Laserfiche WebLink
<br />""III <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />1(2 <br /> <br />2/8/71 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />" <br />ii <br />il <br />I. <br /> <br />Councilwoman Beal felt very strongly about the importance of, continuing the ban in effect. <br />She felt it had been most successful, .and that the citizens had been very cooperative. <br /> <br />Mr. Cliff Everett, Eugene Board of Realtors, offered the opinion that the small amount of <br />pollution caused from backyard burning caused no harm, and that burning could be done <br />only on days of good dispersal. <br /> <br />It was the Council consensus that .no action should be taken on this matter. <br /> <br />V. <br />, 2/3/71 <br /> <br />'Revocable Permit, Mall Location for Brownie Stand - Mr. David Hunt of the Eugene Renewal <br />Agency said the Council, at a previous comnrrttee meeting, had directed the Agency to <br />review other sites on the mall for location of a small displaced business. He outlined <br />the proposal regarding the building and payment for the revocable permi t. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Councilman Mohr said he thought the Council had previously approved location of the <br />stand in the mall, and he did not understand why it was not before the Council. The <br />City Attorney explained that the Council must now approve a revocable permit to allow <br />it to be located in the Mall. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Mr. Ed Stone, representing Mr. and Mrs. Gerald Fields, said they are the owners of a <br />sandwich shop directly across the street from the proposed location. He explained that <br />plac~~~~bf the stand at this site would harm his business, and possibly put him out <br />of business, since Mr. Brown would be selling some of the same items he has for sale. He <br />felt this was mfair competition. <br /> <br />The Council discussed the location of the stand and the amount paid for the permit. <br />They concluded that the amount was fair, and that, rather than harm the Fields' business, <br />this location might in fact enhance their business by bringing more people to that portion <br />of the Mall. <br /> <br />Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the Council approve Mr. Hunt's report, and <br />grant a revocable permit to Mr. Borwn for his stand in the mall. Motion carried. <br /> <br />Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr to approve granting of a revocable permit to Mr. <br />Brown for q>eration of a portable stand in the Mall. <br /> <br />The City Attorney pointed out that it would be appropriate to include in the motion <br />authorization for the City Manager to sign the permit. Mr. Teague and Mr. Mohr added <br />this to the motion. <br /> <br />Vote taken on motion, as amended. Motion carried. <br /> <br />VI. Items to be considered with one motion, after discussion of individual items, if <br />requested. These items were discussed at Committee meetings of January 27 and <br />and February 3. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />A. <br />1/27/71 <br /> <br />Meter Hood Rentals, Schedule - Since the cha~ge for rental of parking meter hoods <br />to contractors was increased, local contractors have met with city staff to discuss <br />possibility of return to old rate, or at least a reduction. Staff believes the <br />present rates should stay in force, since rental of hoods is strictly a benefit <br />to construction or maintenance companies. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. John Boyer of the Associated General Contractors, read letters from many <br />contractors protesting the increase and outlining the number of times they used <br />meters, and the inconvenience to them and their. customers if they;must use a <br />parking lot. They felt the increase was unreasonable, and that s~me adjustment <br />should be made. Mayor Anderson suggested that this problem might be difficult <br />to solve in a public hearing, and suggested a comnrrttee be appointed, headed <br />by Mr. Gribskov, with Mr~ Hershner and Mrs. Campbell, to meet with representatives <br />of the contractors and return with a recommendation. <br /> <br />Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the Mayor appoint a comnrrttee to meet <br />with representatives of the contractors and return a recommendation to the Council. <br />Motion carried. Approve ; <br /> <br />B. <br />1/27/71 <br /> <br />EWEB Board Members Terms, Change from Five Years to Four Years - As a res ul t of an <br />inquiry by Council members on terms of Board members, Eugene Water & Electric Board <br />replied that they had been aware of the variance in terms resulting from even year <br />elections, but that it had seemed to present no problem. Following discusston, <br />the Board agreed that the term of office for EWEB Commissioners should be reduced to <br />four years. This would conform to the.State law requiring that city officials.be <br />elected at the time of Statewide elections. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Regarding representatiennby Wards, the Board recommended that the present method <br />be continued. It was felt this would insure against election of all Commissioners <br />from one section, and would keep the cost of campaigns to a minimum. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />The City Manager suggested that the Council change the prov~s~ons for EWEB terms <br />in the Code, so that recodification could be completed, and consider the question <br />of ward boundaries at a later time. <br /> <br />2/8/71 - 4 <br /> <br />.... <br />