06/24/1968 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Metadata

Thumbnails

Annotations

II"': 25'8 . 6/24/68 \ , extreme demand for long-term parking by stuaents, and recommended as a first phase the' I Ii installation of 250 meters, primarily five-hour with some two-hour and some 30-minute, ~ on University from 15th to 18th and on 15th from University to Agate. If the demand I !, is too great for these meters, then a second phase installation will be tried to the " east. Mrs. Hayward stressed the need for additional short-term parking for visitors " I " to the campus. " II Ii Mr. McNutt moved seconded by Mr. McDonald to go ahead with the first phase as recom- " I; " mended. Motion carried. ,; " I ~ Mr. Anderson moved, seconded by Mr. Lassen to approve Item 5 of the Committee report~ " I: 1; ~ l James Brock and Dennis Nelson, University of Oregon students, objected to installation of the meters ! on the basis that it would result in double parking fees for students who are required to pay a park- ing fee at time of registration for classes. They suggested closing 13th and making it a parking area or chalking tires for more parking turnover. It was explained that the meters were proposed by the Campus Planning Committee to eliminate storage .- of cars on the streets and to provide more parking spaces for comm~ter students. i I, A rollcall vote was taken on the motion to approve, and motion carried' unanimously. ~ ! i, 1 ;' 6. Planning Commission Report - June 4, 1968 a. Zoning Ordinance Amendments - Copies of the permanent report were distributed to . Council members, and the Planning Director explained each proposed amendment and the basis for' the change. He said as experience is gained from working with the . i' new zoning ordinance, other changes could be forthcoming. Councilman Purdy asked about the change to Section 18.07(e) having to do with calculation of density for planned unit developments. The Planning Director said where planned unit develop- ments include street dedications which are not needed for integral use, then the street area will be included in calculating density for the development. No acticn was taken. It was understood further information and sketches on street dedication in relation to density would be brought to the' June 24 Council meeting. The Planning Director showed a sketch and explained the use of dedicated street areas in computing density for planned unit developments (Section 18.07(e)). !: Mr. Anderson moved seconded by Mr. Lassen to adopt the zoning ordinance amendments. Motion carried. ~ i: 2 7. Planning Commission Report - June 17, 1968 ,I a. Variance to Zoning Ordinance, Motel in M-2 zone north of East Broadway at Hilyard - , p. C. F. Campbell planned construction of a motel in the M-2 zone west of his ice plant on East Broadway under the old zoning ordinance, and now finds it is not i: allowed in that zone under the new zoning ordinance. The Planning Commission recom- I' mended a variance to allow development of the motel pending consideration of rezoning I " the area to C-2, which is to be heard by the Planning Commission on July 2. The l' Planning Commission's approval indicated that conditions of rezoning would include I :recommendations on final disposition of the ice plant and total development of the I, I property. Dr. Purdy moved seconded by Mr. Wingard to approve the variance. Motion " I, carried. :, . I' I I Mr. Anderson moved seconded by Mr. Lassen to approve Item 7a of the Committee report. Motion carried. '''- " '. I, I 3 b. Joint Housing Committee Report - The City Manager said a resolution to adopt the Joint Housing Committee report, copies of which were mailed to Council members with proposed amendments, would be before the Council for consideration at its June 24 meeting. Attention was called to the proposed changes, particularly :. with reference to the number of applications which could be handled under the - Turnkey Program. Mr. Anderson moved seconded by Mr. Lassen to adopt the report: Mrs. Niven reviewed the changes to the report recommended since its distribution to Council members. Referring to the Turnkey Program under Item 1 above, she said the Joint Housing Committee felt the private sector should have an opportunity to meet the recommended housing needs, and if the private sector has not acted by the Council's October 14 meeting, then the Council could authorize participa- tion in the Turnkey Program. Councilman Wingard said he was agreeable to his letter from Mr.Alford with regard to the Turnkey Program being placed on file until October 14, 1968 (see action Item 1 above) . A vote was taken on the motion to adopt the Joint Housing report as amended, and motion carried . unanimously. I. . ,. Mrs. Niven asked if the Council would like to have recommendations from the Plan Advisory Committee I with regard to possible locations for the housing recommended, and was told it would. Mr. Anderson moved seconded by Mr. Lassen to keep the Joint Housing Committee in effect in order to consider further studies as may be necessary and, in particular, those ~nvo1ving land use. Motion carried. !i " 'I . , :' ~ 6/24/68 - 17