Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 25'7 <br />. <br /> 6/24/68 <br /> 1 2. Special Election, June 18,1968, Levy Outside 6% Limitation - The City Manager <br />. pointed out on a map the results by precincts of the June 18 tax levy election com- <br /> pared to the results of the May 38 tax base election. Unofficial count shows the <br /> levy outside the 6% limitation failed - 3,568 voting no; 3,045 voting yes. The <br /> Manager mentioned three alternatives (1) balance the budget within the 6% limita- <br /> tion; (2) cut the budget with the idea of resubmitting the issue to the voters as a <br /> special one-year levy; or (3) resubmit the measure in its present form. He said <br /> the budget was cut by some $1,600,000 at the staff level before it was submitted <br /> to the Budget Committee with a few items added back by the Budget Committee. <br /> Discussion revealed that this election cost about $4,000 and that, if it is decided <br /> to ,take the issue to the voters again, there will be about six weeks in which to <br /> develop a measure, with August 1 being the latest date on which figures can be <br /> certified to the County Assessor. Mrs. Hayward called attention to the results in <br /> those precincts where a campaign was conducted in the June 18 election, and said <br /> she felt if another election is held there definitely should be a campaign to inform <br /> the voters. <br />. Mr. McDonald moved seconded by Mr. Lassen to refer the budget back to the Budget Com- <br /> mittee before deciding whether to resubmit an amended measure to the voters or re- <br /> submit the present one. Motion carried. A meeting was scheduled for Wednesday, <br /> June 26, 1968, at 7:30 p.m. in the McNutt Room. <br />. Councilwoman Lauris suggested earmarking items, showing itemized costs of various <br /> services. Councilman Purdy said he would rather see services cut which are not <br />. essential, such as some parks services instead of street lights, etc. The City <br /> Manager said there are many areas in particular departments which cannot be con- <br /> sidered without determining how they would affect the overall operation of the City. <br /> He said he feels the community wants to meet demands of its growth and that accept- <br /> ance of the decision of the small percentage of voters opposing this levy would <br /> seriously cripple programs this year plus increasing needs and compounding problems <br /> in future years. Councilman Anderson remarked that a policy should be set with re- <br /> gard to areas to be considered, i.e., whether to eliminate additions to personnel, <br /> delete certain public works projects, etc. , rather than going over the budget item <br /> by item. Ray Hawk, former councilman, said he felt the Manager should have the <br /> opportunity to make recommendations and that it would be an abrogation of managerial <br /> functions to establish priorities for cuts. Frank Jackson of the Fire Fighters <br />It Association suggested that. the Council hold public meetings, with the Council as a <br /> group explaining the issue to the people rather than on an individual basis. <br /> Mr. Anderson moved seconded by Mr. Lassen to approve Item 2 of the Committee report. Motion carried. <br /> 2 3. Bids, Echo Hollow Pool, Opened June 19, 1968 - Copies of the bid tabulation were <br /> distributed to Council members showing the low bid submitted by Howard Nelson about <br /> $116,000 more than the architect's estimate. The City Manager said he would like to <br /> review the bids again before making a recommendation. Jon Berry, architect, said <br /> the bids would be reviewed with the idea of making several changes and bringing back <br /> a recommendation. No action was taken. <br />. 3 4. Bids, Public Works Department, Opened June 18, 1968 - Copies of bid tabulation cover- <br /> ing paving and sewer projects were distributed to Council members. The Pub lic Works <br /> Department recommended award of contract to the low bidder on the basic bid for paving <br /> and sewer on Minda Drive and Long Island Drive, and for sanitary sewer in area bounded <br /> by Valley West, Bailey Hill, 18th, Churchill Highlands; and on the low alternate bid <br /> for paving and sewers in Olsen-Weiseth Plat, Pine Ridge 1st Addition, and Quaker <br /> Park Addition. <br />. Mr. Wingard moved seconded by Mr. McDonald to approve the recommendation. <br /> The Public Works Director said the cost to the City will be about $2,000 for the <br /> street extension to Hillside Drive on the Pine Ridge project. Councilman Lassen <br /> asked if the storm sewer in the Quaker Park project would be assessed. He said he <br /> did not completely agree with the policy of assessing for storm sewers in new sub- <br /> divisions only. The Public Works Director explained that all property owners are <br /> being asked to sign contracts prior to start of construction agreeing that they will <br /> pay for any storm sewers involved in new subdivisions. <br /> Mrs. Hayward asked if the City is committed to going ahead with these projects, and <br /> the Manager replied that the money to pay for them does not come out of the general <br />. operating funds. <br /> A vote was taken on the motion to approve, and motion carried unanimously. <br />. No action was taken on Items 3 and 4 of the Committee report. See action under Bids under New <br /> Business. <br /> 4 5. Parking Meters, University of Oregon - The City Manager displayed a map showing pro- <br /> posed location of parking meters in the University area. He said the University has <br /> agreed to deletion of meters in the residential area west of the campus, but still <br /> wants short-term meters along Kincaid near the Library and Prince Lucien Campbell <br /> Hall. The staff feels five-hour meters should be left on Kincaid Street because of <br />.. <br /> 6/24/68 - 16 ..oIIIIl <br />