|
<br />e
<br />
<br />,
<br />,
<br />I
<br />
<br />"'IIIl
<br />
<br />7d
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />II
<br />I
<br />'I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />II
<br />
<br />"
<br />I,
<br />'I
<br />II
<br />I
<br />I'
<br />Ii
<br />"
<br />"
<br />11
<br />I:
<br />:1
<br />!!
<br />I:
<br />I:
<br />Ii
<br />I,
<br />I'
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />Ii
<br />:!
<br />"
<br />I!
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />I;
<br />II
<br />I
<br />I
<br />
<br />i
<br />I
<br />I
<br />Ii
<br />I'
<br />I:
<br />,Ii
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />II
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />Ii
<br />i:
<br />!i
<br />"
<br />'I
<br />I.
<br />II
<br />il
<br />Ii
<br />'i
<br />I,
<br />'I
<br />I,
<br />"
<br />II
<br />i1
<br />Ii
<br />'I
<br />:!
<br />'I
<br />II
<br />II
<br />[I
<br />I'
<br />Ii
<br />I:
<br />ji
<br />!!
<br />'I
<br />I,
<br />I,
<br />I!
<br />:!
<br />:1
<br />"
<br />;!
<br />11
<br />!i
<br />i:
<br />i:
<br />Ii
<br />Ii
<br />ii
<br />"
<br />
<br />
<br />I!
<br />
<br />II
<br />
<br />I:
<br />i:
<br />I:
<br />,I
<br />"
<br />ii
<br />I:
<br />
<br />Council Chambers
<br />Eugene, Oregon
<br />March 9, 1970
<br />
<br />1.
<br />
<br />II
<br />I
<br />I:
<br />Ii
<br />,
<br />I'
<br />oni!
<br />Ii
<br />I:
<br />ii
<br />Petition, Charter Amendment for Collecti veBargaining - A petition has been received by the city ii'
<br />which has 4800 signatures requesting a charter amendment to make collective bargaining compulsory, I,
<br />and calling for recognition of'two unions. No action necessary to place this on the ballot for I':
<br />the next city election. I
<br />Ii
<br />11
<br />I,
<br />'I
<br />II
<br />II
<br />Ii
<br />I,
<br />Ii
<br />I
<br />I
<br />,
<br />i
<br />i
<br />I
<br />I
<br />
<br />Regular meeting of the Common Council of the city of Eugene, Oregon
<br />President McDonald in the absence of Mayor Anderson at 7:30 p.m. on
<br />councilmen present: Messrs. McDonald and Teague, Mrs. Hayward, Mr.
<br />Messrs. Mohr and Williams.
<br />
<br />was called to order by Council
<br />March 9, 1970, with the following
<br />Gribskov, Mrs. Beal and
<br />
<br />"
<br />
<br />The City Manager distributed a questionnaire prepared by Mr. Ali Alidjani, who is doing a study
<br />community priorities. It is requested that these be returned to the City Manager's 6ffice.
<br />
<br />2.
<br />
<br />City Manager said Mayor Anderson has agreed to call a special council meeting .Friday, March 13 at
<br />12:00 noon in City Hall Council Chambers for further consideration of this petition.
<br />
<br />3.
<br />
<br />Public Hearing, Appeal to Conditional Use = In a letter to the Eugene City Council Mrs. Gordon
<br />Barron has asked to appeal the decision of the Eugene Planning Commission not to revoke the
<br />conditional use permit of Lakewood Mobile Home Park, and'has protested that some conditions of
<br />the Planning Commission have not been met. The matter has been reviewed' with the City Building
<br />Department and the City Attorney's office. Building Department indicates tree heights are not
<br />in compliance with plans previously approved. Regarding turn-arounds, it is understood Eugene
<br />Sand and Gravel is to construct them, but is awaiting favorable weather conditions. In answer
<br />to Councilman Williams, Assistant City Attorney said that the pr0vision of the zoning ordinance
<br />quoted by Mr. Williams deals specifically with revocation of license and provisions of zoning
<br />ordinance. This matter pertains to conditions of the permit ,which have not been complied with.
<br />The Council has no means for enforcement except revocation.
<br />
<br />In answer to Councilman Gribskov, City Manager said the only alternatives the Council has are
<br />to revoke or refuse to revoke the Conditional Use Permit. If it is revoked the operator must,
<br />within a reasonable period of time, abandon the park or discontinue its use. It is the intent
<br />of the Planning Commission to develop revisions to conditional use permit procedure to give
<br />alternatives and enforcement powers.
<br />
<br />In answer to Councilman'~eague's question, City Manager said a permit could be revoked for a
<br />specified period of time.
<br />
<br />Morvan Thomas, President of the Planning Commission, explained the Planning Commission action.
<br />He commented that the Mobile Home Ordinance will certainly need amendment,. and that the Planning
<br />Commission is in the process of studying that ordinance. He said the Planning Commission had been;
<br />concerned at putting people out of their homes, and felt revocation was too drastic for the condi-i
<br />tions not complied with. The Plannigg Commission sympathised with neighbors, but were unable !
<br />to obtain compliance.
<br />
<br />Regarding Councilman Teagues suggestion for revocation for a specified period, Assistant City
<br />Attorney suggested continuing the public hearing for 60 days, at which time the Council could
<br />consider again the matter of revocation. Owners should understand that if the situation has
<br />not been improved, the Council will revoke the permit. The building department would be notified
<br />the property must be vacated, and that it can no longer be used as a mobile home park.
<br />
<br />Mr. Gordon Barron, 1540 Hughes, agreed with the Attorney's proposal. He said they felt this
<br />would be a reasonable approach. He advocated amendment of the ordinance so that some other
<br />course could be followed to enforce compliance.
<br />
<br />Mr. Jim Britton said he was an engineer doing work for Lakewood Mobile Home Park, He agreed that
<br />some procedural matters needed change, not because of errors in the past, but because of lack of
<br />experience. He outlined problems and expense incurred, and explained that turn-arounds will be
<br />constructed when weather permits. He commented on the 'Sign, and said the Board of Appeals had
<br />recently permitted a vari~nce.
<br />
<br />There was some discussion about Mr. Britton's statement concerning drawings and problems in
<br />arriving at agreement on construction of paving. Public Works Director said his office had just
<br />today received drawings, and that they had not been examined.
<br />
<br />Councilman Mohr observed that if a vote were taken at this time he would vote for revocation. He
<br />wanted the developers to know exactly where the Council stood and the seriousness with which the
<br />Council views the matter. If the conditions are not changed, the Council will have no alternative
<br />but to revoke the permit.
<br />
<br />il
<br />
<br />Ii
<br />,:
<br />Ii
<br />'I
<br />
<br />Mr. Gribskov, Mr. Williams and Mrs. Beal agreed with Mr. Mohr.
<br />
<br />Mr. Larry Loper explained to the Council problems in planting trees, and said they would gladly
<br />put up a fence, if the Council required them to do so.
<br />
<br />Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mrs. Beal to continue the public hearing on appeal to Conditional
<br />Use Permit, Lakewood Mobile Home Park, until May 11, 1970. Motion carried.
<br />
<br />March 9, 1970 - 1
<br />
<br />......
<br />
|