the rezoning petition. Motion carried, all counci1- 1 <br />men voting aye except Mrs. Lauris, no. <br /> <br />1 3. Special Council Meeting - It was agreed a special meeting of the :Councilwould- be' held <br />on August 8, 1967 at 5:.00 p. m. to consider contract award for airport improvements. <br />Bids will be opened Augus.t 3, 1967." 0 <br />", <br /> <br />Dr. Purdy moved seconded by Mr. Anderson that:Item 3 of the Committee report be. received and filed. <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br />Other i.tems o'r:.'Committee agenda July 20, 1967 rot considered at that time: <br /> <br />- ~ <br /> <br />2 1..: Planning Co'mmissi.on Report' - July 5. 1967 <br />a. Rezone from :({-l to C-'3P; northeast corner 12th and Garfield, J. D., Walling' -. The <br />Planning Commission recommended denial. <br /> <br />Dr. Purdy moved seconded by Mr. Anderson to deny the petition. Motion carried. <br /> <br />3 b. Rezone from R-3 to M-2. area on south side of 5th between Jefferson. and' Washington. <br />Charles Bonnett -The Pl.3"nning Commission recommended approval, subject 'to an agree- <br />, ment with the 'property owner that any signs will be no higher than the ~levated ap- <br />'proachs to 'the br~dge. <br /> <br />Dr. Purdy moved seconded'by:Mr. Anderson to approve the rezoning, hut to hold passag~'of the rezoning I. <br />ordinance for 30 days to give an opportunity for the City to contact the State Highway Department con- <br />cerning the possibility of purchase of the property. Mdtion carried. <br /> <br />4 c. Rezone from R-4 to C-1. area on east side of Hilyard Street between Broadway and 11th. <br />Standard Oil Company - The Planning Comrri.ission recommended approvaL <br /> <br />Dr. Purdy '~ovedseconded by Mr:. Anderson to approve the rezoning petition. Motion carried. <br /> <br />5 d. Rezone from R-l to R-3G. area orr south side of 24th betweenWillamette and High. ~ <br />Bonney. Miller. and Hoare - The Planning Commission,recommended ap~roval. , <br /> <br />Councilman Wingard asked if some provision could be made so future rezoning petitioners gaining ad- <br />vantage by reason'of'approva1 of rezoning would be.required to pay for any alley improvement involved. <br />The City Attorney was to investigate and report. ' <br /> <br /> <br />Dr. Purdy moved seconded 'by Mr~ 'Anderson to approve the rezoning petit~on. Motion carried. \ <br /> <br />I <br />e. Rezone from RA to R-2. area on south side of 40th between Hilyard and Ferry. Johnson - <br /> <br />The Planning Commission recommended denial of the rezoning. <br /> <br /> <br />Dr. Purdy moved seconded by Mr. Anderson to deny the rezoning petition. <br />, . 'I;> , <br /> <br />Ruth Vanfossen, real estate saleswoman; reviewed the background of the property and said she would <br />like to see it developed for multiple-family housing, but if denied asked that the .item be referred 1- <br />back to the Planning Commission for consideration of planned unit development under R-1. <br /> <br />Mrs . Lauris moved sec.onded by Mr., Anderson to refer back to the Planning Commission for cons'iderat ion <br />of R-lPD. <br /> <br />Vince Farina called a~tention to the fact that there is no provision for planned unit development in <br />the present zoning ordinance, and that there will 'not be until the new zoning ordinance is adopted. <br />It was suggested that the present zothimg ordinance be amended to allow planned unit development until <br />such time as the new ordinance is adopted. \4It <br /> <br /> <br />~. 7/24/67 - 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.