12/22/1969 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~ e ': l 51 t' f i v .11- l2/~2/69 , , - ____ - _. __ - __ - _u_ ~ _ ~ --- ----._---- -- - - --------. .--------- -- -~ -_._-~---------- -- ---- --- - ---- --- - ---- -_. -- - - ----. -- ------ ,~ I Mr. Orland Howard, 4846 Brookwood Way, explained that he represented the property owner, and that this property had been on the market for three years. Because of the uncertainty of the future highway, prospective buyers were reluctant to invest in the property. He felt that the State had indicated a possible need for the property, but would not condemn it, and that the actual location of the centerline had not been established. The City Manager indicated that Mr. H ward had been misinformed regarding the highway centerline. A public hearing was held approximately two years ago, an~ the centerline was fixed at that time. The design of the interchange has not been fixed at this point, and there is a question whether or not there will be an interchange at that intersection. Mr. Howard also apparently misunderstood the Planning Commission reference to the Mapped Street Act, which provides that the City may protect future rights of way, but must be in a position to buy property if and when the protection intereferes with proposed development. The Planning Commission position has been that the portion lying between the centerline and the Southern Pacific-Coos Bay branch should be zoned industrial, and that the I highway itself would be the dividing line between industrial and residential. A mobile home south of the highway wouldnot be compatible with the industrial uses now located there. e There was further discussion concerning possible rezoning of the southern part of the property. The Manager read a letter from the State Highway Division which indicated that the State had notfirm plan for an interchange, and that until a plan is approved, no development should be made along Danebo Road which does not take into account the possibility of approach fills for an overcrossing for the freeway. I Mr. Howard said that the State of Oregon letter assumes the restriction of plans, leaving right of way for the State of Oregon. He felt this was taking without condemnation, and that this was wrong. I The Manager said the Planning Commission recommendation does not in any way attempt to protect this property for highway right of way. Vote taken on motion as stated. Motion carried. I ! * (Further discussion regarding Report of December 2, held at C1mmittee meeting of I December 17, 1969) I Regarding appeals to Mobile Park Conditional Use Permits, Mrs. Niven pointed out the changes in housing needs, and that people will have to realize that the only way needs can be met is with this kind of housing. II In reply to Mr. Mohr, Mrs. Niven said petitioners have to submit PUD plans for Mobile I Home Conditional Use Permits. The Planning Commission is now studying that ordinance I in light of recent developments in mobile homes. Some revisions may be necessary, and I they will probably make a distinction between those homes really mobile, and those which will be permanently attached to the ground. I Planning Director said the Planning Commission had recommended a change of zone from I AG to RA and had given site approval for a mobile home park on the property. It will I ask the Council to hold rezoning until final approval of plans for development. Mr. I Bennett has filed an appeal. Regarding the request by Mobile Towns of America, Mr. Porter explained that the Planning Commission had given approval for rezoning of property north of the proposed highway. DecemblIT, 8,1969: I C. 1) Zone Change recommended, Drs. Pearl and Chambers, east side of Agate Street e south of 19th, requested R-l to RP denied, recommended R-l to RG with Conditional Ise to permit dental offices and apartments. An appeal is on I file and will be set for public hearing. II Mrs. Hayward moved seconded by Dr. Purdy to continue ~he zone change hearing and set a public hearing for appeal January 12, 19~. Motion carried. 1tJ 4. Pro;ect Agreement, Lane County and State Highway Department - This agreement for construction of comfort station in Hendricks Park. It provides $3,351.89 in Land and Water conservation funds for 50% of the project cost. Staff recommends approval. Mr. Gribskov moved seconded by Dr. Purdy to enter into this agreement for construction of a comfort station at Hendricks Park. In reply to Councilman Williams, Parks Director said this agreement provides for attachment I I to sewers, rather than septic tanks. Vote taken on motion as stated. Motion carried. Mrs. Hayward moved seconded by Dr. Purdy to approve Item 4 of the Committee report. Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, motion carried. 5. EWEB Land Sale - Lots 1 through 7, Larch East' Subdivision. This land was bought by EWEB and subdivided to secure a site for a substation north of Larch Street and west of el West Amazon. This agreement disposes of lots not needed for the substation. \ Mrs. Niven asked if this item had come before the Planning Commission. Planning Director , 12/2'2/69 - 6 ...4 ,!