|
<br /> ~
<br />- 525
<br /> ~
<br /> 11/27/67
<br />I ORDINANCES
<br /> 1 Council Bill No. 8191 - Levying assessments for sanitary sewer to serve Lots 14 through 18, Block
<br /> 2, 1st Addition to Sun Ray Ridge (Four Estates-Pump Station and ~C Levy), submitted and read the first
<br /> time in full on October 9, 1967 and held over to this meeting to allow proper notice of assessment to
<br /> be given owners of affected properties, was brought back for consideration with no writtenprotests
<br /> on file.
<br /> Dr. Purdy moved seconded by Mr. Anderson that the bill be read the second time by council bill number
<br /> only, with unanimous consent of the Council. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the
<br /> second time by council bill number only.
<br /> Dr. Purdy moved seconded by Mr. McNutt that the bill be read the third time by council bill number
<br /> only, with unanimous consent of the Council. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the
<br /> third time by council bill number only.
<br /> Dr. Purdy moved seconded by Mr. McNutt that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall
<br />e vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 15023.
<br /> 2 Council Bill No. 8192 - Levying assessments for sanitary sewer in BD-65-4 (bounded by line 800
<br /> feet north of and parallel to Barger Drive, Southern Pacific right-of-way, Concord Street, and future
<br /> north/south Belt Line Road), submitted and read the first time in full on October 9, 1967 and held to
<br /> this meeting to allow proper notice of assessment to be given owners of affected properties, was brought
<br /> back for consideration with three written protests on file.
<br />I Steve Tyler, attorney representing Windsor, Vansel, and Oral and Lucille Graville, said the Gravilles
<br /> have no intention of developing their property at this time and requested deferment of assessment.
<br /> Letters from Mr. Tyler were presented with regard to the deferment request. The Public Works Depart-
<br /> ment reported the properties do not meet the criteria for assessment deferment - the property is
<br /> accessible and can be subdivided. Discussion followed with regard to a portion of the property on
<br /> which access was lost in the construction of Belt Line Road, but it was pointed out the sewer construc-
<br /> tion was completed prior to the County's receiving the right-of-way which cut off access. It was de-
<br /> cided the County should be contacted for permission to run connections through the right-of-way to
<br /> the properties at the intersection with Belt Line Road, and that the assessment would be deferred un-
<br /> til accessibility to the sewer was established.
<br /> Dr. Purdy moved seconded by Mr. Anderson that the bill be read the second time by council bill number
<br /> only, with unanimous consent of the Council. Mot ion carried unanimously and the bill was read the
<br /> second time by council bill number only.
<br /> Dr. Purdy moved seconded by Mr. McNutt that the bill be read the third time by council bill illmber only,
<br /> with unanimous consent of the Council. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the third
<br /> time by council bill number only.
<br /> Dr. Purdy moved seconded by Mr. McNutt that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall
<br /> vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 15024, Counc ilman
<br /> Lassen abstaining.
<br /> 3 Council Bill No. 8193 - Levying assessments for sanitary sewer in BD-65-9 (bounded by Royal Avenue,
<br />I Gilbert Street, Southern Pacific right-of-way, and Chase Street), submitted and read the first time in
<br /> full on October 9, 1967 and held over to this meeting to allow proper notice of assessment to Qe given
<br /> owners of property, was brought back for consideration with no written protests on file.
<br /> Dr. Purdy moved seconded by Mr. Anderson that the bill be read the secondtime by council bill number
<br /> only, with unanimous consent of the Council. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the
<br /> second time by council bill number only.
<br />e Harold McCulloh, 543 Sierra Street, commented on the per-square~foot charge instead of zone calcula-
<br /> tions and cited figures used in a September 1963 pamphlet published at time of the Bethel annexation.
<br /> Arthur Langhoff, 275 Baxter Road, asked about the value of his property after sewer installation inas-
<br /> muchas it is anticipated the State will purchase it for Highway 126 right-of-way. The City Manager
<br /> explained the basis for the State's purchase is the value set by appraisers.
<br /> Mrs. Forrest Kobbe, 225 Baxter Road, questioned the amount of her assessment compared to that levied
<br /> against a neighboring property, and was told the size of her lot accounted for the larger assessment,
<br /> that right-of-way width is less abutting her property.
<br /> J. D. Will iamson, 3140 Elmira Road, asked on what basis the property is assessed to a l60-foot depth
<br /> and was told it is a Charter provision.
<br /> Councilman Anderson left the meeting.
<br />I Mrs. Edith Horej s, 3187 Elmira Road, said she does not believe the $2.00 water user charge is legal,
<br /> that reports of hepatitis is a procedure for gaining annexation of areas to the City, and that the en-
<br /> tire lot should not be assessed when the sewer line utilizes only the easement.
<br /> Dr. Purdy moved seconded by Mr. McNutt that the bill be read the third time by council bill number
<br /> only, with unanimous consent of the Council. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the
<br /> third time by council bill number only.
<br />e Dr. Purdy moved seconded by Mr. McNutt that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall
<br /> vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 15025.
<br /> .,'
<br /> iI t...
<br /> il
<br />
|