03/09/1970 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

81 e 3/9/70 I I - - and said at that time it would not be reasonable to pay for streets with slope easements. The City Manager said in the case Mr. Meltebeke mentioned, the property owner protested at the public hearing and the Council felt the assessment was proper and made the assessment. I * Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr~. Hayward that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only with unanimous consent of the Counciilil. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mrs. Hayward that the bill be read the third time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the third time by council bill number only. Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mrs. Hayward that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye the bill was declared passed and numbered 15891. Council Bill No. 9082 - Levying assessments for paving Capital Drive from Cresta de Ruta to Spring Boulevard; Spring Boulevard from 601 south of Capital Drive to 400' north of Capital Drive; Madrona Drive from Capital Drive to 100' north; Woodlawn Avenue from Capital Drive to 70' W~st; and Dresta de Ruta from Capital to 2001 north was submitted and read in full the first time on February 9, 1970, and held over to this meeting to allow proper notice of assessment to be given owners of affected properties, and brought back for consideration with two written protests on file. e Mr. Fred Yahn, 2540 Woodland Drive, asked why the project had been extended to Madrona Drive which had already been paved. Public Works Director explained there were several public hearings and notice had been sent to everyone about what would be paved. He explained reasons for this work being done, and that Madrona had not been paved to city standards. The City Manager said the city would be pleased to review the matter with Mr. Yahn, but that the ordinance should be ppssed. If the city is found to be in error, a correction can be made. I Mr. Gary Rholl, 3235 Alaer Street, complained that he had been billed for 165 feet, but that 15 feet of his property had not been paved. Public Works Director explained that there are no lot corners in this neighborhood and property owners are not sure where their property begins and ends. City has to go by deeds, and Mr. Rholl was only assessed for property listed in the deed. He said they would check into Mr. Rholl's complaint concerning a spring and with EWEB concerning the valve which is apparently aggravating the problem. Mr. Lee Raish, 2510 Spring Boulveard, complained that a strip beyond the intersection had not been completed. Public Works Director explained that part of the street had been an overlay, and that the maintenance department could complete the job. Neighborhood would not be charged. * Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mrs. Hayward that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council. Mr. Mohr asked if Mr. Teague had amended his motion to exclude Ordinances 9081 and 9082. Mr. Teague said he had not. Councilman Mohr felt there were substantial problems between the Engineering Department and owners on these two ordinances, and that it might be well to hold the~. Councilman McDonald explained that the projects had been completed, and that the C{ty had assessed on the usual policy of deed and ti~le insurance reports. The City could not survey each lot. I The tity Manager explained that the problems here could be solved, but that they had no bearing on the assessment project. If an error in calculations is dills covered later, a correction can be brought to Council. I I I I II I Mr. Donald Lower, 2500 Spring Boulevard, said there was a discrepancy in his property line, and he had purchased another 18' so that he could use his garage. He said the whole hillside is off on the survey. -, MD. Mohr moved to amend the motion to hold over assessments of Rholl property and Yahn property. Motion died for lack of a second. Vote taken on original motion. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mrs. Hayward that the bill be Read the third time by council bill number only with unanimous consent of the Council. Motion carried unamimously and the bill was read the third time by council bill number only. Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mrs. Hayward that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall vote. All councilmen voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 15892. Council Bill No. 9883 - Levying assessments for paving Martha Court from Calvin Street to West ~vas submitted and r~ad in full the first time on February 9, 1970, and held over to this meeting to allow proper notice of assessment to be given owners of affected properties, and brought back for consideration with no written protests on file. I Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mrs. Hayward that the bill be r~ad -th~~eco~d_time by~c0uncil-bill'number only with unanimous consent of the Council. Motion carried unanimously ana the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. 1\ .... ii :1r. Teague moved seconded b~ Mrs. Hayward that the bill be read the third time by council bill number 3/9/70 - 12 ~ e