02/22/1971 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~ 1~ e 2/22/71 I: :' :i I Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. I: II II it ! I Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall' vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 16152. COUNCIL BILL NO. 9351 - Levying assessments for sidewalk on Whitbeck Boulevard from McLean Boulevard to Heather Way; and Heather Way from Whitbeck Boulevard to Fillmore was submitted and read in full the first time on January 25, 1971, held over to this meeting to allow proper notice of assessment to be given owners of affected property, and is brought back for consideration with one written protest on file. A letter of protest was received from Mr. Gordon Bussey, 3270 Whitbeck Boulevard, which included pictures showing sloughing bank which had covered the sidewalk with debris. Mr. Gordon Bussey questioned whethe~ the City has the responsibility to try to stabilize the bank. He was not suggesting that the City be held liable, but inquiring whether the job had been completel finished by the conrractor. He had contacted private contractors and felt they were too high, but it turned out the bancrofting cost more than the private job would have. Public Works Director explained that the contractor is not required to do any excavating beyond the established line, or to provide for drainage of the owner's property. He ,said the City had been aware of the problem, and felt it was related to drainage. ' The City is not responsible for interior drainage or for lateral support. As far as assistance, the City would be glad to work with Mr. Bussey to see what might be done. e There was discussion whether there was any way this problem could be corrected and the entire area assessed for the cost. It was explained that the assessment had been charged for this area, and that this problem was not one that should be shared by the entire group. I City Manager suggested the Council proceed with the assessment, since the contract should be paid, and he and the Public Works Director and Mr. Bussey could later discuss whether the City had any responsiblity or there was anything that could be done to assist him. Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall v6te, ~ll councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 16153. COUNCIL BILL NO. 8917 - Rezoning northwest corner Coburg and Willaken~ from RA to R-2 and RP was submitted and read in full the first time on June 2~" 1969, given 2nd and 3rd readings and fleld for final passage pending final approval to the devel~pment, it is brought back for final passage. Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 16154. I COUNCIL BILL NO. 9282 - Rezone area located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Coburg Road and Tomahaw~ Lane From R-l to R-2 PD was submitted and read in full the'first time on Gctober 26, 1970, given 2nd and 3rd readings and held for final passage pending final approval of Plannea Unit Development. Planning Commission having given final approval to the development, it is brought back for final passage. With regard to the preceding two bills, Mr. Williams expressed concern about building permits. In answer to his concerns, City Manager pointed out fuhat ground breaking may proceed before a building permit has been obtained. - In answer to Mr. Mohr's question concerning need for a zone change in the PUD process, the Manager explained that the Planning Commission considers design as well as density in reviewing a PUD. If the density requested is appropriate for the area, but denser than the parent zone, the Planning Commission recommends a zone change, but that the ordinance permitting the change be held until an acceptable PUD plan flas been submitted and approved. Mr. Teagve moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 16155. COUNCIL BILL NO. 9356 - Authorizing Finance Director to write checks up to $1,000 and establishing a fund of $10,000 per month for this purpose was submitted, and no councilman requesting that the bill be read in full it was read the first time by council bill number only. ' Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that, with unanimous consent of the Council the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was ~ead the second time and considered for enactment. I Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill wasde~reared passed and numbered 16156. - ~ 2/22/71 - 14