|
<br />r ~
<br />(lq!,sP .a
<br />U?,":J:() .
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />: - -- -..
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />.. 3. Supplemental 'Agreement, Willakenzie Area Watershed Work Plan . - At pre~~!i~.?n ~greement 1
<br />between the Soil Conservation Service, Lane County, Springfield, Rainbow Water District and
<br />I Eugene provides for joint d~ve10pment of drainage canals. As a result of rapid urba~ization, 1 _
<br />I the original plan, providing for open drainage canals, is no longer feasi~le. The proposed
<br />[/ modification pro~ides for substitution of an intercepting f100dway adjacent and parallel to I
<br />Ii the North Belt Line Road, with reduction in capacity of some channels. Proposed modification I
<br />,I will be constructed by. the Soil Conservation Service and maintained and operated by the city I
<br />1: of Eugene.
<br />
<br />11 The Council questioned the Director of Public Works concerning additional cost and method of
<br />if fin'ancing. Director of Public Works said costs are .somewhat comparative, but that tiling Ii
<br />ii would cost approximately two. willian dollars. Financing will not be required now, and will Ii
<br />ii probably be. done through future bond issues. 1'1
<br />
<br />I, I
<br />Ii Dr. Purdy moved seconded by Mr. Wingard :to approve the proposed modification plan of the j
<br />11 Willakenzie Area. Motion carried. II
<br />,I I'
<br />
<br />i.l Mrs. Hayward moved seconded by Mr. McDonald to approve Item 3 of the Connnittee report. Motion carried'jl. a
<br />II · I .
<br />
<br />il Mrs. Bea1 questipned wording of minutes. She felt they should reflect that the re'vised agreement wi 11 ,I
<br />:i result in som~what. similar costs for .the city of Eugene in the portion of the project covered by Ii
<br />I; this agreement, but for the city to provide storm sewers for the. Wi11akenzie area and take advantage II
<br />Ii of this floodway will cost approximately two million dollars. !
<br />:1 '
<br />
<br />Ii 4. City Milk Inspection - The City Manager asked for directi on in determining whether to elim- II .1
<br />;: inate milk inspection from City services, and whether the Council prefe~red to wait until I
<br />I,' after July 15 election .to make. a decision. I _
<br />I ,
<br />'I 1
<br />. II Councilwoman Hayward felt this public hearing was of utmost importance, and should be held !
<br />I' at the. firs,t. Council meeting aft7r t~e e1ecti~n. Dr. Purdya~kedt~at representat~ves from i
<br />II County Health, Department and San~t~r~an' s off~ce report on th~s subject, and Counc~lman I
<br />i1 Wingard suggested that the dairy industry be represented. I
<br />Ii II
<br />I' I
<br />Ii Mrs. Hayward moved seconded by Dr. Purdy that a public hearing be scheduled for July 28 to Ii
<br />!i determine public opinion regarding retention of the milk control program. Motion carried. Ii
<br />!, \'
<br />, 1 . ~
<br />I, . . " t
<br />'I Mrs. Hayward moved seconded by Mr. McDonald fa approve Item 4 of the Connnittee report. ' ., I
<br />I! 'n-'-. . . -- - j
<br />I Mr. McDonald requested budget connnittee members to be present at public hearing, as well as those I
<br /><in Ii mentioned in the Connnittee report. 'I'
<br />II
<br />.. II I
<br />'''Iii Vote taken on motion. Motion carried. I
<br />I ,I
<br />~i Other items on July 9 agenda, not taken at that time. (,
<br />" . I"
<br />,1 I
<br />II 1. Condemnation Authorization, Gilham Road - City Manager explained that, subsegu~nt to prepara- II
<br />Ii tion of Agenda some options had been obtained.. Staff reconnnends the following options be 'I
<br />i; exercised: Carman, 2118 Jeppesen Drive, ,$250.00; Stevens, 1660 Gilham.Road, $350.00; Blum, Iii 1-.
<br />Ii 1830 Gilham Road, $500.00. ,I
<br />q II
<br />
<br />ii Staff reconnnends authorization be given to proceed with condemnation suits on the follow- 11
<br />: ing properties: Woodward, 1990. Gilham; Determan, 1980 Gilham. .' . ... . . ii
<br />
<br />I Manager said he will continue to attempt to negotiate .options on those properties, prior to :1
<br />:' actual court action. III
<br />,I I
<br />Ii
<br />ji Mrs. Hayward moved seconded by Mr. McDonald to exercise options to purchase Carman, Stevens j! e.
<br />'I and Blum properties and proceed with condemnation proceedings on Woodward and Determan I'
<br />ill properties for right of way on Gilham Road. Moti~n ~arrie~~ .~. ii
<br />I I'
<br />ii 2. Lease, City owned land, 3rd and Ferry Streets (H & H Properties) - This 190 I square foot II
<br />:, wedge lies. just south of Eugene Moving and Storage and was leased to Mr. Holleque five Ii
<br />it years ago for $5.00 per year. At that time, it was vacant property, held by the City for Ii
<br />'i possible roadway purposes. The property is now developed with a building 'on it and used 1'1'
<br />11 as a driveway to adjacent property. Manager suggested renewing the .lease for $60.00 per .
<br />;: year, with condition Ho11eque pay taxes and assessments. Ii
<br />!/ I
<br />[I "
<br />,I Mrs. Hayward moved seconded by Mr. McDonald that the city rep.ew the lease for H. & H. Pro- Ii
<br />.: r; ..perties as reconnnended by City Manager. Rollcall vote. All councilmen voting aye, the ,i
<br />II mo t ion carr ied . li
<br />
<br />II I
<br />,i' 3. Traffic ... r .1'
<br />Ii a. Through Street, 14th from Patterson to High
<br />I' b. Yield Signs, 17th at Mil~,and Ferry I
<br />III c. Priority, Diverter P1an.~
<br />i, City Manager read a report from Traffic Engineer, advocating changes in the area west of
<br />Ii University east of Wi11amette Street, to facilitate movement of traffic, and slow traffic
<br />Ii patterns. Mrs. Bea1 expressed appreciation for the comprehensive report.
<br />:1 . .
<br />
<br />tli Mrs. Hayward moved seconded by Mr. McDonald to approve the recommendations of Traffic
<br />( Department with regard to area west of University and east of Wi11amette.. ; 4It
<br />
<br />, Dr. Purdy questioned.whether this. plan should be imPlemented without public hearings. City II
<br />It I,
<br />~:i 7/14/69 - 8 It
<br />
|