Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> r <br /> 006Q <br /> .~, G e <br /> 7/28/69 <br /> Ii <br /> II c. Rezone to R-4~ 975 and 995 West 7th, Wayne Johnson - The Planning Commission recom- I <br /> II <br /> ,. mended denial of the R-4 zone and instead recommende"d issuance of ~ conditional' <br /> :1 use permit: to allow multipl!= family use as used o~ly aroun~ tJ:1e. University or adja- <br /> " <br /> cent to the central business district. The petitioner h?d no opposition to this <br /> . arrangement. <br /> Mrs. Hayward moved seconded by Mr. Gribskov IO approve issuance of conditional use permit for the area. <br /> " Motion carried. <br /> J <br /> " d. Rezone to RG area south of 24th between Portland and Willamette, Furtick - The plan- <br /> I <br /> - ning Commission recommend.ed approval; granting also a conditional use permit to <br /> 11 <br /> allow development of public off-street parking facility in conjunction ,with existing <br /> pharmacy and medical clinic across the alley to the east. The Commission felt with <br /> : proper screening and buffering this would be in the be~t interest of the City in <br /> ,i! view of the critical parking problem in the area. <br /> Mrs. Hayward moved seconded by Mr. Gribskov to approve the Plannin~ Commissi~n reco~~ndation on I e <br /> Item 5d of:the committee report. Motion carried. I <br /> e. Rezone to R-2 PD, southwest corner Bond Lane and Norkenzie. .Road , B!Lair - The Plan- I <br /> ni~g' Commission recommended approval of the requested R-2 PD to a depth of 150 feet I <br /> from Norkenzie Road, and denial for tJ:1e bal?nce leaving it RA. . Also, tha t the I <br /> I ordinance effecting the change be held from final passage until final approval of <br /> development plans. Ii -I <br /> f. Rezone to C-l, southeast corner 1st and Monroe, Evans - The Planning Commission <br /> I' <br /> recommended approval of the C-l zone provided the petitioner constructs a sight ! <br /> 'i obscuring. fence on the south property line and provided the new building is , <br /> I <br /> located on the property line. <br /> Mrs. Hayward moved seconded by Mr. Gribskov to approve the Planning Commission recommendations on 'I <br /> Items 5e and 5f of the Committee report. Motion carried. <br /> g. Rezone to M-2, area south of 11th Avenue between Bertelsen and Wallis, Hult - <br /> The Planning Commissionrecommended approval' subject to-buffering. --See-*'in'~.-- - - . <br /> The Planaing Director said the Commission questioned interpretation of Article 24 of the Zoning I <br /> Ordinance since it mentions motor vehicles but does not mention trucks, thus questioning whether log I, <br /> trucks could be controlled under provisions of the Ordinance,and felt this item should be referred <br /> to the City Attorney. I <br /> i <br /> Mr. J. Wesley Morgan, representing Nils B. Hult ana Associates, commented that this situation exists I <br /> due to lack of zoning lcarification and intent of the City at the time this property was originally I <br /> zoned, leaving the souther 170 feet as RA and zoning the bal?nce M-2. He contended if the RA classi- I <br /> I <br /> fication remains they have no way of utilizing the property, and said the owner of property to the I <br /> south for which a trailer park is proposed is not interested ih purchasing this piece. If t~e M-2 Ii <br /> zone is approved, it is intended to develop the parcel in conjunction with that to the north, using <br /> the entire property for truck' maintenance shop and parking area. II I <br /> ,1/ <br /> II <br /> Mr. John Mulder, attorney representing A~bert Jagger, owner, of the property to the south on which a Ii <br /> trailer park is proposed with an approximate investment of $350,000, said he did not oppose. the 'I <br /> rezoning but would like to see certain controls and restrictions placed on any appro~al, particularly I, <br /> in the area of noise control. He suggested hiring of an acoustical engineer, property screening, II <br /> time limit on hours trucks can drive on ,and off the property, and continued regulation or review of <br /> ! ~ the site. II <br /> Mr. Albert Jagger, 4080 Castelloe Avenue, presented a report from the Workmens Compehsation Board II e <br /> : regarding noise l~vel tests, a report prepared by Emerald Electronics "Sound Intensity Survey of I' <br /> It <br /> Log Trucks" concluding without some type of acoustical barrier there would be excessive noise from. <br /> the truck operation. He said a consulting acoustical engineer he contacted would be willing to work 'I <br /> out the problem but Mr. Jagger felt it should be at Hult's expense. Mr. Jagger said he felt any II <br /> approval should be subject ~o restrictions on noise level. . - . . - - . -. _ _ _ _ . . 4 _ . _ _ _ . <br /> Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mrs. Hayward that the item be tabled until the August 11, 1969 Council I <br /> meeting to give Mr.. Jagger and Mr. Hult the-opportunity to work out a solution. Motion carried. I <br /> II <br /> h. Rezone toR-2, <l8th and Taylor extended; Hiatt.,.-The.Planning.Conrrnission-recom--.. <br /> mended approval of the R-2 zone subject to installation of buffering, ,right-of-way I <br /> jl dedication, submission of plans for development, and provisions for turn-around <br /> at end of Taylor Street. I <br /> 'I <br /> - ~ . - -- - . ----- -..-.-- -- - . - --_...- - -.-_._--- II <br /> Mr. Don Len~ve, representing the petitioner, said he was ih agreement and will comply with the condi- Ii I <br /> tions of approval of the R-2 zone. He asked for clarification of the provision for a turn-around I <br /> , <br /> on Taylor Street, and.the_Public Works-Director.explained.the-type-desired-and,.that-it w0u1d' be 10- I <br /> , <br /> cated on the subject property, not. on Taylor Street. The Planning Director commented. that a minimum I <br /> " Ii <br /> of 10'x15' would be needed for the turn-around. <br /> " Mr. Albert Deschnes, 1710 Taylor Street, said he and other neighbors made their objections known to Ii <br /> " <br /> the Planning Commission and submitted a petition to the Commission stating the basis of their ob- I: ,. <br /> I: <br /> jections. He raised a question regarding a fence required ,to buffer property to the north, and the Ii <br /> \\ Planning Director said the fence would be provided. e <br /> . " <br /> " <br /> " " <br /> . " <br /> ~ 7/28/69 - 4 " <br />