01/25/1971 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

,.... t57 e 1/25/71 F had been classified as substandard and ~ad to.be pemo,ved." The CounciLshould.he con- sidering only those areas where there are applications or pending applications for re- newal programs. 1j 'I \; I Mrs. Campbell was concerned that this program would only give landlords in areas of congestion, such as the university area, a license to rent substandard dwellings to students:: without fear of reprisal. Mrs. Niven explained that they would be required to comply with safety standards. Other- wise, rather than go to unnecessary expense, landlords might simply close their buildings, leaving many people with no' place'to rent. This recommendation is a compromise to insure that safety standards are met. Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the Planning Commission recommendation be approved. Motion carried with Mr. Hershner and Mr. McDonald voting no. !:II. Business License Fee Changes F.roi)(~sed changes'_"i~: J;5u~*E.~'iist):icense, rates for inc) usion in new code ,were ~qircl!:~a ~ed pr&.viously to CounCilinen.' No action takenSo that counciL may have more time to study-the proposal before the regular meeting. e City Manager explained differences between fees charged electricians and plumbers in answer to the Councilmen's query at a previous meeting. There is a difference in responsibility and title between plumbers and electricians. I Councilwoman Beal still expressed interest in the application for license and examinations. Manager said Mrs. Beal could meet individually with the Building Superintendent to resolve her questions. Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the proposed changes in,license fees as recommended by the administration be approved, with the understanding they can be reviewed again. Motion carried. IV. Items to be considered with one motion after discussion of individual items, if requested. These items were discussed at Committee meetings of January 13 and 20. A. Dog Control Ordinance - Councilman Hershner was concerned with the section of this ordinance dealing with dogs wearing collars with licenses attached, and suggested that an addition could be made to include fenced yards in the exclusions. He, also suggested that a deadline of March 1 for purchase of license be included, to, bring the ordinance into conformity with that of the County. The City Attorney agreed that these amendments were proper and should be included. Mr. Robert Wright, 1974 North 16th, Springfield, was concerned that the dog control ordinance was unconstitutional and he felt Eugene should operate under its own ordinance. The City Attorney explained that, under contract between the City and the County, the County enforces the City ordinance. However, there has been a conflict regarding fees and age of animals. Mr. Wright objected to impoundment of dpgs without prior notice to owners. He felt purchase of a license entitled an owner to allow his dog to run free. I Councilman Mohr explained that the reason for having an ordinance is to insure that dogs are not allowed to run free, and are kept under, control. ___." .="~~, ._....=._,;:..__ _'---="'. -.--:'-..;.::-~_ """--~ _' T-C--'-l~--:-:;" ...,-:~ .; -;;c:;;:c..::;.,--.. ~ ..--,-,--_._~ l?X~':Am~ndmept 'o.f. Or.dLna.nce :(j6=n~~pning~abpr~6pntracts -:::~CounciJ.man ,Mohi:exprefpied concern that :'~theJ:Quncil-had irot-ameifdea. thiEr-ordinance, .so tfiat penalties--'wouldndtbe mandatory. Councilman Williams felt that the Council had latitude in deciding whether the violation was willful, and therefore, there was no problem. e It was the consensus of would not be mandatory. next comnrrttee meeting. the Council that the bill should be amended so that penalties The City Attorney will return a proposed amendment at the C. Eugene Renewal Agency Application for Renewal Plans - A proposed agreement with Eugene Renewal Agency will provide certain staff services to prepare applications for devel- opment and renewal and for a workable'program. An outside consultant had been budgeted for, but Lt has been determined, after review, that ERA could do this staff work. A resolution will be submitted for app~oval at the next regular meeting. The Planning Director explained the applications needed by the City in the, future, and that the office of Housing and Urban Development encourages use of the Renewal Agency for thi s ' work. I 'D. Appointment of Representative to L-COG - Because its by-laws require appointment of a ci ty represen~ati ve be appointed '.P:tior:.~921itHilii;'y,,"fi'jf;~:'l'97.'3:;~--Lane Council of Governments has requested that a representative be'appointed at the next regular Council ~eeting. Mrs. Beal moved3seconded by Mr. williams to nominate Mayor Lester Anderson as the Council representative to Lane Council of Governments. e ."':r Mr. McDonald moved seconded by Mr. Hershner to close the nominations and cast a unanimous ~ 1/25/71 - 4